Comments on: DateBk5 Just Released

Pimlico Software has released DateBk5, the latest version of its calendar and scheduling app. The new version includes extensive use of color, including color icons and backgrounds. It also offers a single, large, tabbed dialog for handling all the global preferences and many other improvements. It includes support for the high resolution screens on both Sony and HandEra devices. It is available now for $25.
Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (178 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

WOW!!!

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 11:38:56 AM #
The best just got better!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: WOW!!!
Echelon @ 5/7/2002 1:55:41 PM #
Absolutely,

Just installed it (have been using the beta for the last couple of months), and it works great

RE: WOW!!!
stephen007 @ 5/7/2002 2:55:34 PM #
Yes, I've been using Datebook X since Datebook 3. It is an incredibly awesome program that just keeps getting better and better and better.

Hats off to Pimlico!!!

Stephen

RE: WOW!!! (ish)
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 5:39:49 AM #
Looks nice. But the support for color and non-standard screen resolutions makes it very slow. I think I'll stick with Datebk3 v3.1a.

Hi-Res+

rclayton @ 5/7/2002 11:52:35 AM #
Just to clairfy.....this now supports Hi-Res...not the Hi-Res+ of the new NR70 series?

Is it official that we here at PIC call it Hi-Res+? Just to avoid all the confusion....

Ryan
ryan@girlandgeek.com
http://www.girlandgeek.com

RE: Hi-Res+
Ed @ 5/7/2002 11:54:55 AM #
This can get confusing. I try to make it clear when I'm talking about the Sony version of hi-res and the HandEra version of hi-res. So far, hi-res+ applies only to the 320 by 480 NR series screen.

I sure hope PalmSource make it simpler in future versions of the OS for developers to support multiple screen sizes so all apps can easily support all screen sizes.

---
News Editor

RE: Hi-Res+
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 11:57:59 AM #
That is a bummer, anyone know if/when they plan to add support for this?
RE: Hi-Res+
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:09:06 PM #
I'm confused. I'm using Datebk4, and have for months, and it has had hi-res support for a long time. I am now using Datebk5 and find no new "hi-res" features. Am I missing something???
RE: Hi-Res+
Ed @ 5/7/2002 12:39:42 PM #
You are correct. Sorry, I misread something on the What's New page. DateBk5 offers more hi-res support than DateBk4, but you are right in saying this isn't the first version with any support for it.

---
News Editor
320x480 display?
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 4:54:36 PM #
Can it do 320x480 just like Act Names 5.2a ?
It will be great if this will work for Clie NR70.

RE: 320 x 480
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:26:48 PM #
No, that is what the Hi-Res+ that Ed is talking about. It does support 320 x 320 or what ever it is.

iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 11:59:03 AM #
The major competitor iambic (of Action Names DateBook) has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com (the later was registered on May 2!!!). Now things are getting interesting...
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
fleegle @ 5/7/2002 12:13:16 PM #
IMHO, that is what Iambic needs to resort to in order to get people to try their products. It clearly shows who has the superior products.

I bet they also tried to hijack other addresses of their competitors.

I think I will stay away from Iambic software until their policy changes.

Iambic Predatory Domain Name Pratices
sundance_7 @ 5/7/2002 12:35:02 PM #
I just sent the email below to Iambic's Public Relations division ( pr@iambic.com ), and I'd encourage anyone upset by their practices to do similar...

Cheers,
sundance
----------------
As a power-user of Palm-branded products and a regular consumer of palm-os compatible branded products, I am writing to you to tell you that I am disappointed by your company's policy on registering domain-names of competitor's products to redirect them to your site. This practice is underhanded, misleading, disingenuous and beneath your level as a corporation. I encourage you to surrender all such registered domains, and to discontinue such practices in the future, until such time, I will personally not buy, recommend, or refer any Iambic product in any forum.

Sincerely,


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:39:54 PM #
Or you can go here:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N263223D

and post to their forum.

Ted Tschopp

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:49:46 PM #
I just sent off an email too, it really shows how immoral the company is. I would never buy any of their software now.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:51:52 PM #
I agree it was bad of iambic to register their competitor's product names as domain names but it wasn't too smart of Pimlico to not have them registered already. Smart companies register a domain with every product they are working on.

Are DateBk4 or DateBk5 are registered trademarks? In previous court cases, cyber-squatters didn't get to keep a domain name when it was trademarked to someone else.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:52:45 PM #
Corporate cyber-squatting.... how pathetic. Next thing you know they will post an e-mail "will work for food"
RE: Immoral??
montyburns @ 5/7/2002 12:53:08 PM #
Immoral: Not moral inconsistent with rectitude, purity, or good morals contrary to conscience or the divine law wicked unjust dishonest vicious licentious as, an immoral man an immoral deed

Should the word immoral *REALLY* be applied here?

Maybe prankster is a better use here...

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 1:22:19 PM #
Immoral or prankish, the sad things is that Iambic feel it necessary to take these steps to compete against software that, after all, funds wildlife conservation. Nice attitude!

I'm made my feelings clear in their discussion forums and I certainly won't be using their software or recommending them again.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 1:28:03 PM #
that's totally pathetic of iambic. datebk5 is such a superior product.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 1:30:33 PM #
Superior or not (though I do agree that Datebk5 is), to resort to cybersquatting to try to gain an advantage over your competitor and could be the basis of a lawsuit if Pimlico Software is willing to pursue it. This is certainly the most clear-cut case of such I have ever seen.

volcanopele

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 1:38:40 PM #
And now the thread in their discussion forums about this has been deleted! Woo hooo ... nice people!!!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Ronin @ 5/7/2002 1:53:19 PM #
Wow!

Just tried the two domain names myself and sure enough you get unceremoniously redirected to the Iambic Actionnames web page.

As shocked as I was by this I was even more shocked at the fact that the thread in their forums mentioned above is gone. This amazes me not only becuase it is very cavalier behavior by Iambic but also because of the remarkable speed in which it was accomplished. I do not know about you guys but the Iambic customer service e-mail responses are a long time in coming.

If they could apply the kind of energy that is being applied to PR to the actual product maybe the heavy handed PR would not be necessary.

Just a thought.

Do these developments indicate that the Palm OS development world is starting to attract sharks?

Again, wow! What a revolting development.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Echelon @ 5/7/2002 2:00:02 PM #
I have to agree with the poster who mentioned the fact that DB4/5 revenue goes to the Gorilla Haven.

IMHO it would be bad enough to use these types of methods against another for-profit company, but to target a charity does not evoke much consumer support to say the least.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Moosecat @ 5/7/2002 2:01:13 PM #
Sheesh ... Iambic is not making itself look too good. Domain name hijacking is usually a tactic of sketchy web porn companies.

Incidentally, it is not necessary to have a REGISTERED trademark in order to invoke the federal anti-cybersquatting laws. Names or symbols used in commerce may be entitled to trademark protection even if not registered, so long as they have become distinctive and associated with their owner. Pimlico might have a decent shot of getting these domain names back.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 2:01:35 PM #
i started a new thread over there entitled "PATHETIC"

lets see how long it lasts :)
gee, i've used tiny sheet loyally for a few years, but this is sad.

bastards!!!

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:03:33 PM #
While I agree the domain name hijack is off-base, it's interesting that if DateBK5 doesn't find it's Icon database, it will "look for any resource database with a creator id of Actn" Hmmm, I wonder what product might have Icons saved as Actn? One person's "feature" is another person's "infringement"
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:07:50 PM #
Well, they deleted my post over there. I reposted, and I'll post what I posted over there here:

I was considering purchasing your product tinysheets, as it supports the new Sony hi-res+ format, but now that I see you have registered your competitors names as domain names, I feel I will have to refrain from purchasing your product. I also feel that I will not be able to recommend them or your time tracking software to the company I work for during the day.

I'm sure you felt that the quality of your product demanded that you respond in such a manner.

Ted Tschopp

P.S. Also becuase you feel like censoring my orignal message, I feel it necessary to repost it.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Patrick @ 5/7/2002 2:08:44 PM #
I'd like to say that the negative publicity generated by forums such as these would serve to steer people away from Iambic. However, I suspect the lion's share of potential buyers don't frequent these on-line forums and will innocently assume that "DateBk5" is just Iambic's shorthand for their "Date Book 5".

Sigh.

Like what it did for others, reading this note disgusted me and one of the first words that came to mind was "boycott".


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Moosecat @ 5/7/2002 2:09:17 PM #
My curiosity about slimy cybersquatting behavior piqued, I thought I would see if any nefarious evildoer has registered "www.plam.com" -- a common typo for "Palm."

My fears were confirmed: Evil alcohol merchants calling themselves "Plam Vineyards" have hijacked that name, obviously attempting to steer careless Palm enthusiasts into a life of drunken decrepitude.

Shameless.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:14:54 PM #
Well, technically, it is only cyber-squatting if Pimlico actually wants those domain names and is willing to pay for them. I do not know if that is the case or not.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:16:18 PM #
Open Letter to iambic:

To Whom It May Concern:

I have worked hard to convince network administrators in my law office to incorporate TimeReporter for TimeSlips into our computer management system. So far, we have paid more than $500 for various copies of this software.

Undoubtedly, this software will need to be upgraded in the near future. However, your actions in regards to the DateBk4 and DateBk5 domain names has convinced me to counsel everyone here against any such purchase from your company, now or at any time in the future.

Furthermore, you need to consult legal counsel as soon as possible. I am not giving you legal advice, nor would I ever represent individuals or corporations who have to resort to such measures to make a dollar. I have principles. Nevertheless, you would be wise to talk to an attorney who is well versed in computer law who has researched cyber-squating. Have the attorney look up a case concerning "joecartoons.com."

Regardless of the outcome of any potential legal action against you, know this: You can kiss one loyal customer, and everyone in this law firm, and every attorney and law firm that I ever speak to, goodbye.

Sincerely,

J. Bradley Horn, Esq.
Shoemaker & Associates

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:19:22 PM #
> My fears were confirmed: Evil alcohol merchants calling
> themselves "Plam Vineyards" have hijacked that name

Those Plams need to change their family name just like that evil European Budweiser knock-off company should.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 2:19:52 PM #
hmmmm, my thread lasted all of ten minutes

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:24:57 PM #
'iambicPresident' is now sitting in their forums removing the posts of outraged customers, ex-customers, potential customers, ex-potential customers and anyone else who cares. Glad to see (s)he has time to moderate the forums in between trying to steal their competitor's eco-friendly customers!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 2:30:23 PM #
this is kind of fun seeing if they can keep up the deleting of the posts as we add new ones:)

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:30:27 PM #
F*** Iambic.

I spent 20 bucks on Actionnames only to find out they wanted an extra 10 for version 5.

I hate to say it but their management sucks.

By the way, I dumped Actionnames for DateBk4, now 5, months ago....

and I RECOMMEND that you do the same.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:46:10 PM #
you can also reply in the existing threads, that'll make them crazy searching all the threads for messages to be deleted :)
RE: The Effects of this dialogue
sundance_7 @ 5/7/2002 2:46:16 PM #
Actually, when you think about it from a marketing standpoint, the people in here are largely developers, early adopters, and opinion leaders in the PDA markets.

To that end, Iambic would be better off taking action to mollify their PR issues here, than on their audience-limited forum. Basic PR Iambic, time to go back to school you chumps.

Incidentally, I just sent a note to PalmStation.com telling them about this thread... Censor THAT.

Bite me,
sundance.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:47:18 PM #
If everyone posting to this thread would spread it to other Palm forums, user groups, etc., I think it would be more effective than just posting here. It's pathetic that Iambic would resort to such low-brow tactics. Since everyone that reads this knows about it, it's time to spread the word throughout the Palm community to boycott Iambic.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:51:43 PM #
There are also a couple of posts in the PDBBuzz forums about this.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
fkclo @ 5/7/2002 2:51:59 PM #
Looks like the PIC forum is now being defaced ! Watch out !

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 2:53:24 PM #
the PIC forum has been hacked for a while today. i don't think that's related to this at all.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:56:52 PM #
Whilst everyone has been busy posting as fast as possible in Iambic forums has anyone thought to contact the makers of DateBk to make sure they are aware of what there competitor is doing?
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:57:55 PM #
How about posting a review on PalmGear for ActionNames? ...

http://www.palmgear.com/software/showsoftware.cfm?prodID=3435

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:00:41 PM #
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 3:01:45 PM #
good idea. by the way, i posted about this on the yahoo datebk discussion group. CESD (datebk author) frequents there, so he will see it, and we'll see what he thinks.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:02:30 PM #
Wow, this makes me even happier that I have supported Pimlico Software through long use of their product, rather than Iambic. I have always been so impressed with DateBk3 (and 4 and now 5) that it's my number one reason why I won't switch to a PPC! The developer is just awesome, incorporates so many new features into new versions, and usually doesn't charge even for major upgrades (I paid anyway for the version 4 upgrade, he deserved it!)

I bought Bump Attack from Iambic, but now that they have shown what they really are, I will never buy another of their products. The cybersquatting is bad enough, but censoring the posts to their board shows how slimy they really are!!

Don't forget to add comments to their listing at PalmGear!


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:06:18 PM #
All of the noise/bad press being generated is good, but it needs to go somewhere. We should be using the forums and email to demand that Datebk4.com and Datebk5.com direct you to pimlicosoftware.com .

Although they have acted with astonishingly poor judgment, I would be really surprised if, before the day is over, Iambic doesn't switch off these domain names from directing you to ActionNames. But that is not enough. I think the only way they could salvage any credibility is by redirecting the domain names to the rightful website of their competitor and actual owner of the product name.

FYI: datebk4.com registration (WHOIS)
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:14:55 PM #
Organization:
iambic inc
Vidal Graupera
12 South First street
San Jose, CA 95113
US
Phone: 1 408 367 1600
Fax..: 1 408 367 1606
Email: jerome@iambic.com

Registrar Name....: Register.com
Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

Domain Name: datebk4.com

Created on..............: Thu, May 02, 2002
Expires on..............: Fri, May 02, 2003
Record last updated on..: Fri, May 03, 2002

Administrative Contact:
iambic, Inc.
Vidal Graupera
12 South First Street Ste. 300
San Jose, CA 95113
US
Phone: 1 408 367 1600
Fax..: 1 408 367 1606
Email: administrator@iambic.com

Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Register.Com
Domain Registrar
575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor
New York, NY 10018
US
Phone: 902-749-2701
Fax..: 902-749-5429
Email: domain-registrar@register.com

Domain servers in listed order:

DNS.TIMEREPORTER.COM 209.133.27.56
PHOENIX.TIMEREPORTER.COM 209.133.34.245

FYI: again datebk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:21:16 PM #

Organization:
iambic inc
Vidal Graupera
12 South First street
San Jose, CA 95113
US
Phone: 1 408 367 1600
Fax..: 1 408 367 1606
Email: jerome@iambic.com

Registrar Name....: Register.com
Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

Domain Name: datebk5.com

Created on..............: Thu, May 02, 2002
Expires on..............: Fri, May 02, 2003
Record last updated on..: Fri, May 03, 2002

Administrative Contact:
iambic, Inc.
Vidal Graupera
12 South First Street Ste. 300
San Jose, CA 95113
US
Phone: 1 408 367 1600
Fax..: 1 408 367 1606
Email: administrator@iambic.com

Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Register.Com
Domain Registrar
575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor
New York, NY 10018
US
Phone: 902-749-2701
Fax..: 902-749-5429
Email: domain-registrar@register.com

Domain servers in listed order:

DNS.TIMEREPORTER.COM 209.133.27.56
PHOENIX.TIMEREPORTER.COM 209.133.34.245


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:31:12 PM #
So, I see the Iambic president online in the forums deleting all negative messages about the whole datebk*.com scandal. What a loser and slime bag! He knows he screwed up and now he will just ride the wave of uproar and wait for it to settle down (as it all eventually does) and end up with an address that directs you to his site. What we as users must do, is to spread the word and keep pressure on this guy to give it up. If we don't the outrage that we are experiencing is all for naught.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:36:12 PM #
But what can users do? I think who needs to take initiative is the datebk product owner. Anyone can register any domain available. If it is a trademark than the owner should take legal action. Or any other suggestions?
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 3:43:12 PM #
I JUST GOT BANNED from the iambic forum!!!

it's about time :)

no, i don't believe the terms of service said that i couldn't expose iambics shady business practices. hmmm...

BOYCOTT ALL IAMBIC PRODUCTS!
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:45:48 PM #
!!!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
lilmagnus @ 5/7/2002 3:48:16 PM #
FYI: CESD's comments from the Yahoo! group...

From: "C. E. Steuart Dewar" <dewar@P...>
Date: Tue May 7, 2002 12:26 pm
Subject: Re: [pdbk] Strange redirection

> On Tue, 7 May 2002 11:30:56 -0400, William Smith wrote:
>
> >All's fair in love and marketing I guess.
>
> No it is not... and I'll never buy anything from a company that I know
> practices these kinds of things. If they have to resort to this to sell
their
> product, then even they must not believe in the quality of their software.

I concur with the latter statement. It may be legal, but it smacks of a company run by people who will trade all their integrity to make a few extra dollars, and I just won't stoop that low under any conditions.

I guess there's someone there who is patting themselves on the back at how clever they are.

Personally I don't find it clever - I find it distasteful and surely a reflection on the ethics of the people who run that company.

Yes, I suppose I could have rushed out and registered all those domains (and datebk4.org and datebk4.net and datebk4.name), but the only reason I would have done that would be to protect myself against this kind of muck. I find it so distasteful to think that way, that I just won't do it.

You can send an email to Iambic telling them what you think about it.

Cheers!
CESD, Pimlico Software, Inc.
==========================================


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Moosecat @ 5/7/2002 3:49:45 PM #
The really stunning thing, to me, is that iambicpresident thinks that the best solution is to silently delete each message as it is posted, or each user as s/he appears.

If he thinks this practice of co-opting domain names is acceptable, then POST A MESSAGE DEFENDING IT. If he's got nothing to say in defense of this tactic, then SHUT DOWN THE REDIRECTS.

Sheesh...

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 3:50:21 PM #
How low can you go Iambic?
So low even LAWYERS cant stomach your evil:
:)

"Furthermore, you need to consult legal counsel as soon as possible. I am not giving you legal advice, nor would I ever represent individuals or corporations who have to resort to such measures to make a dollar. I have principles."

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
alanh @ 5/7/2002 3:52:54 PM #
The author of DateBk3/4/5 is aware of Iambic's actions and has posted a brief note in the groups.yahoo.com pimlicodatebk forum. Members of that group can read it at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pimlicodatebk/message/20602

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 4:02:09 PM #
iambic's actions are particularly bad when you see this note on the Pimlico site:

ALL the profits from the sale of Pimlico's shareware products go to the Dewar Wildlife Trust, Inc. a 501(c)(3) and Georgia non-profit corporation which the Dewars established to fund various wildlife conservation projects including the Dewar's own Gorilla Haven project which is building a sanctuary for Western Lowland Gorillas on 324 acres in the North Georgia Mountains -- the first phase of which is currently scheduled for completion in 2002.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Ronin @ 5/7/2002 4:04:19 PM #
Just as a reply to the poster that commented about DateBk5 using icons with the 'Actn' tag.

Having used the beta, the reason for this is very simple (as explained by the DateBk author) and is supported by quick search of PalmGear. It was done simply to help developers that were creating icons for the two programs by eliminating the need to prepare and post two sets of essentially the same icons. Also note that DateBk5 will still search for icons sets with the DateBk Creator ID Tag and does this by default. It only looks for the 'Actn' ID if there is no icon set with the DateBk ID tag present on the device.

It eludes me as to how this is an infringement on iambic since it does not have any direct effect on their program or its utility. It does not detract from the unique features of ActionNames nor does it decrease the amount of icon sets available for it. The only viable argument, I see, is that it takes away from the theoretical 'competitive' edge fo more color icon sets available for Actionnames then for DateBk4. However, this argument is elusive as it seems that most developers that wrote new sets or updated their existing sets were doing identical icon sets for both programs. Now this is unnecessary and optional at the icon creator's choice.

In any event, even if you consider this a wrong, it is a wrong of far less magnitude. And, no matter what justification you use, two wrongs do not make a right.

Uggg! RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 4:05:54 PM #
Ok I can't help it... I hate seeing the word "hijack" being used so wrongly.

From Dictionary.com:
hi·jack also high·jack (hjk) Informal
tr.v. hi·jacked, hi·jack·ing, hi·jacks
1. To stop and rob (a vehicle in transit).
2. To steal (goods) from a vehicle in transit.
3. To seize control of (a moving vehicle) by use of force, especially in order to reach an alternate destination
[end dictionary.com]

In Internet (and Website) terms, hijacking is the act of forcefully or fraudulently redirecting traffic from a live domain that is not yours and/or taking over control of a live domain that is owned by someone else. These domains were not owned by anyone were they? So it's not hijacking.

Bad business practice? Sure, maybe, depending on your own outlook. But not hijacking. My personal opinion is that if they were important, they should have been registered by Pimlico instead of hanging out there for grabs by anyone.

And a *WINE* company trying to steal PDA traffic? Give me a break.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
TedTschopp @ 5/7/2002 4:06:44 PM #
It's a shame, I was going to purchase Tinysheet, but I'd rather spend money fighting this than supporting Iambic, I just purchased www.datebk.com, net, and org and I will point them to the correct website.

Ted Tschopp

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 4:13:00 PM #
i'm not a lawyer, but somebody posted this on the yahoo group:
From http://www.houstoninternetlaw.com/cyber_squatting.html

"In November, 1999, Congress passed and President Clinton signed the Anti-cyber Piracy Act (the “Act”). The Act is found at 15 U.S.C Section 1125. The Act establishes that a registrant of a domain name may be liable to the owner of a trademark or others that may be affected by the “bad faith” of the domain name registrant.

"As indicated, the Act provides protection not only for registered trademarks, but also to:

"any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact which is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to affiliation, connection or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship or, in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities of goods or
services.

"The Act further provides that the owner of the domain name

' …shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act.

"The Act defines bad faith to include:

"'the person’s offer to transfer, sell or otherwise assign the
domain name to the owner of the mark for financial gain without having used or (having) the intent to use the domain name in a bona fide offering of any goods or services, or the person’s prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct.'”

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 4:15:35 PM #
>>And a *WINE* company trying to steal PDA traffic? Give me a break.

I think the above post about the "Plam" wine company stealing a mis-spelling of Palm was a joke. But yes, hi-jacking might be to strong a term. But what iambic has done is underhanded and according to legal precedent, can be challenged in court.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
bookrats @ 5/7/2002 4:21:34 PM #
One addition: I recommend writing a polite note. I wrote a businesslike E-mail basically saying (1) I thought this was a poor business practice, and (2) it dissuaded me from buying anything from them, because I though the quality and support for their products would be similar to their marketing techiques.

PS Ted: Nice work with datebk.com!

----

Jeff Meyer

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
drixter @ 5/7/2002 5:08:19 PM #
I agree -- be polite. Don't flame, just let them know where they stand in your eyes.

The email I just sent to iambic:

The fact that you have registered the names of your competitors' products as domain names (DateBk4.com & DateBk5.com), and redirected those names to your own website, is deplorable. The fact that your competitor's profits are directed to charity makes your action even worse. The only thing it says to me is that your products must be inferior, or you would not resort to such pathetic tactics.

I've been using DateBk for a year or so. I'm reasonably happy with it, but not a die-hard loyalist. Before I learned of this, I would have considered switching ActionNames if I developed the opinion, from reviews or friends, that it was somewhat better than DateBk. Now, not only would your product have to be infinitely superior, DateBk would have to be downright unusable. Not too likely. Even so, I think I would rather revert to the standard Address Book than support such an ethically challenged company as yours.

Consider me an ex potential customer.



RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:14:49 PM #
If you're looking to post a comment somewhere, try the AN Yahoo group forum. They might have a harder time deleting those messages. Maybe their existing users would enjoy learning more about iambic's business practices (and DateBk5 as well).

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/actionnames

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Moosecat @ 5/7/2002 5:14:55 PM #
Why is it that every -- and I mean EVERY -- time I try to make a joke online (see, e.g., the "Plam" post above), someone doesn't get it and believes that I am a big moron? I thought that one was awfully clear, too.

I will, however, stop saying "hijack," since it is not quite the right word. A better word is "co-opt," but it isn't as sexy.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 5:18:03 PM #
it's a good idea, but i've posted what i deemed fairly reasonable posts on the iambic forum, and the action names yahoo group, and had them both deleted.

vidal is a slimeball

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:23:39 PM #
I don't know if Ed will follow up on the story and the growing anti-Iambic feeling but another Wes Salmon over at PDABuzz has emailed both Iambic and Pimlico Software for comment and a possible explanation for this and will then, once he has received a reply (or sufficient time passes without a reply) from both, he'll be posting a story about this.


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
big_raji @ 5/7/2002 5:29:02 PM #
I got banned from Iambic's forums, and my post was similar to this:

"Why do www.datebk4.com and www.datebk5.com lead to the Iambic site? Did Iambic buy out the DateBk product, and now legitimately own the rights to DateBk, as well as the domains? etc"

No response. Just a ban. Oh well.

---
What's Wrong With This Picture?
http://raj.phangureh.com/picture.html

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
jjsoh @ 5/7/2002 5:29:21 PM #
There was a point in time last year when I wanted to give iambic's datebook a go. Now I know, that will never happen.

As a DateBk user since ver. 3, I have been loving it ever since. Version 5 is, above and beyond, better than anything before--hands down.

Pimlico Software not only developed the #1 "must have app", they never failed to alienate their customers along the way. Excellent upgrade offer!

Hats off to them for their great product and great service.


Jim

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:31:04 PM #
Well I personally preferred Action Names over Datebk4 (haven't tried Datebk5 yet). After reading this thread, I must say that I am disgusted by Iambics tactics..what a PR nightmare they have on their hands! Instead of gaining from the domain hijacking, they are losing ptoential customers -- even fvor their other products. It is doubtful that I will ever support Iambic again.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 5:40:07 PM #
be careful what you say, iambic would ban you for those comments....i'm serious!!

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:43:30 PM #
I heard that this was becuase Iambic was going to purchase Datebk4 and sell them under the name Action Names 6.0


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:48:38 PM #
I have been running the demo of Action Names for about 15 days now with intentions of purchasing it at the end of the demo. Frankly, I like it a lot. Action Names is simple, yet powerful enough to add the functionality I need without overwhelming me. I am one of the few people that don't care for DateBk in any of its forms, however after reading this (I already had some doubts about Iambic which I had decided to ignore) I removed the software from my device and am now stuck using the built in apps. I don't know just how utterly disgusting this behavior is, but I do know that it shows a great lack of judgment from a business point of view and I don't really want to do business with an organization like that. Perhaps they will change their policy regarding this issue in the future, but I think I will have doubts about their motivation, goals, and priorities toward customers for some time to come.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PDA Guy @ 5/7/2002 5:57:34 PM #
Agreed, Ed should post this as a separate news story, as this has taken over what should have been a simple announcement story/thread. )
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:02:15 PM #
YES!!! Not the least of which is that loyal ActionNames users might not even read this thread, not realizing it's more about their company of choice, not DateBk5.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:03:51 PM #
I agree. Ed, any plans to ask Iambic and Pimlico for comments and then give us a new article to post our feeling in?
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 6:07:23 PM #
i think it would be good to have an article, but i know what it will be. CESD of datebk will be classy about it, and not do anything, while vidal of iambic will ignore everybody, and try to cover it up.

i don't know if ed would want to post what would probably be more of an editorial, either. how can you write an unbiased article on this???

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:15:05 PM #
the webmasters would not be willing to put in risk potential revenues from iambic's ads, so probably they won't try to defend pilmico's or say anything bad about iambicTH :)
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:18:48 PM #
iambitch good one!! lol!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:25:20 PM #
Rather than just linking to your warez (which I detest) why not try to encourage people to register DateBk so that not only do Iambic loose customers but Pimlico gain them?
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 6:27:10 PM #
warez are a whole other discussion, but in this case, i do think that it was funny to post that...

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:36:46 PM #
If I were a hacker I would deface Iambitch site really bad.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:46:16 PM #
Some of the comments are devolving into "If I were a redneck, I'd lynch them SOB's."

Let's keep it clean, folks. They did something sleazy and perhaps illegal. Don't sink to their level, kids.

Ed - be careful
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:59:23 PM #
Jeepers Ed - i don't support censorship (or nescesarily condemn warez for that matter) but do you really want to leave the above link to an illegal copy of ActionNames on yr site? You might be inviting trouble.....
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
Admin @ 5/7/2002 7:50:37 PM #
the warez link has been removed. thanks for the tip.
-Ryan
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 8:27:56 PM #
I am removing my ActionNames and buying DateBk5 from Pimlico. What an idiot of a company and a bigger idiot that is running it. They must not be very confident of their product and thus need to resort to such low and dirty tricks.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 8:35:25 PM #
My post at their forum:

Im very surprised at the actions of iambic in registering the domains datebk4.com and datebk5.com, and redirecting them to their own site. These domains are names of their competitors software, and this tactic has only been used by shady porn sites in the past to try to get traffic.

I am the technician in charge of purchasing software for resale at my company in Melbourne, Australia. Consequently, I will not be aquiring any software from iambic until these rather immature and immoral tactics stop.

Leigh Stillard

P.s If this thread is deleted, I will have to go and post this on the software placed at Handango, Palmgear and similar sites.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 8:44:28 PM #
wow, they are good. they banned me before i was even able to make a post?!?
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/7/2002 8:52:46 PM #
what a joke, here's iambitch's reasoning for all the deleted posts:

"Reminder to all,

ON TOPIC: Tips, tricks, and questions and answers relating to iambic products. Examples of subjects appropriate to this forum include interoperability and synchronization with third party applications
use of features questions and clarifications on documentation where to download where to buy how-to's Palm OS system software and hardware compatibility questions about hacks that work or don't work with a given product where to download installation help reviews general tips to assist fellow customers strategies for making the
most out of iambic products ideas for new features questions on the history of design decisions made in AN and any other topic that someone using AN might want to know.

OFF TOPIC: Sexuality politics religion posts asking or commenting about deleted posts or banned members racial or ethnic issues advertisements for competing products or services posts made to cause grief to others intentionally misleading posts flames and
personal attacks posts about individuals and not the products posts just to agree with another person but adding no significant additional value or information in their own right commentary about pricing or upgrade policies commentary on the forum rules posting of issues or disagreements with iambic personnel.

If you wish to report bugs, or need technical support, please go here
http://support.iambic.com.

An atmosphere of civility and congeniality is a must in order to keep this forum as helpful as possible. Please use your best judgment.

Thank you,

Vidal Graupera"

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
msmasitti @ 5/7/2002 9:31:49 PM #
If you guys want to talk about this, signup at PIC, and discuss it in the Forums. It is in the software folder.

------------------------
Mario
CLIE Moderator
http://www.geocities.com/msmasitti
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
ImpReza M3 @ 5/7/2002 10:02:07 PM #
thanks, mario. here's the link to that forum thread regarding this issue. a useful discussion has already been started there.

http://www.palminfocenter.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4938

_______________
-Reza "Type-R" Farhoodi
Off-Topic Forum Moderator

PERZN PRYDE!!!!
_______________
L.A. Lakers Watch
Final 5/5-L.A. Lakers 86, San Antonio 80
L.A. leads series 1-0
Next game: Tuesday 5/7 vs. San Antonio @ 10:30 PM.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 10:05:36 PM #
Well, I', off to register DateBk5, partially just to say F*** Y** to Iambic. Thanks for the heads-up on this one.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 10:07:11 PM #
If you are ban from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ActionNames

why don't you created a yahoo groups e.g.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACTnames
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Iambic-ActionNames

Then you are the admin on one of these groups. Then, you will not be ban and post anything including a cracked Iambic Products in Files section of these groups. See how would Iambic react on this! See how would Iambic sales in few months. BOYCOTT Iambic!!!!

Any takers? Make it fast before Iambic would create these groups.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 10:16:57 PM #
I just registered DateBk6.com!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 10:25:33 PM #
DateBk4 is the first Palm program I ever purchased. Not only is it extraordinarily powerful, but its author (who incidentally, is just one man), answers support questions personally every single day. He has shown several people how to configure the program to suit their individual purposes. It's amazing. The fact that he is using the proceeds to create the Gorilla Haven just shows what a class act he is. There are very few people with the intellect and compassion of CESD (as he's called in the forums).

As for the icons recognizing the creater code of ACTN, this is actually non-controversial. Most of these icons are not created by Iambic, but rather by third-parties for that software. It is they who will profit most from CESD's decision to use that format. Otherwise, the only change in the icon format itself (other than the use of color) is the particular size, which DateBk5 recognizes. CESD could have used his own creater code (which changes anyway in DateBk5), but this wouldn't have helped anyone (unless the icons were hi-res, which could have been cool).

Anyway, I *was* considering TinySheet before this story broke here. Now, I'll pass.

elo

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 12:09:49 AM #
I bet he'll wish that he didn't post his fax number!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
rldunn @ 5/8/2002 12:25:09 AM #
I just noticed that Palmgear removed ActionNames from the Essentials list it was on there earlier today. And Cliesource has removed all Iambic products from its file listings. It's nice to see these sites standing up for what is right.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 1:53:50 AM #
It may be possible to post any ire of Iambic is the product reviews at the product marketing sites (palmgear.com or handango.com). But they may filter reviews too since they get a cut.


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 7:15:01 AM #
Here is a copy of the e-mail I sent to iambic this morning. I suggest everyone send them a not telling them about how you feel:

"To: jason@iambic.com administrator@iambic.com support@iambic.com
Re: ActionNames

I have been attempting to convince my office IT administrator to purchase ActionNames for all personnel (40 personnel). After iambic registered DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com and redirected those to the ActionNames page, I've now made the suggestion that we incorporate DateBk5 instead. I can't support any company that stoops to these types of tactics to generate business. The money raised by sales of DateBk go to charity, so you are trying to line your pockets with money that otherwise go to charity. I can't even begin to tell you how utterly distasteful that is.

JBH"

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 9:32:29 AM #
LOL, this is really funny...I bet he wishes he could 'undo' his little mistake.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 9:57:11 AM #
I would be interested to know how much Datebk5 sold yesterday. It has to be a TON.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 10:13:02 AM #
there were around 1,800 downloads on PalmGear and Handango. If his conversion rate is around 20% than he sold 360. That will be gross $8,982.00 and net without the harsh 30% commission $6,287.00

Not bad.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 10:44:39 AM #
Folks, let's not let this die out! Keep this topic alive as long as possible, keep the pressure on! You know Vidal is expecting to just wait until the furor dies down, and he will still have what he wants, users being directed to HIS site.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 10:51:16 AM #
but having this limited to PIC is not going to help much. until it reaches zdnet or something like that than nothing will happen.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 11:20:45 AM #
Well, I sent e-mails to reports at both ZDNet and WiredNews concerning this issue. We'll see if anyone picks it up. I sure hope they do. Corporate cyber-squating trying to take proceeds away from a charitable organization this really takes the cake. Iambic, your company and everyone in it is lower than pond scum.

JBH

(OT) RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 11:28:38 AM #
Just gotta say regarding the 20% conversion rate on downloads -vs- sales. I only wish it was that high. I'd be rich :)

The conversion rate to sales is *much* lower. In the case of my products, it is closer to 2% than 20%.

Don't forget also, that many of those downloads could be existing users upgrading their product.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 11:32:58 AM #
Guys, the ultimate way to get publicity on this issue is to get it posted on Slashdot.org. I've already submitted a news item on this, but it may not be enough to convince the Slashdot guys to put it up, so why don't all of you go over to Slashdot and submit a news item on this ? :) ...
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 11:40:19 AM #
My post made to every product-related forum on their website...

To all Iambic customers or potential customers:

You may or may not be aware that Iambic has recently begun criminal
"cybersquatting" of their primary (and superior) competition DateBk
4 & 5 from Pimlico Software.

Vidal Graupera has registered the datebk4.com and datebk5.com
domains and is re-directing them to the Action Names web page in an
attempt to deceive users and potential purchasers of Pimlico's
products. This began only days ago in anticipation of the latest
release of DateBk5 from Pimlico.

It would be bad enough for Iambic to display this complete lack of
morals and ethics against a for-profit competitior, however Pimlico
Software is not a for-profit competitor. They are a non-profit
organization that supports wildlife conservation and is constructing
a "gorilla haven" for the protection of these animals in a natural
habitat.

I would encourage you all to write letters or email to Iambic
expressing your distaste for their actions. I would also suggest
that any potential purchasers of Iambic products consider the types
of criminal and unethical activities that your hard earned dollars
would be supporting.

If you are considering purchasing Action Names, I would strongly
suggest you instead purchase DateBk5 at
http://www.pimlicosoftware.com You will receive a better product,
fantastic customer support, and you will be supporting a wonderful
charity not a sleazy company willing to resort to criminal tactics
to try to deceive their competition's customers and prospective
customers.

As if all of this was not enough, Iambic representatives have spent
the last couple days deleting any post on the forum which mentions
this situation in an attempt to avoid public scrutiny of their
actions. This post will be quickly deleted I am sure.

Please remember that the only way to let companies know this kind of
behavior is intolerable is to vote with your dollars. Please make
that statement by taking your money elsewhere.

Best regards,

Robert C

Not affiliated with Pimlico Software, only a happy user of their products.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
sundance_7 @ 5/8/2002 11:54:26 AM #
I just submitted a short item to slashdot ont he topic, you should do the same...

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 12:04:03 PM #
No one probably noticed, but www.datebook5.com also redirects to Iambic. We all know they just added the "Datebook" to Action Names to make people think it was the same product. I know I often tell people about DateBk5, but verbally it just sounds like "Datebook 5" so this probably is a very effective way to get people that are actually looking for the other product (not really knowing which one it is, just looking for something a friend mentioned). I try to be sure to describe it as "Datebook, without the O's".


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 12:08:12 PM #
Get the word out to the PUG's as well.. I've already notified two groups of which I am part.. I suggest everyone else do the same. Most of them have email lists.. spread the word. :)
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
fleegle @ 5/8/2002 12:39:36 PM #
"I just submitted a short item to slashdot ont he topic, you should do the same..."

I couldn't find your post on slashdot.com. I wonder if they deleted it. :-O

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
rldunn @ 5/8/2002 12:42:25 PM #
Looks like they finally removed the redirect. Both datebk4.com and datebk5.com now just display a blank page.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/8/2002 12:47:31 PM #
it's about time. still think an apology is in order, though...

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 12:47:31 PM #
Since most non power-users don't visit forums it would be better to write reviews about Action Names mentioning their dirty business practices.

Here you can post reviws: www.palmgear.com www.handango.com

By doing that normal people will see the review beafore they buy. Also while at it you can comment on the buggyness of Action Names.


RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 1:01:25 PM #
Iambic $oftware is more abusive than Micro $oft.

Pimlico software is a company own and operated by just one man(C.E. Steward Dewar) he is the only programmer involved in DateBK#.

Iambic that is a corporation should have some respect! An people complain about Microsoft, Iambic bussiness practices are more abusive than Micro Soft.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 1:02:40 PM #
Has anyone noticed that datebk4.com, datebk5.com, and datebook5.com now point to a blank page, not the iambic pages? I think they got the message!
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
escobar @ 5/8/2002 1:19:47 PM #
The Iambic Forums are " temporarily unavailable due to maitenance and upgrade. Please check back in a few minutes. "

Maybe a coincidence?

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/8/2002 1:32:51 PM #
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
BillFugina @ 5/8/2002 2:07:28 PM #
I just read the article at BrightHand. It seems the only way to get to the article is if you know the URL, http://www.brighthand.com/newsite/features/iambic.html

There doesn't appear to be any way to find the article through the website. I doubt anybody who doesn't already know the story will see this.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
PR @ 5/8/2002 2:13:56 PM #
look at the very top of the home page, there's a graphic that says "iambic under fire"

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
BillFugina @ 5/8/2002 2:35:40 PM #
You are right. I stand corrected.

I wonder why it doesn't appear as an item in the news or features section.

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 3:12:56 PM #
I am sick with Iambic's hijacking, but to compare them with Micro$oft is unjust. What Micro$oft does is far worst.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 3:15:09 PM #
I wouldn't say it's unjust to compare them to Microsoft. Both are companies that will stop at just about nothing to try and get more business. Microsoft is just bigger and has gotten away with it for much longer.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 3:16:20 PM #
Please note folks, that the domains ONLY have their default page changed. Any other address using these domains will still bring the user to Iambic's site. This is hardly a remedy, IMO. And certainly has not changed my opinion of the company! I personally will not trust them ever again.
MSFT
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 4:31:22 PM #
MSFT wins through great products and hard work. Please don't compare MSFT's accomplishments to some tiny (no pun intended) software company cyber-squatting domain names.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 4:46:12 PM #
I don't think any of you know what you are talking about. Anyone has the right to get a domain name. Obviously Pimlico had not reserved these as of yet, so Iambic did. Also a hacker might have done this as well. You don't know. I think you guys need more info before you jump to conclusions. Anyway, I still LOVE ActionNames. It's far better than that stupid DtBk5 junk. No offense to those of you who do like DateBk5.
RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 4:55:08 PM #
Yeah, no offense. Your product is "stupid" and "junk" but no offense.


RE: MSFT
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 4:56:43 PM #
Microsoft wins through illegal use of its monopoly, as has been decided in our courts. I wouldn't compare their "accomplishments" with a small company, but their tactics are similar (both are unfair and illegal).


I think WE are the ones who know what we are talking about!!
ImpReza M3 @ 5/8/2002 4:56:48 PM #
to have DateBk5.com be registered to someone else other than Pimlico is one thing, but to have Pimlico's competitor do it just to attract extra business is terrible and you know it. you may still like Action Names (inferior to DateBk5) and iambic, but after this, you are now in the minority.

_______________
-Reza "Type-R" Farhoodi
Off-Topic Forum Moderator

PERZN PRYDE!!!!
_______________
L.A. Lakers Watch
Final 5/7-San Antonio 88, L.A. Lakers 85
Series tied 1-1
Next game: Friday 5/10 @ San Antonio @ 10:30 PM.

Article on CNet
BillFugina @ 5/8/2002 5:13:10 PM #
Here is link to a short article on the DateBk domain story.

http://news.com.com/2100-1023-903161.html

Iambic's response
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 9:22:46 PM #
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:26:14 -0700
From: iambic Systems Administrator <administrator@iambic.com>
To: Deleted name
Subject: RE: Sorely disappointed.

Hello [deleted],

thank you for your email, we highly value and appreciate users and customers feedback. I hope that the few lines below will provide an answer to your
concerns.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Adriano

~~~~~
Adriano Chiaretta
Engineering Manager and MIS Director
iambic, Inc.
www.iambic.com


---------------
On May 2, 2002, iambic purchased and registered datebk4.com and datebk5.com which were available. As a vendor of datebook software, iambic's maintains that it has the right to purchase domains containing
the generic key word "datebook" (and the abbreviation "datebk") which are not trademarked.

As there was never any previous interest in, use or promotion of these domains, they did not generate any significant additional traffic or sales for us.

On May 5, 2002 we began to receive some concerns and notice postings questioning these domain registrations within the Palm user community. We became concerned when this trend continued and began to shift the
discussion away from who makes the best datebook product to issues surrounding the registrations, sales practices, and other non-product issues.

As a member of the Palm developer community, in order to move the discussion back on track, on May 8, 2002 we redirected these pages to a blank page.

Ethics and strong customer support have always been the cornerstone of iambic's success. Thank you, again, for contacting us, and we look forward to the opportunity to continue working with you.
---------------

RE: iambic has hijacked DateBk4.com and DateBk5.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 6/22/2002 1:19:10 AM #
What a load of crap from Iambic. If they just wanted to register "datebook" and it's abbreviation, they'd've registered "datebk.com," not "datebk4.com" & datebk5.com." Now, they're lying through their teeth.

Pathetic.

Don't forget the PalmTracker reviews....

MIDI Sound For Alarm

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:28:08 PM #
Does anyone know if I can use the built in sound in NR70V for alarm?
RE: MIDI Sound For Alarm
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:35:27 PM #
maybe
RE: MIDI Sound For Alarm
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 4:49:53 PM #
Well, I've got the James Bond theme set for my Alarm.
RE: MIDI Sound For Alarm
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 8:51:10 PM #
Yes. It works quite well with my T615-C. I don't think you could do an MP3, though (:

Interface Woes

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:48:00 PM #
I'm sure there's a lot of power in this app relative to the native address book, but... is it just me, or is the interface for this program incredibly crowded, ill arranged, and just plain ugly?
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 12:55:10 PM #
It all depends on how you customize it. The beauty of DB5 is that if you like all the extra bells and whistle cluttering your screen, you got it. If you don't, they can be hidden/whisked away. Thing is, the power is always there.
RE: Interface Woes
PR @ 5/7/2002 1:31:29 PM #
agreed. you don't have to have the icons, background color, or split screen if you don't want to. you can make it look just like the palm os datebook. i've been using datebk5 for a while as a beta tester. it is far and away the best datebook out there. i still find out new features that excite me!

RE: Interface Woes
Ronin @ 5/7/2002 2:19:18 PM #
I have been using DateBk4 and using the DateBk5 beta for quite a while and I tend to agree that DateBk can be quite overwhelming. It is a feature packed piece of software. The program is a more feature filled calendar than almost any I have ever used on a PC & is definitely more usefull than Outlook.

But it is a program you can grow into. I think that on the first install to many things are present on the screen and cause a reaction of feature overload to the new user but the interface can be customized to be almost indistinguishable from the built-in datebook.

Bottom line, don't give up on DateBk5, give it a chance and take some time to get a feel for it. Once you become familiar with the true power of this program, you won't regret the time spent.

RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:34:42 PM #
AMEN
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 2:39:14 PM #
Agreed. I was on and off with DateBk3 for more than one year since I was impatient to make myself familar with it. Then one day I spent a couple hours reading the manual and tried out features. WOW. It became clear I have missed a lot of good stuff. Now I have been using DateBk4/5 for a couple years and just can't recall how my life was (dis)organized before that!
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:03:09 PM #
In terms of the cluttered interface -- and, even worse, the preferences organization -- I usually suggest a competitors' product that has 80 percent of the functionality and a lot better aesthetic sense. However, with the nature of the discussion two posts above this one, I'm not going to mention what that product is...
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:26:37 PM #
The biggest thing that will help you is to read the manual, there are so many features. It really helps to read it all the way through.
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:40:06 PM #
"In terms of the cluttered interface -- and, even worse, the preferences organization"

Just a note that the preferences have been totally reorganized, and are much more intuitive now than they were in DateBk4.

RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:59:34 PM #
YES! The Preferences are way better now. And the new icons, WOW! I love havng so many colorful icons to choose from. And repeating ToDos...and dozens of other great new improvements. It amazes me everytime CESD comes out with a new release how much great stuff has been added!!
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 9:35:24 PM #
"I'm sure there's a lot of power in this app relative to the native address book, but... is it just me, or is the interface for this program incredibly crowded, ill arranged, and just plain ugly?"

I have to agree I used Datebk+ for a while and liked the interface. I then tried Datebk4 for a month and the interface always felt clumsy and slow. So tonight I tried Datebk5 and things have not improved much and the program is slower. The preferences are better, but still the interface is too clumsy for me to use on a daily basis.

RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 11:17:45 PM #
I had been using DateBk3 for two years before I upgraded to DateBk4. I didn't find the interface more complex at all as long as not using the split window. I did find it a bit slower than DateBk3 when I turned on grey scale on my old Palm III device. After I bought a Visor Platinum, the speed problem is gone. Now I am very happy with DateBk5. I found the new preferences window is very clean. Features like TapAndHold, strike-across, link and log to address book, call/action, Advance notice of event, and Daily Journal have become part of my everyday life.
RE: Interface Woes
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/10/2002 12:53:15 AM #
Things like the icon in the upper-left corner and the T and L on the bottom really bother me. I don't use them, so from my point of view they are (literally) useless clutter. Never did work out whether you could get rid of them.

Hmm, can you prioritise events? Like, I want to see all A+ events in the next two weeks on a single screen. AFAIK, nobody does this, but maybe I'm not looking hard enough.

Requires 600K of Internal memory?

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 4:57:14 PM #
They must be kidding.. 600K ??

RE: Requires 600K of Internal memory?
PR @ 5/7/2002 4:59:39 PM #
it's worth it, i tell you.

plus, you don't need a separate phone, todo, or memo enhancement application--this one does all of that. it would be worth buying a palm for this program only, IMO.

RE: Requires 600K of Internal memory?
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 5:55:11 PM #
if you had an 8 or 16 MB device, you wouldn't be complaining. Now go back to play with your 2 MB Palm M100
RE: Requires 600K of Internal memory?
TDS Computer @ 5/8/2002 2:36:13 AM #
I do agree. ActionNames 5.2 is 400K, and I thought that was huge. 600k is a lot. i run ActionNames off of my Smartmedia card, so it is no big deal. Does Datebook5 run off of a memory card, or does it only work in the Palm RAM?

Visit us at www.tdscomputer.com
RE: Requires 600K of Internal memory?
Altema @ 5/8/2002 11:18:32 AM #
Yea, it's a whopper, and size was one of the things that kept me away from both the major datebook replacements. But, I thought I'd give it a try, and I'm hooked now. The interface can be as simple as the standard datebook app, or as complex as you want. Each view screen has its own appearance prefs. An entire years appointments displayed clearly on one little screen? Yep! The icons are a blast too... re-created several without touching the documentation. Being able to set individual sounds for each appointment, and having both an alarm and a pre-alarm is nice. An extra FYI alarm the day before a big event is wonderful.

RE: Requires 600K of Internal memory?
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 3:56:35 PM #
>if you had an 8 or 16 MB device, you wouldn't be >complaining. Now go back to play with your 2 MB Palm >M100

I am sorry, but I have a 16MB device. You totally don't get what I wam talking about.

Make an example to let you know it clearly.

Suppose normal PC programs takes 10MB of your hard drive, will you think a program which takes 50MB "too large"? This has nothing to do with that you have a 10GB hard drive, or 40GB hard drive or how much free space you have in your system.

Of course 600K is fine for the RAM I have in my Clie, however this is really waaaaaaaaay too large, I am just comparing it with regular Palm OS programs. How much RAM I have is a seprate issue.

Anyone upgraded from DateBk4?

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:33:05 PM #
I plan to upgrade from DateBk4 to DateBk5. But I don't want to mess up my icons, crosslinks, and other data. DateBk4 is the most complicated PalmOS program I know.

Has anyone done this upgrade yet? Any advice?

By the way, does anyone have a high resolution, color owl icon for DateBk5?

RE: Anyone upgraded from DateBk4?
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 6:43:14 PM #
Datebook keeps a small database on your Palm that holds your settings. Make sure you DON'T delete that. It's about 1k. Before upgrading, simply delete the datbook4 file from your Palm. It's about 300-400K. Not sure about icons. Some of my customized ones got replaced, because they did not come with Datebook in the first place. No problem, wait til you see the new icons.

Color owl icon? Datebook program has links to more icons (2kids in the garage)

Roy

RE: Anyone upgraded from DateBk4?
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 9:59:19 PM #
I had no problem doing it. I uninstalled Datebk4 using Launchem and made sure ONLY checked the box that said "Uninstall program" and left "preferences" unchecked. Everything went smoothly.
RE: Anyone upgraded from DateBk4?
jjsoh @ 5/7/2002 11:28:09 PM #
Same here. Upgraded without any problems. As long as you read the instructions within the README file, you should be fine.

I would've told you RTFM, but I'll play nice. ^_^


Jim

RE: Anyone upgraded from DateBk4?
IanJD @ 5/8/2002 4:49:50 AM #
Your datebk4 icons should be preserved if you only delete the datebk4.prc file, and install datebk5.prc. While datebk5 will use the monochrome datebk4 icons, if you want to use multicolour icons you will have to recreate them with the included icon editor.

RE: Anyone upgraded from DateBk4?
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 4:30:37 PM #
The download file of DateBk5 includes a file named Icon-DateBk5.prc which contains the color versions of the old monochrome icons using the same names. If you install this, all your existing icon'd events will have the new color versions of the icons. Simple as that.

incredible but DateBK 5 is a one man achivement.

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 10:05:15 PM #
It is really incredible to know that such a wonderful program as DateBK is the product of one man (C.E. Steward Deward). Pimlicosoftware is just composed of Mr. Deward.


Iambic that is a corporation does not even comes close to Mr. Dewar's quality product, even with their dirty marketing tatics.


Some Background on

haxa @ 5/7/2002 10:34:27 PM #
these are what i found out after some research at the Internet archive

1. http://www.pimlicosoftware.com/ has always have the DateBk as their product ever since Nov 27, 1999, that time it was under http://www.gorilla-haven.org/pimlico/

2. meanwhile, the word DateBook on ActionName only started to appear on Oct 15, 2000 on iambic.com website. prior to that, iambic only catagorize its product ActionNames 4.5.3 (the version at that time) under the CONTACT MANAGEMENT AND DATEBOOK.

before that, on Aug 15, 2000, iambic's Action
Names was still Action Names. Only on the
Oct 15, 2000 that it became ActionName DateBook!

and now iambic is doing this to datebk4.com and
datebk5.com

it looks like iambic.com desperately in need of
the DateBook brand name.

-haxa-


-haxa-palmx member, kuala lumpur, malaysia

To those of you who registered datebk domains....

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/7/2002 11:33:55 PM #
...why not donate them to Pimlico. You can probably deduct it from your taxes if you donate to the Gorilla Haven. (assuming it's a non-profit)

mike foley

RE: To those of you who registered datebk domains....
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 12:09:15 AM #
If you follow the posts above, it was a company, iambic, who registered it. Iambic is a head-to-head competitor of pimlico software. This is an indecent way of marketing. I am sure it will back fire them.
RE: To those of you who registered datebk domains....
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 1:06:15 AM #
I think he means the people that have registered other domains, that Iambic didn't already take. I agree, they should be able to deduct it on their taxes as charity.

Hijcacking turned off

bookrats @ 5/8/2002 1:10:51 PM #
As mentioned elsewhere, going to "datebk4.com" or "datebk5.com" now goes to a blank page.

Apparently, Iambic got the message.

Gotta say, this is one of the *fastest* consumer protest cycles I've ever seen. People discover problem, LOTS of people complain (here, and in other groups), distributors/retailers respond to negative feelings (Action Names taken off of PalmGearHQ's Essentials lists), company gets off the hot seat -- all within about 24 hours.

----

Jeff Meyer

RE: Hijcacking turned off
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/8/2002 2:33:19 PM #
Even though it points to a blank page now, this action is still a form of hijacking ! I think Iambic should turn over the datebk*.com domains over to the created of DateBk, and also issue a public apology.

RE: Hijcacking turned off
goochisan @ 5/9/2002 10:35:00 AM #
FYI --

Only the "www.datebk4.com" and "www.datebk5.com" URLs are redirected to a blank page...

The simpler "datebk4.com" and "datebk5.com" URLs (without the leading "www"s) STILL take you to Iambic.

Lame.

Bye, bye Iambic. Don't expect a DIME from me!

-- John Goodman
Incite Design Works
www.incitedesignworks.com

datebk 5

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/9/2002 10:24:41 AM #
In the new datebk 5 upgrade, does the vibrate mode work as an alarm option on the M505 ? Sure would be nice if it did.
RE: datebk 5
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/10/2002 12:45:49 AM #
The vibrating alarm worked great on my m505 and now m515.
RE: datebk 5
I.M. Anonymous @ 5/10/2002 1:45:48 AM #
How do you get vibrate mode to work in datebk 4? It works in palm date book, but in my 505 does not work in datebk 4. Am I doing something wrong? I'd love to know how to make it work.
Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: