Comments on: Sleek Enhanced Pocket Tunes Skin Mini-Review

When Pocket Tunes 4 arrived on the scene back in December ’06, one of the most welcome additions was the new “Sleek” UI. In our Pocket Tunes review, I called it “a welcome and much-needed improvement over the cluttered and, well, ugly High Fidelity interface of pTunes 3.” Based on customer feedback, Normsoft and Gx5 have further refined Sleek in the months since, claiming to “improve the listening experience”. Have they succeeded? Read on for PIC’s mini-review…
Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (6 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Start a new Comment Down

Great Skin - No 5-Way

rener @ 3/28/2007 10:15:47 PM # Q
I've been using the sleek-enhanced since it first came out and it (like almost all of g5x's UIs) is an awesome interface and, in many ways, a great improvement over the regular sleek skin.

However, this comes at the expense of 5-way nav. Where, in the old sleek version, the 5-way could be used in the standard Treo method to move around the UI and choose songs from the playlist, toggle repeat or shuffle, and do other typical nav tasks. The new "enhanced" version, however, has relegated the 5-way to an iPod like control, where volume, skip, etc. are the only tasks it can perform.

NormSoft was excellent in addressing this issue in on their Yahoo list, however, suggesting a future update may re-introduce the 5-way nav. (Hopefully, and especially, in the play list view).

Other than that, I think the skin is a great improvement and it has become my skin of choice.

RE: Great Skin - No 5-Way
freakout @ 3/28/2007 10:24:56 PM # Q
D'oh! I actually made a note of that and forgot to mention it in the review...

I like it too; I just think the Jump Bar crowds out the Navigation view a bit too much. I'd rather have kept the look of the original Sleek for the Navigation view, and just tacked on the Playlist and Album Art views.

It's still a great design though, and (IMHO) a much better mobile music experience than you'll get on a dedicated mp3 player, ala` iPod.

Tim
I apologise for any and all emoticons that appear in my posts. You may shoot them on sight.
Treo 270 ---> Treo 650 ---> Crimson Treo 680

Reply to this comment

Lazy?

PacManFoo @ 3/29/2007 8:19:22 AM # Q
Looks like these newer skins are not being made in 320X480. For cryin' freak'n out loud, you can't tell me that it would be that difficult. If you can make a Green one why not the Blue and Crimson as well. Why do I seem to get the feeling certain developers are giving the middle finger to us TX/Lifedrive/T3 owners. I have bought more software in the last 6 months then I had in the last six prior years. I will continue to support developers who create for the TX and dog those who do not.

Bad lazy developer, Bad!

PDA's Past and Present:
Palm - IIIxe, Vx, M500, M505, Tungsten T, TX
Handspring - Edge, Platinum, Deluxe
Sony - SJ22
Apple - MP2000, MP2100

RE: Lazy?
relyons @ 3/29/2007 10:59:55 AM # Q
I recently completed a contract to develop a Palm OS application for a major health care technology provider. The application displays patient demographics, lab results, medications, radiology transcriptions, etc.

The client provided several Palm handhelds for testing, including the LifeDrive and Tungsten T5.

I risked missing project deadlines to incorporate dynamic sizing. Our team thought the full screen view of patient data would impress our client and help our client impress its clients during sales calls. It took two days to learn how it worked and 15 minutes to 4 hours to incorporate it into each form. It also added additional testing time to ensure dynamic sizing support didn't break the application on legacy devices.

When we demonstrated dynamic sizing, our client responded, "OK." They immediately continued their line of questioning to ensure that (a) the data on the screen was accurate and (b) the feature set is equal or better than their competitors. Little else mattered.

On sales calls, we urged the client to demonstrate the application on the LifeDrive or T5 in landscape mode. The client demonstrated our application on Treo smartphones because smartphones are the neat, new, cool thing. The LifeDrive and T5 stayed in the office.

RE: Lazy?
PacManFoo @ 3/29/2007 1:41:38 PM # Q
So what's your point?

This is a consumer application which they already have a Green Version of the skin but don't put out a Red or Blue one. See the skin is already made they just need to change the freakin' color.

4 hours to incorporate into a form. Ah yea right. Better pull that Palm OS for Dummies book out one more time.



PDA's Past and Present:
Palm - IIIxe, Vx, M500, M505, Tungsten T, TX
Handspring - Edge, Platinum, Deluxe
Sony - SJ22
Apple - MP2000, MP2100

RE: Lazy?
PacManFoo @ 3/29/2007 9:38:44 PM # Q
Now the Treo-Palm Sneetches had Palms with phones.
The PDA-Palm Sneetches had none upon thars.
Their screens weren't so big; they were really quite small.
You would think such a thing wouldn't matter at all.
But because they had phones, all the Treo-Palm Sneetches
would brag, "We're the best kind of Sneetch on the beaches."

PDA's Past and Present:
Palm - IIIxe, Vx, M500, M505, Tungsten T, TX
Handspring - Edge, Platinum, Deluxe
Sony - SJ22
Apple - MP2000, MP2100
Reply to this comment
Start a New Comment Thread Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: