Comments on: Final Settlement in Defective m Series Suit

Pilot 1000-->Pilot 5000-->PalmPilot Pro-->IIIe-->Vx-->m505-->T|T-->T|T2-->T|C-->T|T3-->T|T5-->TX

i just wish dude could formulate and post thoughts in a CLEAR AND CONCISE MANNER.

"i just just wish dude could..." BWAHAHAHAHA!

------------------------
Sony CLIE UX100: 128 MB real RAM, OLED screen. All the PDA anyone really ever wanted.
------------------------

The Palm eCONomy = Communism™

The Great Palm Swindle: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7864#108038

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

loser.

Add all these posts together... and Voice remains a mystery.

Although if you really are a help desk worker, I pity the poor people who are asking for your help!! ;)

"Hi, I'm looking for Paediatrics-"

"Paediatrics?!?! It's run by GREEDY SCUM who are INTENT on manipulating their poor users into paying for pitiful incremental upgrades to their children! Now take your biotchslapping and go home!!"

;)

Tim Carroll
Your friendly customer service robot
(and big Treo fan)

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

"Sadly", it was Geeko who found this little gem and commented on it last week. "Sadly" you have become embittered after the rapier found its mark and left your face permanently scarred + disfigured, Zorro-style. Yet instead of being grateful for having been spared the coup de grace, you come out when the lights are out (c0ckroach-style) and spew your useless Graffiti (1?) here, attempting to sully my artwork. Like a mangy, delusional cur pretending to mark its "territory", you continue to run and hide (Bronski Beat Smalltown Boy-style) as soon as the Big Dogs arrive.

Smalltown Boy [David's Theme"]

You leave in the morning
With everything you own
In a little black case
Alone on a platform
The wind and the rain
On a sad and lonely face

Mother will never understand
Why you had to leave
But the answers you seek
Will never be found at home
The love that you need
Will never be found at home

Run away, turn away, run away, turn away, run away.
Run away, turn away, run away, turn away, run away.

Pushed around and kicked around
Always a lonely boy
You were the one
That they’d talk about around town
As they put you down

And as hard as they would try
They’d hurt to make you cry
But you never cried to them
Just to your soul
No you never cried to them
Just to your soul

Run away, turn away, run away, turn away, run away.
Run away, turn away, run away, turn away, run away.

Cry , boy, cry...

You leave in the morning
With everything you own
In a little black case
Alone on a platform
The wind and the rain
On a sad and lonely face

Run away, turn away, run away, turn away, run away.
Run away, turn away, run away, turn away, run away.

I.M.

Ronin

Yeah, but it's you who continues to chortle over it a week later, like the second-grader you are. Interesting that these things are always done by somebody else: "Surur did it, not me! Gekko did it, not me!"

Actually, I was giving Geeko credit for finding that horrid little picture showing how much Jeff Kirvin looks like he sounds. I was revolted, yet still I could not look away. When was it that you claim I said Surur said something that was actually attributable to me? Links PLEASE. I love it when you lie in public, David. By the way, we're still waiting for you to explain that whopper of a lie you then RAN AWAY FROM:

"the Kyocera 7135, a rather aged Palm OS 4-based phone, has outsold all of the Pocket PC/Windows Mobile/etc. phones made by all of Microsoft's licensees, put together."

- David Schlesinger (Senior Manager at PalmSource in charge of cobbling together PalmLinux and preventing it from turning into ANOTHER Cobalt Catastrophe)

http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111762

Keep running from The Truth, David. That seems to be the M.O. at Palm/PalmSource these days...

Take a little responsibility for yourself.

I always do. But YOU, on the other hand, seem to be incapable of admitting when you've been caught LYING in public. Shame on you, David.

And put an edge on that rapier; it's blunter than a butterknife.

That's an odd request comimg from someone who could be mortally wounded with a spoon. I had such high hopes for you, David, but you continue to disappoint. Perhaps it's time you called for reinforcements other than that bumbling buffoon, Marty Fouts. Make sure you choose someone with better verbal abilities than you, though - there's no challenge in julienning rank amateurs like you.

>>>"Sadly" you have become embittered after the rapier found its mark and left your face permanently scarred + disfigured, Zorro-style.

And then you woke up, and it had all been a dream! If you believe this, you really need to be staying out of the medical supplies room on your breaks from the "Help Desk" there.

"Help Desk"? Are you talking about the one you're running of to after each of my replies to you? They must be running low on sutures and bandages by now. The "Z" scars on your face are now connecting to form a continuous quiltwork pattern. How quaint.

>>>...you continue to run and hide (Bronski Beat Smalltown Boy-style) as soon as the Big Dogs arrive.

Whatever are you talking about...? Who's hiding? I'm right here, as you must certainly have noticed between the last time you made this silly claim and today. Although I can certainly understand your desire that this should be the case, wishing doesn't make it so, I'm afraid.

How about you publicly admit you LIED (repeatedly!) when you parrotted "the Kyocera 7135, a rather aged Palm OS 4-based phone, has outsold all of the Pocket PC/Windows Mobile/etc. phones made by all of Microsoft's licensees, put together." for starters? Make the First Step, David:

David: "Hello. My name is David Schlesinger, Senior Manager at PalmSource. And I'm a troll and a liar."
All: "Hello, David."

I'd stick to pushing the "ACCESS as hostage-taker" scenario if I were you. At the very least, since ACCESS isn't going to be selling PalmSource to Palm, you should be able to run with that one for a while without being immediately shown to be wrong.

Actually, I like my Access-as-a-better-Symbian theory the best: Great OS + huge app library + good developer community + fair developer tools; without overbearing spectre of Nokia trying to run the show = instant mobile platform IF packaged with ALL the ingredients (as I've previously suggested that PalmSource have rolled into PalmOS). It wouldn't take a lot of effort to make PalmOS into a killer mobile platform. PalmSource was too clueless to see this. A better-run company might have better luck.

http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111669

I.M.

Ronin

------------------------
Sony CLIE UX100: 128 MB real RAM, OLED screen. All the PDA anyone really ever wanted.
------------------------

The Palm eCONomy = Communism™

The Great Palm Swindle: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7864#108038

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

Interesting that these things are always done by somebody else: "our CEO did it, not me! Lunktard did it, not me!"

Take a little responsibility for yourself.

[TVoR carves yet another "Z" on David Schlesinger's horridly scarred-up visage...]

>>>...yet still I could not look away.

Like I've intimated: weak-minded.

Brilliant and convincing (as usual) response there, David. You should have gone to law school.

Anyway ss far as providing links, you must have an awfully poor short-term memory; I'll grant you that, since the alternative is something like "pathological liar". All anyone has to do is scroll back through the other fun thread in which we've been engaged; anyone, heaven bless 'em, who needs any further verification as to what you're all about can feel free to look there.

Sounds like you're running and hiding, as usual. If you believe (as you wrote) that "the Kyocera 7135, a rather aged Palm OS 4-based phone, has outsold all of the Pocket PC/Windows Mobile/etc. phones made by all of Microsoft's licensees, put together." then post a link to the data corroborating that absurd claim. Otherwise apologize for parrotting such a ridiculous LIE here.

>>>I always do.

Izzatso, "Carl"? Where's this web column you claim to be responsible for? I'd love to read it.

I'll bet you would. I suppose I could tell you, but then I'd have to... you know...

>>>...Access-as-a-better-Symbian theory...

Yeah, I can see how you'd like that one better. It's obvious and inane, as opposed to simply silly. "Like Symbian but not Nokia", huh?—wow. Deep insight there. But keep at it, I expect you'll be--as usual--continually surprised (i.e. blind-sided). Certainly that's what history suggests.

More misquotes from you, David? How sleazy. I said:

"3) Access-as-a-better-Symbian theory: Great OS + huge app library + good developer community + fair developer tools; without overbearing spectre of Nokia trying to run the show = instant mobile platform IF packaged with ALL the ingredients (as I've previously suggested that PalmSource have rolled into PalmOS). It wouldn't take a lot of effort to make PalmOS into a killer mobile platform. PalmSource was too clueless to see this. A better-run company might have better luck."

http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#113917

Keep trying to give misinformation, though. I see you've learned well (from Michael Mace?).

Those who forget the lessons of history really are condemned to repeat 'em.

Tragically ironic quote coming from someone working at a company:
- previously run by the man who oversaw Apple's Copeland Catastrophe
- who's Board Chairperson previously ran Be
- who's engineering staff became dominated by Be refugees that still pine for their BeOS "glory days"
- and who's engineering staff's most recent "triumph" was that steaming pile of feces called "Cobalt".

Sounds to me like there's been a HELL of a lot of "forgetting" going on at PalmSource for quite a while.

Other than that, yawn.

Indeed. I just hope that you and your staff at PalmSource wake up before we see the (inevitable?) concluding act of the Copeland -> BeOS -> Cobalt -> PalmLinux tragedy.

The weekend's too short to waste any more of it on you, P. Diddy; I've got things to do, movies to see... Feel free to declare yourself the winner of something or other in the meantime. I'll be interested to see the upswelling of popular support for your positions in its wake. In all frankness, you're one looking increasingly like an "army of one", there, private.

Might I suggest you rent "The Unbearable Lightness of Being"? And maybe you need to add "Write a viable mobile OS" to your to do list? I don't think I'm the only one that feels this way, David - I hope others will also let you know how tired we are of seeing Palm/PalmSource destroy the platform with their Keystone Kops routines. It's time to worry when former PalmOS users can't even bother complaining because they simply no longer care. More and more people are giving up on PalmOS, David and your demise was entirely self-inflicted.

TVoR

------------------------
Sony CLIE UX100: 128 MB real RAM, OLED screen. All the PDA anyone really ever wanted.
------------------------

The Palm eCONomy = Communism™

The Great Palm Swindle: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7864#108038

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

Who's to say that's not spelled correctly? Hmmmmmm?

[TVoR calmly loads rifle, waiting for Marty to step forward...]

------------------------
Sony CLIE UX100: 128 MB real RAM, OLED screen. All the PDA anyone really ever wanted.
------------------------

The Palm eCONomy = Communism™

The Great Palm Swindle: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7864#108038

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

what you don't know keeps the rest of us laughing.

HAND

May You Live in Interesting Times

Foremost among the differences between these two projects is that Cobalt GM'd, twice, 6.0 and 6.1. I worked on both releases, and I use a device running Cobalt as my main handheld—and no, I won't tell you which off-the-shelf PDA I reflashed to enable that, I'm just fortunate that way—and it's a very good operating system, with some significant advantages over "stock" Linux on that type of device and some neat innovations.

The reasons it didn't get into the marketplace are complex, and I'm not going to get into 'em, but it was certainly not because it was a project that never finished (as was Copland) or that it was simply "crappy."

Just thought you should know.

Love,

Lefty (the Great and Terrible)
Minister of Fun (or else!)

Congratulations on achieving complete and stainless self-parody.

Tungsten T3. Choking. On. Cobalt. Please. Get. It. Off. Me. Please.

------------------------
Sony CLIE UX100: 128 MB real RAM, OLED screen. All the PDA anyone really ever wanted.
------------------------

The Palm eCONomy = Communism™

The Great Palm Swindle: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7864#108038

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

You should really work on that sentence structure, then. "Its" would have been vastly clearer, at least. You keep up your "English as a First Language" studies, though—who's to say, with appropriate diligence, whose aptitudes and abilities might not increase...? A little, anyway, but any improvement would be a step in the right direction. By the bye: "by any other name", not "by any other word."

Now do you STILL see references to YOU specifically?

No, but again you should try to be a little more clear in the future. Your free-floating accusatory fantasies are so numerous, diffuse and wide-ranging, it's difficult to tell whom you're attempting to malign at times.

Have you ever been to Lyon?

Nope. Been to Lyons, though.

Hey, there are a bunch of folks in Legal who'd be interested in getting their Palm devices reflashed with Cobalt, too. Can they tag along? They might even want to get your autograph. I'll make it worth your while—whatever sushi you can gesture and grunt at's on me. (Try the fugu, it's to die for.)

Love,

Lefty (the Great and Terrible)
Minister of Fun (or else!)

The reasons it didn't get into the marketplace are complex, and I'm not going to get into 'em, but it was certainly not because it was a project that never finished (as was Copland) or that it was simply "crappy."

This isn't exactly the impression I got from your former hardware division, nor from your own people. The stuff I've heard from Palm, and from PSRC on the occasion of the Cobalt 6.1 release, was that the reason Cobalt never made it was because it was effectively half an operating system. That it got pushed out the door prematurely back in 2003 to comply with the artificial marketing deadline, and it wasn't in a state nearly suitable for actual use. Limited driver support, nearly no phone function stack, buggy application compatibility, and features missing right and left, even after you subtract the things like a file system and new UI that PSRC cut earlier in the development. If you have a reply to this, I'd love to hear it.

What, I'm not in your address book?

...and I'll see if PalmSource flunkies qualify for the downgrade.

Oh, we'd better: that's our name on the copyright notice.

No doubt your license fees are all paid up, hm? (We're talking a little higher stakes here than cadging one's neighbor's WiFi signal here, by the way. Bring your checkbook--there's a reason I'm willing to sport you the sushi...)

Can you take responsibility for Cobalt's catastrophic failure? The wasting of the past 4 years of development time? Or do you refuse to take responsibility for anythin at all?

As far as its being "half an operating system," we worked closely with several licensees on devices that--while they haven't made it to market, again for a variety of reasons that I'm not in a position to discuss--were for all practical purposes ready to go.

Sure. They could have shipped them but they just didn't feel like doing so. Yeah. Right.

Oswin demoed their version at the developers' conference last year, and there were several other efforts. Again, I'm not in a position to go into specifics, but I can say that none of 'em had to do with failures or lacks on the part of the software.

Really? That Oswin phone operated like a pig that had just been pumped full of tequila and Rohypnol (as often happens on Mexican farms during the months that the women have migrated north to the Napa Valley for our wine harvest).

Getting driver support, something we'd hoped we wouldn't wind up being solely responsible for, was indeed one of the issues which proved to be problematical, as was learning curve in general; this was one of major factors in making a move to Linux attractive.

"Wow! Writing software is hard work! Can I have some more beef jerky, please?"

For the record, Cobalt incorporated full file system support from its initial release, as well as including a NAND-optimized version of the LFS file system in v6.1.

Tainted by Magnificent Marty Fouts, no doubt...

[I'm posting this from a friend's "borrowed" computer while visiting an remote site today. When I get back to the office I will exchange the rapier for a machete and end this charade by putting our little Japanophile out of his misery once and for all. Stay tuned...]

Take care, David.

I.M.

"Sensei"

------------------------
Sony CLIE UX100: 128 MB real RAM, OLED screen. All the PDA anyone really ever wanted.
------------------------

The Palm eCONomy = Communism™

The Great Palm Swindle: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7864#108038

NetFrontLinux - the next major cellphone OS?: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=8060#111823

Tell them to post their email addresses and I'll see what I can do. No promises, though. We don't want to impose on the person providing this valuable community service, no do we?

They might even want to get your autograph.

Check your address book. Who signs anything anymore? This is the Digital Age, David.

I'll make it worth your while—whatever sushi you can gesture and grunt at's on me. (Try the fugu, it's to die for.)

If you like fugu, I could send you some of the leftovers for your dining pleasure. I guarantee you'll never taste anything like that again...

>>>Post your email address here...

What, I'm not in your address book?

Nope. Sorry to hurt you like that. Are you now gonna take me off your speed dial, Seinfeld-style? I suppose david.schlesinger@palmsource...com should work, but I'd like to see you BEG for it. Go ahead and BEG for Cobalt, David.

>>>...and I'll see if PalmSource flunkies qualify for the downgrade.

Oh, we'd better: that's our name on the copyright notice.

No doubt your license fees are all paid up, hm? (We're talking a little higher stakes here than cadging one's neighbor's WiFi signal here, by the way. Bring your checkbook--there's a reason I'm willing to sport you the sushi...)

Why would I have a license fee? It's not like I'm installing Cobalt on any devices myself. And what kind of dirtbag piece of sh!t PalmSource engineer would steal a neighbor's Wi-Fi? And be dumb enough to boast about it here at Palminfocenter? Hmmmmm?

Has www.t3cobalt.com been registered yet? I have a feeling it will be a HOT property.

I can't take responsibility for vague statements from unidentified folks.

Wish I could find that old briefing PowerPoint they sent us for the Cobalt 6.1 release. Besides C6.1, it also talks about the 11 Palm OS smartphones to be released in the first quarter of 2005. I can find my other briefing packets, but not the one from Palm for that day. Dang.

In any event, I won't attribute specific statements to people, because I'm working strictly from memory, and I wouldn't want to get it wrong. But I have had it from PalmSource people that the 6.0 release of Cobalt was not in the condition it should have been for a released product, which was one of the reasons for going back and doing the revisions that were done in 2004.

Re: the lack of devices having nothing to do with software, I just find it rather suspicious that for all these devices from different companies, different designs, and different technologies, the two things that they had in common was that they were Cobalt based, and they failed to reach even a certification stage.

For the record, Cobalt incorporated full file system support from its initial release, as well as including a NAND-optimized version of the LFS file system in v6.1.

I think we're talking about two different things. I mean an actual file system, with files and folders, such as is seen on a laptop.

As do I.

Ah yes, Nagel was quite the teller of tall tales. My personal favorite was his long running (ultimately unsubstantiated) claim that PalmSource was sitting on top of 29+ new licensees. All lies of course, but in hindsight it's rather fitting that a vaporware OS should have vaporware licensees as well.

-------------------------------
Editor, http://Pocketfactory.com
Contributing Editor, http://digitalmediathoughts.com

No, I don't make it a point to attempt to attempt reasoned discussions with the demonstrably irrational, sorry. Wipe those flecks of spittle off that keyboard when you get a chance.

Keep running away from responsibility, David. There's always someone else to blame besides you.

>>>Sure. They could have shipped them but they just didn't feel like doing so. Yeah. Right.

As I said, "a variety of reasons I'm not in a position to discuss..." Take it as you like.

A variety of reasons. Like:
- Instability
- Sluggish performance
- Heavy hardware requirements (minimun 400 - 500 MHz CPU)
- Wonky multithreading/problematic memory allocation (crash and BURN, Baby! BURN!)
- Missing telephony (Sprint? Can you hear me? Can you HEAR ME!)
- Lack of drivers (an oft-quoted, "convenient" excuse)
- Lack of raison d'etre (no Cobalt-specific apps -> no need for Cobalt)
- PalmOS 5 (a known quantity) was hackable to near-Cobalt specs (Helloooooooo Tapwave!) without all the Cobalt headaches.
- Loss of confidence in PalmSource. Licensees realized they were being suckered by the old shell game and decided to cut their losses when the delays/excuses started
- Freakish new coding skillset required for Cobalt-specific apps + no serious commercial app coding environment available
- Lack of true multitasking - oops! (You mean multithreading isn't "almost as good"???)
- It was too little too late to compete with the upcoming Windows Mobile 5

and...
- It smelled of Be engineers (the smell of death)

>>>That Oswin phone operated like a pig that had just been pumped full of tequila and Rohypnol (as often happens on Mexican farms during the months that the women have migrated north to the Napa Valley for our wine harvest).

The Oswin phone was not a finished product. And where'd your deep sensitivity for the "easily offended" of "many nationalities" get off to...?

More excuses, David. So Cobalt didn't suck - it was Oswin that sucked instead? Yeah. Right. And I'm deeply sensitive to Mexican pigs. What's your point? Could I perhaps be of Mexican heritage? Get a clue, David.

>>>Tainted by Magnificent Marty Fouts, no doubt...

No, in point of fact, Marty didn't work on that. As usual, your "no doubt"'s are pretty dubious.

That was a joke for Marty, David. He's been quite emphatic about - repeatedly - stating that he had nothing to do with Cobalt; he was hired on (November 2004?) to help you cobble together scavenged code to create PalmLinux.

>>>When I get back to the office I will exchange the rapier for a machete and end this charade by putting our little Japanophile out of his misery once and for all. Stay tuned...

Oh, come on. How many times have we heard that one before, hm?

Ummmmm... never?

Like I keep telling you, wishing doesn't make it so. A better use of your time might be to concentrate on the correct use of the possessive; that makes you look at least as foolish as I do, and at least you can do something about that...

Posting of photos of me won't do it, I assure you, nor will your third-grade commentary, I'm afraid--they just show you up (again!) as a churlish, worthless, pointless and content-free hypocrite with nothing substantive to say, a very dull axe to grind, and too much free time on your hands.

That "dull axe" has quickly reduced YOU to kindling, My Wooden-Syntaxed Friend. Time to burn whatever is left over.

*******************************************************************************

Negel et. al. were bluffing all along:

http://tinyurl.com/cd2qm

*******************************************************************************

http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7394#101438

*******************************************************************************

http://www.palminfocenter.com/comment_view.asp?ID=7166#97721

I can't find the comments where the PalmSource rep finally admitted that PalmOS 6 (Cobalt) was really "not ready for prime time", but they WERE made. Looks like someone from PalmSource asked for the truth to be shredded Ollie North-style...

I.M.

Fawn Hall

"Now I was there before and after Amelio was there, when things were in dire straits. My manager in a team meeting would ask "Common sense, and why is there none at Apple?" When in a rare moment, all of the QA divisions would say thumbs down to shipping the buggy OS, the infamous Dave Nagel would say ship it anyways. The local community college in Cupertino (who dearly love Macs) had actually put a purchase freeze on Macs. I recall Amelio relaying a story about him trying out the new Macs at his desk, and had it crash all the time; he understood there was a serious problem and tried to do something about it, but unfortunately there was Nagel and others. Some engineers' attitudes was the workaround for the bug was to "buy a new computer". Now Nagel is off to Palm to destroy drive that into the ground."

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0887309194/103-5214010-4258252?v=glance&n=283155

Yawn. Still.

That aside, it's becoming clear that you're an honest-to-gosh mental case. You know, as in "you've got some actual, serious, cognitive problems." Seek some help. Hanging around here clearly isn't therapeutic for you.

To: All claimants
Re: Taylor v. Palm (Palm m100, 105, 125 litigation)

I am writing to update you regarding the settlement proceedings. As you know, this litigation was brought in connection with data loss in Palm m100 series PDA's (upon battery replacement). The case was settled successfully on November 18, 2006. The settlement allows owners of defective PDAs to receive a replacement unit (refurbished or new, depending on Palm's inventory) of equal or greater value. We beleive this is a fantastic recovery that has real value. To receive a replacement unit, claimants must use the "Final Claim Form" found on the taylorsettlement.com web site. The deadline was originally in February 2006. The NEW deadline is July 16, 2006. All claim forms are to be sent to:

Taylor Settlement
P.O. BOX 1120
Grand Rapids, MN 55745-1120

Please note, claim forms should NOT be sent to our office. Palm, Inc. is administrating claims out of Minnesota, and this Minnesota office must receive the claim forms!!!

I understand that many claimants sent in their claim form months ago. Please do not feel as though you have been forgotten. A national claims process takes some time to get up and running. Palm assures us they are working hard to prepare the administration of claims, and that claimants who have submitted a claim form will soon be contacted.

At this point in time, our office has not been made aware of which claim forms have been received by Palm. I apologize, but we are unable to investigate on your behalf. My only suggestion to those who are concerned their paperwork was lost is to send a second claim form (a copy) via certified mail with a note explaining its purpose.

Thank you for patience in this matter. I firmly believe you will be happy with the result. And certainly, if you have a consumer issue like this in the future, we would be happy to investigate.

Very truly yours,

Christopher W. Taylor

===========================================
===========================================

Roger K.
Cheap Domains to the People!www.GimmeMyDomains.com