![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Comments on: Sakoman Returns to AppleSteve Sakoman, the former Chief Products Officer for PalmSource, has returned to his former employer, Apple Computer, as a vice president. Sakoman recently left PalmSource amid the last round of job cuts.
Detailed Comment View (6 Total Comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments. RE: Might as well be now if ever
Being PalmInfoCenter.com, we'll hope for a PalmOS PdaPod. That would be scary -- a PDA with a built in hard drive. I think the iPod proves that it can be done under $500 (a reasonable amount for a PDA - no offense Sony fans). RE: Might as well be now if evergfunkmagic @ 3/6/2003 3:33:46 PM #
Although this is probably bogus, there were rumors over at cliesource a while ago about something called the NX70vx that supposedly had a 5 GB HD. http://makeashorterlink.com/?W1B6246B3 I would be pretty skeptical about it though... RE: Might as well be now if ever
Yea, a iPalmPod (I'd really like them to call it the iNewton, but that'll happen about the time Jobs asks me to takeover Pixar), running OS5 with 5/10/20/30 gigs of memory would be real neet. Given Apple's penchant for design, it would have a great screen and form factor. Unfortunately, given Apple's penchant for "not invented here", I'd be real surprised if they went with PalmOS. It makes sense for tehm to use PalmOS - it already links with the Mac, is robust, small and modifiable (Apple could develop their own iPalmPod finder as a front end); which they could use to extend into tablets as well. Of course, they could just want a smart enhineer to work on the mac. RE: Might as well be now if ever
"Unfortunately, given Apple's penchant for "not invented here", I'd be real surprised if they went with PalmOS."
Actually, Apple didn't develop any of the internals of the iPod. Essentially, they came up with the design and outsourced all the work for the embedded OS (Pixo), firmware, DSP, etc. In the case of the iPod, I think they realized that by outsourcing as much work as possible, they were able to bring a final product to market much quicker than if they had built it entirely on their own.
RhinoSteve @ 3/6/2003 4:20:28 PM #
Guess the few weeks of testing the VC waters was that bad and he couldn't get the $10,000,000 he wanted to the latest and greatest trendy start-up. Sigh.
Welcome home Steve!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() Special Deals
|
With the storage space afforded by even a 5gig iPod hard drive, it would make all of the squabbles over MemoryStick Pros vs. SD cards a relatively moot point. Apple could stick in a small 2 or 1gig HD into a PdaPod (my name for it) and still be vastly ahead of the competition in terms of storage space. Of course, lack of firewire in most PCs would still be an issue, but Apple could always bundle a cheap 2-port PCI card in the box...
I have long wondered why Apple didn't attempt to at least stick a toe into the consumer digital camera market after having more or less launched it many moons ago but with the competition so cutthroat, it's easy to see why they'd rather focus on a feature-laden PDA instead. Hmm.....