MobileInfocenter

Comments on: Palm Easily Retains Lead in Worldwide PDA Shipments

According to a report from Gartner Dataquest, Palm and the Palm OS easily maintained its lead over its rivals in units sold last quarter. In a move reminiscent of Palm's pre-announcement of the m500 series, buyers waiting for Pocket PC 2002 cut that OS's already weak share of the market almost in half.

Palm Inc. had 29.7% of worldwide PDA sales with 745 thousand units sold during the third quarter of 2001. That's a slight drop from its 31.7% in Q2. In the U.S., Palm had 38%, down from 40%

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (62 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

Goodbye PocketPC!

I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 11:16:49 AM #
Ha! Looks like the recession will kill PocketPC in the consumer market. It will be relegated to an IT tool/toy.

Better luck next time, Microsoft! =)

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 11:37:12 AM #
I agree. Who would want to spend an extra $100-$200 bucks for something that a Palm can do?? Especially corporations that are laying off people.

Microsoft, Compaq, HP and others, if you are listening, multimedia functions are NOT necessary in a business environment. If you continue to make products that can play movies and music well and yet, crash and lose important data as well as make it difficult to access this data, then your market share will dwindle. Especially if you continue to charge 600-800 bucks.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 12:17:53 PM #
Yeah! I agree 100%. There´s no sense for a businessman to carry an AC adapter together with the PDA. 8 hours of battery life with short usage is not convenient.

Better luck with the XBox! ;)

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 12:29:54 PM #
I don't think PocketPC will die.
I believe there are many people "waiting" for PPC2002.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 2:22:42 PM #
Speculation

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 3:32:16 PM #
For the record, have you tried a pocket PC? The crashing part is just bull... My Visor crashed more often than my iPaq... I don't think you're basing these comment on real-life experience. Prove me wrong! ;)

As for the 8 hours battery life that's another myth. Don't forget that it's 8 hours of *continual* use. My Visor on very good rechargeable batteries lasted me about 5-6 days of usage, my iPaq about 2 days. It's not as horrible as you say...

Oh and by the way, have you seen that all the PalmOS machines that are becoming the more populars are the one that are adding more functions like the pocket pc? mp3 player, color screen, movie playing, expansion slots... you find some of these in the Palm m505, Sony Clié, Handera 330.

And for the record, my brand new iPaq cost more than 100$can less than a Palm m505...

Sorry for the long post...

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 3:36:49 PM #
Give me a break, people! I am a Palm user and respect the Pocket PC PDA's. In the hardware arena, the PPC machines BLOW away all the palms. Enough with the MS bashing. I think without the PPC, Palm would not have gone to color sooner as expected. Competition is good for the industry. I am a proud owner of the Clie 760C.

Cheers!

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 3:37:41 PM #
I agree Multimedia is not needed in the business enviroment...But than why is Palm shifting in this direction after years of complaining like a little girl that it's not needed? Why the MP3 add ons? Why the more colored screens? If the Palms can already do it all, and the Palms have been virtually unchanged in the last 4 and half years, why the big threat from MS and the move to the new ARM processor, OS 5 even after OS 4 isn't even a year old, and the desperet attempted to buy a dead company called BE to try and get some new light and function in a Palm OS which HP could already have done in some of their higher end calculators?

Now don't look to me as the bad guy here... I am just pointing out the obvious. What the Palm community doesn't want to look at is costing them. Every single Palm unit you see now and all the money and accessories and software you have now and invested in your palm will be a waste when the new Palm arm processors hit the market. Tht too me sounds like starting over. I am more worried about Palm than I am about PPCs. Palm has made themslevs looke like the biggest @$$ to the world with the market share dropping to just over 2 bucks, loosing a deal with a company they were about to purchase cause there stocks weren't worth a pile of S**t when the deals was suppose to go through, There new complex, having to back out cause they had no more money, and grossly over pile of invetory for a product that was no longer in high demand, the m505...(need I say more to the disappointment?) Their compettors making new innovation while they are wasting their time attacking their own customers for using the word PALM in their websites. It's Palm that looks like they don't know what they are doing. Like they are making up the business plan each dayas they wake up or as they go along.

I wouldn't get too excited about palm's lead. It's only nature for people to hold off buying a product when a new one is about to be released. So for MS it is expected. BUT WHAT has Palms excuse been for the LAST YEAR??????

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 3:45:23 PM #
"Oh and by the way, have you seen that all the PalmOS machines that are becoming the more populars are the one that are adding more functions like the pocket pc? mp3 player, color screen, movie playing, expansion slots... you find some of these in the Palm m505, Sony Clié, Handera 330."

Yeah, and they are, at least, $100.00 cheaper...for example:

A Clie N760C with 64MB Stick is $550. An 64 MB Ipaq 3870 is $659.00 or more. The whole point is why keep charging 20% more than the competition when, as of recently, the competitions product is doing what you can do?

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 3:54:00 PM #
"Palm has made themslevs looke like the biggest @$$ to the world with the market share dropping to just over 2 bucks, loosing a deal with a company they were about to purchase cause there stocks weren't worth a pile of S**t when the deals was suppose to go through"

Let me tell you something. If Microsoft only made profits off of PocketPC products, they would have gone out of business a long time ago. I can almost bet that they are losing money on PPC. They are STILL not outselling Palm in the PDA market and Palm is at, as you say, $2.00 a share. MSFT has the cash from their slew of other products to keep throwing money into PPC. Now, in saying that, drop the nonsense and understand that MSFT has no idea what everybody wants in a PDA and how to get it to them cheap.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:11:35 PM #
Sorry guys, but Palm and Sony are not following the steps of PPC. In expansion they are following HandEra and Handspring, the same with colour. Palm and Sony had 65000 colors before PPC, and remember that the first was the Prism. mp3 was an expansion option which was pretty succesfull on the Visor platform. Sony is a big in portable music. Now remember too: the number two PDA seller is Handspring, not Compaq, not HP, not Casio. All of these combined don´t match Hansdspring!

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:51:26 PM #
Microsoft doesn't have to make money out of PPC (or at least not yet). They have many money making sources. What they are doing is trying to gain as much market share as possible at the moment. Therotically if their market share gains to a point that we all depends on it, that's the time Microsoft will make money out of us. So Microsoft is pathing *the future* of PPC and does not want to suck your money right now.

By the way, I love and hate Microsoft.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 5:11:40 PM #
"Yeah, and they are, at least, $100.00 cheaper...for example:"

Well that's not what i'm seeing. I see the iPaq 3635 at 550$can, the Casio e-125 at 500$, etc... The new HP and iPaq are at 900$can to 1000$can (for 64meg). The Palm m505 is 700$can and the Sony clié is 800$!

"A Clie N760C with 64MB Stick is $550. An 64 MB Ipaq 3870 is $659.00 or more. The whole point is why keep charging 20% more than the competition when, as of recently, the competitions product is doing what you can do?"

Well i think you could not have taken a worse comparison between 2 products. The clie comes with 8meg of ram while the Ipaq has 64meg. Take a 32meg 3635 ipaq and buy a 32meg SD card and look at the price. The worse in this is that you took the 3870 price... the one with integrated Bluetooth!

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
Raishe_werk @ 11/5/2001 5:25:03 PM #
i am actually looking into new iPAC. the main reason in readily available 802.11 support. plus color, plus multimedia. sure it may crash, and the battery life may suck, but its all a price to pay. palm has just continued to dissapoint me time after time. i am not say 'palm sux, and ppc rewlz'. right now i just feel an iPAQ will be a better fit for my needs. keep up the good work Ed, and i will always be a palm user at heart

-Raishe
"Monster Pig eats Jesus
More at 11"
RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
Raishe_werk @ 11/5/2001 5:27:58 PM #
d@mn, i can't spell. sorry

-Raishe
"Monster Pig eats Jesus
More at 11"
RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 7:26:30 PM #
Comparing PPC ram size to Palm OS ram unit for unit is the work of rookies. For the record, you can get 7 times more memory in an IPAQ (64mb) than a Palm (8mb) and still run out of memory on eqivalent software before the small ram Palm. The PPC's are ram hogs!!! I know I own BOTH. Just because it has a big head doesn't mean it has much in it.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 8:20:00 PM #
Prime example...Let history guide you poor souls...

Internet Explorer vs. Netscape Navigator

EVERYONE bashed IE when it came out. Now...Netscape is out. That's why Palm is shaking in their boots. Granted they are still the market leader but their profit margins are sooo low (along with their stock price) due to the price wars. Granted I'm a Palm user (Clie 760), I foresee th PPC to dominate maybe not now but later on.

MS has the deep pockets to ride the PDA roller coaster. I hope that Palm make it but I'm not tryin to deny the inevitable. I hope I'm wrong...

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 9:59:09 PM #
People have use this examples before and before, which is

Netscape vs. I.E.

I.E. wins because it is illegally bundled into Windows 98. Also, it wins because it is FREE.

Who is going to buy a version of I.E. if it charges you $30? (Hmm. Yeah the service packs should be free.)

Now, Pocket PCs are even more expensive than Palm handhelds. Who is expecting Pocket PCs to win?

What M$ should do is to give out free Pocket PCs in Christmas so that it can regain some market share. After the battery life is used up, it can be thrown like snowballs because it is as goog as bricks.

Don't! That hurts! :-p

Commitment of software developers is the key......
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 10:08:08 PM #
to whether palm will survive.

Some years ago a company called Microsoft "got" an idea to use GUI for its windows software, but then they crash so much people don't want to use it. But then they stuck with MS windows because they have a kick-butt software called MS office, which is always a version faster than the Mac counterpart...

Though there are many reason which I won't discuss why Mac is where it is right now, the point I was trying to make is that - if Palm has many dedicated developers with customised software available that stretches Palm OS's limits, Palm should be able to continue its dominance in the PDA market. Microsoft has to fight battles in many fronts (XBOX), there might not be enough resources to catapult the PPC.

But Palm, don't seat on your success, innovate more and innovate often.......;->

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
popko @ 11/5/2001 10:25:50 PM #
humm ... so people don't buy PPC coz they are waitting for PocketPC 2002 ... and so Palm sales is down coz people are waitting for OS5 ??

I for one will hold on to my Visor and start saving money while the battle of PocketPC vs PalmOS goes on.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 10:28:49 PM #
> Every single Palm unit you see now and all the money
> and accessories and software you have now and invested
> in your palm will be a waste when the new Palm arm
> processors hit the market.

This is just not true. OS 5 will run all current Palm applications. All handhelds from Palm will use the Universal Connector (from the m500 series and m125) for at least the next 2 years.

Ignore this troll's FUD!!

Please, let me laugh at you.
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 12:05:11 AM #
>This is just not true. OS 5 will run all current >Palm applications. All handhelds from Palm will use >the Universal Connector (from the m500 series and >m125) for at least the next 2 years.
>
>Ignore this troll's FUD!!

To the Troll..

OS 5 is VAPORWARE. Don't tell me what OS 5 WHISHES to have when Palm is still trying to buy BE to help them get their heads out of their @$$'es in trying to make their OS with more multimedia functions.. Besides.... HOW MANY DEVELOPERS do you know still write software for Windows 95?????? Maybe a few..but hardly anyone.. Even though most of all Apps for Win 95 will still run on WinXP hardly anyone is still writing just for Win95. The same will hold true with the new OS 5. IF Palm had the talent and ability to make their new OS backwards compatible (Ha..good luck) What makes you think people will keep writing apps that will only run on the old technology of Palm? Hence..

EVERYTHING YOU SEE NOW for Palm will be of no use... And you will windup having to buy new stuff..ALL OVER AGAIN.

BESIDES..Here is something to think about. HOW LONG Do you think the new Palms if and when they ever come out with the new OS, and new Arm processors running at 206 or 412 mhz will last with a color screen? You actually think it will get any better time than any PPCs now?? U think you will be able to use 2 AAA batteries? I will give you a hint. The Palm IIIc get's worse battery time than any PPC out there with a slower processor and smaller display. I'd say Palm users are the ones who look foolish for barking and complaining when their own devices can't even compare.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 12:44:01 AM #
"Comparing PPC ram size to Palm OS ram unit for unit is the work of rookies. For the record, you can get 7 times more memory in an IPAQ (64mb) than a Palm (8mb) and still run out of memory on eqivalent software before the small ram Palm. The PPC's are ram hogs!!! I know I own BOTH. Just because it has a big head doesn't mean it has much in it."

That's not really the point... i'm saying that now, with the PPC2002, the PPC2000 devices are cheaper than the top of the line Palm OS machines. The previous comparison between a Clie and a 3870 iPaq isn't really fair.

How much ram in a pocket pc is supposed to be equal to the 8meg of ram of a Palm machine? Don't forget that you do more with the PPC than a Palm. Running multiple programs at the same time, running videos, running a newsreader with over 1000-2000 messages, etc... sure that consume lots of ram but try that with a Palm!

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
Altema @ 11/6/2001 8:07:37 AM #
You know you are in the middle of a flame war when only two people dare put their names on their posts. Anyways, just for the sake of accuracy (perhaps they were typos?):

Battery Life - The Palm IIIc has a continual runtime of up to 16 hours on a single charge. In the real world of cranking up the brightness to impress onlookers, you get 12 to 14 hours. The iPaq will run 3.5 hours with the sidelights turned down to a moderate level, knock that time down to 2.5 if you turn the sidelights up. This is not a problem unless you are traveling, or put more than 3 hours of use on your device a day. For travel, there ARE travel chargers for most handhelds, but to tell the truth I only used mine once on my former IIIc just to see if it worked.

Memory - I have a 72Mb Palm with no "helper apps" to run things from the card, so forget about the 8Mb glass ceiling for Palms, it no longer exists.

Multimedia - Don't know where the idea came from that Palms cannot do multimedia... I have about a dozen media clips, trailers, and music videos. Yes, that's with sound.

Multi tasking - I've never seen anyone on a PPC actually USE more than one app on the screen. The other apps may be open, but they are covered up while the user is doing something else. The ability to do is good, but I don't see it in the real world being used a lot. It DOES serve some purpose, as I don't know what I'd do if I could not access my notepad, address book, and others while in the middle of a telnet session or something. The argument of saving time by not closing the app does not stand, how much faster than "instant" do you want?

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
Altema @ 11/6/2001 10:05:34 AM #
One last comment (had to logoff to do some work), I don't think the PPC will die or go away. The current lull probably is due to folks waiting for the new version. However, I also don't think that PPC2002 will take over the handheld market with any great dominance unless it has totally new software which would render every former PPC obsolete.

Of course we have to look at the big picture: Everyone with a handheld... take a look at it. It does not matter if it is a PPC with more processing than a mini mainframe, or if it is a Palm OS device running full multimedia, 45 applications, and half a gig of memory. Every one of them will be obsolete in 2 years. So enjoy the device you prefer... if it does what you want, then you have the correct device.

Goodbye Mr. Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 10:25:51 AM #
> OS 5 is VAPORWARE.

You've stopped listening to facts that don't agree with what you've already made up your mind about so I'm going to stop talking to you with one final statement: Palm showed off OS 5 almost a year ago running current Palm apps on an ARM-based processor. So you are totally wrong about that. You totally ignored me when I said Palm would be using the Universal Connector for another couple of years because that wasn't what you wanted to hear. So your statement that all peripherals would have to be replaced wasn't just wrong, it is now a lie because you know that's not true. When you start having to support your arguments with lies, you lose.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 5:04:37 PM #
"Multi tasking - I've never seen anyone on a PPC actually USE more than one app on the screen. The other apps may be open, but they are covered up while the user is doing something else. The ability to do is good, but I don't see it in the real world being used a lot. It DOES serve some purpose, as I don't know what I'd do if I could not access my notepad, address book, and others while in the middle of a telnet session or something. The argument of saving time by not closing the app does not stand, how much faster than "instant" do you want?"

And suppose that by closing your telnet client and switching to notepad you loose the connection? not very good...

Hmmmm, i suppose someone listening to an mp3, while having MSN messenger to chat and surfing the web will not be used in the real world?

The other thing you are missing, it's not really the time saved (as you say, on the Palm it's instant) but it's the fact that the apps is still running in the background. While my very big list of newsgroups is loading, i can look at my appointments of the week, etc... (and BTW don't tell me that a Palm would have opened these newsgroups faster... it's false, i know, i had one).

Multitasking has it's use!

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 5:21:46 PM #
"humm ... so people don't buy PPC coz they are waitting for PocketPC 2002 ... and so Palm sales is down coz people are waitting for OS5 ??"

Well i think there is a difference. The PPC2002 devices have been announced for a while now while the OS5 devices are nowhere to be seen... (if you know where we could see them, give me a link, i would be interested). That's normal than people are waiting for the new PPC2002 machines.

Just look at Palm when they announced too soon their m505.

I think the christmas season will be the real test...

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
Lefty @ 11/6/2001 5:48:24 PM #
> Hmmmm, i suppose someone listening to an mp3, while having MSN messenger to chat and surfing the web will not be used in the real world?

I listen to mp3s and surf the Web all the time on my N760C.

RE: Goodbye PocketPC!
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/7/2001 4:08:49 PM #
"I listen to mp3s and surf the Web all the time on my N760C."

Exactly my point, multitasking has its use. The only difference is that your Clié is able to do that because they built a mp3 player into their PDA.

Palm outsells Compaq four to one...
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/7/2001 7:24:46 PM #
Remember all the article crowing about how Compaq was now Number 1 in revenue three months ago? In the 3rd quarter, Compaq generated $83m from 185,000 shipments while Palm was way ahead with $200m from 754,000 shipments. So why weren't there dozens of article about how Palm is now number one again? Tech publications are biased towards Micro$oft, that's why.

Sony

I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 11:44:21 AM #
Any numbers on my personal favorite Sony? :)

RE: Sony
Coyote67 @ 11/5/2001 3:34:58 PM #
if they didn't mention it, most likely its too small to make a difference, i.e. handera


---------------------------------------
When you find yourself in the company of a halfling and an ill-tempered Dragon, remember, you do not have to outrun the Dragon...you just have to outrun the halfling.

RE: Sony
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 5:48:07 PM #
These are worldwide figures so it'll be low, BUT, for the usa, and just the PalmOS market, Sony holds 10%.

and just recently in a cnet news article the Clie S320 is number 3 in retail sales.

RE: Sony
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 8:55:38 PM #
Sony's still a bit late for this report.....i'm sure, for the reports in the coming quarters........everyone would be driven away.

Price

I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:00:19 PM #
It all comes down to price and function.

With M10X series below $200, Palm sells because it works and it's cheap.

If you've got a big budget to blow before year end and a requirement to limit yourself to a M$ platform, by all means get a PPC.

I'd rather get tools in the hands of those who need it as opposed to having it look cool (wow it's windows) and be politically correct to the folks paid off by M$.

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:06:16 PM #
You're a jerk.

PPC is great!

Palm is crap.

They're toys, not real computing tools.

They have no corporate support either!

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:17:10 PM #
"They're toys, not real computing tools."

You are talking about PPC, aren´t you? They crash and eat your batteries (8 hours at most), weigh double than a m505, need an extra sleeve for expansion, etc. (I forgot that you need a bigger shirt pocket...)

Corporate support?
Maybe you don´t know how to surf the web or use Google, I won´t teach you, but there are lots of corporate solutions for PalmOS, and support from Palm inc. is more than adequate. (You don´t need technical support because they are easy to use, two taps and you are on the soft you want, and they work and don´t crash).



RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:20:04 PM #
Nonsense,

Palm is heavily used in the corporate arena. It's a tool (just like ppc), not a toy.

I'm not playing favorites here. They both have their own following for their own reasons. Me, I'm a palm person, but that's me.

Isn't there a ppc forum for you to hang out at... You jerk!

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 4:22:59 PM #
Another question:

Isn´t Palm Infocenter a center for Palm related information? Why is PPC people always here bashing Sony, HandEra, IBM, Handspring, Palm, etc.?

Don´t they have a specialized site to explore and know about the new marvels of MS?

I know there are some inteligent guys who make really impressive software for that platform and some accesories too, so I think that there must be something interesting to discuss out there...

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 5:00:37 PM #
Why does everyone hate Microsoft so much? I agree that Microsoft prices his software way too high, but isn't he also bringing the computer more user-friendly to us? I hate the idea that Palm is better than PPC because PPC is made by Microsoft. This doesn't make sense, not even common sense, at all.

First of all, if you want to compare, you *have to* try and experience with both of the products first. So many of you are saying that PPC has a short battery of life when compared to PalmOS, but have you tried and proved this before? You believe because this is what you heard. And so many of you is saying that PalmOS can also play a main part in corporate market? But have you noticed that not many company is investing PalmOS extensions into the corporate market because it is going to be a large investment?

It's a good thing to have opinion, but you shouldn't trash another product simply because it's made by the company you don't like. (by the way, do you know those guys who invented PalmOS is now HangSpring? wouldn't you say HangSpring sucks now?)

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 6:04:51 PM #
I sell Palm and iPaq. Our firm sell hardware and develop custom software solutions for Palm and PPC. I confess that for the developers, PPC is an easier platform. But we test both machines together and the Palm crashes much less, and the battery life is 3 days while the iPaq last some hours. 802.11 is not embedded on the iPaq. I believe they will. The same with Bluetooth. Both features are external (not on the m505 yet but available on Handspring or on the Vx).

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 6:13:20 PM #
I just need to share this with some of the Palm OS users here.

I have been a Visor user for some times. And I need to shed some FACTUAL truths to all of you.

My Visor crashed more often than ever any PPC has ever. Now my Visor didn't crash often, but it did crash on the average of 2 or 3 times a month. Loading new software, trail versions, over clocking, and so on.

I have also been using a PPC for a while for reasons that are so obvious that more than of Palm community refuses to see. That being said, My PPC has never crashed.. this on top of trying the latest cutting edge beta software, and with a hacked up version of PPC2002 OS. I have been using the PPC heavliy for over 7 months and with both OSes I have never had problems..

So please lets stop using the "Oh MS crashes" issue... cause it's old, and not true. PPC do cost a lot more... I will admit.. But take any Palm os device and out fit it so it can do half as much as any of the latest PPCs, memory, mp3 if even you wanted too, and you would of spend way more than any PPC would of cost

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 6:21:38 PM #
Ughh.

The Palm is not crap. It's a great, mature platform with a dedicated and committed user base.

It has terrific corporate support. You'd be amazed at how many Palm OS handhelds have been bought by corporations for their employees. Vertical apps are there too - look at Symbol.

Palm and Handspring (not Hang-spring) should be thanked for getting the units down in price so everyone can afford one. You don't see a PPC for $100. True, it's not color and doesn't have all the bells and whistles, but it still performs the core functions. If you want the extra features or functions, spend more money or add the software or peripheral later.

Microsoft is in this market because Bill Gates wants to have influence over it and ultimately control it like Windows.

Have you looked at PPC 2002? It's cool. It has nifty watermarks on the screen. And the power of Microsoft behind it.

I remember many years ago, the logic was to purchase IBM products "because no one was ever fired by buying IBM". Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer rely on a similar thinking - no one is ever fired by buying Microsoft.

So, look beyond big brother's safe "PPC" choice. Support the Palm platform in both the home and corporate environments.

RE: Price
DAK @ 11/5/2001 7:03:18 PM #
The Palm device meets my business needs. I don't need buy the extra stuff.

By the way I work in a large Healthcare company and Palm OS and Palm are our national standard. PPC's are not even on a draft standard waiting for review.

So........ I guess it depends on what need. The only PPC's I have seen here are by the Desktop support staff who brought them from home.

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 7:24:42 PM #
I drive a Chevy, you drive a Ford.

I get there just like you, only the car looks different.

Chew on that.

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 7:30:33 PM #
Yes, but the whole idea behind WinCE is to take a bloated desktop OS and shoehorn it into a handheld. That's kinda like putting a truck engine into a Ferrari. Something is to chew over.

RE: Price
CKMOOSE @ 11/5/2001 8:22:28 PM #
Palm OS et.al. sells a LOT more than PPC. The larger part of population of the world who use handhelds prefer it. So, no matter what you say, it has more support, software and hardware solutions. And that's just fact. But so what?

Both Palm and PPC as well as any other handheld is just that, a handheld. It's not a way of life. It's a tool. Some people like to use power tools some people like had tools, some even like antique tools. Guess what. They all work for the people using them.

All this name calling and anger over a plastic and metal device is silly and slightly sad. Enjoy whatever tool you have chosen and be happy.

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 9:00:54 PM #
Notice that Apple is still doing business. Compitition, stimulates growth. But competition does not in and of itself
require one ultimate winner. This is the glass ceiling that drives our media and the people responding to this post.
I would worry much more about a different operating system encroaching on palm and PPc's market much more than
either ultimatly getting it all. The science of handheld ergonomics, personal information efficency and user connectivity
is still in it's infancy. The Plam OS is super. Lets use this board to explore its pros and cons and leave those of the PPC OS
up to it's users.

George

Speak softly and carry a big memory stick.

Pocket PC users
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 9:50:23 PM #
Pocket PC fans here come out and say my thing does not crash.

What site am I surfing? Hm... It is PALMinfocenter.com

I think I am surfing the wrong site here. It would be PocketPCinfocenter.com

Anyways, for some of the true Pocket PC fans, no matter how you defend your product. Just admit that Pocket PC is unreliable as Firestone tires on Explorer. Your Explorer will not crash does not mean that other Explorers will not crash. Understand?

If there is a NHTSA for cars, there should be something similar for PDAs. It will recalls all Pocket PCs that have problems. It will rank Pocket PCs two stars for frontal crash test and marginal on rollover.

Where is your friend, Gartner Dataqest? It is famous for biased number towards M$.

P.S. Give me $600 bucks and perhaps I will buy a Pocket PC. Indeed, I will buy a Palm m505 and save the extra $200 for some cool shirts that can fit my Palm m505. By the way, I owned a Palm m505 already. So, what should I do? Should I hang out PocketPCinfocenter.com? Am I lost? Don't... :-p

Wrong Info......
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/5/2001 10:19:11 PM #
"Why does everyone hate Microsoft so much? I agree that Microsoft prices his software way too high, but isn't he also bringing the computer more user-friendly to us? I hate the idea that Palm is better than PPC because PPC is made by Microsoft. This doesn't make sense, not even common sense, at all."

For the record, Apple was the first easy-to-use computer that implemented GUI. Windows did crash very often when version 3.0 came out, while Macs are already very stable.

PPC is simply to bulky (hard and soft) for people to use, period



RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 12:28:37 AM #
You know.. for some people it is very difficult for them to write their names.

It's amazing what a little bit of schooling, learning, and education can do. I'd say most Palm users could learn a PPC or any other platform if they would stop complaining and actually tried to learn something much like a kindergarden can do. Just maybe more Palm users whether they switched or over or not would find more use for their PDAs, than besides a coaster..and maybe people will actually carrier ther PDAs with them.

RE: Price
CKMOOSE @ 11/6/2001 2:10:08 AM #
OK... The above post makes no sense.
It starts out commenting on a lack of education. But, it is comprised of run-on sentences that change points in the middle.
The post ultimately makes no point at all.
I'm not surprised that it was posted anonymously.

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 9:48:50 AM #
Do you want to know why we hate Microsoft? We are tired of their "innovation". They COPY ideas, dump a lot of money into them from their Windows profits and hope they kill the competition in the process. You see, they innovated Windows...wait, Apple was there first. The innovated the PDA...wait Palm was there first. Its like you have this person that is around you 24/7 and you just want them to dissappear. We need a break from Microsoft and Palm is fitting the bill very well.

RE: Price
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 6:30:04 PM #
POCKET PC

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

PALM OS


End the discussion.
We all like what we like.
We solved nothing.
It will eventually be solved it in the marketplace.
I don't care if yours/mine is bigger/better/stronger/weaker/lousy/smaller than mine/yours.
Let's move on.
Thank you.
Have a nice day, kids.



Palm is doomed... or not

I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 11:19:06 AM #
ummmm... well no one has said it yet.. and ummm oh... it seem that on the base of one quarter's information, Pocket PC is doomed too.

Long live Nokia... hmm nope they are only doing well in Europe...

It looks like we are all doomed... except perhaps those cunning people that saw the end of the handheld revolution and bought into paper and pencils

Serious point here... don't write off any brand/OS on the basis of one or two quarters' information. This business is cyclicle. Consumers are generally pretty savvy and know what is on the way from various companies so quarterly figures are very heavily influenced by rumour of impending products.

Carts and horses

I.M. Anonymous @ 11/6/2001 9:19:14 PM #
Well, yet again, Gartner have not failed to put their best pro-M$ spin into their report.

It is not the case that PocketPC sales are down because of the announcement of the PocketPC2002. Quite the reverse.

Companies like HP and Compaq are going through a tough time in their core businesses at the moment. On top of that, in the handheld market (which for them is a sideshow), they see their market share declining consistently and they find themselves having to reduce their prices to stay in the game. This is not good. In fact, at a time when they have more than enough on their hands just to keep their main businesses afloat, they are becoming less and less willing to devote time and money to the handheld market. And let's not make any mistake, saddled with the WinCE/PocketPC, this market was never going to be a goldmine for them. Their commitment to Uncle Bill's folly is now shaky (at best).

To put it bluntly, the reason why PocketPC2002 was announced so early is that certain M$ executives were forced into it, so that they could point to something in the future which they can sell to the manufacturers a "light at the end of the tunnel". The early announcement was just an attempt to prevent a mutiny, to try to keep some of the manufacturers in the game. M$ simply cannot afford too many more situations like what occurred when Phillips dumped WinCE a couple of years back.

So, you see, the annnoucement was made because of poor sales; the annoucement was not, as Gartner say, the cause of this unacceptable result.

Another consideration is that Redmond is not exactly united when it comes to support for PocketPC. It has now gone well past the stage of quiet whispers in the corridors. Questions are being asked, openly, about the viability of PocketPC. The beancounters are sharpening their knives. Unless there is a turnaround soon, the pressure will build until there is only one alternative left.

There is a very real prospect that PocketPC2002 will be axed early next year.

RE: Carts and horses
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/7/2001 1:36:50 AM #
Get serious. Let's see now:

Palm is probably going to announce "a major restructuring" (last step before declaring bankruptcy) soon after Christmas.

Handspring is withering on the vine. (If their Treo fails - and it will once Sony enters the wireless game - they will follow Palm in filing Chapter 11.

HandEra has fallen on hard times (despite what their three shrill supporters on this site keep saying) after gambling and reinventing itself as a PDA company. I wonder why Sam's Club dumped them so quickly... Who else is selling HandEras?

Sony is rapidly expanding its sales and will probably sqeeeze everyone else out by undercutting prices and providing better hardware. Once Palm's hardware sales nosedive this quarter, expect Sony the White Knight to swoop in.

RE: Carts and horses
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/7/2001 8:22:18 AM #
If HP ported the PalmOS, that would really be the end for Palm/Handspring/Handera. Imagine HP engineering with the PalmOS! That would be something. The sooner they drop the PPC millstone, the better.


Goodbye Palm

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/2/2001 12:00:05 PM #
Goodbye ugly green screens: R.I.P. Guess what, I'd better spend a few hundred bucks more on something that actually works and that hundred bucks will go to smarter guys at Microsoft, Compaq, HP or others. Guess what, they do a better job, and don't just lay off people like Palm recently did...

RE: Goodbye Compaq and HP
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/2/2001 4:32:06 PM #
Totally false arguement. As part of their merger, both HP and Compaq will be laying off tens of thousands. Expect either the Jornada or the iPaq to go away completely. Why should one company make two different lines of handhelds?

Besides, you've never owned a Palm in your life. You've had a WinCE since 97 and never even tried a Palm. Billy Gates told you it was bad and you believe everything it says. Begone, Microserf.

RE: Goodbye Palm
I.M. Anonymous @ 1/22/2002 9:03:18 PM #
Actually, both HP and Compact have laid off before the merger. HP has laid off 6,000 and Compact has laid off several
thousand as well. The merger is estimated to bring addtional layoffs/attrition of 15,000.

Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: