Comments on: Rumor: Details on Upcoming HandEra Device

According to PalmQ Online, a Russian site, someone who is testing a pre-release version of a new color model from HandEra was willing to leak some details. According to this source, it will have a 240 by 320 pixel screen. This TFT display will be backlit and will be capable of displaying 64 thousand colors.

It will run Palm OS 4.1, have 8 MB of RAM, and 4 MB of flash ROM. It will use a 33 MHz Motorola Dragonball processor.

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (101 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:19:34 PM #
I guess competition is good because consumers benefit. Ed, if possible please make a head-to-head comparison and evaluation with Handera and Sony NR70

Thanks in advance!

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
Davy @ 4/4/2002 1:23:43 PM #
Screen Res: Sony 320x480, Handera 240x320.

Color Depth: Both 65k

Processor: 66mhz Sony, 33mhz Handera

Ram/Rom: Handera 8 megs ram, 4 megs Rom. Sony 16 megs ram, 8 megs rom.

Size: Handera: 4.75 by 3.2 by .7 inches, which is slightly thicker than a 330. It will weigh 5.65 ounces. Sony 5.4 by 2.8 by .65 inches. It weighs 7 ounces.

Extras: Sony mp3 playing, Camera, Keyboard, unit is it's own case (+$100), Jog Dial, Memory Stick Slot. Handera: It has a jog wheel and, of course, still has a Compact Flash slot and an SD/MMC one. It uses the HotSync port from the Palm III series, so current 330 owners can

Price: Handera: $450, sony $500 or $600 w/camera.

A equally matched contender? Hardly. But, the new Handera will have some buyers who don't want the Sony Multimedia wunderkind.

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:48:52 PM #
One advantage of Sony's hi-res and virtual graffiti is that it is more compatible with old apps. As long as hi-res assist is turned off for old apps, simple pixel doubling makes everything look exactly as it does on a 160x160 screen. With HandEra, the 240x240 main screen means that older apps have to be either shown in a smaller 160x160 section of the screen or 'scaled to fit' which can cause compatability issues. Both require applications to be modified in order to take advantage of the extra screen space when you minimize/hide the virtual graffiti. Plus, the higher resolution of sony's screen means better images/graphics and fonts.

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:29:03 PM #
> One advantage of Sony's hi-res and virtual graffiti
> is that it is more compatible with old apps.

and Sony's hi-res APIs for developers are completely incompatible with the Palm OS 5 hi-res for new apps.

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:52:27 PM #
>> One advantage of Sony's hi-res and virtual graffiti
>> is that it is more compatible with old apps.
>
>and Sony's hi-res APIs for developers are completely >incompatible with the Palm OS 5 hi-res for new apps.

Not surpising, considering the Sony API's were written before Palm OS 5 was. Hard to make things compatible with something that doesn't yet exist.

Not sure why people pick on the Sony API's - software developers have done a good job of supporting the hi-res Sony units with them, and I've had nearly 100% success in running non-high-res applications on my Clie 610.

Sure things will change with Palm OS 5, but until it's released, Sony will have the best solution for high resolution. And at the rate Sony and Palm are going, Sony will have released another 30 or 40 new models of palmtops before Palm releases OS 5.0 - sometime in 2006...

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
bcombee @ 4/4/2002 4:17:09 PM #
Reps at PalmSource 2002 indicated that Sony may release an OS patch that would support the new Palm OS 5 density API calls on current hi-res 68K devices. Sony's API may be proprietary, but their current devices may be compatible with hi-res OS 5 apps.

CodeWarrior for Palm OS technical lead
RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 4:26:36 PM #
I wouldn't doubt that HandEra has a device like this lying around somewhere or that maybe they've given a few similar to some people to test, but these specs seem more like rumor than fact.

A serious contender for Sony.....
Palm_Otaku @ 4/4/2002 5:04:21 PM #
Another feature that the HandEra has is built-in voice recording! It also has great buttons (ahem; fast CF backups/restore; and a company with a fabulous customer support track record! I bet the battery life will also be very good. (a shame that the battery pack is rumored to be built-in instead of removable as in the existing 330...

Also, there are a lot of CF peripherals (WiFi, ethernet, etc.) that work with it; the Sony requires a CF-sled (currently only available in Japan) or perhaps infinite patience waiting for more MSIO peripherals...

Presumably the new HandEra will be SDIO-compliant and will be able to use the Palm/Toshiba Bluetooth card (apparently the Sony Infostick is not scheduled for release outside of Japan :-(

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 7:02:24 PM #
> Sony requires a CF-sled (currently only available in Japan)

From what I understand, that sled only works with one or two devices, maybe just a single wireless phone card.

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 12:45:39 AM #
Handera is a great device for some people.
Its CF card support is probably one of its biggest
strength.

I wish the new one has 16M.

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
LC @ 4/5/2002 1:35:57 AM #
Is the handera going to have basically the same form factor as previous handeras or is the design going to be redone so that it looks modern?

Also is it USB compatible using the palm III connector? or is it serial compatiblity only? That may be the ultimate killer for me.. although the CF slot would be SOOOOO cool .... but then the drivers...


= = =
LC =
= = =

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 2:48:31 AM #
HUGE Handera form factor or.... the smallest color PDA (T-615). HandEra had better figure out how to reduce the size of their units.

RE: A somewhat serious contender for Sony.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 2:58:59 AM #
> and Sony's hi-res APIs for developers are completely
> incompatible with the Palm OS 5 hi-res for new apps.

Not quite. Sony's hi-res API is DIFFERENT from PalmOS's high-density API, but it's not completely incompatible.

Sony's high-resolution library can be implemented using OS 5's high-density calls. This means that it should be easy enough for someone to develop a substitute library to allow apps written for high-resolution CLIEs to run on OS 5 devices. (In fact, Sony indicated at PalmSource that they will provide such a compatibility layer.)

(Whether or not high-density apps written for OS 5 will run on existing high-resolution CLIEs is a different matter; Sony's API is more limited, so implementing Palm's API using Sony's would be quite a bit harder.)

WOW!

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:24:56 PM #
i might just consider this handera over sonys. I already have an 32mb SD card worth $39 and 8mb,32mb,64mb,128mb CF cards from my digicam. ive always wanted to view pics from my digicam on my handheld instantly.

RE: WOW!
mikeliu @ 4/4/2002 5:41:18 PM #
from someone who owns a memory stick digicam (Sony P5)and a memory stick PDA (Sony 760) let me tell you that it's pretty overrated to be able to view digicam output on your PDA.

Palm OS PDA's are just too slow to be able to handle displaying those 1+ MB monster JPGs that digicams output, and they have to scale it to, and they're too slow to be able to scale it without it looking crappy.

Still, everything else you have might still make going HandEra a good choice even if you took my advice and ignored the digicam angle.

RE: WOW!
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 12:06:23 AM #
thanks for pointing that out. i guess a pocketPC can do a faster job on that huh? i guess im just looking for my peripherals to use each others CARDS and i really dont have any room for memorysticks in here.

8mb is not enough

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:27:53 PM #
For one of Handera's key markets, medical users, 8mb is no longer high-end. Sure, memory cards can add almost unlimited storage, however, too many apps like ePocrates either don't support VFS or are too slow in accessing the memory card. Actually, the slowness is a chracteristic of VFS, itself, as data has to be copied from the memory card before the app can be run.

I'm sure they would be doing 16mb to match Sony and Palm's current high-end products.

RE: 8mb is not enough
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 5:15:32 PM #
Well, RAM will always not be enough, but this is why we need external media. One thing HandEra did is that they released a program called "AutoCF." This program helps regular applications that doesn't support VFS to take advantage of it. This idea helps leads other programmers to build PowerRUN, MSMount, PiDirect, etc.

Just look at what Sony did to their MemoryStick? Nothing. Adsolutely nothing.

RE: 8mb is not enough
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 8:01:42 AM #
I never understood why folks say that 8MB is not enough. I used to have a Palm V, and as soon as I installed AvantGo on it, I ran out of RAM. So I felt quite liberated when I eventually bought my HE330 because it had enough RAM to handle the AvantGo channels I subscribed to (7 total). Today with all the things I do with my HE330 (games, lists, built-in apps, Acrobat, Quick-sheet and -word) I am
only using half the RAM in my device. With the 32MB MMC card I have as well, and the AutoCard app Handera has (when will that come out of beta?), I don't see why 8MB isn't enough.

I'm not claiming that anyone demanding 16MB is wrong, I'm just wondering what to *DO* with all the RAM I have.

-- Paul

RE: 8mb is not enough
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 9:00:56 AM #
With the increasing popularity of color apps, hi-res apps, and multi-platform apps (designed for Palm OS and Pocket PC), these programs are simply getting larger.

ePocrates, the most ubiquitous program for medical PDA's takes up 1.6 megs or so. It's twice as large as it was two years ago. PatientKeeper's new 3.0 beta is over 2 megs. Neither will work off a memory card anytime soon. Many NSBasic apps and HanDbase apps are now written in "large" code, with the runtime libraries built-to the program.

Any memory stick or SD card peripheral will take up your slot so anything that you want to use with that device will have to be in RAM.

I have tons of space left on my 128 meg memory stick, however, I am always find myself short of RAM.

RE: 8mb is not enough
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 10:16:36 AM #
"ePocrates, the most ubiquitous program for medical PDA's takes up 1.6 megs or so. It's twice as large as it was two years ago. PatientKeeper's new 3.0 beta is over 2 megs. Neither will work off a memory card anytime soon. "

Wow, What a BIIIIIIIggg program.

So they can not even put in to /Palm/Launcher instead
of RAM? Did you try PiDirectVFS to put their database on the card?

Another TRGpro user who has TONS of programs and database.
(Still can not fill up half of 8mb, but almost finish my 128mb CF)

RE: 8mb is not enough
Ed @ 4/5/2002 11:07:32 AM #
You might be interested in PiDirect II, which lets handhelds run files directly off a memory card, without a full copy being written to RAM.

Here's a review:
www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=3241

---
News Editor

RE: 8mb is not enough
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 3:25:51 PM #
PiDirect II is awesome! I was using AutoCard first, but it gave me some problems to the point that I either had to sacrifice RAM or buy PiDirect II (i.e. using the large spellcheck dictionary in Wordsmith. I now can use it on the card). PDII allows you to run 10 files off the card without registering it, but it will not work simultaneously with AutoCard, so that defeated the purpose.

I now have absolutely NO problems running any app from a memory card.

As for having to remove your card to use peripherals, a unit with 2 card slots works wonders for getting around that. With my HE330, I can have memory and apps in the SD slot, a Socket digital phone card (to hook up to my cell phone) in the CF slot, and still use my PPK keyboard. Combine that with the right software and I effectively have a wireless laptop!

Sean

Upgradable to 16MB?

robrecht @ 4/4/2002 1:33:13 PM #
Is the current Handera 330 able to be upgraded to 16MB?

Thanks, Robrecht
RE: Upgradable to 16MB?
Ed @ 4/4/2002 1:46:28 PM #
Yes, a few weeks ago Tony Rudenko introduced an upgrade for the HandEra 330 to 16 MB of RAM. It costs $110.

www.PalmPilotUpgrade.com/about.html

---
News Editor

Hopefully Incorrect

Ed @ 4/4/2002 1:31:23 PM #
This may sound like an odd thing for me to say but I hope some of the information presented here is incorrect. The new HandEra device really needs 16 MB of RAM and the 66 MHz processor. HandEra refreshes their product line very slowly and, while I think a 33 MHz processor is fine now, if the company is still selling a device based on it next year, it will look dated.

That said, I like HandEra's hi-res screen and virtual Graffiti so I applaud the inclusion of color.

---
News Editor

RE: Hopefully Incorrect
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:56:53 PM #
hmm. cant log in...

i agree with ed. this has to be false. it doesnt seem like handera to come out with a device thats just a 330 with a color screen. they would need a good reason to release a new device.

-scaught

RE: Hopefully Incorrect
Vexel9 @ 4/4/2002 9:44:03 PM #
I agree as well. It already seems dated even before its released. If the release date of this unit will be in a few months 33Mhz will be glaringly inadequate, for a NEW release at least. And the 8mb? There's gotta be something wrong with that?

RE: Hopefully Incorrect
wintermute @ 4/5/2002 8:57:18 PM #
Well I don't know about that. I agree to an extent. Handera understands that 16mb is a trend, and most are going to follow it, infact most have already in the PalmOS platform. And the 66mhz will soon become a trend if OS5 takes a little longer, to have some side profit or something. BUT Handera knows by adding all this, it will only extend the price. Handera is becoming VERY common, but Palm is still most known. SO, inorder to have consumers to order their product, they must have great prices that beat Palm, great function, rather than a name you can trust. It might not make sense, perhaps I'm not saying it well enough. But it does make sense once you think about it. The features you talk about will increase the price. I think their goal right now is to steal consumers and get some of that market share! This is one good way.

------------------------------------
http://pdan.has.it
------------------------------------
You don't want to grow old but you don't want to die young!
------------------------------------

Too Little, Too Late

tipds @ 4/4/2002 1:41:45 PM #
Compared to industry leaders, this new model has a lower res screen, less memory and a slower processor. I don't really see how it can really compete in the high-end market, especially at that price. Yes, the color depth is greater, but that will have a limited impact. Realistically, how many colors can one display on a 320x240 screen? (76,800) At that res, the jump from 16-bit to 24-bit color will not be noticable. I really think they should have concentrated on the ARM processor, added memory and gone with a larger screen, at a minimum. It would also help if they offered a faster expansion memory option, like Sony's memory stick. The old-style sync port will also hurt it. I'm all for standardization, but not when the standard is so far inferior to other available options.

Sorry to be a downer,
Tip DS

RE: Too Little, Too Late
Ed @ 4/4/2002 1:49:04 PM #
Just keep in mind, this is a rumor. It may turn out to be incorrect.

---
News Editor
RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:50:47 PM #
I've heard people make a very similar arguement about the Sony's 320 x 320 screen. What's the point of cramming in more pixels if the screen doesn't get any bigger? The HandEra's screen is acually larger, though there are few pixels.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:57:17 PM #
It still better than all Palm product in term of screen and expandibility, second only to Sony in term of screen and style.

No matter how much money you pay, you won't be able to put Wi-Fi or 1Gig microdrive on Sony. Handera on the other hand can take ANY of Sony peripherals, even that idiotic memstick. (with CF universal adapter)

RE: Too Little, Too Late
fleegle @ 4/4/2002 2:40:11 PM #
What "CF universal adapter"? Do you have a website to reference?

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:12:24 PM #
Try Pretec site.

some british store sells it (too lazy to click more of google search)
http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=PRECTRIO

so incidentally, this mean PPC can accept memory stick.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:34:25 PM #
> Compared to industry leaders, this new model has [...]

Uh ... Palm is the industry leader and this device compares quite favorably to Palm.

> At that res, the jump from 16-bit to 24-bit color will
> not be noticable.

64 thousand colors is 16-bit, there is no jump.

> It would also help if they offered a faster expansion
> memory option, like Sony's memory stick.

Hilarious. Memory Stick is slower than SD or CF. Come back when you know what you are talking about.


RE: Too Little, Too Late
sub_tex @ 4/4/2002 4:00:39 PM #
"Hilarious. Memory Stick is slower than SD or CF. Come back when you know what you are talking about."

yes.

Along with the totally original title of this post (which we sure need to hear a few more thousand times because it's SO cool to post Too little Too late whenever new hardware is introduced...) this whole post is not worth the time to read it.

Handera seems to have their heads on straight, and have produced quality products. I agree with Ed in that i'm leaning more toward the rumor on this one since this device wouldn't hold well in the next 4-6 months.

The 330 is still a darn good pda today. in 6 months though when the ARM and os 5 devices hit? Hence the new device, which i think we're still yet to hear about.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 4:01:56 PM #
> It would also help if they offered a faster expansion
> memory option, like Sony's memory stick.

>Hilarious. Memory Stick is slower than SD or CF. Come >back when you know what you are talking about.

I'd be interested in knowing where your data came from. Not saying your wrong - I've just never seen a good comparison of transfer rates...

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 5:21:17 PM #
Basic Fact: SD has the fastest transfer rate in theory

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 7:27:11 PM #
"Compared to industry leaders..." The ONLY "industry leader" with anything higher than 160x160 res is Sony. HandEra's QVGA screen is higher resolution than all other PalmOS licencees, except Sony and a Symbol Prototype. The Symbol prototype however is using HandEra's OS, and the same Epson Color coprocessor that Epson and HandEra worked together on (maybe even the same color screen as this HandEra prototype for all we know).

I've only used VFSMark on the Sony S320 and T615 but the results were dismal compared to SD on Palm M50x's and SD and CF on the HandEra 330. So far though CF on a HandEra is still the speed winner. The dragonball is the limiter though. Theoretical maximums will only come into play on faster ARM hardware.

I'm guessing MS on an NR70 will just come up to par with SD and CF on other devices.


RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 7:42:47 PM #
> The ONLY "industry leader" with anything higher than 160x160 res is Sony.

Sony isn't an industry leader. Their PDA marketshare is small, and the number hi-res devices they sell is even way far smaller than that. Their S-series has likely outsold all the rest of their devices to date. The most common industry standard screen size for PDAs is 160x160 followed by 240x320.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
tipds @ 4/4/2002 7:53:36 PM #
Sub_tex & Anonymous,

I've come back, and I still know what I'm talking about. I'll admit the oversight on the 16 vs. 24 bit issue, but the speed of the memory cards stands. The 2000 standard from the SDCard orginization is 2MB/s. (In theory) Sony's memory stick standard achieves 2.45MB/s all day long. Feel free to double check my data. SD-org's target is for full compliance of 10MB/s transfer rate, but to my knowledge, it's not yet firm yet. (You'll notice all data refers to transfer rates "up to" 10MB/s for this proposed standard) Also, when do you suspect most of these handhealds were designed? How long do YOU think the engineering cycle takes at a company like Palm, Handspring, Sony, etc? Do you think the models using these cards were designed last week? By the way, what industry do YOU guys work in again?

Anonymous... Do you think, someday, you can figure out how to get yourself registered here? I mean, it's one thing for La'Tex to go gettin' pissy using his name, but to hide behind "anonymous"...

G'day,
Tip DS



RE: Too Little, Too Late
LarryGarfield @ 4/5/2002 2:34:22 AM #
The theoretical throughput, according to the official spec, of SD is the fastest of any of the PalmOS-supported memory card. Notice "theoretical". Due to the physical electronics present in all Palms, CF cards (or rather the CF bus connection) delivers the best real-world throughput of any card on the Palm today.

--
This post is ROT26 encrypted. Reading it is a violation of the DMCA
RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 7:54:20 AM #
> The 2000 standard from the SDCard orginization is 2MB/s. (In theory) Sony's
> memory stick standard achieves 2.45MB/s all day long.

Don't quit your day job. It is not MB (megabytes) it is megabit (Mb). SD can do 2.5 Mbit/sec on a one bit interface and 10 Mbit/sec on a four bit interface. There is no "target for full compliance" or whatever you are talking about, current Palm devices current devices have a 1 bit interface, SD cards can have a 1, 2 or 4 bit interface. If you check say SanDisk's specs for their SD cards, they support the appropriate transfer rates on the different width interfaces. I can pretty much guarantee that you will never ever see these theorectical maximums, let alone "all day long".

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 8:29:59 AM #
Oops, I was wrong, it acually is megabytes (MB). Transfer rates are usually measured in megabits though. Anyhow, you still are never going to see that performance, and the actual differences in between 2MB/sec and 2.5MBsec isn't going to be noticable unless you are working with very large amounts of data. CF, like on the HandEra devices, is still way faster than the current SD and MS implementations.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 10:29:17 AM #
FYI, when I backup my entire RAM to CF card, take about 25 sec(size:4.7Mb), and the CPU of TRGpro is 16.5 Mhz.

I have no idea how fast a SD card can be, maybe a handera user can compare SD with CF side by side?

Just wonder how much time it take to backup entire RAM to memorystick? Any Sony user please?

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 11:41:36 AM #
Compare CF and MMC side by side? OK. (I don't have a SD card) I have a SanDisk 32MB MMC card and a SanDisk 32MB CF card in my HE330.
Currently my CF card has 4.71MB free due to vacation pictures on it, and the MMC card has 14.8MB on it due to 5 backup files on it.

I backed up my device onto the MMC card, and it took 1:06 to create a sixth backup file at 3.276MB. The same backup on the CF card took 31 seconds.
I suppose I could wipe the CF card and create 5 backup files on it before trying this test, so that both cards have the same stuff on them, but this seems
close enough.

-- Paul

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 1:49:39 PM #
I'm not sure what kind of backups you're doing, but using the included backup program on the HandEra 330 it only takes about 12 seconds to back up the entire RAM, over 7MB, to CF. You may want to look into using a different backup program.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 1:52:16 PM #
I have TRGPRO with 64MB CF card, and a Sony S320 with 32MB memory stick. TRGPRO backs up about 7.5MB data in less than 20 seconds, while Sony backs up about 3MB of data in what feels like eternity (1 min). This is the primary reason I am not willing to go to the color sonys right now despite its many other appealing features. Technical specs means nothing, only performance matters.

Greg

RE: Too Little, Too Late
tipds @ 4/5/2002 2:49:02 PM #
Unfortunately, these kinds of comparisons tell nothing of real interest. There is no laboratory controll at all. There are many factors that will come into play when backing up... the least of which is not the backup program.

If there's anyone that would like to discuss the matter further (in a rational manner), I'd be more than happy to do so in a more "mature" environment.

G'day,
Tip DS

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 3:52:05 PM #
"mature" meaning everyone agrees with your flawed theory of Sony being an industry leader?

C'mon, it's already obvious you're not interested in discussing anything, because you've already decided on the "Sony rules" mindset.

Get real.

Sean

RE: Too Little, Too Late
tipds @ 4/5/2002 5:11:44 PM #
Well, Anonymous, judging by the fact that you haven't figured out how to register here, and also by your comment above, you clearly haven't read many of my posts. Now, you never DID tell me what you do for a living. Tell me how it is that you've become an expert on this subject.

With interest,
Tip DS

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 5:39:53 PM #
> it's already obvious you're not interested in discussing anything

Yes, and for some reason he thinks posting false information as "tipds" is better than posting factual info anonymously.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 6:15:54 PM #
To the person who has a Handera that can backup entire RAM(7mb) within 12 second:

You may want to consider the CPU speed difference between Handera and TRGpro. However, could you please tell us what brand/model# of CF you are using? I am really curious!! :)

RE: Too Little, Too Late
tipds @ 4/5/2002 7:39:30 PM #
SD Standard Specs
http://www.sdcard.org/press5.htm

MS Specs
http://www.memorystick.org/msinfo/eng/mscon/media.html

· Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments may be moderated/deleted.


RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 7:42:18 PM #
FYI... Using HandEra's Backup utility (V3.0) 177 files, 4359K...

...Lexar Media (USB enabled 4x) 32MB CF = 35 sec.

...IBM 32MB CF = 30 sec.

...Epson 8MB CF (an old camera card of mine) = 23 sec.

...Lexar 64MB MMC = 1 min. 25 sec.

Not a perfect test, but should give you an idea.

Expansion Card Speeds [was RE: Too Little, Too Late]
Palm_Otaku @ 4/5/2002 7:51:27 PM #

There's an app called VFS Mark that performs 9 various read/write/etc. tests of removable expansion card media.


The reference score of 100 is for a Palm M500 with a Palm 16MB SD card and provides an average of these tests (higher is better).


Here are a few results we've seen:

m505 : 16MB SD : 94

m505 : 16MB MMC : 59

T615c: 32MB MS : 43

H330: 192MB CF : 131


I don't know how accurate/representative the numbers for VFS mark are, but they certainly put at least some quantitative data on card speeds. They also validate my observations that the Clie/Memory Stick combo is relatively very slow.


You can find VFS Mark at http://www.kopsisengineering.com



RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 10:14:24 PM #
> SD Standard Specs
> http://www.sdcard.org/press5.htm

Those aren't "standard specs". That is just a press release. Here are the specs for SanDisk's SD cards:
http://www.sandisk.com/download/Product%20Brochures/OEM%20--%20Datasheets/SDRev5_2-02.pdf

You are the one that incorrectly stated, "It would also help if they offered a faster expansion memory option, like Sony's memory stick." Even if SD was slightly slower than MS, the CF slot on the HandEra 330 is already way faster than the SD and MS slots on current Palm and Sony devices. Even if the theoretical maximum for SD was just slightly slower for MS, who cares? You will never see those numbers on these devices anyhow. Do post some VFSMark numbers from your Clie.
http://www.kopsisengineering.com/vfsmark.zip

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/8/2002 8:25:01 AM #
--I'm not sure what kind of backups you're doing, but using the included backup program on the HandEra 330 it only takes
about 12 seconds to back up the entire RAM, over 7MB, to CF. You may want to look into using a different backup
program.--

I *AM* using the native backup program. I'd like to know how you got twice as much data to back up in half the time as me.

--Unfortunately, these kinds of comparisons tell nothing of real interest. There is no laboratory controll at all. There are
many factors that will come into play when backing up... the least of which is not the backup program.
If there's anyone that would like to discuss the matter further (in a rational manner), I'd be more than happy to do so in a
more "mature" environment.--

I don't know, seeing how fast others can get transfers done seems pretty interesting to me. And why worry about laboratory
controls since we don't work at Handera and aren't privy to the internal software code. Kinda makes a lot of laboratory
control conditions impossible. We're doing performance testing here, not unit/functional/integration or even system testing.
At this level, there is no white-box testing...it is all blackbox (push stuff in, see what comes out). The only factors I can think
of are:

CPU speed, OS version, list of enabled and disabled hacks, list of software on device, brand and model of flash card,
battery level (if you really want to get anal about variables), amount of data, fragmentation in RAM and on flash.

I think the best test I've seen on this "immature" board so far was the VFSmark tests, but the standard backups on various
media was very interesting. In short, lighten up.

Just my opinion.
-- Paul

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/8/2002 11:43:40 AM #
> I *AM* using the native backup program. I'd like to know how you
> got twice as much data to back up in half the time as me.

I didn't do anything special as far as I know. Are you using a fairly recent release of the OS? I know HandEra changed some things in the code that gave at least some performance improvement. I get similar performance on both a Lexar 4x speed 32MB CF card and the 16MB Feiya CF card that HandEra gave me for free for being one of the early 330 buyers. If you are using MMC you will definitely get and with SD you would likely get slower speeds. I am not overclocking the CPU or anything like that.

RE: Too Little, Too Late
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/15/2002 2:20:34 AM #
"Well, Anonymous, judging by the fact that you haven't figured out how to register here, and also by your comment above, you clearly haven't read many of my posts. Now, you never DID tell me what you do for a living. Tell me how it is that you've become an expert on this subject."

I work on PC's and *handheld* devices. What is it you do again besides trolling?

Oh, and in spite of not registering, my posts have my name signed at the bottom, so don't be confusing me with other "Anonymous" postings. You didn't originally pose the occupation question to me, but since you later directed it my way, you now have my answer.

Sean

RE: Too Little, Too Late
Wollombi @ 4/17/2002 9:38:02 AM #
C'mon Tips...I know you have SOMETHING to say, however useless it may be...

_________________
Sean

It is not very comfortable to have the gift of being amused at one's own absurdity.
-Somerset Maugham-

Serial Interface - Still?

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 1:48:45 PM #
While I think Handera has put out a great product in the past, I'm surprised (and saddened) not to see USB hotsync.

RE: Serial Interface - Still?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:19:54 PM #
I'm no engineer, so I don't know if this is possible, but why can't HandEra make a USB interface that will still work with Win NT? Most USB-interface PDAs (Handspring, Palm) will also connect via serial. Is there no way to allow both USB and serial connectivity without requiring Win98 as a minimum?

RE: Serial Interface - Still?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:25:59 PM #
If I remember right, there is an interview of HandEra's president someplace where he implied that they may keep the Palm III connector for accessories (since Palm wouldn't let them use their "universal" connector), but that they would also provide some other means for USB syncing.

RE: Serial Interface - Still?
Ed @ 4/4/2002 4:31:28 PM #
You probably read it here. When I spoke with Mark Kubovich, HandEra's president, at the PalmSource conference, he said they were working on ways to add USB functionality while still keeping backward compatibility with III series peripherals.

---
News Editor
RE: Serial Interface - Still?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 10:39:51 PM #
Handera claims that the 330 is the FINAL model with serial port hotsync.

RE: Serial Interface - Still?
tipds @ 4/5/2002 2:53:44 PM #
The problem isn't really in the design of the handheald, but in Windows. NT has notoriously bad support for USB. It's mainly due to the fact that they (Microsoft) will not relinquish direct control of the hardware to anybody else. They have very legitimate reasons for this, but that doesn't change the fact that NT USB support is not there.

Tip DS

IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 2:33:03 PM #
Come on, Ed - it was posted on April 1st...

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 2:39:15 PM #
And your assumption that the rest of the world (PalmQ is a Russian site) observes what is an inane holiday in the U.S.? Let's start looking at the world through a wider perspective.



RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 2:50:44 PM #
Don't go insulting another person's country, now, Mr. Europe. There is no need for that and no harm was intended in the post.

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
LanMan @ 4/4/2002 2:52:03 PM #
Ed already addressed the April Fool's issue in a subnote of the article.

<><
RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:07:07 PM #
The article says March 31st I think, if the translator is working.

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 4:27:18 PM #
"the rest of the world (PalmQ is a Russian site) observes what is an inane holiday in the U.S.?"
My friend:
Let me tell you first that the world is not circling around the US.
Proudly being Russian I'm surprised that this site started (seriously) posting the April 1st jokes from all over the world.
It's absolutely normal to post such joke on April 1st in Russia as well as in the rest of the world.


RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 5:26:17 PM #
Yeah, the world certainly DOES NOT revolve around the U.S. In fact, there are many people in the US who visit Russian websites to find out about new cutting-edge Russian PDA's. :)

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
Vexel9 @ 4/4/2002 9:41:33 PM #
New russion cutting edge PDA's? Which ones are those?

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 1:20:50 AM #
> Yeah, the world certainly DOES NOT revolve around
> the U.S. In fact, there are many people in the US
> who visit Russian websites to find out about new
> cutting-edge Russian PDA's. :)

Well, be careful here. Following the logic of your post one can conclude that the world really revolves around Japan.

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
rigter @ 4/5/2002 2:55:53 AM #
Please, don't give him piss.
While making the joke he actually fell over it himself.

It is only logical that many of the international meeting places on the net are american/english because they do not speak our languages, or even know where to look on a map of the world when looking for our countries.
But I'm glad to say that I have met lots of interesting people through this and other boards, no matter what language/pda/type of aquarium/whatever...

Cheers,
Jan

/*
One thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse.
*/

History of April Fool's Day
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 8:22:57 AM #
April Fool's Day did not start in America. No one knows how this holiday began but it was thought to have originated in France.

In the sixteenth century, New Year's was celebrated on March 25 and celebrations lasted until April 1st. When New Year’s Day as changed from March 25 to January 1st in the mid-1560's by King Charles IX, there were some people who still celebrated it on April 1st and those people were called April Fools.

Each country celebrates April Fool’s differently.  In France, the April Fool’s is called "April Fish" (Poisson d'Avril).  The French fool their friends by taping a paper fish to their friends’ backs and when some discovers a this trick, they yell “Poisson d’Avril!” .

In England, tricks can be played only in the morning. If a trick is played on you, you are a "noodle". In Scotland, April Fools Day is 48 hours long and you are called an "April Gowk", which is another name for a cuckoo bird. The second day in Scotland’s April Fool's is called Taily Day and is dedicated to pranks involving the buttocks. Taily Day's gift to posterior posterity is the "Kick Me" sign.

In Portugal, April Fool's is celebrated on the Sunday and Monday before Lent. The traditional trick there is to throw flour at your friends.

In America, Americans play small tricks on friends and strangers alike on the first of April.

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
seanhennessy @ 4/5/2002 8:33:05 AM #
I have to say I seriously doubt that Handera are bringing out any more Motorola-based PDAs. They are a small company and like to produce models with a long life (only two so far!), so bringing out a new one when ARM-based PDAs are only 6 or 7 months away seems to violate their philosophy. 8MB RAM and 33MHz don't sound likely either.

RE: IT WAS POSTED ON APRIL 1ST
TDS @ 4/5/2002 8:44:19 AM #
Wow,
Thanks for that info on the different "April Fools" traditions... It was really quite interesting. I did not know that New Years day was actually celebrated in late march/early April! (Well, 400+ years ago). You learn something new eveery day!

Whoop-Te-Doo

jamuka @ 4/4/2002 2:53:59 PM #
A little advise for Handera if this rumor is true:

Don't go on the air to show this lame machine to Neil Cavuto.

;)

RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 9:17:05 PM #
Handera is a kick ass machine!


RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 10:41:17 PM #
Actually, I have had the chance to play with Sony Clie's 615, the Palm 515 and the handera 330. Overall, the handera handled the best and had the fewest compatablilty problems when it came to using skyscape medical and handheldmed software. Sure it may not be all that pretty (yet, perhaps the color device will do it for me) but it is a workhorse and the CF card/ SD card works much easier than the palm 515 or Clie anyday.

RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 8:44:18 AM #
>> Sure it may not be all that pretty <<

People acknowledge/complain about the 330's looks, but consider the following:

Even with the form factor it has now, the 330 is still equal in size to the smallest PPC - the Toshiba Genio. (I don't count the iPaq because it requires that enormous sleeve to add expansion.) And it's also at least as nice-looking as most of the PPC offerings, better than some. Have you seen the new Casio? Yikes! Put a bag over that one!

I also don't quite comprehend people's complaints about the casing. HandEra chooses silver, and everyone howls. Sony chooses silver, and the same people go "Ooooh, Aaaaah." Sounds to me like Sony-apologist biased bulls***.

RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 9:55:32 AM #
Because the Sony is an actual metal casing while the Handera is cheap painted plastic. BIG difference, and I've owned both so I can attest to that.

RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 10:58:19 AM #
He is talking about N710/N610/S320 silver PLASTIC casing, OK?

RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
MacPrince @ 4/5/2002 6:46:45 PM #
>>Because the Sony is an actual metal casing while the Handera is cheap painted plastic. BIG difference, and I've owned both so I can attest to that.

Uhhh....wrong. The HandEra's casing is metal-plated, not silver paint. If you've supposedly owned both (with I sincerely doubt) take it and try to scratch the "paint" off. Can't do it, can you?

RE: Whoop-Te-Doo
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/7/2002 10:52:18 PM #
>> He is talking about N710/N610/S320 silver PLASTIC casing, OK? <<

Yes, that is indeed what I was referencing. I should also affirm the above post that the HandEra is metal-PLATED plastic, not PAINTED. If you want CHEAP & PAINTED, buy the Sony N-series. You'll notice paint rubbing off pretty much every place that the unit gets consistent friction--stylus silo, sides, bottom, back...

And if you want CHEAP METAL housing, go for the Sony T-series, which, depending on the unit you get, may be warped or slightly bent. Yeah, THAT'S quality control...

But I guess we can't point out cheap cost-cutting measures in the Sony, can we? That would burst people's oh-so-fragile bubble that they feel compelled to flame others in order to defend...


ok here is my take

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:35:45 PM #
I am a native russian speaker, can confirm that translation to english was ok, however I highly doubt its true because I find its impossible to believe that some russian site got an edge in beta-testing of new western device. Also bear in mind that 1st of April in Russia is celebrated WIDELY as fools day, however to be fair in this case details aint that extremely good to be suspected as a joke. Bottom line: this device, even if true too crappy to be seriously considered :)

RE: ok here is my take
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 3:51:05 PM #
Isn't the point of April Fools to be funny or absurd rather than simply wrong or made up? What's the point? Does this pass for humor in Russia? Perhaps.

What's next? Doctoring a photo to make a dark gray case look black? Ha ha ha! Change OS display from 4.1 to 4.0? Wheeee! Pass the Vodka!

RE: ok here is my take
TDS @ 4/5/2002 8:47:53 AM #
That last post was a little rough and off-color. Many Americans celebrate the same way, by making false product announcements to see how many people they can fool. Whoo-Hoo! Pass the "Bud Lite!"

Feedback from Handera

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 7:51:50 PM #
I recently emailed their sales department asking if they had a color model coming out soon since I was also considering the m505. I also asked if I should hold out. Well, they could not comment on a release, but they responded by saying that I shouldn't hold out. So I don't whether or not to believe the Russsian source.

RE: Feedback from Handera
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 8:50:28 PM #
Buy this one and after 6 months buy another one with ARM chip, color and Palm OS 5. Are you a first time PDA user? The idea is have a PDA that you like now and buy a next one. Maximize its use now and buy another one later to suit your needs.

RE: Feedback from Handera
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 9:10:48 PM #
At least you got a response. I sent an email to their sales department shortly after the announcement of the new Sony indicating that I loved my Handera but that I was starting to thirst for a color screen and faster processor. I just wanted to know if they had something in color planned for the summer timeframe or visible future because I'd wait that long for a color Handera. I never got a response.

RE: Feedback from Handera
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 6:25:16 AM #
Here is the actual response:

"Thank you for your interest. However, we have no information for public
release concerning new products at this time. We will post information at
our web site when new products are ready to be announced.

I would not wait for us to release a color unit soon, however."

My Vx has a broken screen. What to do, I don't know.

Handera rocks

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 8:46:48 PM #
I've first been a Palm III user, then a TRG Pro, and then a HandEra 330. HandEra rocks because it allows users like me to keep all my expansion kit collected over the years. I'll be awaiting for the color model if this rumour is true.

TFT Screen? Now that's a killer

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/4/2002 9:05:58 PM #
I know everyone else's worries, but how about the "fact" that it will have a TFT screen? Another PDA
that has an invisible screen outside? I won't buy any PDA that doesn't have a good screen outdoors.

So...negatives (if true)...8MB Ram, 33Mhz, TFT screen and BIG...a no go for me. I've always liked the
330, but wanted something with color and more memory. If true...too little, too late, might as well
by Palms M135

RE: TFT Screen? Now that's a killer
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 2:45:49 AM #
TFT stands for thin-film transistor; basically it means the screen is active rather than passive, allowing for faster response times and better colors.

By itself, it doesn't mean anything about the screen's reflectivity properties. Sony CLIEs have TFT screens but are visible both indoors and out.

TFT STDN
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 9:23:38 AM #
Palm m130 on the other hand has STDN-screen. Slow on the update, yes!
Look at animation running on m130 and then on m515 and you instantly see the difference between TFT and STDN.
STDN is all smudged up.

TFT is definitley the screentype to use.
A reflective TFT with front-light/side-light would be even nicer (as opposed to the non reflective TFT with back-light).

Been waiting for this

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/5/2002 7:16:24 AM #
As someone who uses a CF card based camera, I've been waiting patiently for this. The low price and high volume of CF cards make them much more attractive than either memory stick or SD cards. The idea of being able to review picts (and other data) by swapping off cards is something I've been yearning for, and now that the Visor Prism is basically dead in Japan, Hand Era is my only hope. The main other thing I was hoping they would do is make their sound I/O stereo - then they would have a great consumer oriented model!

Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: