Comments on: TI Announces OMAP Development Platform
Article Comments
(10 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: Pricing is for losers
If history repeats, it's going to be priced to choke anybody other than a Fortune 500. TI's DSP development tools are obscenely priced - $3000 and up.
RE: Pricing is for losers
Should TI absorb the cost of the hardware, and give the kit away for free?!
RE: Pricing is for losers
It's for OEMs, not end users
It's not intended to compete with CodeWarrior, etc.
And, BTW, TI's Code Composer also includes extras such as royalty free licence for the DSP/BIOS RTOS (OK, I still think CC is pricey, but not way out of line compared with other commercial embedded development tools). If you're just playing around with DSP's you can get DSK's with assemblers or Code Composer (limited to the DSK) for $200 - $400.
God .. can humans get any dummer .....
RE: Pricing is for losers
Incidentally, Code Composer for OMAP is $4500. I'm curious how that is going to relate to the pricing of the Innovator Development Kit, and therefore indicate how aggressive TI is going to be about seeding development.
RE: Pricing is for losers
Hmmm. As a developer, i'd stick to supporting the standard communications APIs in Palm OS - which will in turn, already allow me to take advantage of TCP/IP communcations over whatever network (including 2.5 and 3G) is made available by the service/hardware utilized by the user (except for the Vii/i705 of course). Honestly, i don't understand how it is that so many companies expect developers to shell for some system that provides optimization for their proprietary technology. I'll leave it to PalmSource to bring this together in the OS. My company can't afford to gamble (on the adoption of OMAP as a signicant standard, for example). Users want standard internet inter-operability (ie: TCP/IP). Since this will work over 2.5/3G then why do companies insist on a proprietary 'cell phone' approach to PDA communcations development? Personally, thats why i would never bank on the PalmVii/i705 approach (or web clipping for that matter). These are interim solutions with no long term future: as soon as the bandwidth /memory is cheaply available, then the only thing that we will see on PDAs (and probably natively on cell phone aswell) is full, standard TCP/IP application development - with the 'ugly details' of the network layer hidden from the developer - as it should be, and has been in the Desktop for years.
This TI dev kit makes sense for manufacturers, but as for their assertion that developers can use this to build apps that are optimized for this hardware - i can't imagine why. This lack of standardization (so popular these days in wireless/PDA circles) is a step backwards.
Pricing
RE: Pricing
I'm sure the devkit will popup on some warez site or on some p2p network.
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
Pricing is for losers