Comments on: Rumor: Oslo Never Going to Be Released

Last month, an image was released of a prototype handheld from Palm Inc. that would run Palm OS 5. It was called the Oslo and rumor had it Palm would be releasing it next month.

According to PDA Buzz, this device will never be released. Quoting "reliable sources", the article says that Oslo was a prototype that the company decided months ago to not make into a shipping product.

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (117 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

Despite the bashing. . .

somas1 @ 8/20/2002 11:54:17 AM #
Despite everyone's bashing of the little Oslo it could have been a contender

Contender
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 11:57:39 AM #
The collapsible design would only have the effect of boosting the price for a feature that is not practical. It did look cool though

Hope they have something better in store because they need it

RE: Despite the bashing. . .
Nate @ 8/20/2002 12:05:17 PM #
Coulda been -- I certainly liked the looks of it (though the rumored thickness scared me off a bit). I imagine if this really was a passed-up prototype that they have something even better in the works though...

_________
Syncplicity. Redefining Simple. www.cognitiveroot.com

How much spin is in this spin?

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 11:59:06 AM #
Could it be that our overwhelmingly ngative response scared them off?
RE: How much spin is in this spin?
Token User @ 8/20/2002 12:30:02 PM #
What negative response ... which PIC posting were you reading?

General concensus was that this was a device that everyone (except the Sony trolls) wanted. Only major criticisms were they should make it a little thinner, and have a virtual grafitti area.

Palm doesn't drive their development based on gossip
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:53:56 PM #
Palm doesn't change their plans based on gossip based on rumors. They haven't removed a product due to bad response to "rumors".

The exact OSLO you see in the pictures may never be released, but not because of the rumors (that are inconsequential in the bigger scheme of life).

Even if the exact OSLO won't be released. The OSLO does correctly illustrate many of the technologies and features that will be available in the coming months and devices *similar* to OSLO will be released.

So just relax and don't overly analyze/obsess the rumors.

RE: Palm doesn't drive their development based on gossip
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:32:40 PM #
Well I hope you are right:)

And so do others

RE: How much spin is in this spin?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 1:27:49 AM #
"The OSLO does correctly illustrate many of the technologies and features that will be available in the coming months and devices *similar* to OSLO will be released."

I'd be happy with something with all the Oslo features (hi-res screen, OSv5, speaker, D-pad) but minus the retracting bottom.

negative response
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 2:29:26 AM #
hmm, yeah, the palm guys always hang around here in pic and check out these nonsense comments, and if someone posts "oslo sucks" they are simply not going to release it.

Remeber, this is just a rumor

epall @ 8/20/2002 12:01:55 PM #
I think it's just a rumor. I'm still hoping for Oslo to come out before september.

RE: Remember, this is just a rumor
Beavis @ 8/20/2002 12:35:32 PM #
Didn't Palm make websites take down the leaked pictures? If it is never going to be released, what was the big deal about showing the pics?

RE: Remeber, this is just a rumor
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 8:35:57 PM #
Because when Palm brings out the m520, the exact same thing as the m515 but with OS5 and a 66 MHz processor, they figure all the loyal brainwashed Palmites will throw $600 at it. If the Oslo pictures were to remain out, it **might** make said Palmites think about how they've been buying the same old schlock over and over again and actrually demand they DO SOMETHING!
RE: Remeber, this is just a rumor
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 1:20:45 AM #
Palm didn't make all the websites take their pictures down. Notice the one on this very page.
RE: Remeber, this is just a rumor
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 1:21:53 AM #
Oslo was a rumor too. There was a picture to go with it so a lot of us believed it but there was never anything official from Palm.
What If...?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 2:17:04 PM #
Hmmm...maybe Palm allowed the pics to be leaked and then made a show of going after PocketPCThoughts.com (who originally posted the Oslo pics on the net) in order to drum up some needed publicity/curiosity?

Just a thought.

Oslo Never To Be Released

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:08:10 PM #
This is pathetic. I have been looking fowerd to the OSLO for months, and now it is never to be released. Could it be our negetive response to the thickness, or could it be palms bad financial position. Whatever it is palm better come out with something better because they need it. :)
RE: Oslo Never To Be Released
ahecht @ 8/20/2002 12:13:50 PM #
It is too bad. I too would've seriously considered purchasing one. I do hope that their replacement also features integrated bluetooth, enhanced speaker, and a d-pad.

RE: Oslo Never To Be Released
Sweetlu @ 8/20/2002 12:14:49 PM #
The thickness off this device really turned me off. Hopefully Palm releases a device with a D-pad, speaker, bluetooth, & high res+ screen (soft graffiti area) in an m500 series form factor. Please Palm no graffiti area, let the users choose what input layout they want to use.

Yankees, Steinbrenner,...... I will never turn to the dark side.
RE: Oslo Never To Be Released
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:20:49 PM #
Good, personally I would like them to keep the V, m500 series form factor, and just upgrade the inside with the hi-res screen, processor, card slot and such.
RE: Oslo Never To Be Released
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:25:22 PM #
Well, I think Palm would be well-served to release 2 "new" units this fall:

A "juiced up" m5xx (call it the m525 or m525xe or something) formfactor unit, OS 4.1, 66 mhz dragonball, m515 screen, and a better battery to make up for the faster CPU. Not having high-res, virtual grafitti and mp3 (unlike Sony) will actually be a benefit for once as it'll add to battery life.

Then release a "brick" OS5 unit somewhere in size between a palm III and a v/m500 formfactor, and have a knockout screen on it, as well as a D-pad and perhaps even Bluetooth.

That way there will be the current models taking up the low and middle end of the price spectrum, with the two power models available at the high end. A 66 mhz dragonball should be amply sufficient for someone who demands the m500 formfactor anyway. It will not be realistic for Palm to shoehorn an ARM cpu into that case for at least 6 months anyway...

Palm Development

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:19:50 PM #
Palm Development:

Ok we have three products that have got the go-ahead. Now where do we put our money?

1: Consumer surveys………To costly
2. Trust the developers……… Hell no!

Leak the info and read the posts… Great idea, no investment…right target. Can I get a promotion!

PDA Buzz

Doo @ 8/20/2002 12:24:14 PM #
I consider the where this info came from. PDA Buzz has had a very negitive palm slant for a while now.

But it was cancelled months ago...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:26:45 PM #
A lot of people think that it was cancelled based on feedback on various message boards, but the article said that it was cancelled months ago. Plus, there was some positive feedback (directional pad, etc.)

Although with Palm who knows. Maybe is was cancelled days ago. Days, weeks, months, 16-bit, 12-bit, what's the difference.

It did look to be an innovative (maybe that's the problem) design with some merit.

I am guessing that someone will eventually come out with something like it.

RE: PDA Buzz
Moosecat @ 8/20/2002 12:30:23 PM #
You're assuming that we interpret this news as bad? I'd bet most people (myself included) think it is good news that Palm isn't going make its first major OS5 innovation a useless sliding clamshell for the graffiti area.

The disappointment voiced here is more a reflection of being returned to a state of total ignorance about the first OS5 devices, rather than disappointment that we won't be able to buy Oslo. Let's hope there's a REASON Palm rejected Oslo -- maybe they have something much better.

RE: PDA Buzz
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:44:44 PM #
The negative slant towards Palm was because Wes Salmon was in charge there. PDA Buzz got bought out last month and Wes left so the site is much better, though not nearly as good as Palminfocenter. :)
Wes : Good riddance
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 1:22:33 PM #
As far as Palm specific coverage, Palm InfoCenter ****s all over PDA Buzz.

But you're right, the mood has been considerably lightened since their new ownership got rid of that "PocketPC Nazi" Wes Salmon.

He was just POSITIVE that the Palm OS (not just Palm the company) was going to be eaten alive by PocketPC and Symbian.

I myself can't predict what will happen, but I like Palm's and Symbian's (future) position better than PocketPC's.

Anyway, I like to visit PDA Buzz about once a week or so and get my fill of other PDAs/platforms' progress.

The mood of the site has improved drastically since he was fired.

RE: PDA Buzz
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:06:01 PM #
Ya, PDABuzz actually would tend to have a positive slant towards Palm; most PocketPC forums were concerned about that right when Wes left
RE: PDA Buzz
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 7:58:23 AM #
C'mon - Wes was about as fair as it gets. Unless you are heil Palming everything, you're considered biased. I use a Palm device everyday, but I don't think that Wes was in anyway biased one way or the other. Palm IS slow on innovation and the Oslo looked like they were actually TRYING to do something. Hopefully they looked at Sony and realized what they had wasn't nearly up to par and will now do an NR-70 clone.
RE: PDA Buzz
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 9:06:11 AM #
To the person who refers to Wes as a "pocketPC nazi", I think you're a fool. First of all, for throwing around a term like Nazi in such a casual way. That is such a loaded and inflammatory word. Sceondly, I think you are foolish in making the claim you make about the so-called bias of PDABuzz. Now, I am a loyal Palm user, and have never owned anything but a PalmOS device, but let's face facts: PocketPC's OS and hardware has steadily improved and innovated. In the same time period, Palm has done little. It's only because of Sony (and I am not a Sony user, btw) that PalmOS machines are really moving in any kind of interesting direction. Maybe Wes is biased in favor of companies and products that are actually doing something.

As for Wes being dead-set against PalmOS products, here's a quote from his review of the Clie NR70:

"In my four years of covering the mobile computing industry, I've found few products that pique my interest as much as the Sony CLIE NR70 series. From the day I received it, I have been in PDA bliss. While it falls short in a few areas compared to competing multimedia enabled PDA's, the overall feature set, stunning design, and wow factor are enough to make up the difference. While my NR70V is now on its way back to Sony, you can rest assured I will have one of my very own shortly."

Hmmm....now those sure sound like the words of a PocketPC Nazi, doesn't it? Give me a friggin' break.

Sorry, friend, your comments are both silly and don't hold up in light of the facts.

it is comming

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:29:45 PM #
I have a good source that said that it is going to be released. The oslo code name was changed the second it leaked, so insiders can say "oslo will not be released"

RE: it is comming
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:49:17 PM #
"I have a good source"

OK than,
What are your sources???

How do we know you are not just saying this.

Razor
Palm_Otaku @ 8/20/2002 2:13:34 PM #
Waaaay back in late '98 (Palm III days) there had been all sorts of rumors and speculation about a new, thin Palm Device codenamed "Razor". Then at the PalmSource conference, a Palm rep (Mark Bercow maybe) said "There is no forthcoming product called Razor". What Palm had done was changed the codename to "Sumo", and a few months later released the Palm V.

Now I'm not suggesting that this is necessarily what is happening with "Oslo". If you read Denny's comments on PDABuzz, he states that "Oslo" was a prototype and that Palm's new high-end device will have a different design.

On the other hand, maybe Denny was told "the pictures leaked to the web were of a prototype" (true) and that "There is no forthcoming product called Oslo" (true).

Who knows? :) All I know is that I *really* am looking forward to seeing the new OS5/ARM devices come out!

Heh, and NR70V
Palm_Otaku @ 8/20/2002 2:25:32 PM #
Also, at this year's PalmSource, the NR70V was briefly flashed at one of Sony's sessions (which Ed got a picture of and posted here). It was described as a "prototype" to illustrate the kind of innovation that Sony was putting into the platform. Of course that prototype was released as a product.

OTOH, there have been a number of fully-functional prototype designs (from various licensees) that have not made it to production.

Only time will tell with "Oslo" :)

Quick Guide to Palm OS Device Codenames
bcombee @ 8/20/2002 7:04:38 PM #
From HwrMiscFlags.h in the Palm OS SDK:

Jerry: Palm VII HAL (Palm Computing)
Rocky: Pilot, PalmPilot, Palm III HAL
Sumo: Palm IIIx/V/Vx HAL
Austin: Palm IIIc
Calvin: Palm m100

HAL refers to Hardware Abstraction Layer -- its the layer of the OS between all the calls that programmers use and the actual hardware registers.

Other codenames mentioned in various header files:

Thumper: Qualcomm PDQ
Touchdown: Early name for Pilot 1000/5000
JerryEZ: Later Palm VII, all Palm VIIx's

Brad: ???
Cobra2: ???

Cessna: never released Motorola Palm OS phone

Phoenix: Samsung IH-300

Slinky: Handspring Visor
Belle: Handspring Visor Edge (???)

CFlash: TRGpro
StarKist: HandEra 330

Pda1Mono: Sony CLIE PEG-S300
Pda1Color: Sony CLIE PEG-S500C
Yosemite: Sony CLIE PEG-N710C
Nasca: Sony CLIE PEG-S320
Yellowstone: Sony CLIE PEG-N610C
Yosemite2: Sony CLIE PEG-N760C
Venice: Sony CLIE T415
Modena: Sony CLIE T615C
Nasca2: Sony CLIE PEG-S360
Redwood: Sony CLIE PEG-NR70, PEG-NR70V

--
CodeWarrior for Palm OS technical lead
Programming help at www.palmoswerks.com

RE: it is comming
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 8:06:56 PM #
I know probobly no one is reading this, and probobly no one remembers one of the reviews in the article on "More details on the next gen. handhelds". But the reply said that the real name of OSLO was FARGO. I also read a reply for this article (Rumor: Oslo Never Going to Be Released) that said the reason people say oslo wont be released is that palm changed the code name the second they knew info leaked. Could FARGO be the real changed code name?

Sounds like a bad handheld name. :)

RE: Quick Guide to PalmOS Device Codenames
Palm_Otaku @ 8/20/2002 11:50:59 PM #
Cool, Ben :)

Brad - Palm IIIx
Cobra - Palm Vx ("Cobra2" I dunno - the limited edition colored cases? The rebranded epocrates?)

I've noticed your interest in this topic before, and I'd like to compare notes sometime. Palm uber-geeks might like to see a page on this at www.palmevolution.com (of course I'd like to check if the PalmOS licensees have any issue with codenames being made public after the devices have been released).

RE: it is comming
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 5:59:06 AM #
the trgpro codemane was "nomad"
RE: it is comming
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/23/2002 1:35:27 AM #
The codename Faro turned rightly out to be a short and secret faaaart

Colors

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:30:14 PM #
I wonder how many colors the screen can display?;-)
RE: Colors
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 1:46:56 PM #
:-)
RE: Colors
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:27:27 PM #
Oh that's an easy one, whatever the box it came in says !!!
RE: Colors
useybird @ 8/20/2002 3:50:33 PM #
no because they might lie like they did with the m130

----------------------------------------

As heard on "Cheers":
All:NORM!
Woody:What's up Mr. Peterson?
Norm:The warranty on my liver!

Why Oslo is being terminated
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 8:25:14 PM #
This is not being released due to one simple problem: Palm does not know if this is a 12 or 16 bit screen because their heads are so far up their ***! Talk about self-inflicted wounds, these people are begging for failure.
RE: Colors
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 9:01:45 PM #
As Foghorn Leghorn used to say in the old cartoons "It's a joke boy, get it, joke, man I say buy'em books and send them to school and they still don't get it" ;-)

Faked image ?

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:19:14 PM #
I don't believe this was a "real" device anyhow.

1. Blow the image up and look at the left edge
adjacent to the grafitti area. Lots of blurring.

2. How physically would such a sliding device be manufactured ? There would be huge problems with reliability even if such device could be manufactured.

3. Again inspect the zoomed image:
The interface at the bottom of the sliding screen appears incredibly thin and there appears to be no "edge" at the bottom of the sliding screen.

Its a fake.

Who produced it?? Palm probably to stall over the non-appearance of OS5 devices I suspect. Teething problems with PACE perhaps, Palm ?

RE: Faked image ?
Ed @ 8/20/2002 12:41:00 PM #
I can answer part of this. The original image from the Thai PUG showed the serial number next to the word Oslo. I blurred it out so Palm wouldn't know who had leaked the info. It was probably too late at that point because the Thai PUG had shown it to the world but I still thought it would be best.

---
News Editor
RE: Faked image ?
iain.collins @ 8/20/2002 12:48:57 PM #
A/C: These were all explained ages ago.

I'll bet if you'd seen a picture of an NR70V a year ago you would have said it was impossible to manfacture, couldn't be made reliably and must be a fake.

Your entirely paranoid and I'd go so far as to say mentally ill if you think that it's a fake and that it was released by Palm to divert attention from OS 5 devices.

But then there is always one lunatic who insits that something is a fake, a trick or a con. I've uploaded images of unreleased software and had the same response ("It's clearly a fake, your lame and your rubbish at Photoshop", etc etc.)

This happens all the time on the Spymac gallery I notice, with images I personally know to be entirely genuine. Some people just find life easier if it's one big fantasy.

RE: Faked image ?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:55:06 PM #
Oh no, please don't spoil it for all the photoshop trolls who have had nothing better to do but count pixels and color weights!!!!
What ever will they do now?

(Don't worry guys, Fisher Price leaked some info on it's new line of "Weebles". I hear there is some really suspicious smudging around those pics that should be investigated!)

RE: Faked image ? a PLOY!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:40:22 PM #
They intended to fake or show a non dummy device to that people in the market who comes across the device will hold off their $$$ to wait for what the OSLO has to offer. but it didnt stop me from buying a T665.. HA!

but then it did fool many people here and it kept them from buying the already available handhelds in the market (not just the t665)

nice try palm...

RE: Faked image ? or not
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:17:51 PM #
Looks real to me
RE: Faked image ?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 5:22:02 PM #
>>nice try palm...

you no-life troll.

RE: Faked image ?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 11:30:20 AM #
SLIDING DEVICE IMPRACTICAL?

See the Sharp Zaurus. 'nuff said

RE: Faked image ?
ijablokov @ 8/21/2002 1:11:32 PM #
There's always a pessimist, go back to finding goofs on DVD's LOL

Ok, I'm baffled?

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:26:52 PM #
If they knew that they would not be releasing this model then why all the big fuss when pocketpcthoughts broke the news and put out the picture? As I understand it, palm's lawyers called ppcthoughts and asked nicely to have the picture removed which was done to avoid any legal action by palm. Then they also wanted to know the serial number of the unit which was blocked out of the picture.

Could all this have been a ploy just to keep our attention focused on the oslo so they can get "free" feedback on the concept?

Oh well, I guess we'll just have to sit and wait.

By the way if this rumor of no oslo is true then that means that the high end OS5 device should be based on the M515 design with hi-res, built-in bluetooth, and so on.... That would be PERFECT!

RE: Ok, I'm baffled?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:42:46 PM #
Yawn...This would be boring.
Innovation?
RE: Ok, I'm baffled?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:47:35 PM #
There are places where innovation is important and places where the best solution has already been reached and you shouldn't change things. The Palm V design is the best one a handheld can have. Notice how Sony, Handspring and Acer all copied it. Complaining that Palm isn't changing it just for the sake of change is like complaining that all the 2003 cars lack innovation because they have 4 wheels.
RE: Ok, I'm baffled?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:53:12 PM #
For Palms’ sake I hope this is not where they will take this technology. I am not saying that the Palm V did not have a good design - in its time. I do think that right now they need a bigger boost than more power under the hood as the competition get tighter.
RE: Ok, I'm baffled?
jjsoh @ 8/20/2002 4:09:05 PM #
: Yawn...This would be boring.
: Innovation?

Well, in terms of form factor and hardware, Sony innovates fine by themselves (among others). I have an m505 and I love the form more than any other Palm OS PDA. So as for Palm (i.e. V, m50x), well, IMO, if it ain't broke... :)

Jim

RE: Ok, I'm baffled?
Take1 @ 8/21/2002 8:05:38 AM #
I agree with the need for a powerhouse flagship model in the Palm line-up. The current m515 isn't really impressive when you look at Sony stuff. I personally never considered a Palm simply due to the lack of audio (.mp3 support) and the low-res screen. Looks like Palm has finally gone to 320 x 320, and audio may be in the works (to some extent).

I think Palm pretty much gave up doing anything exciting with their devices in regards to larger screen/multimedia.

A device that's approx. m5xx sized w 320 x 480 screen (virtual grafitti) and heaphone jack for listening to .mp3s (at least as good sounding as the T series) would have me in line to buy one.

Because of the Osbourne factor...
JonAcheson @ 8/21/2002 9:52:48 AM #
No, not Ozzy.

One of the classic blunders in selling technology is to announce your next generation models before they're ready to go on sale. Why? Because if the next generation is good enough, people will wait to buy it, and your sales tank in the meantime.

The classic example was the Osbourne computer, whose first model was successful. The company announced that the next model would be even more awesome, and the customers listened and said "wow, I'm going to wait and get one of those!" and stopped buying the first model. The company went out of business before the second model could be produced.

Palm doesn't want rumors of upcoming devices killing sales of current devices.

Jon Acheson


"All opinions posted are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled."

Most probable cause

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 12:42:38 PM #
1. The MX is proven unreliable and it doesn't give price edge.
2. The Xscale based PDA price is going down so fast, Palm couldn't possibly ignore it by releasing MX based PDA.
3. Very tepid reception on the leak picture.

Most probably Palm will release off the shelf Asus based PDA as rumored. It's here, cheap, working, and thin. Except for the annoying fact that it also run PPC.

More info on Motorola Dragonball MX1?
Palm_Otaku @ 8/20/2002 2:12:49 PM #
Could you post a link to a source that provides more details on your statement that the MX is proven unreliable? I (and probably lots of others) would be very interested in getting more informed on this.

RE: Most probable cause - MX1
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 5:39:25 PM #
How can someone claim the MX1 is unreliable if production samples are not yet available? So far, the MX1 is the only CPU that has been approved by Palm to run Palm OS 5.

The MX1 is the most power efficient and highly integrated silicon between the three leading ARM Palm OS-ready companies: Motorola, TI and Intel.

Besides power efficiency, the chip includes controllers for LCD, memory, infrared, SD, compact flash, camera, and acceleration for Bluetooth and MPEG4.

I believe it is also the least expensive of the three, specially if you consider the integration.

In any case, Palm has announced their PDAs will use TI's chips- which make your comment totally irrelevant and inaccurrate

Go ahead, get and Xscale-based PDA - just remember to get an extra set of batteries.

ARM processors
Palm_Otaku @ 8/21/2002 3:02:42 AM #
In any case, Palm has announced their PDAs will use TI's chips- which make your comment totally irrelevant and inaccurrate

I'm not sure that Palm has stated that *all* of their OS5 devices will use the TI OMAP. It certainly makes sense for their smartphone, but they could use another "PalmOS Ready" chip for other devices. Apparently they've said that a device coming in '03 will use XScale and it's possible they'll use the MX1, or even the chips from ATI or QMedia (though it's unknown how far along these latter chips are).

Go ahead, get and Xscale-based PDA - just remember to get an extra set of batteries.

Heh, well that might be true if you get a PPC XScale device (because PocketPC 2002 isn't optimized to take advantage of the power-saving features) but I expect that Intel will have implemented this feature in the HAL for PalmOS devices.

GOOD THING, ugly palm won't be release after all........

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:25:30 PM #
People love the slim design of palm like M515 would not have to carry a brick and look stupid. If there is anything that needs to be improved for the current palm, it is the screen, the speed, virtual graffiti while maintaining the current form factor. Hopefully all would get addressed in the OS 5.
Um, yeah, right
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:52:48 PM #
People hate bricks?

Then why are they buying m100s and m105s in droves??

You're aware that the Oslo's "specs" make it narrower, and CONSIDERABLY shorter than the m515, right? Thus making it the smallest Palm handheld?

Think before you type.

RE: GOOD THING, ugly palm won't be release after all........
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:57:37 PM #
Personally I dont even care about the form factor of a handheld. I really only care about the features of a handheld. And so if the reason palm didnt realease OSLO was the thickness, I would have bought the first Oslo handheld.

Plus (I am no develepor or engineer) the m5xx form factor with a 320x320 res screen, speaker, blue tooth and ARM processor with duel expansion, who knows how many colors now, and other features cramed into an m5xx searease form case would be increasing the price and make the product more expensive, wouldn't it?

Still I cant wait to see what they do with the OS 5 :)

RE: GOOD THING, ugly palm won't be release after all........
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:34:23 PM #
I find even the m505/515 to be just a hair too thick for my liking. I liked my Vx and I really love my m500. If they're going to get more money from me, it will have to be for a product with a high-res colour screen the same size and thickness as the m500, or the m515 at the thickest. Just one man's opinion, of course, but I was disappointed by the Oslo and knew I could never carry something that thick around. My m500 fits in my wallet. (Oh, and they'd better keep the universal connector. If I have to sell another portable keyboard I'll be really annoyed.)

All this to say, I'm now optimistic that they'll release something better than Oslo, and I say "take your time". We don't need another m500/m505 fiasco where they make the announcement way ahead of availability. That was really bad.

Chad Conrad

RE: GOOD THING, ugly palm won't be release after all........
useybird @ 8/20/2002 3:54:00 PM #
If the Oslo is too thick for anybody to buy, we might just have to recall all Visors (Edge excluded) for being too thick and selling too well.

----------------------------------------

As heard on "Cheers":
All:NORM!
Woody:What's up Mr. Peterson?
Norm:The warranty on my liver!

The difference is CHOICE.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 6:58:06 AM #
I am the original writer and my words to the second writer is this.....if you put something cheap enough people will buy it, not because it is especially sexy or anything. If you care please note that my heading started with the word UGLY.

And to useybird, if Sony offer to exchange their handheld with the thick ones from Visor, I have to bet that the yield is at least 90%. The point is, once people see how thin you could make them, there is no turning back unless it is cheap. On my last count I think Visor discontinue Prism shortly after Sony release the high res screen with a lighter case. GET THE POINT?

RE: GOOD THING, ugly palm won't be release after all........
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 3:40:41 PM #
>"I have to bet that the yield is at least 90%"<

This is solely a statement of opinion. You offer no empirical evidence either to back your opinion, or to establish your credibility beyond "because I think so". I have used both handhelds mentioned in your post, and both have their own flaws and merits. Bottom line is a person will buy what works for them, and meets their price point.

RE: GOOD THING, ugly palm won't release, NOT
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 7:09:56 PM #
Note that this is going to be the BEST and SMALLEST handheld on the market. Every high end user will want one!!!
;)
A bet is a bet.........
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 11:50:03 PM #
>This is solely a statement of opinion. You offer no empirical evidence either to back
> your opinion, or to establish your credibility beyond "because I think so".

I would have said "I think instead of I bet". You should realize the difference and that if you can offer a controlled experiment which we can both agree on then we can have our bets down. Obviously most study don't start out like this but if you only point is to say that there is no empirical evidence, then you are exactly missing the point and what you have to say is irrelevant because you, as demanding a scientist as you are, cannnot disprove me. Your assertion is even less credible and generalize to the point that it doesn't offer any opinions or viewpoints, let alone any material contribution to the problem. You even offer nothing and doesn't think about the reasoning behind why I make that assertion. As such I would have to say that you offer nothing other than critizing someone's thinking process which is neither scientific or beneficial to other Palm users.

No funding for bets, maybe......
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2002 12:06:14 AM #
>This is solely a statement of opinion. You offer no empirical evidence either to back
> your opinion, or to establish your credibility beyond "because I think so".

just to add to the last post: If you don't have the funds to bet, maybe you can request research fund for the study of people's preference on handheld and whether people would substitute a better product for an OK product. At least that would save you some chips that can be used in Vegas.

We should sue Palm!

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 2:54:02 PM #
How can Palm POSSIBLY be trusted now. After all, we put our blind, unending faith in this RUMOR, and now, look at the slap-in-the-face we get. I am outraged that Palm could possibly THINK of denying this RUMOR and telling me that I cannot buy a product that didn't exist, but that I had full faith WOULD be created!

It's not nearly enough that I can go buy a competitor's product. Palm and all its employees must DIE! And their remains should be fed to all those gorillas aided by Pimlico.

RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:21:06 PM #
This is a palm website, not a critisize palm website. Convert to the dark side PPC (Like PPCrap)
If you want to critisize palm, the worlds best selling handheld and platform then critisize palm at pocketpc.com, where you belong
RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:39:43 PM #
Did you seriously not notice that the original poster had his tongue firmly in cheek?
RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:40:37 PM #
Isn't that like saying Taurus is the best car because it outsold Mercedes?
RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 5:01:47 PM #
Uh...I think the Gorillas Pimlico supports are vegetarians.
RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 5:09:47 PM #
"Uh...I think the Gorillas Pimlico supports are vegetarians."

Pimlico actually supports a rare carnivorous breed of gorilla

RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 6:55:55 PM #
"Did you seriously not notice that the original poster had his tongue firmly in cheek?"

Yeah, and head squarley placed up his arse!

RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 7:12:09 PM #
Don't feed the trolls, Kiddies.
RE: We should sue Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 11:52:10 PM #
what the hey?! Is the sarcasm of the original poster that hard to grasp? How the hell could he make it more obvious? oh yeah - i forgot - this is PIC and this kind of comment is usually the kind of thing you kiddies say with a straight face. i hate the lame, no-life, juvenile bantor on this site so much that the only thing i can think of to say to you lame'os (aside from what im saying here) is exactly the kind of sarcastic statement the original poster made - the only sane response to sony/palm fanatics and whiney children with no lives.
RE: Anon Trolls [was: We should sue Palm!]
Palm_Otaku @ 8/21/2002 12:13:13 AM #
Yeah, many of the discussions here get contaminated by this kind of juvenile background noise all too frequently.

Ed, are you and Ryan still thinking of implementing "Registration required for comments"???

Please!!! You've got a GREAT news site here, but the signal-to-noise ratio is often terrible -- you've got to do something to help make this a more civilized place :)

RE: We should sue Palm!
formerlyanon @ 8/21/2002 4:25:50 AM #
LOL!
good one
btw the americans here arent proving wrong the stereotype of americans not understanding sarcasm
"Dont call your mother an iron" family guy


My palm III was 50p from a charity shop, and introduced me to pdas

Oslo will be released

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:08:44 PM #
OK, probably not under the Oslo name (lame name anyway for a PDA). And, as pointed out in an earlier post, the production version may vary slightly, but the key ingredients will be there, i.e. high res, OS5, built-in bluetooth et al. So says my good friend who works at palm.

In order to be released in Sept., production units have been on the manufacturing line for over a month now. No negative feedback generated on these message boards will change that (even if I agree with most of the "negative" feedback). So, buckle up and hold on tight. The OS5 wave is approaching shore.

RE: Oslo will be released
XScale @ 8/20/2002 3:25:19 PM #
So does your friend tell you September is a sure thing for a new Palm OS5 release?

RE: Oslo will be released, good thing
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 3:28:57 PM #
Can your friend give me some more specs on the new handheld, or can you post some info on this site, please:)
RE: Oslo will be released
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 3:47:52 PM #
I have a friend whose sister's stepbrother's cousin's niece works at Palm and tells me.....

You get the point.

We all will reap rich rewards! ''Things go good now.''

Strider_mt2k @ 8/20/2002 4:27:19 PM #
Whether this particular model gets released or not doesn't overshadow the point that there's a ton of KILLER PDA stuff coming down the line soon from everybody!
And not just the usual suspects, but ACER? Samsung?
(Kyocera getting serious too!)
We are about to live through a handheld explosion!
(And I' don't mean mis-handling those fuel cell things either) ;)


strider_mt2k@yahoo.com

Apples iPhone is (probably soon) coming
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 6:42:38 PM #
If the rumored (and very plausible) voice over IP ultra-sexy iPhone (white) from Apple sees the light of the Californian sun then Palm will see the dark side of the moon, in no time.
Name it PalmSource, Palm Inc, Palm hardware, Palm C(O)rooks. however you want, they will be jettisoned of the market within hours such a item is available on the market.

RE: We all will reap rich rewards! ''Things go good now.''
CanadianToastBoy @ 8/20/2002 11:55:46 PM #
Some other apple products comming soon
iMicrowave
iTv
iPee-Pee (toilet)
ivacuum
i etc

RE: Apples iPhone is (probably soon) coming
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 1:14:00 AM #
As the immortal Flo would say, "When donkeys fly!!"

After 756 previous, incorrect rumors saying Apple is about to put out a handheld of some kind, I can't believe ::anyone:: takes this seriously. The boy has cried wolf way too many times.

p.s. Kiss my grits!

RE: We all will reap rich rewards! ''Things go good now.''
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 3:51:00 PM #
>"Name it PalmSource, Palm Inc, Palm hardware, Palm C(O)rooks. however you want, they will be jettisoned of the market within hours such a item is available on the market."<


While I'm sure that IF Apple releases such a product, it will be a very nice offering indeed, I've heard too many people predict the "death of Palm" to give any such comments credence. Like you are the marketing guru here. Please.

RE: We all will reap rich rewards! ''Things go good now.''
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 7:40:49 PM #
No, the next portable Apple product will be the iBrator... they are targeting the upwardly mobile, bored house-wives and porn*star markets! :-)

RE: We all will reap rich rewards! ''Things go good now.''
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2002 3:49:05 PM #

"No, the next portable Apple product will be the iBrator... they are targeting the upwardly mobile, bored house-wives and porn*star markets! :-)"


Oooh, I'd buy one, as long as it had a user-friendly interface! (snork) (Female, BTW!)

Oh Oslo, We Hardly Knew Ye

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 6:16:14 PM #
Maybe Palm will stick with the slim V/m5xx Form Factor? I hope so.

Heh, heh...

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 7:04:41 PM #
I spoke to a *very* good friend who just happens to work for Palm just after the initial Oslo rumours, where everyone was bitching about the thickness of it. The *only* things she said was that "they are wrong about the thickness", and "I've had one under lock and key for weeks now".

It's real, it'll ship, I can't wait! :-)

RE: Heh, heh...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 7:59:57 PM #
You better be 100% correct on this, because I and many others are depending on you. Plus I have been waiting for Oslo for about 3 months.

:)

RE: Heh, heh...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 8:21:37 PM #
Did she say it was recodenamed to fargo. There is a rumor that this is true. Sounds like a lame name for a brilliant handheld.

As long as this handheld wave is coming, I'm buying one!!! :)

RE: Heh, heh...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 9:58:02 AM #
Oh yeah, well my friend said that your friend said they were talking about this over coffee and they said, "whisper, whisper, whisper", and if you don't believe me then my dad will come over and beat up, your, your, what do you have at your house that my dad can come over and beat up?
Fargo
quacksalve @ 8/21/2002 10:01:14 AM #
Really? I love the name Fargo (from the Coen brothers movie).

RE: Heh, heh...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 2:13:41 PM #
>> "Oh yeah, well my friend said that your friend said they were talking about this over coffee and they said, "whisper, whisper, whisper", and if you don't believe me then my dad will come over and beat up, your, your, what do you have at your house that my dad can come over and beat up?" <<

Better yet, you should say "My Sony will beat up your Palm," or "My Palm will beat up your Sony."

Depends on whose childish perspective you want to mock.

RE: Heh, heh...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 6:35:52 PM #
Fargo was the original name for a device with internal BT. It had been used internally at Palm as far back as September, and probably earlier. Fargo was originally planned as a Dragonball 66MHz device with internal BT, but it was decided to wait until ARM was ready to make it viable.

I don't know if Fargo and Oslo are the same thing - but they certainly sound similar because they have internal BT. However, the slider certainly wasn't in early Fargo specs.

RE: Heh, heh...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/26/2002 1:06:04 PM #
Fargo is the name of a billiards game. It combines the aspects of straight pool and nine ball with two different play modes. A great game - it is now used in tournaments in this modern era of billiards/pool.

Oslo cancelled, Norwegians pissed

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/20/2002 8:39:51 PM #
but who cares
Could Be worse
CanadianToastBoy @ 8/20/2002 11:50:39 PM #
They could of code-named it something moronic, like Liberty, Bush, September, Pride or something September-ish

RE: Oslo cancelled, Norwegians pissed
Token User @ 8/21/2002 12:19:33 PM #
What would happen if the OSLO was re-code named "Bush":

None of my text entries could be more than 6 characters long;
The location of the cities in "City Time" would be screwed up;
My calendar would keep teling me it was 1992, not 2002;
It would keep pausing;
My email messages would be reported to the authorities;
It would run have an EPA friendly case, but require an Alaskan oil field to power it;
"Missile Commander", "Chopper", and "Tapper" would be default apps.

Others?

RE: Oslo cancelled, Norwegians pissed
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 3:54:06 PM #
Get a grip. Nobody here cares about your political opinions.

In fact, nobody here cares about your opinions at all. Why do we all think we're so damned important to the rest of the world? Jeez people it's only a PDA for crying out loud. I love handhelds, but there's so much more to life once you realize how insignificant you really are.

RE: Oslo cancelled, Norwegians pissed
CanadianToastBoy @ 8/21/2002 4:05:34 PM #
hahaha.... does it also include a gps that shows the position of Saddam Hussien?

Ugly Oslo

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2002 6:23:32 PM #
Good it sucked anyway.

More OS 5 Vaporware

Tinuviel @ 8/22/2002 2:20:39 PM #
So how long has it been now since the vaporware OS 5 has gone "Golden Master"? And still no device in sight that will run it (if it actually exists at all) or even a rumor of a device that will run it. Perhaps our best hope is that when Palm shares reach the price of a McDonalds Happy Meal (tm), Bill Gates will find enough spare change between the seat cushions of his couch to buy the whole company. Slap in IE 5, and Word and the whole thing could then run on a platform with a 2Ghz Pentium 4 and a 5 minute battery life.

RE: More OS 5 Vaporware
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2002 3:56:53 PM #
...Palm shares reach the price of a McDonalds Happy Meal (tm)...
Sorry to correct you: for a Palm share you cannot even get a decent beagle,
PPC Trolls Running Scared
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2002 4:17:43 PM #
The PPC trolls are scared out of their pants by OS 5. PPC is struggling and soon any advantage in features it had will be erased. Multimedia, 400 MHz processors (that actually RUN at 400 MHz) all coming to the Palm OS this fall. PPC's share of the market is going to drop back down to single figures.

I've heard Microsoft is going to drop the whole PPC platform and move the marketing and development money into tablets. There's no competition there and they might be able to make some money. Microsoft and HP are tired of the tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars they lose every year.

RE: More OS 5 Vaporware
bcombee @ 8/22/2002 8:42:16 PM #
Palm OS 5 has run on my Windows box since early this year... the Palm OS 5 simulator is the real OS 5 code compiled for x86 and running with a special Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) that interfaces with the Win32 API.

--
Ben Combee, CodeWarrior for Palm OS technical lead
Programming help at www.palmoswerks.com
RE: More OS 5 Vaporware
Tinuviel @ 8/23/2002 2:53:34 AM #
But I don't wish to run OS 5 on my desktop- much as I hate Windows 98. I wish to run OS 5 on a HANHELD! Preferrably one with a Palm V form factor, a High resolution color screen, a soft grafiti area, and an earphone jack for decent mp3 playback. An 8 - 12 hour rechargeable battery life would be acceptable. OS 5 running on a Palm V... What a concept! Why can't Palm think of that?
Yep, you're right about the bagel, guess I haven't checked the stock price lately. It seems like just yesterday a hundred shares of Palm were worth as much as a new car. Now a hundred shares is worth the same as the lunch special for 2 at Denny's.

PALM - What's going on??

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/24/2002 8:37:24 PM #
Hello, desperate OS5 user to OS5 developer, is there a problem mission control??
We're ready! We will be carefull, just let us have a go, go on just do it, we wont laugh, were desperate, we just want high res, etc, and we dont want to have to go to Sony, they do not have an SD slot YET, we will embrace it, FOR **** SAKE JUST GIVE US THE BLOO__ DEVICES.
No, wait, I get it, they are going to do a 'STAR WARS' on us, release OS6 first, then OS5 devices will be ready, hence why OS5 comes out and everybody puts out there best OS4.1 devices, very clever, by OS7 the story will all fall into place.
Geeshe, I'm really having trouble working out why Palm are not doing so well.
Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: