MobileInfocenter
PalmInfocenter.com - Palm Software, News & Reviews

Comments on: Palm Powered Devices Have Less Support Problems

A user survey in the December issue of PC World shows that Palm Powered handhelds have fewer support problems and leave their owners more satisfied than Pocket PC devices.

 

Return to Story - Permalink Start a new Comment Email Story


Detailed Comment View (162 Total Comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way.
login or register for free in order to post comments.


Down

 Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
budrowilson @ 12/22/2003 4:14:22 PM #

Anyone who owns a Palm product knows it isn't perfect. But relatively speaking, it's much easier to deal with than any Pocket PC handheld. It'll take hell freezing over before I buy a Pocket PC...


 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
4s @ 12/22/2003 4:30:59 PM #

I briefly switched to PPC because I grew tired of waiting for a Palm with virtual grafitti, hi-res, that did not involve sliders or memory sticks. I had problems with power buttons and dead pixels on more than one model. I am back with Palm, which seems to never let me down.


Even though I babied those PPC, they had problems, unlike my Palms, which have been much more rugged.

<><


 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
conflagrare @ 12/22/2003 7:20:02 PM #

Just had a look at the PPC forums.

They have a fun time with memory leaks, driver conflicts, and "system stability when there is less than 20MB free".

Sounds fun to me.


 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
NumLock @ 12/22/2003 9:56:58 PM #


 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
LiveFaith @ 12/23/2003 8:45:14 AM #

conflagrare,

It's sounds just like Windows! That was the goal and it looks like they did it.

Pat Horne; www.churchoflivingfaith.com


 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
rsc1000 @ 12/23/2003 8:38:04 PM #

>>Even though I babied those PPC, they had problems, unlike my Palms, which have been much more rugged.

So true! A few years ago, I was using a Casio EG-800 'ruggedized' PPC (check out this big ol' beast: http://www.pocketpcmag.com/images/CasioEG-800.jpg). It cost $1400 cdn at the time - almost double the non-ruggedized version (it was basically a rugged E125). I dropped it 3 feet unto carpeted floor and it died (im not making this up!). If i had a buck for every time my old Palm Vx was subjected to the same or greater torture (in some cases MUCH greater) and lived, i'd be rich.



 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
devildoc @ 12/26/2003 2:30:41 PM #

Particularly if it was USD.


 RE: Palm OS isn't perfect, but...
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 4:05:43 PM #

Or Euros!

Reply to this comment
 Shame about Sony Clie PEG-TJ35-G
elmo @ 12/22/2003 5:53:23 PM #

Shame about Sony pushing up the statistics (Palms needing support), I have had a Palm for as long as I have had a hand held, and they have been brilliant!

However, I finally convinced my Father to come over from the dark side ;) to get a palm. After many years of PPC usage, he purchased a Sony Clie PEG-TJ35-G with Palm OS 5.2.1

Purchasing a palm was when the problems started, every second day, he would have to do a hard reset and restore from memory stick. Did sony give a damn about this? Hardly at all. After a lot of battling, they replaced the unit with a new unit..TWICE (with the error still occuring).

I'm throwing it open to any Sony support representatives to contact me, and show that they care about their products and keeping the reputation of "Palm Powered Devices Having Less Support Problems"

Mark
email: cybercrutch [at] yahoo [dot] com [dot] au



 RE:No Shame about Sony Clie's
Hal2000 @ 12/22/2003 7:17:53 PM #

All of my Sony PDA's have been tough on the inside and out with none of the problems mentioned above. Certainly, Sony's reliability, tech support not included, should not bring down the palm OS average.

"One hour martinizing! Who is this guy martin anyhow?"

 RE: Shame about Sony Clie PEG-TJ35-G
timepilot84 @ 12/22/2003 11:03:09 PM #

Aren't those being recalled?


 RE: Shame about Sony Clie PEG-TJ35-G
xpan @ 12/23/2003 4:37:33 AM #

yes. You were unlucky to buy the only clie that has been recalled because of internal problems. Thank God I managed and cancelled my order before completion and turned to T|T2.

At least in the USA and Canade there has been a major recall. check www.cliesource.com and www.clie-link.com
for further info

home is where my computer is...

Reply to this comment
 Don't want to start a war here but....
mr_yellow @ 12/22/2003 11:27:25 PM #

I'm a Palm to PPC convert that's looking for a way to get back to Palm. But statistics can be manipulated in many ways to prove an hypothesis.

But it's really hard to say which OS is more "stable" than the other. From what I've seen, Palm owners come in two fronts: no-effort dummies, and typical gadget geeks. There are more "dummies" than "gadget geeks" palm users.

PPC owners come in the same 2 fronts, but with more gadget geeks than dummies.

If you're a gadget geek, you will spend the exact same amount of time setting up your palm as your ppc to your liking and have it operating to it's limits (like any power user would). PalmOS has the same amount of quirks and tricks as any PPC device.

But if you're a dummy user, It takes a lot more effort to setup a ppc to operate for day to day uses than a palm. PalmOS is just "easier".

So let's not get into a big war here. This survey says nothing about the actual abilities and stability of the OS's... It does say a lot about they type of users found in each group.


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
Larken @ 12/23/2003 12:55:28 AM #

I think in the circumstance of the individual user, you are correct. Because I have supported PDA users in the past, I think a bit differently. When you work in an environment of 2000 users, and you are supporting handhelds, the vast majority of users are not what you would call power users. Most are only using their handheld for PIM functions. In this instance, you get a real feel for how much easier Palm is to support and how little support they need compared to PPC. I would say in a given month, there were at least 3 times the number of calls for PPC as there were for Palm. And the resolve times for Palm is almost always shorter than PPC.


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
jodpel @ 12/23/2003 1:25:09 AM #

I've had a lot of PPCs and a few Palm OS devices (Casio E100, E105, Jornada 420.. 4XX something anyway, iPAQ 3650 and 3955 as well as Sony T series, a Palm m505 and a Tungsten T... I just returned a T3 for a refund.) Would you believe that the only unit that I ever owned that had to go in for repair was the Tungsten T? The #@$! digitizer messed up. They sent it back the first time without doing much to it. This time I got a new screen and have had it back for about two weeks.

I really like the Palm OS, but there are some things that I do with my PPC that work better on that platform. If I loaded enough 3rd party software on either one, I could make them flake out (PPC or Palm). The T3 that I tried for a few days would hang the HotSync manager every time I synced Versamail with my Exchange account. I keep trying to go Palm, but it won't do everything my PPC will do yet. I thought the T3 would be the one, but it's still not quite there yet. The Sony wound up with my daughter, my wife uses the Tungsten T, the m505 went to a friend, and I'm still stuck with the iPAQ until OS6 comes out. I am frankly bored to death with the Windows CE user interface.

I guess user mileage varies. I suppose a magazine poll isn't terribly scientific. I really think(hope) that when everything settles in with OS6 and stabilizes, I'll find PDA nirvana.


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
LiveFaith @ 12/23/2003 8:49:26 AM #

Remember that classic TV advertisement from the 80s from Apple Computer which showed a large corporate office environment with a PC and a Mac sitting side by side for all users to access? Two managers are discussing which system is best as they stand inside a glassed in office.

One gives the normal canned conehead response "Well it's the one with the most MIPS, mhz and throughput etc etc". As users get up and down from using the Mac, they more discerning manager says "But, you know a lot more people use the Mac than the PC". Immediately, the conehead says boldly, "Yeah, but that's an unfair comparison ... PEOPLE LIKE USING THE MAC". Then the two managers stare at each other in the amazement of epiphany!

Enough said about why Palm.

Pat Horne; www.churchoflivingfaith.com


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
talos4 @ 12/23/2003 1:14:14 PM #

jodpel,

The T3 Versamail problem was due to the fact that your default MAPI client is incorrectly set to Outlook Express, not Outlook. It's in the documentation and reminds you in the Versamail configuration/setup.

That said, as an owner of various Palms since the original PPP, I wouldnt exactly say that they in general are the most reliable devices I've ever owned.

Which to me says that PPC's must really suck.

R


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 3:21:52 PM #

>>>Which to me says that PPC's must really suck

Oh stop. They don't suck. Not completely. Nor are PalmOS devices Manna from Heaven.

PalmOS 6 had Better Be Something Amazing, is all I can say... it's the culmination of *years* of PalmOS user frustrations. And if they don't please the living hell out of us, there will be war.

Sharpening my WMDs...


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
TASKA @ 12/25/2003 9:59:59 AM #

OS 6.0 would be so slow and unstable, I'll have enough comic material till 2006.

 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
mikecane @ 12/25/2003 10:13:06 AM #

We'll see.

What will WinMob04 require? 1GHz XXXScale just to get past the logo screen?


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
TASKA @ 12/25/2003 1:59:34 PM #

No, that would be POS 6.0, with all the memory mapping, secure kernel and big fat emulator layers. :D

WM2k4 is jsut the same as WM2k2 right now, a couple minor up grade that's about it.


 RE: Don't want to start a war here but....
Tuckermaclain @ 12/26/2003 11:59:03 AM #

>>.What will WinMob04 require? 1GHz XXXScale just to get past the logo screen?

MobyWin? Ahoy! That's one big piece of bloatware, Jack Sparrow! You're gonna need alot of wind in your sails to get past the logo!

I couldn't help it. I was watching Pirates of the Caribean again.

Reply to this comment
 Apples to Oranges
DevPOV @ 12/22/2003 11:23:03 PM #

The Palm OS is quite a simple OS to deal with unlike the "comprehensive" Windows OS (mobile edition). Palm does not support multi-tasking, real device drivers, etc. Support *should* be less using an OS that is less complicated.

But if you look at the trend, I bet support requirements have been growing steadily with each major OS release. Devices running the 3.x OS are extremely stable. OS 4.x devices, aren't bad, but a few things started to crop up. OS 5.x has been making software development much more complicated. PACE is great, but some apps, hacks, etc. just don't "behave" well. Many apps don't even take advantage of all OS 5 has to offer. A user has to really check if they are running the right version of an application for their device. Sony, Handspring, and Palm flavors all have different features developers need to be aware of and code around. Even simple things like the virtual graffiti input area have different requirements on different devices with the "same" OS.

I bet when OS 6 devices start showing up, the complexity will start getting to the point where support may match the PPC levels. Especially the first few revisions. At that point, the "comprehensiveness" of the OS will start to resemble Windows.

So, comparing the support requirements of Palm OS to PPC is apples to oranges.


 RE: Apples to Oranges
DevPOV @ 12/22/2003 11:52:27 PM #

hehe... I guess I could've just said "The more complicated an OS is, the more chances there are for bugs and therefore user-support issues."



 RE: Apples to Oranges
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 9:57:32 AM #

>>>I guess I could've just said "The more complicated an OS is, the more chances there are for bugs and therefore user-support issues."

I wonder what you'll say when you see PalmOS 6? I hope you like the taste of your own words (I've had to eat mine several times!).


 RE: Apples to Oranges
DevPOV @ 12/24/2003 2:38:54 PM #

Well, the pessimist in me says that since OS 5 created incompatibilities and whatnot, that OS 6 will also.

BUT, I'm still banking that Palm OS 6 will STILL be a better platform than M$.


 RE: Apples to Oranges
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 12:10:39 PM #

I hope you get to laugh all the way to that bank.

I'm still waiting to hear the announcement that its finished On Time As Previously Announced.

Reply to this comment
 Palms are like Macs
benixau @ 12/23/2003 2:00:20 AM #

Palms are like macs - they work and work. When something does actually go wrong 9/10 times it just needs a reset and all is fixed.

PPCs are, even by MS' admittal, Windows in your pocket. If you like the windows world and need PPC features (ability to extend no of inputs and switch seperately (little thing in bottom right of PPC bottom bar)) OR want PPC hardware features (HP4150 is a very good reason to switch) then go get them.

Just dont come here for help.


 RE: Palms are like Macs
xpan @ 12/23/2003 4:45:22 AM #

almost... but don't forget that PPCs are much more expencive than Palms (as MACs are more expenive than PCs).



---
"home is where my computer is..."


 RE: Palms are like Macs
mikecane @ 12/25/2003 9:19:35 AM #

>>>almost... but don't forget that PPCs are much more expencive than Palms

Not *that* expensive.

For just $50 more than the T3, you can get an hp 41xx with BT *and* WiFi built-in. (For $100 *less*, you can get one w/o WiFi -- the 1945!)

One can use the "But it doesn't have a 320x480 screen!" argument -- but that alleged "high res plus" screen is *still* only showing as much text as the *original* 160x160 screen (L->R).

And the hp 41xx is smaller and sleeker than the T3.

How odd that the *true* successor to the Palm V series is from hp and runs PPC OS!


 RE: Palms are like Macs
jss1432 @ 12/26/2003 4:25:32 PM #

Yes, Palms are like pre-OSX Macs: they crash a lot, they don't multitask, they look pretty, and they have a zealous user community that thinks they are perfect nontheless.


 RE: Palms are like Macs
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:01:17 AM #

And just like the Mac, MS steals all the best ideas from it...


 RE: Palms are like Macs
jss1432 @ 12/27/2003 2:03:51 PM #

Yes, and just like most of the stuff that Microsoft copied from Apple was stuff that Apple copied from other people, so most of the stuff that Microsoft is copying from Palm is stuff that Palm copied from other people. Overall, none of Microsoft, Apple, or Palm are very original.


 RE: Palms are like Macs
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 4:09:13 PM #

Xerox PARC -- now *there* was originality!

Apple has been original. The iPod broke new ground. They've made many things very user-friendly, even if those ideas rested on the foundation of PARC's originality; they also went beyond PARC in many ways. MS has yet to catch up to Apple.

But, geez, no floppy with the iMac...?

As for PPC and Palm... I like PPC's Tap&Hold. I also like the way I can copy/paste **GOBS** of text w/o fear of crashing. Bloody hell, trying to edit simple DOCs on my CLIE above *20K* is like defusing a freaking bomb! OTOH, Palm has reliable PIM alarms (hear that, ska?!)...


 RE: Palms are like Macs
abosco @ 12/28/2003 8:14:33 PM #

I'm surprised you haven't pointed to this yet:

http://www.vcnet.com/bms/departments/innovation.shtml

I still laugh every time I go there.

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: Palms are like Macs
Foo Fighter @ 12/28/2003 9:05:06 PM #

Quote: "Say no to monopolies"

Gee, guess that includes Apple since they are even more monopolistic than Microsoft.

-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com

Reply to this comment
 Does One OS Really Fit All?
jdh @ 12/23/2003 9:00:13 AM #

I think the inherent problem here is the belief by Microsoft that their Windows OS should be extended to all possible platforms, and is a good fit in every situation.

Over the past few years, Windows has become a reasonable desktop PC OS, but in my opinion, that's about the only platform that it's even reasonably usable on. Unfortunately, Microsoft has tried to extend the same model to Servers and PDAs... I'm really not sure what thought process led them to believe that the same basic OS used on a desktop PC would work in a server or PDA environment.

Windows Server is a joke in terms of both performance and stability when put up against Linux, any Unix-derivative or even NetWare. As far as I'm concerned, Windows Mobile still has a long way to go before it's at the same level of stability, performance, and usability as Palm OS.

Think about it: Would you rather use an OS that was *designed* for your type of device, or something that was hacked down from another platform? Palm designed an OS for a PDA - it has never been intended or used for anything else, and it works really well as a PDA OS for about 99% of the "normal" PDA users out there.

And does your PDA *really* need to support multi-tasking?

I realize that there are a lot of "gadget geeks" out there that like the Pocket PC, but I think there are also at least as many "gadget geeks" who are using something like the Sharp Zaurus...



 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
DevPOV @ 12/23/2003 1:21:13 PM #

You're right about that, and that HAS been what made Palm OS much better. Due to market pressures (M$ and "power" users), I'm thinking the Palm OS trend is going towards more complexity and "do everything" and that's going to really increase the support and usability.

I *loved* it when a Palm could run on a couple of dry cell batteries. Very usable. Now, if my Palm drains while on a long flight, I'm S.O.L.


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
SKA @ 12/23/2003 2:03:42 PM #

why don't we wait for Palm OS 6.0 and hear everybody scream how multi-tasking is the best envention since sliced bred.

 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
the phoenix @ 12/23/2003 5:00:21 PM #

The "Multi-tasking" thing is a funny one though. My Psion mx5 multi tasked just fine, I could switch between one task to another and there it was just how I left it. My home computer does the same (either PC or Mac) ..... But funnily enough, I get the feeling my Palm device also does the same thing. I switch from an email to a memo, and then when I go back to the email, I am exactly where I was!

Yeah yeah, I know. It's not "multit-asking" as such. but it amounts to the same thing in practical terms, and isn't everyday use what matters in the end?

My point it that at the multi-tasking bone is a nice one to throw, and I guess a true one in the true sense of the word. But when it comes down to everyday use, it does just that as far as the end user is concerned. My treo 600 can pick up mail in the background if I so desire it to, and then I can switch back and browse. I can receive a phone call and talk to the person on the other end and check out my calender (using either the speaker phone or the ear buds of course!) I can listen to MP3's, write an email and get interupted by a call or a text message.

Though not officially multi-tasking... It seems to be doing a pretty good job of it to me...

But hey, what do I know?!


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
techiemac @ 12/24/2003 9:51:37 AM #

Regarding the issue of multitasking...
I'm a software engineer and I can tell you that most apps, by default, are not multitasked (ok, the OS may spew off a few threads for your app but that's a different story). Take, for example, when you need to do some sort of processing a progress bar pops up and you can't do anything... not a multitasked app.
This, believe it or not, can be a good thing. When you are dealing with multiple tasks, a whole host of issues can pop up (dealing with Mutexes, Semaphores, Priority Inversion, etc.) and if you do not cross your t's and dot your i's then both the developer and user is in for a whole world of hurt. Personally I like the fact that PalmOS is not multitasked. It works great, does what it needs to, and is stable.
There are too many developers out there that see that: 1. They can multitask an app
2. Don't look at the real issues behind multitasking
3. Code that puppy up without enough experience (yes, there are many things one does not learn in school)
4. Create havoc due to priority inversions, locked threads, etc. Don't get me wrong, even very experienced developers wrestle with this.
I'm claiming that I'm an "uberdeveloper" but I have worked on high availability multithreaded apps and gone through the hurt that can be associated with it.
Those people that brag about how PocketPC is multithreaded and PalmOS is not, one can ask the difference in reliablity between the two systems.

-Mac


techiemac@yaspamhsucksoo.com (to email remove spam sucks)


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
DevPOV @ 12/24/2003 2:42:03 PM #

Exactly. For PDAs, I vote for a non-multi-tasking OS.


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 4:04:14 PM #

I vote for multitasking.


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
pixelator @ 12/25/2003 10:54:10 AM #

I also vote for multitasking. See, this is what I'm talking about -- some folks get so entrenched that they lose sight of the benefits of something different and, perhaps, just MAYBE, better suited to their needs? 'Oh, I don't have it so I don't need it.'

Silliness. I've had no 'multithreading issues' using PPC software before, even with the most rudimentary apps. Not as simple as Palm, perhaps -- but not rocket science.


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 12:11:53 PM #

Pix: I've made the same points in the past. You just haven't seen them or choose to ignore them. The dolts in the past I had to put up with who wailed, "Color isn't necessary..." Please!


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
ZX @ 12/27/2003 10:43:41 AM #

Yeah, multitasking is *good-to-have* but does not truly serve out actual difference in user experience.

The palm (or PPC) has a small screen and can only display one app at a time to decently use it at all. Palm already have events that apps can use to hook on and perform tasks (eg alarms etc).

As the phoenix said, what really matters is what the user ultimately experience.

Palm apps (that are written according to the proper palm design) should store its states when the user selects one of the hard buttons or the sillkscreen buttons or power off. In some apps, the design may be to close the app or something while in others (like memopad), the current state is saved.

When the app is relaunched, the app will reload any existing information or state stored and display to the user the app as it last appeared. With some exceptions, most palm apps are doing this nicely (thanks to the simple way of doing this provided by the SDK!).

As a result, the end-user gets the same (or similar) experience as in the case if the OS is multi-tasked.

I'm sure there are those who want their memo-pad to continue to use up preciouse CPU cycles in the background and perhaps respond to some ghost-user input as well, but with the screen real-estate of the palm (or PPC), most apps do not need to do anything once it is in the background.

"Have a Nice day unless you have other plans" - Quoted from Buddhist Literature


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:02:29 AM #

MultiFinder on the Mac did the same thing.

But really, the MemoPad using CPU cycles is a straw man. There are instances where multitasking is useful. Must I list them and insult your intelligence by doing so? I'm sure you can think of a few on your own.


 Multitasking on a PDA
hotpaw4 @ 12/27/2003 4:26:12 PM #

Multitasking on a PDA might be useful when the background task is doing something useful, downloading a web page, streaming some audio, etc. However most of the background tasks running on a typical PPC handheld are just wasting memory and CPU cycles, which has a far worse impact on a device with a small battery than on a desktop PC. And as the Mac MultiFinder and PalmOS have demonstrated, being able to switch back to a small application quickly does not require preemptive multitasking.

So the proper way to architect multitasking on a PDA would be to provide enough background thread/task support for comms/media/security, etc., but not so much as to encourage lazy programmers to write more apps which just waste memory spinning in the background.


 RE: Does One OS Really Fit All?
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 5:22:33 PM #

Yes: Let's hope they do that. (Unlike with WinCE where MS Smurfphone XDAII owners find all the damned processes have been taken up by sloppy programmers who *should* have used threads instead!)

Reply to this comment
 And the preaching goes on...
pixelator @ 12/24/2003 3:40:05 AM #

Another PPC-bashing article by PIC. Mike, are you paying attention? This is what I'm talking about.

Anyway - look at it this way, Palm Boosters. A PPC is like a car with electric and automatic amenities compared to a stripper without any options. Naturally, with fewer things to break, reliability on the stripper will be higher. PalmOS is indeed more simplistic for the casual user (try managing expansion memory files and that simplicity takes a hit - as when attempting to wrangle wireless cards, etc). Ergo, these people's expectations are lower.

It's no surprise we see this kind of garbage posted here at PIC. I just wonder if someday Ryan and his fellow Palm fanatics will someday relax their aggro attacks on PPC and see that there really are some reasons to pick something OTHER than the much-beloved (and defended) PalmOS.


 RE: And the preaching goes on...
tg50fan @ 12/24/2003 5:55:09 AM #

I have just purchased a replacement for my dying psion (guess which one !).
I have no 'axe to grind' and offer the following thoughts.
I wanted an organiser which would do what my psion did (keep me organised !) but given the changes in technology I wanted a colour screen and the ability to keep me entertained (mp3 etc) so I had a wide choice of devices for the sort of money Id expect to pay (UK £150 t0 £300- usually our numbers equate to doillar figures despite exchange rates.)
It is clear that Pocket PCs (PPC means something very different to veteran Mac users) need a faster processer to support a larger OS and therefore tnd to give less features at a given price point. Despite my natural Apple desire to avoid all the works of Gates and his minions I did ask around about Pocket PC devices and the users seemed happy with them apart from occasional 'lock ups' which could be dealt with without losing all data. However the TG50 was on offer at a local retailer, had a thumb keyboard and came with a good selection of software to do everything I wanted. I therefore chose the Clie, am happy with it and would buy another.
Surely the bottom line is if a device does what you want well and does not drive you crackers it is a good device, I never missed all the goodies on my psion but liked the fact it was virtually bomb proof and had good software. Would it be possible to call atruce on this issue and ignore those who are obviously prelytising and generally being mischevious ?
Seasons Greetings from the UK (BTW Macs rule :-))

CJB

My psion died and went to PDA heaven. I hope its not jealous of my TG50


 RE: And the preaching goes on...
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 9:45:37 AM #

Hey, Pix. Guess what? The *same* frigging article is cited (did you catch that key word, Pix? *CITED* -- they are *referencing* an article written *elsewhere*! It's not "by PIC.") at the following sites too:

http://geek.com/news/geeknews/2003Dec/bpd20031223023206.htm

http://www.bargainpda.com/default.asp?newsID=1815

http://brighthand.com/article/Survey_Palm_OS_Users_Have_Fewer_Problems

Now are you going to go whiiiiinnnne over there?

Oh, and check out the spin on that article especially *here*:

http://www.newmobilecomputing.com/story.php?news_id=3601

You should send that site an award for their -- cough!cough! -- objectivity!

It's *very* interesting that pocketnow and ppcthoughts and ppcpassion do *not* cite the article. How very very very very VERY interesting! Don't you think so?


 RE: And the preaching goes on...
Admin @ 12/24/2003 2:26:15 PM #

Please specifically explain to me how I am personally attacking Microsoft as you claim?

I am simply reporting the facts from an article that was published by another magazine. Neither do I ever claim one os is better than another or "bash" as you suggest. That is what is done by the trolls that post here from "pro-msft" sites.

ps - great point Mike!

-Ryan


 RE: And the preaching goes on...
Gekko @ 12/24/2003 3:03:03 PM #

Ryan - It's obvious that you SELECTIVELY post only stories that are PRO-Palm/Apple and ANTI-MSFT/PPC. Your unbiased charade is an insult to our intelligence. Despite that, I still enjoy the site. After all, it is "PALM Infocenter". THANKS for your work.



 RE: And the preaching goes on...
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 3:15:33 PM #

Hey, he mentions when Palm (palmOne/PalmSource) screws up. Do you EVER see that on the MVP sites? No, they come like little beggars with cap/cup in hand and their jillions of qualifiers, "You know, maybe if MS did this..." or "Maybe it's just me, but shouldn't this work like that?" et al.

They would *never* rake MS over the coals as I've raked Sony and Palm over them. Gotta protect their little kissy-kissy setups.

("My God! BillG gave me an *autographed picture* for Xmas!")


 Is THIS bashing, Pix?!
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 4:04:42 PM #


 RE: And the preaching goes on...
Hazniet @ 12/26/2003 12:21:50 PM #

Hey Gekko,

Notice the name of the site: PALM Infocenter.

If you want to go marching around glorifying PPC OS then go to another site. I don't come to PIC to listen to a bunch of PPC trolls talk it up. Talk is cheap, bring your proof next time...oh wait you don't want to spend the time/money to create a survey such as this one because the data would probably point to PalmOS.

________________________________________
If you feel like you're under control, you're just not going fast enough.


 RE: And the preaching goes on...
Gekko @ 12/26/2003 5:30:49 PM #

hey Hazniet - I could care less who wins - Palm or PPC. I buy the best product that works for me at that point in time. I have no bias. Get a life.



Reply to this comment
 I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 9:58:47 AM #

I mean, look, they *make it a point* to come here and defend a frigging platform from a BILLIONAIRE. Talk about shills! Talk about sucking up (and up and up and up!).

I never see this kind of reaction on PPC sites from Palm owners (well, except from Foo at times, but he's sui generis!).

Palm owners generally ignore PPC sites.

Too bad PPC owners don't do the same. (You'd think that glorious OS of theirs would keep their idle hands occupied. Apparently not...)


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 10:07:56 AM #

Oh, look at this stark admission!

"Disclaimer: while we sympathize with Microsoft´s efforts in cell phone industry, we are however interested in long-term success of Microsoft powered cell phones (Microsoft Smartphone and Pocket PC Phone Edition), that is why we are revealing problems, rather than hiding them... Several websites that are being run by so called MVPs (Microsoft Valued Professionals) are not allowed to publish such information, but we, being an indepentent publication, can do it! Watch msmobiles.com regularly for more revealing stories about Microsoft powered cell phones! You will not find such stories elsewhere because either people are totally anti-Microsoft and understand Microsoft technologies only superficially, or are restricted by Microsoft and cannot publish such stories. We can."

http://msmobiles.com/news.php/1870.html

Now, let's see... aren't the webmasters of ppcthoughts, ppcpassion, and pocketnow MS MVPs?

"...or are restricted by Microsoft and cannot publish such stories."

Oh, I see now! Thank you, Big Brother!

(Let's see someone from palmOne or PalmSource try to get away with sh*t like that *here*. Won't happen!)


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/24/2003 11:27:43 AM #

So , uhm mike, how is that Sony you are using? It's a device made by multibillion international conglomerates, Sony.

So much for defending under dog eh?


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 12:28:00 PM #

Me, DEFEND Sony?! Have you been smoking the mistletoe?


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/24/2003 1:12:27 PM #

are you saying you are not purchasing a device from multibillion dollar multinational company?

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/24/2003 3:14:06 PM #

That's exactly what I'm saying. Someone else bought it for me as a gift.

Now please put your tail between your hind legs and scram.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
RhinoSteve @ 12/25/2003 2:59:34 AM #

I heard it best, "A Windows licensse is much akin to an abused wife. They just accept the beating and can't even see that there is a life where they can be happy. When something better comes along, they run since they don't feel they deserve it."

And frankly, PPC users fit this profile to a tee!

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/25/2003 9:17:15 AM #

Ah, you're exaggerating.

There are reasons for each platform. Even the Linuxed Zaurus.

But neither of those two match the simplicity or the *reliability* of PalmOS's PIMs.

That's is PalmOS's strength -- and maybe its downfall too...


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
pixelator @ 12/25/2003 10:32:52 AM #

Mike: I am a PALM user as much as you. Moreso, because I've put a hell of a lot more money in their pocket than you have. I'm a shill? So does that mean YOU'RE a shill in the PPC forums on BH? LOL.

Ryan: You regularly post pro-Palm anti-PPC articles. I just browsed one from November of last year a couple of days ago. There were comments in the response column to that effect, even back then (discussing Ed's objectivity and your seeming lack thereof - which is telling, because I've gone on record at BH of saying Ed needs MORE objectivity).

The bottom line is, this article (that was readily quoted here with additional comments by PIC) reflects something we already know - not that PPCs are inherently less reliable or more poorly made, but more complex and not as easy to use as your basic Palm Zire. I challenge any magazine or website to pit a Sony CLIE NR/NX/NZ against your average (or top line) PPC and see how the average consumer fares in using each to their fullest potential.

Mike, I'm glad you're not an e805 owner (although you'd never know it from your mass postings in the Toshiba forum at BH). I can only imagine the amount of spazzy horsepucky we'd have to wade through every day from you if you actually OWNED one. I'd fear for Bill Gates' life if anything actually went wrong (as you seem to continue to operate under the fantasy that he is the evil PPC overlord and any of us who speak non-critically of the platform are 'shills').

Get real, guys. It's as the previous poster put it. You get what you prefer if it does the job better. I have both because I have many jobs (like being the biggest geek I can be).


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
pixelator @ 12/25/2003 10:44:38 AM #

Oh, and to Palmbooster RhinoSteve: I did find something better, and bought it - an e805. How's that theory of yours working for ya? I figure I have the best of both (current) worlds with the devices I have.

Here's another theory: Palm devotees love to claim a kind of quasi political/ethical superiority by swearing off Microsoft powered PDAs (despite their dependence and investment in desktop MS software). When a PPC pops up with a new feature, they firmly and with piety that would make the Pope cringe, proclaim that feature to be frivolous or unnecessary. This was true of, let's see... Color, high res screens, expansion memory, swappable Lithium batteries, MP3 playback, headphone jacks, multimedia, d-pads... etc. -- I've already seen some of the more hardcore Palm fans dismissing VGA on a handheld as 'excessively high resolution'. LOL!

C'mon, fellow geeks... We're all sort of on the same team, anyway. Merry Christmas and may all your presents be PALMS! ;)



 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
abosco @ 12/25/2003 11:10:26 AM #

>>I've already seen some of the more hardcore Palm fans dismissing VGA on a handheld as 'excessively high resolution'. LOL!

That would be me. Taking into account VGA can have higher resolution videos, pictures, games, and the like, I definitely think it's too high because of the battery power required. HVGA is already bad enough with power. Look at the TT3 - can't even last four hours. Imagine putting VGA in that! No way. I like it that OEM's are trying to pick up where Microsoft stopped, but VGA may be going a little too far. (And battery life seems fine on the e805 because it's got a monster battery - I've heard it enough.. but you won't see a VGA H4155 anytime soon)

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/25/2003 12:55:52 PM #

Bosco, you tried to dismiss Gaming on PDA as silly and try to put forth that Palm is a serious tool unlike that multimedia laden and snazzy PPC fooleries.

until you post your NX launchers, and it shows 80% of your apps are games! (I am still laughing)

----- now for this "support problem".


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
RhinoSteve @ 12/25/2003 1:52:59 PM #

Well have fun resetting that e805 when you have too many apps running. I stand by what I said and quit consulting jobs when they decided to go PPC. Later, I find out users in the field were having big time problems with the units and backflashing to management. Calls back to them six months later were not returned by management since they didn't want to admit they made a mistake.

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
rcartwright @ 12/25/2003 11:42:47 PM #

I love to see all the peace on earth and goodwill toward men on the PIC board at Christmas.

Life is a great adventure or nothing.

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 12:13:26 PM #

>>>Mike: I am a PALM user as much as you. Moreso, because I've put a hell of a lot more money in their pocket than you have.

Shall we also upzip and measure?

>>>I'm a shill? So does that mean YOU'RE a shill in the PPC forums on BH? LOL.

Not a shill for Palm. Or PalmOS. Show me the kind of PalmOS cultist postings I've made over there that PPC users engage in *here*.

>>>Ryan: You regularly post pro-Palm anti-PPC articles. I just browsed one from November of last year a couple of days ago.

Too bad you didn't supply an URL. Was he again *referencing* an article posted elsewhere? And, hey, what about all those idiotic Gartner forecasts that constantly predict Palm's funeral under PPC? I notice the Big Three Cult Sites (thoughts, passion, now) regularly make sure to *reference* them.

>>>There were comments in the response column to that effect, even back then (discussing Ed's objectivity and your seeming lack thereof - which is telling, because I've gone on record at BH of saying Ed needs MORE objectivity).

Well, if Steve is to be believed, Ed is happily using a Toshi GENIO now.

>>>The bottom line is, this article (that was readily quoted here with additional comments by PIC) reflects something we already know - not that PPCs are inherently less reliable or more poorly made, but more complex and not as easy to use as your basic Palm Zire. I challenge any magazine or website to pit a Sony CLIE NR/NX/NZ against your average (or top line) PPC and see how the average consumer fares in using each to their fullest potential.

Oh, I'll give you the bottom line right here to that comparison --

PIMS: Palm - excellent, PPC - awful
Everything else: Palm - awful, PPC - excellent

Now show me just *ONE* PPC Cultist who''l admit that the PIMs for PPC are just crap!

>>>Mike, I'm glad you're not an e805 owner (although you'd never know it from your mass postings in the Toshiba forum at BH).

Mass postings? As opposed to your overweening egocentric look-at-me-I-*used*-to-be-a-game-tester-at-Lucas novella-length posts?

>>>I can only imagine the amount of spazzy horsepucky we'd have to wade through every day from you if you actually OWNED one. I'd fear for Bill Gates' life if anything actually went wrong (as you seem to continue to operate under the fantasy that he is the evil PPC overlord and any of us who speak non-critically of the platform are 'shills').

I've never said average users who like PPC are shills. You *know* who the shills and cultists are. Maybe you are even one of them (judging from how you go out of your way to defend PPC on PIC!). Don't fear for Gates' life. Fear for the lives of the millions who suffer under his crapware dominion.

>>>Get real, guys. It's as the previous poster put it. You get what you prefer if it does the job better. I have both because I have many jobs (like being the biggest geek I can be).

I'd say you were the biggest something else...

>>>Here's another theory: Palm devotees love to claim a kind of quasi political/ethical superiority by swearing off Microsoft powered PDAs (despite their dependence and investment in desktop MS software).

I've made that point to Ryan in private emails many times. "Are all PIC users Mac owners? Don't they use Windows? What's this bizarre schizo hatred?"

>>>When a PPC pops up with a new feature, they firmly and with piety that would make the Pope cringe, proclaim that feature to be frivolous or unnecessary. This was true of, let's see... Color, high res screens, expansion memory, swappable Lithium batteries, MP3 playback, headphone jacks, multimedia, d-pads... etc. -- I've already seen some of the more hardcore Palm fans dismissing VGA on a handheld as 'excessively high resolution'. LOL!

And I hope those morons are very happy with the latest version of the Zire. It has nothing to distract them: no color, no MP3, no video capability, and no storage on card!


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/26/2003 12:46:53 PM #

>>> Not a shill for Palm. Or PalmOS. Show me the kind of PalmOS cultist postings I've made over there that PPC users engage in *here*. >>>

ah, but you have front page material to bash PPC. :) You think you can get away with it. hah...

>>> Too bad you didn't supply an URL. Was he again *referencing* an article posted elsewhere?

Upi mean like this? (of course it has been down lately since PPC marketshare start to look seriously big compared to back in the days, a year ago)
http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.asp?ID=4562

>>> Well, if Steve is to be believed, Ed is happily using a Toshi GENIO now.
Steve will say anything as long as it's a paying customer. Ed is a total pamiehead. He'll pull a stunt of double standard and put different weight on headlines just to make Palm sounds ok. (eg. he wrotes 3-5 mention on Dell late releasing OS update, while didn't make a peep about SD debacle until 3 weeks later after developer confirmation and after that only menation "palm need user help" instead of Palm screwing up like he would in Dell/PPC case. (there are plenty more examples)


>PIMS: Palm - excellent, PPC - awful

BS! open a forum thread and make your case! (or is this similar hogwash claim like PALM has excellent battery life, PPC sucks. But strangely no palm users dare to post battery log for straight up comparison. lol. let's do this pal. feature by feature, tap by tap, data by data)

>>> I've made that point to Ryan in private emails many times. "Are all PIC users Mac owners? Don't they use Windows? What's this bizarre schizo hatred?"

It's a simple case, palm1o fan would make up myth and spin and bash PPC performance. Are you denying you didn't do it? lol. Your article are still on database pal, it CONTAINS factual error. And AFAIK, it ha been retracted or corrected.

but keep it up there, I like free entertainment. Each year as POS stumbling into the same path PPC has gone thourh. I'll do my "I told you so" poke in the eyes. And you, my dear, is going to eat a lot of crow next year.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 3:57:25 PM #

>>>ah, but you have front page material to bash PPC. :) You think you can get away with it. hah...

"Why I Won't Be Buying a Pocket PC," you mean? I still stand by it. *Nothing* in that article is untrue or wrong. As I pointed out in another post, the Cult Boyz at PPCT *finally* admitted alarms are *UNRELIABLE* on PPC.

>>>Upi mean like this? (of course it has been down lately since PPC marketshare start to look seriously big compared to back in the days, a year ago)
http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.asp?ID=4562

Ryan sent me that article to proof before he ran it. I pointed out several things I disagreed with and several things I thought he shouldn't state because he'd wind up looking foolish later. He chose to ignore me. Eh.

>PIMS: Palm - excellent, PPC - awful

>>>BS! open a forum thread and make your case! (or is this similar hogwash claim like PALM has excellent battery life, PPC sucks. But strangely no palm users dare to post battery log for straight up comparison. lol. let's do this pal. feature by feature, tap by tap, data by data)

Yawn. The case has been made elsewhere. The best one is here:

http://tinyurl.com/yqy7t

Read it, ska. Edumacate yourzizzle.

Oh -- and about those *ADMITTEDLY UNRELIABLE ALARMS* in PPC? *That* is your idea of excellence in PIMs?

>>>It's a simple case, palm1o fan would make up myth and spin and bash PPC performance. Are you denying you didn't do it? lol. Your article are still on database pal, it CONTAINS factual error. And AFAIK, it ha been retracted or corrected.

URL? Where? What hallucinatory are you currently taking?

>>>but keep it up there, I like free entertainment. Each year as POS stumbling into the same path PPC has gone thourh. I'll do my "I told you so" poke in the eyes. And you, my dear, is going to eat a lot of crow next year.

Crow is still better than *your* diet.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Foo Fighter @ 12/26/2003 5:25:14 PM #

RhinoSteve: "I stand by what I said and quit consulting jobs when they decided to go PPC."

Huh? You quite your consulting job because "they" (I'm assuming you mean your employer) adopted Pocket PC? That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. You're either making that story up, or you are the most irrational and unprofessional consultant ever to leave the biz.



-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Foo Fighter @ 12/26/2003 5:34:59 PM #

Good God! Am I the only one that's bothered by the fact that people came here to argue on Christmas day?@!? Don't you guys have families? Jeez.

-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/26/2003 6:44:24 PM #

>>> quote mikec
>>> Why I Won't Be Buying a Pocket PC," you mean? I still stand by it. *Nothing* in that article is untrue or wrong.

yeah right. You must be the only one on the planet who has PPC that can accept HWR input on the slider. lol. Even Bosco quit posting around a link to that article after figuring out how wacky the article claims are.

>>> Ryan sent me that article to proof before he ran it. I pointed out several things I disagreed with and several things I thought he shouldn't state because he'd wind up looking foolish later. He chose to ignore me. Eh.

Two fools don't amount to much.

>> http://tinyurl.com/yqy7t
Read it, ska. Edumacate yourzizzle.

Excuse me sir. That article is dated november 2000. LOL
isn't it a bit... ehrr ancient?

eg. Bug me has been ported to PPC since then, PI and AF also weren't available around that time. Most of PPC apps mentioned on that article are either defunk, receive major upgrades, or have been replaced with more superior alternative.

but amusingly enough, the apps for Palm haven't changed much.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
abosco @ 12/26/2003 7:05:34 PM #

>>ah, but you have front page material to bash PPC. :) You think you can get away with it. hah...

Yes, but it wasn't on a PPC site. That's kind of the point he was trying to make.

>>Steve will say anything as long as it's a paying customer. Ed is a total pamiehead. He'll pull a stunt of double standard and put different weight on headlines just to make Palm sounds ok. (eg. he wrotes 3-5 mention on Dell late releasing OS update, while didn't make a peep about SD debacle until 3 weeks later after developer confirmation and after that only menation "palm need user help" instead of Palm screwing up like he would in Dell/PPC case. (there are plenty more examples)

I'm not a big BrightHand fan either, but judging from the amount of time you spend there, you must seriously love it. Just like you really love it here at PIC since you take an IP ban and a final warning by the webmaster lightly and continue insulting him. Maybe I'll see you on the 10 o'clock news tonight in cuffs as the cops are taking you in on harassment charges of a local webmaster. I can hear ska's cries now, "PLEASE! YOU CAN HAVE ME, BUT LEAVE THE BLOWUP DOLLS ALONE!"

Honestly - do you spend more time at PPC sites or Palm OS sites?

>>BS! open a forum thread and make your case! (or is this similar hogwash claim like PALM has excellent battery life, PPC sucks. But strangely no palm users dare to post battery log for straight up comparison. lol. let's do this pal. feature by feature, tap by tap, data by data)

When are you going to learn nobody cares? Can't you accept the fact that he prefers the usability of Palm's PIM and doesn't like PPC's? Why does someone always need to provide proof? It's as if disliking PPC is impossible. That must be the same reason why when someone posts, "I've used both and I prefer Palm," you always, ALWAYS accuse them of lying.

>>It's a simple case, palm1o fan would make up myth and spin and bash PPC performance. Are you denying you didn't do it? lol. Your article are still on database pal, it CONTAINS factual error. And AFAIK, it ha been retracted or corrected.

You are the worst offender of this yourself. When was the last time you acknowledged any achievement in the Palm OS platform?

Lord, how can you try to claim any validity to your accusations, predictions, and BS? You're an anonymous lunatic on an internet forum. Your inability to provide some real contact information so we can discuss this in a more appropriate place makes me wonder why you even bother spending days-on-end posting to people who don't like you at the site of an alternate platform about stuff nobody cares about.

I love being childish, but you are the epitome of immaturity. Even I shake my head in disgust at you.

>>Good God! Am I the only one that's bothered by the fact that people came here to argue on Christmas day?

It's fair game since it's the day after Christmas, now. ;)

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/26/2003 9:07:02 PM #

What Palm achievement? 2.5 hrs battery? stretch screen? frying SDcard? or that ever so usefull Palm SDIO slot?

oh wait, wait must be that Palm multimedia they are now so enamored with. grafitti invention? Xerox begs to differ apparently. Thumboard? Well RIMM sued and won.

The original Palm pilot I can give you, but since then?

please Bosco. let's be serious, Palm isn't even the first one putting integrated BT on handheld despite making the first noise and big one at that too.

After years of chest thumping, now reality is coming down hard on inferior palm product. And all you can do is scream....I am gonna sue you, I am gonna sue you. blow up doll, blow up doll...

okay. How about giving me convincing evidence that Palm is really superior. (hell at least mikecane tries, thos pathetically enough an article from 11/200. That's practically before the last ice age.)

very cute Bosco, mister Palm expert. I have to test your so alled are of expertise soon. The web app app you say?


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/26/2003 9:16:04 PM #

oh and Bosco,

for a person claiming not 'caring a bit' you sure put a lot of emotional energy on this. At least I am not conflicted and everybody knows that.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Gekko @ 12/26/2003 9:40:06 PM #

Can we get Bosco and Ska in the boxing ring together to settle this thing once and for all? We could broadcast the match live via streaming video here on PIC. I will gladly throw in $50 towards prize money for the winner to purchase a new PDA of their choice. Maybe 'Gfunkmagic' would agree to referee?



 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
TASKA @ 12/26/2003 9:59:14 PM #

lol. sure. I won almost all arguments so far anyway, It'll be easy if it's just Bosco. Plus by now, all PPC applications are better than anything POS can muster in almost all category except obscure hobbyist apps. Bosco really has to dig deep to find an obscure Palm apps that hasn't been downloaded since the war of independence to win his argument.

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Altema @ 12/26/2003 10:46:51 PM #

Well this is an interesting thread on the the day after Christmas... Is everyone bored with their toys already?

Seriously, I'm one of those who have owned both and have seen good and bad on both sides. However, there are a couple of comments that are incorrect I'd like to throw my opinion at. This does not mean I'm bashing anythin, as I provide support for both platforms as well.

"What Palm achievement? 2.5 hrs battery? stretch screen? frying SDcard? or that ever so usefull Palm SDIO slot?"

Obvious referrence to the T3: After the ROM update, most T3's get 4 to 6 hours continous runtime. Not stellar, but being a compact device it has a small battery. Fitting a 400Mhz processor in something smaller than a Palm V (except thickness) has it's penalty, but it's not 2.5 hours.

The stretch screen actually works out well for the users I know (mostly doctors and teachers). Small form factor unless you want all that screen area, which is only a click away. I personally do not think that having to reset a PPC to change orientation is the right way to do things. Palm got this feature right despite lacking a standard API at release time.

In regards to the frying SD cards, I was in there with the rest about the T3 being a card toaster. Although Palm never gave the internal details of their fix, I thinks it's safe to say the SanDisk SD card controllers could not handle the speed. Slowing down the write speed seems to be part of the resolution for handling the weaker cards: an updated T3 benchmarks at only 58% for the write function, but at least the SanDisk cards can handle it now. The other functions are still absurdly fast, like DB import at 887% and File seek at 1180%

BTW: Some folks never use the SDIO capabilities, but some use it everyday. But it is a moot point and does not prove anything because SDIO is becomming standard across the board.

"Plus by now, all PPC applications are better than anything POS can muster in almost all category except obscure hobbyist apps."

Nope, not there yet. Matter of fact, it is the mainstream apps that are significantly poorer. Palm apps like AcidImage, DTG, MobileDB, SmartList, SnapperMail, and a host of others hardly fall into the "obscure hobbyist" category. Building a relational database with lookup tables, db joins, and field expressions right on the handheld is an example of real work in the real world.


 Over here Bosco, mike
Courante @ 12/26/2003 11:12:53 PM #

Mike, here is your 2003 update on that Nov '00 article.

http://www.pocketpcpassion.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38539


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
pixelator @ 12/27/2003 12:02:01 AM #

[b]Well have fun resetting that e805 when you have too many apps running.[/b]
Don't worry, I don't have to reset no matter how many apps I run. You really do have some funny ideas about PPC... PPC/WM has had internal shutdown for inactive processes for some time (in the rare event program RAM does become scarce - that doesn't really happen on a 128MB device).
[b]
I stand by what I said and quit consulting jobs when they decided to go PPC. Later, I find out users in the field were having big time problems with the units and backflashing to management.
[/b]
You can stand by what you said, but it's your problem that you quit consulting jobs just because they went PPC. I think that simply illustrates your own personal intolerance and lack of skill with the platform. What kind of consultant bails when something different enters the scene? Yeesh. Remind me not to hire YOU.
[b]
Calls back to them six months later were not returned by management since they didn't want to admit they made a mistake.
[/b]
It was more likely they didn't want to deal with you because you bailed over their choice of PDAs.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Courante @ 12/27/2003 12:22:47 AM #

}}}} Nope, not there yet. Matter of fact, it is the mainstream apps that are significantly poorer. Palm apps like AcidImage, DTG, MobileDB, SmartList, SnapperMail, and a host of others hardly fall into the "obscure hobbyist" category. Building a relational database with lookup tables, db joins, and field expressions right on the handheld is an example of real work in the real world. {{{{

Look again. None of the software you mention even come close competing in their categories.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
abosco @ 12/27/2003 1:39:21 AM #

>>I won almost all arguments so far anyway

Hold it right there, wench. You win arguments because I let you go, not because you have me beat. You're never going to drag the best out of me no matter how many times you reply yelling and taunting. Remember about a year ago in the depths of the BrightHand forums, we held a small contest to see who could fit the most "yada"s on the screen at one time, since you kept talking about how QVGA on a PPC could display more data than HVGA on Palm? I think I fit in 520 in WordSmith with very very light sub-pixel font rendering, and you tried real hard and fit in something like 538 and started going off about how you won the argument. I laughed and left the thread. The fact remains that I could have decreased the font size. I could have decreased it a lot more so that there could have been 1000 yadas written legibly there. But after a while of being pissed off at you and your BS comments, I cooled off and took it lightly. You know, let you have the benefit of the doubt so you look stupid when I tell you how easy I let you go (like now).

I'm glad I haven't really kicked your ass to oblivion more than a couple times. I don't go to these forums to prove how strong my NX is. I do it to optimize it, make it better, fill it with better applications, make it more useful, and the like. All you want to do is profess how great yours is and how bad mine is. Sounds to me like you're convincing yourself more than anybody else.

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Courante @ 12/27/2003 1:52:22 AM #

You 'could have'? but you didn't...

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
abosco @ 12/27/2003 2:10:05 AM #

Could have, and still can. But I won't, so please, move on to another "argument" you wish to win. I've got things to do (mainly sleep, and reveling in my own laziness over the entirety of winter break.. woo! wooooo!!!).

Man, it really bothers you, doesn't it? It's like a game of poker. Am I bluffing? Am I telling the truth? What if I'm right? What if I've been right all along and have been messing with your mind this whole time? How do you know? You don't, because you'll never experience Palm OS beyond GIF screenshots on developer websites.

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 Ska the troll
Admin @ 12/27/2003 10:58:08 AM #

FYI Everyone, not only is SKA (TASKA, etc) posting lies to back up his false claims, but he is using multiple FAKE accounts here on PalmInfocenter to make it sound like he has support from others! This is not a new tactic for ska.

He is also using the Pixelator and Courante accounts.

Dude, get real, move on and stop posting here. You're very unwelcome. Go have some fun troubleshooting your handheld and editing your registry settings. You're beating a horse that died long ago.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:10:32 AM #

What?!!? Pixelator over here *AND* at BH is actually ska?!

Is this verified, Ryan?

>>otherwise rubbing my hands in glee over the length of this thread!<<


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Admin @ 12/27/2003 11:13:45 AM #

I just looked further, pixel has a very similar netblock, so I can't rule it out. I am absolutely postitive about the other accounts he has. I guess have to start posting users IP's with every post, due to all this nonsense and lies from the handheld remorse club.

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:18:13 AM #

I really have my doubts that Pixelator is ska. His messages at BH are too lucid and he does not go off on PalmOS over there (only here!). ska is someone who has problems with English (or as he probably pronounces it in his native tongue: Engrish, Ungrish, Urgresh, AhOoGah).


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
NumLock @ 12/27/2003 11:20:59 AM #

isn't ska the guy that writes for msmobiles?

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:22:27 AM #

>>>Mike, here is your 2003 update on that Nov '00 article.

>>>http://www.pocketpcpassion.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38539

Thanks. Geez, everyone go look at that thread. Check out the 4th Textmaker screensnap. To have *that* on PalmOS with double-tap/drag capability ...

... and, hmmm, don't I see the words "Palm Guru" on that screen snap? Heh-heh...


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:25:23 AM #

>>>isn't ska the guy that writes for msmobiles?

Well, this certainly reads like his, er, handiwork! --

http://msmobiles.com/news.php/1872.html


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
abosco @ 12/27/2003 11:35:10 AM #

No freaking way. If anything, Pix lives close to ska or is good friends with him, nothing more. Pix has an NX70v and Toshiba e805, and I remember ska talking about his H2215 a while back. Also, ska talked about the Toshiba being useless because it has button lag and that we should wait for the next HP model. Would someone really go through all THAT trouble just to make it look like he was right? I mean, changing accounts on the same home computer (or at work) and being the same guy is pretty easy, but jumping on a different computer and being a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GUY is absurd.

Think about this - ska can't write if his life depended on it. That MSMobiles article is definitely his. I would hazard a guess that he would put his fullest effort into making it sound grammatically correct (even though many mistakes fell through the cracks). Pixelator at least sounds like he has a vocabulary and doesn't skip articles (a, an, the) before nouns in the classic style of ska. Do you think ska would really mess up his professional MSMobiles article on purpose and talk under Pix like normal (which has better vocab) just to be two separate people? I wouldn't think so.

Pix can be rational. Ska can't. Let's just put it that way.

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Foo Fighter @ 12/27/2003 12:45:37 PM #

Jesus Horatio Ch****! You have got to be kidding? Are you saying that Ska is impersonating Pixelator...or that Pixelator is?!?!? Well this certainly was a startling revelation. What next? Mike Cane actually is the former Iraqi Minister of Information?

-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 1:18:09 PM #

>>>Mike Cane actually is the former Iraqi Minister of Information?

I have never been in Iraq in my life.

Neither has Saddam Hussein!


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Gekko @ 12/27/2003 1:30:18 PM #

You're all nuts.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
RhinoSteve @ 12/27/2003 2:18:00 PM #

If you want to really know, yes I did quit that job when they went PPC. While there were other reasons, that was the final straw. I find that companies that take conservative baby steps (into the meat grinder this time) don't come on top most of the time. When a VP makes a called based upon a sales crew with a "wonderful" deal and forgoes taking the advise of a paid consultant, I saw it ready to go off the rails. I suspected that there may be been kickbacks involved but I have no evidence for proof.

Looking back now two years later, that company's URL is no longer active, the phone lines are disconnected and none of the managers are willing to talk to me. When I finally tracked down a former employee, I feel redeemed that I was right all along.

I don't know what kind of consultants you are used to work with, buy my peers consider my move very professional and responsible. Hell, I don't even list these guys on my Past Clients List since it was such a bomb.

QED


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 4:15:05 PM #

>>>I find that companies that take conservative baby steps (into the meat grinder this time) don't come on top most of the time.

Ah, adventures in conSLUTancy (I had to cap the transposition for The Dim). Been there myself. Guess what? It NEVER, EVER ends!


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Altema @ 12/27/2003 6:30:10 PM #

"Look again. None of the software you mention even come close competing in their categories."

LOL, OTF, ROTFL, ROFLMHO, ROTFLAS, ROTFLSHISMC, COTFLGUOAHAHA!


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
pixelator @ 12/29/2003 3:02:15 AM #

Ah, no, I am most certainly NOT 'SKA' or the person who uses the variations of that name! Ryan, I'd appreciate it if you'd check your data before making such a comment. I may bend toward the PPC end of the spectrum around here and ruffle some Palm feathers, but SKA I am not. I use an Earthlink/Mindspring account, I can privately verify my IP if you want to email me: pixelator@mindspring.com

I do appreciate the votes of confidence from sparring partners abosco and Mike. Thanks for seeing past our differences of PDA opinion and elevating me at least to some degree of lucidity. ;)

Candy canes all around.


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Admin @ 12/29/2003 10:56:33 AM #

Pix, I apologize if you are not ska. However, you yourself shouldn't go around making unfounded claims.

 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Foo Fighter @ 12/29/2003 12:49:19 PM #

Quote: Ryan, I'd appreciate it if you'd check your data before making such a comment."

Yeah, Ryan. Jeez! Do you realize how many nasty comments I had ready to post in case this accusation turned out to be true?

And Pix, I had a hard time believing you were Ska. We may have disagreed with each other in the past. But I never thought you would be capable of such Trollery. ;-)


-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
pixelator @ 12/29/2003 1:24:14 PM #

Ryan, first of all, I don't recall making any UNFOUNDED CLAIMS. If you refer to my comment that you post anti-PPC content articles with a frequency that indicates a bias, I don't think that's unfounded (nor am I the only one who's pointed it out).

Second of all, apology accepted - but I don't see what one has to do with the other. You may be upset with SKA/whoever he is for spoofing accounts, but that isn't me. I think that, while you may disagree with my previous statement, it doesn't make it any more OK for you to call me a SKA clone/troll/spoofer. I don't consider his activity on PIC even remotely similar to mine.




 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
pixelator @ 12/29/2003 1:30:48 PM #

Thanks, Foo. I agree, we don't always agree (more often than not, lately, it seems) but I'd like to think I'm not a troll and unless I've got a bad case of multiple personality disorder, I haven't been posting under alternate aliases. :)




 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Courante @ 12/29/2003 1:37:06 PM #

>>> And Pix, I had a hard time believing you were Ska. We may have disagreed with each other in the past. But I never thought you would be capable of such Trollery. >>>

gee foo, how sweet of you. lol.
that after swearing left and right without thinking first right after the announcement? You were actually accepting a conclusion made by somebody with dubious news reputation.

like I say, not sure if you read it before it got erased. If you don't believe me, you can try logging in with new account and start posting anything beyond cheerleading tune and see how fast your account get deleted.



 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Foo Fighter @ 12/29/2003 2:02:29 PM #

"that after swearing left and right without thinking first right after the announcement?"

Swearing left and right? I only posted one comment.

-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
abosco @ 12/29/2003 5:32:02 PM #

>>You were actually accepting a conclusion made by somebody with dubious news reputation.

Well you sure as hell like the site. You probably spend more time here than Ryan.

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: I love the smell of incensed PPC cultists
Courante @ 12/29/2003 9:59:10 PM #

are you saying you don't like me bosco? lol.
I am hurt.
Reply to this comment
 ska's word
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 4:30:09 PM #

Just got this vai email from the excellent A Word A Day site:

ninnyhammer (NIN-ee-ham-uhr) noun
A fool; blockhead.

-- if that is not ska to a T...



 RE: ska's word
pixelator @ 12/27/2003 12:10:17 AM #

>>Shall we also upzip and measure?

Sure. I've owned more Palms than you. Next.

>>Well, if Steve is to be believed, Ed is happily using a Toshi GENIO now.

Not exclusively.

>>Oh, I'll give you the bottom line right here to that comparison --

>PIMS: Palm - excellent, PPC - awful
>Everything else: Palm - awful, PPC - excellent

>Now show me just *ONE* PPC Cultist who''l admit that the PIMs for PPC are just crap!

Maybe because you're full of crap, yourself? OEM PIM on PPC is no worse than OEM PIM on Palm. We can get into it on a proper forum if you like. Here it's kind of cramped.

>>Mass postings? As opposed to your overweening egocentric look-at-me-I-*used*-to-be-a-game-tester-at-Lucas novella-length posts?

*I* haven't written long rambling articles under the false assumption that anyone gives a rat's ass as to why I refuse to buy a PPC...

>>I've never said average users who like PPC are shills. You *know* who the shills and cultists are.

And there are no Palm shills? Come on.

>>I'd say you were the biggest something else...

Oh, argh! The pain!

>>I've made that point to Ryan in private emails many times. "Are all PIC users Mac owners? Don't they use Windows? What's this bizarre schizo hatred?"

I ask myself that.

>>And I hope those morons are very happy with the latest version of the Zire. It has nothing to distract them: no color, no MP3, no video capability, and no storage on card!

OK, so we don't disagree on everything. Just as Rodan and Godzilla once teamed up, I guess there can be hope for us, as well.


 RE: ska's word
mikecane @ 12/27/2003 11:12:12 AM #

So are you or aren't you really ska? Be a man and admit it, if it is so.


 RE: ska's word
pixelator @ 12/29/2003 3:07:55 AM #

I think you knew the answer to that one, already. I appreciated your comment.


 RE: ska's word
Foo Fighter @ 12/30/2003 1:45:26 AM #

Quote: "like I say, not sure if you read it before it got erased. If you don't believe me, you can try logging in with new account and start posting anything beyond cheerleading tune and see how fast your account get deleted."

Ska, it isn't so much WHAT you say as HOW MANY times you say it. That's what drives everyone nuts. You keep trying to spread Pocket PC gospel to a group that doesn't care. This is a Palm fan site, you aren't going to find many people interested in PPC here. Brighthand would a better place to post your arguments.


-------------------------------
My blog: www.pocketfactory.com


 RE: ska's word
abosco @ 12/30/2003 2:00:11 AM #

>>Brighthand would a better place to post your arguments.

Too late. He hit them like the Bubonic Plague at the same time as PIC! What a nightmare.

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: ska's word
Courante @ 12/30/2003 4:42:44 AM #

[i]it isn't so much WHAT you say as HOW MANY times you say it. That's what drives everyone nuts. You keep trying to spread Pocket PC gospel to a group that doesn't care.[/i]

true, admitedly it's a bit harsh at times, but necessary. It has nothing to do with spreading the gospel, but subduing these plebs. They can go to PDA hell if they want to, I wouldn't care. But they must be subdued.


 RE: ska's word
abosco @ 12/30/2003 11:46:03 AM #

>>but necessary

Necessary? Not at ALL!! Are you another person who hacks a website just to show the webmaster they have a security hole?

That's probably the worst reason for justifying trolling I've ever heard. Why can't you just be more like Pixelator? (Whoa.. never thought I would say that)

-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + T616


 RE: ska's word
Courante @ 12/30/2003 12:12:35 PM #

knock, knock. mcfly? It's a joke.
Reply to this comment
 What VGA on a PDA really means
mikecane @ 12/26/2003 4:38:19 PM #

http://home.comcast.net/~swdeveloper/

-- go drool and drool and drool...


 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
RhinoSteve @ 12/26/2003 4:41:23 PM #

Vaporware!


 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
jss1432 @ 12/26/2003 4:45:08 PM #

The PPC may be vaporware, but VGA-resolution PDAs have been out from Sharp for around a year, and unlike PPC or Palm, the OS and UI actually supports VGA resolution in all applications.

Face it, Palm and PocketPC are both reliving history: the Palm camp, like the Apple camp, thinks they are way ahead PocketPC, but in reality, both are shipping outdated technology and are way behind what is technologically possible.


 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
Gekko @ 12/26/2003 8:05:37 PM #

very nice. I need a VGA PDA with a broadband, always-on internet connection with 16 hour battery life. the can put a man on the moon, why can't they give me this?


 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
TASKA @ 12/26/2003 9:03:56 PM #

It's called FOMA phone, some of them has 2.4 inch VGA screen, and the battery performance is well beyond 16hrs. (not on continuously tho')

Foma is always on network.


 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
pixelator @ 12/27/2003 12:26:47 AM #

2.4" VGA - now that really IS excessive.


 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
pixelator @ 12/27/2003 12:28:32 AM #

Rhino: "Vaporware!"

Er, this (Resfix) has been out for WEEKS. What you're looking at is simply the new rev which supports Landscape mode, something I already achieved with Nyditot on my e805 (without resetting).

DAMN! Jealous, much? At least Abosco and Mike give this thing its due and have some grasp of the real pros and cons of Palms/PPCs... But it's diehard PPC-hating Palmboosters like you that amuse the hell out of me. Relax and light another candle on your shrine or something. Don't get wax on that screen, tho.



 RE: What VGA on a PDA really means
Foo Fighter @ 12/27/2003 12:54:27 AM #

Pix, don't bother arguing with RhinoSteve. He is the Ska of the PalmOS fan community. His butterknife-sharp wit and asinine anecdotes are of little credible value. His recent claim that he quit a consultancy job due to being forced to use a Pocket PC is a perfect example. Pay no heed to him.