![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Article Comments
73 total comments The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments.
RE: Flip Cover
I have to admit, it has been a long time since I played around with an m100 so my memory of it is weak. Now that you've said it, I remember something about the m100's flip cover being more rigid. But really, what I was trying to say was that the general shape is the same. You should be able to exchange the same cover between the two models. --- News Editor RE: Flip CoverI.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 8:05:05 PM #
Hmmm, BTW is it possible to buy new flip cover for m100/105 somewhere? RE: Flip Cover
You can purchase replacement flip covers at the palm web site for $14.95. Here is the link: http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z1AC42A2
RE: Flip CoverI.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 10:49:54 PM #
i just looked at my wife's m100 and the fpli cover on the 125 is shaped a bit differently, sort of splayed out at the bottom, to follow the shape of the blue on the face plate. M125 reviewI.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 10:07:03 AM #
Two inaccuracies. The flip cover on my M125 is not the same one as the M100 series. The M125 cover is made of stiff rubber-like material which bends; the M100 series flip cover is hard plastic. Also, the style for the M125 and M100 series are indeed different; Palm actually sells M125 styli which are labelled for that model only. Flip Cover, Stylus, etc.
Thanks for the corrections, guys. I've edited the article a bit to reflect your changes. Another thing I missed: the m125 is slightly thicker than the m100 series. This means soft cases should fit but hard cases might have problems. I tried it with a Scribble Chameleon and it wouldn't fit. --- News Editor RE: Flip CoverI.M. Anonymous @ 5/12/2002 3:51:08 AM #
Interesting to see that Palm sells replacement flip covers the cover on the M100 was so poorly engineered that mine broke off (the plastic 'tube' that grips the metal bar at the top of the handhold just basically crumbled to pieces) after about a month or two of use.
This has left me with a coverless Palm, which is bad: a minor effect is that the screen (including the Graffiti area) quickly gets scratched from riding around in my pocket. A more serious effect is that when it's in my pocket, the buttons tend to get jammed down (either the power button or the up button which turns on the clock), because they're not protected by the flip cover. So the m100 drains its batteries, and goes into a low-power state where I have to reset it to get it going again. And that means saying goodbye to any data I entered since my last HotSync. Poor engineering leading to repeated data loss has soured me on Palm more than a little. I just don't trust my Palm any more, which is sad.
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 6:25:39 PM #
I have nothing against Palm. I wish them success. But what possibly can the M125 offer I do think so...I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 6:34:00 PM #
A better screen than the S320 or Visor Neo for one. And a better value, too. If you can live without a color screen, this is the way to go. I like a cradle, (which the other 2 don't have) and the free sd card is good too. RE: I don't think so...I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 6:35:18 PM #
I have to imagine this does not cost much more than the m105 to produce. So it offers a handheld that they can probably eventually sell for less than $150 (or maybe even at $100) and still make a profit from it. Then they'll be able to standardize all their devices around SD and their universal connector, from low-end to high-end. RE: I don't think so...I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 6:41:36 PM #
> A better screen than the S320 or Visor Neo for one. > And a better value, too. Actually, if you want a better value and a better screen, you can get a HandEra 330 for $200 from Sam's Club or for around $280 delivered from other online sites. Still, I think Palm is setting the m125 up to be much less expensive than $250 in fairly short time. It is an obvious replacement for the m100 and m105. RE: I don't think so...I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 7:01:12 PM #
I think the above post is right about value. People compare it to the sony 320 for 200 which has rechargable batteries over the 125. I would take the 125 over the 320. You get a cradle which is 59.99 for the sony. If you add the cradle to the 320 now you higher then the 125. Huh?I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 7:09:16 PM #
What is the market for this toy with the tiny screen and the huge body? RE: I don't think so...I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 7:35:32 PM #
Did you read the "Rugged" area of the review? It doesn't need a case, it has one already. RE: I don't think so...He||Raiser @ 11/15/2001 9:32:18 PM #
What you guys haven't mentioned is that the S320 is only $169 at most e-tailers and retail stores. I plan on getting two for my parents at $149. The screen of the m125 may be slightly less green, but the screen is smaller. The S320 has an internal Lithium-Ion that the m125 lacks. As for expansion, I still can't understand why Palm would place the slot on the side. RE: I don't think so...I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 9:44:46 PM #
Same as Mr. He||Raiser. I still believe that S320 is still better compare with its competitive price, recharged battery, and larger screen. RE: I don't think so...
But don't forget you do not get free office software - Documents to go. A $40 value.
Also, you get free Mobile Connectivity Kit. And another 16-mb SD-card. Finally, you got a Palm. P.S. For some amateurs, the AAA batteries are even better because they may forget to charge the battery. Haha. Just kidding.
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 9:50:51 PM #
Ed, I'm surprised that you would paint such a glowing picture around any of Palm's newest devices, especially the low to mid range products. They all fall very short of being worthy or their sticker price. None of them offer any new features at all (except for the SD slot), and the OS still remains unchanged. In fact, none of Palm's products are the least bit innovative. Why aren't you more critical of Palm? Where are the features? Each new release is just a tire rerun of the same old Palm. You seem to like any device that comes your way, as long as it runs the PalmOS. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 10:30:28 PM #
Then what new features you want? It can type e-mail for you? What innovative PC functions have been added lately? How about Pocket PCs? Come on, just wake up. Tell me What Sony innovates? What's different from N-760C to S-320? Only mp3 for N-760 C. Period. For an entry level, you got a m-125, cradle, free office software and a free 16-mb SD card. What more do you want? A 50% discount? You are paying $250 and you want more features? You want your Honda Civic to have include any new features? Go dream on. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 10:50:57 PM #
> Then what new features you want? It's because of idiots like you that Palm is going down the drain. RE: The M125 sucks!
> "Tell me What Sony innovates? What's different from N-760C to S-320? Only mp3 for N-760 C. Period." Oh please! The Clie 760 has a higher resolution display (320x320) as apposed to 160x160 on all other Palm devices (except Handera). That alone is a huge innovation. Even the new T415 has true audio output instead of the lame piezo buzzer found in all current Palm devices. Sony is an innovator...Palm isn't. Neither is Handspring. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 11:29:51 PM #
You guys are nuts or what. You expect to pay $250 for innovations? I can tell you what Palm m505 innovates, but I cannot tell about M125 and so did Sony 320. It's about price/innovations. You guys may dreaming that you can pay $250 to get a device that has more innovations than palm 125. If you cannot find one unit that has more innovations than Palm m125 yourself, please keep your voice down about what Palm m125 lacks because your points becomes invalid. Or simply put - Can you get a handheld for $250 yet get more features than the m125? The answer is no. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 12:20:57 AM #
Handspring innovates! Does Palm or Sony have a phone attachment? Can Palm or Sony have MMC/Memorystick/Springboard/CF/CF II/SD and other expansion methods? I don't think Handspring is the biggest innovator, but right now they seem to be so much more consumer-friendly than Sony that is very much niche (not a bad thing) and Palm which is just trying to stay alive. RE: The M125 sucks!
> "Does Palm or Sony have a phone attachment?" No. And neither does Handspring. VisorPhone is dead, it was a flop. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 1:33:55 AM #
Uhh Foo, ever hear about the TRIO from handspring? I guess you don't get out much. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 4:37:31 AM #
"You guys are nuts or what. You expect to pay $250 for innovations? I can tell you what Palm m505 innovates, but I cannot tell about M125 and so did Sony 320. It's about price/innovations. You guys may dreaming that you can pay $250 to get a device that has more innovations than palm 125. If you cannot find one unit that has more innovations than Palm m125 yourself, please keep your voice down about what Palm m125 lacks because your points becomes invalid. Or simply put - Can you get a handheld for $250 yet get more features than the m125? The answer is no." I'm no HandEra fan myself, just too blocky and big and old-skool but, I don't think I even need to add any comments to this quote from a higher post in order to make my point: "Actually, if you want a better value and a better screen, you can get a HandEra 330 for $200 from Sam's Club or for around $280 delivered from other online sites." RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 9:05:51 AM #
You don't get free software and the batteries are the same. So that's not a deal. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 9:07:20 AM #
If ignorance is bliss, there are really some blissful people around here Palm m125: 4.8 by 3.1 by .9 inches The M125 Rocks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/16/2001 9:17:17 AM #
"You don't get free software and the batteries are the same. So that's not a deal." Are you talking about the Neo? You didn't say. If so, the Neo doesn't come with a cradle and the m125 does. The m125 also comes with a 16 meg SD card. And don't dismiss Docs to Go. Its a great proggie. Such a deal! RE: The M125 sucks!dietrichbohn @ 11/16/2001 9:27:20 AM #
Why do you guys think the neo doesn't come with a cradle? It does. My brother in law just got one, crade included. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 11/18/2001 12:23:13 PM #
I have a Visor Neo and it comes with a cradle. It actually got a high grade from Visorcentral for being translucent. Not that it's an innovation or anything, but it's a nice little addition... RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 1/3/2002 8:20:28 PM #
Allright folks this the deal, I just purchased the m125
at Office Max for $199.00 w/craddle, software,OS 401 and "get by mail" 16 MB expansion card. That's for $199.00. Don't you get it!!! For the price, the m125 is a deal that can't be beat! Now, if you insist on comparing Palm with a Sony Clie, at least use the right comparison a m505! Not a m125!! Nitwits you are comparing apples to oranges! The review was "ON THE DAMN MONEY" It is what it is, a pretty good deal for $200.00 bucks. And on top of everything you get $250.00 worth of coupons for more software! Stop being "doinks" and learn to compare correctly. RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 1/11/2002 10:08:06 PM #
What so good about the rechargable battery in Sony? It's average life is about 2 years and it is not replacable. On the other hand, with the alkaline batteries, the m125 can last a very long time. The choice is obvious. Stay with Palm. My fellow workers have been using the old Palm 3x for more than 3 years. Not a single problem. Any reason for upgrade? None.
RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 1/29/2002 11:02:47 PM #
As a new owner of the m125, I must say that I'm pretty impressed with it. It cost me $200 (which is what I paid for the m105 that the 125 is replacing), but it improves on it in several ways, most notably the expansion slot. It's not "the best one out there," but for me (a poor clumsy disorganized grad student), it's just what I need.
One of the best things about it, IMHO, is its durability. When you hold it in your hand, you get the impression (without it being too bulky) that you could toss it against a wall and not worry about it being broken. I didn't get that impression from the Handeras I saw at Best Buy. On the numbers, the Handera seems to have an edge on the m125, but if you drop the Handera, the numbers you'll be more worried about will refer to pieces in the bag you'll be carrying it home in. I have to disagree with the reviewer on one point related to this; the danger of snagging an card on your pocket. My expansion cards haven't arrived yet, but the little placeholder chunk of plastic the M125 came with hasn't given me any fits at all in that way. Unless the expansion cards extend out further than the placeholder, I don't see any danger with always keping a card in the slot. By and large, the review was on the money. I also agree that Palm should have called it the m300 or some such thing. I now have to replace my keyboard, though I chalk this up to my own short-sightedness in not originally buying a Palm with the UC port. All in all, I'm far more happy with the m125 than I was with the m105 (and she was my baby). Viva m125! RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 2/26/2002 9:43:02 PM #
I got my palm m125 for christmas for 200 bucks and I just love it. It's design is great, when I hold it in my hand it fits in perfectly and it feels as though it will never fall out, also the expansion cards aren't brittle and are pretty hard to break. I love to be able to transfer files from palm to card and vise versa. Even though the ir port has been a standard feature for awhile, I love it, it is the coolest thing, I like to send and recieve files, and chat, and control tvs. All in all I would recommend it to anyone since it is totally the best RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 8/10/2002 4:37:17 PM #
palm sucks!!! my girlfrien own one for 3 weeks and she change the batteries 3 times. the m125 is a battery sucker or what? she no abuse it, no use the back light, no games, only datebook for appointments, and palm support can't help her, so , palm sucks!!! i own a clie and is perfect!! RE: The M125 sucks!I.M. Anonymous @ 8/11/2002 1:41:10 AM #
Why do people quibble over the little things? I guess I'm jsut a novice Palm user, but my m125 works perfectly for me... RE: The M125 sucks!
Well, IMHO, as a brand new 125 user (practically virgin
I.M. Anonymous @ 11/15/2001 11:08:30 PM #
The m125 looks like a nice device, but, like Ed said is over priced. Good job on the review, I always like your reviews. Keep it up, and thanks!
Mario
Only the first 40 comments are displayed with the article.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() Special Deals
Palm Reading? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||
In general though, this Palm unit seemed to be more 'solid' than the other m100 series Palms... very very well-constructed. (Totally subjective- go see for yourself)
-Palm Man