![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Hands-on Review: Launcher X By: Scott Windom November 19, 2002 Well, it's out of beta. People have been waiting with varying degrees of patience for Launcher X for a long time, myself one of them. I was an avid user of Launcher III before Launcher X came out and have been looking forward to it with all the rest.
Customization
Icon and List Views
Gadgets
Security
Hi-Res
Improvements
Card Support
Card Refresh
Apps Button Remap After that experience, I essentially stopped using third-party launchers of any variety for a long time. Even after that, I used them only as utilities, not allowing them to remap my apps button. Unfortunately, though, Launcher X does not allow one this luxury. Instead, it simply remaps the Apps button when it is first run, then undoes that when the "Exit Launcher X" menu option is selected. I would much prefer a check box, so I know where the launcher stands. In conclusion, it seems that Launcher X, though a long time in coming, is well worth a look. Launcher III customers will find the same attractive feature set, all the workhorse that the ancestor was, back with reinforcements. For those of you used to other launchers with more eye candy than Launcher III provided, you will also be pleasantly greeted, especially if you have a hi-res display on which to view the new material. All in all, anyone interested in purchasing a third-party launcher or switching to a new one should give Launcher X a serious look.
Launcher X is available from Benc Software. It is $24.95 for new users, and $7.95 for Launcher III owners. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Article Comments
94 total comments The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments.
RE: Looks good from a Launcher III perspective
This is great!
I especially like the option of no text under the icons. (This is done by making the canvas and text the same color) Who needs the names? We all know what our applications are! And this way you can get four rows of icons showing. One thing that bothered me was that the tabs with "icons only" are too small. I prefer no names, just icons so I named the tab with five blanks spaces and chose the "both" option to have both the icon and name appear. Now I have a nice size tab with only an icon. If you only have five or so tabs you may as well use the extra apace with bigger tabs. In fact you can arrange them in a way that all your tabs will utilize all the available space by reducing or increasing the amount of blank spaces you put in the name field!
I had this program on my NR70 for about 1 minute. After that it was obvious that YiShow was far superior, at least for the NR70. I can imagine that for the Palm series this would be pretty good, but not for the NR/NX CLIEs RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
I used it on my NR as a beta, and now in it's full version on my NX, and I would not consider using anything else. It could have more bells and whistles, but it is the most polished and stable launcher I have used to date. RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
I agree with the first poster. I do not want to start any launcher wars but to just express personal dissapointment. Somehow, after all the wait it is very disapointing to discover Yishow is a superior launcher (again personal opinion). In no way am I saying that Launcher X did not do what it said it would. Besides the marginaly useful "homer" button (there are a bunch of other apps that do this function) everything Benc advertised was there. However, Yishow has everything launcher x has plus a far superior file manager. RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
Why do you (original poster) think YiShow is better? Supporting argument(s) please! RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
In certain ways, LauncherX is better (tabs, vfs app mover, color schemes, etc.). Small icons on the TT look better with Launcher X than on YiShow for Palm. YiShow uses the OS's small icons instead of scaling the large ones to a smaller size for better look/resolution. YiShow has the advantage with it's built in file browser, photo app. (slideshow feature), and document reader. I prefer YiShow on the Clie models and LauncherX for the TT. It also has the ability to use wallpapers. Note: Since a large amount of OS5 apps (built-in and 3rd Party) don't use transparent backgrounds, the wallpaper and color backgrounds of both launchers are worthless (IMHO). Unless you like looking at a nice wallpaper or a colored tab window with icons surrouned by a white square! A hack like AppIcon is needed to take full advantage of skins/colors. I think the lines will blur a little more with time as both launchers are work in progress. RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
LX and LIII have one feature that I find to be very handy that is not mentioned very often - the ability to create shortcuts to applications stored on the card. The shortcut is handy, particularly, when you want to transfer a program to the card that has a hotsync conduit. Usually, such an app must stay in internal RAM to sync but with the small shortcut file in RAM and the actual program on the card the conduit is fooled into thinking that the program is in RAM and the program syncs as usual. The only other program that I am aware of that creates similar shortcuts is PowerRun, however, the shortcut is not recognized by the conduit to allow sync (at least the last time I tried PowerRun). Yet another tool to use in moving files to external storage. RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
See I had the completely opposite feeling. I liked some of the earlier versions of YShow, but hated the last 2 releases. I had been using MegaLauncher but love the new LauncherX. YShow was so flakey. Lots of resets. Even caused me to lose data. That is the only time in 5+ years of heavy palm use that I lost data. RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
Same for me, used to use MegaLauncher, and LauncherX is very fine with me. Couldn't stand Yishow. RE: Maybe for Palms, but not for the NR70
Ronin: I know for sure that LX and YiShow both let you make shortcuts. I am pretty sure that ZLauncher also works this way. I can't remember about MegaLauncher and Silver Screen though. It is a great feature indeed. But I just want to make sure that every knows that LIII is not the only launcher that can do this.
This isn't the speed demon I had hoped for and it seems to have added little to the functionality of the long-in-the-tooth Launcher III, other than new pictures. Having to manually refresh the screen to have decent speed is not really a long-term solution. It seems like the other launchers out there have already done most (if not more) than is here--see ZLaucher, et al. RE: Slower than I had hopedPDA Stephen @ 11/21/2002 11:23:43 AM #
I tried SliverScreen, ZLauncher, and LauncherX. I like ZLauncher myself. The thing I find most handy is if you tap and hold on an icon, a list of actions popup allowing me to do copy, move, delete, info ... I find that is easier that dragging the icon to the gadget bar at the bottom (which ZLauncher can do, too). I also like the recycle bin in ZLauncher, you can recover a deleted application is you later change your mind. ZLauncher can do short cut to SD card, also. You can rearrange tabs by simply dragging them on screen (easiler than Launcher X).
-- Stephen Ô¿Ô¬
I liked the review. I really like the product. I'm very pleased with the upgrade policy. There's more to the product than what's reviewed. The "file info" capability is very nice. My one complaint is the removal of the "home tab" option in preferences that makes the 1st tab the one that is always displayed when the launcher is launched. However, I'll get over it. RE: And MORE...
Not so fast... Go to "Edit Category List" in the menu. There is an "Always Start in:" option to select the category to, well, always start in. This is much nicer than L3 because you can choose. L3 just let you always start at the 1st tab. Dave RE: And MORE...Mead Lawson @ 11/19/2002 12:37:30 PM #
mtc111, You can still have the Always Start Here feature you're used to using. Go to "Edit Category List" then choose from the tab list for "Always Start In". I'm still using LIII v2.2 on my Treo 180g. I'll surely register LauncherX when I get a color Palm (Tungsten-T v2.0 with OSv6 - maybe mid '03?). Mead RE: And MORE...
Hey! Thanks for the info. I jumped into the app w/o reading through the documentation... and, I paid the price.
Now I'm simply ecstatic.
RE: Homer?
From the Launcher X FAQ page at http://www.launcherx.com/support/: ---- "Homer" is a feature that will be implemented in a future Launcher X release. When complete, it will allow quick launching into your most frequently used apps from within any application. Speaking for myself, this isn't a big deal -- I have McPhling, which is excellent, and sounds as if it's pretty much matches Homer's functionality (though there's very little detail about what the latter actually is.) If I were B. Benc, I'd look into licensing McPhling to ship with Launcher X under the name of Homer. It's a rock-solid hack. (But, come to think of it, I imagine it won't work under Palm OS 5.0).
[i]"I'm warning you ... if you kill me, they'll just send 008!"[/i] Jeff Meyer RE: Homer?
My guess is that they wanted to get something released finally, so they scrubbed some of the more complex features. We'll probably see it in a later release. RE: Homer?I.M Anonymous @ 11/19/2002 4:56:25 PM #
I personally prefer Phlegm Hack over McPhiling -- I find its penstrokes more convenient. RE: Homer?
Thanks for letting me know about McPhling, Until ten minutes ago I was still using SwitchHack which does not support switching back to VFS apps. RE: Homer?
"McPhling is based heavily on Mitch Blevin's Phlegm Hack. McPhling simply adds a few features and fixes some bugs and goes on from there." RE: Homer?yoyoman412 @ 11/19/2002 9:24:35 PM #
For some reason when I have Mcphling enabled, Blazer wont start correctly, but when I un enable it, Blazer starts fine. So Im looking forward to the Homer function becuase I imagine my Mcphling prblem wont happen with Homer. RE: Homer?
I to use McPhling but it just anoys me that after all this time waiting one of the featured functions of the app has quietly evaporated. Just my £0.02 RE: Homer?VisorMiser @ 11/20/2002 3:12:35 PM #
McPhling rocks, highly customizable and it's 10 bucks (instead of 12) till the end of November. I applaud the developer for having the confidence & guts to put out his app on the honor system, fully functional w/o expiration date.
RE: TT D-padOperator99 @ 11/19/2002 12:27:25 PM #
Yup. And it really is quite a nice upgrade. Esp. the file manager - it might not replace McFile or Filez, both of which I have used (now using McFile), but it does 90% of what I use Mcfile for. The tiny icons are great for squeezing more on the screen and...if the development continues as it did from launcherIII ver. 1.x to LauncherIII ver 3.x, we should be in for some really nice enhancements. The d-pad support alone is enough to get me away from Silver or the Tungsten/Palm built in launcher. RE: TT D-pad
I've installed it this morning. The TT D-pad is supported. Both the selector button and the 4-way scroll. My only problem is that I paid for the upgrade this morning and they still have not sent the upgrade key.
can you have a file in only one category or does it allow a category with all files in it? RE: categories (copy/move)
I don't quite see what you're asking. Scott HandEra Moderator Off-Topic Moderator I'm trying to be PC, I really am, but I'm just too into handhelds.
Only the first 40 comments are displayed with the article.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Special Deals
Palm Reading? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||
----
[i]"I'm warning you ... if you kill me, they'll just send 008!"[/i]
Jeff Meyer