![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() CorePlayer for Palm OS ReviewBy: Kris Keilhack November 28, 2006
TCPMP (The Core Pocket Media Player) has a long and illustrious history on not only Palm OS devices but Windows and Symbian-based handhelds as well. The developers of TCPMP, after honing their skills on the freeware version, have now decided to move forward to a next-generation, commercially released media player. Now CorePlayer, the freeware app formerly as TCPMP, has finally arrived on the Palm OS scene after numerous delays and false starts. Read on to see if the new commercial version can unseat the quirky but rock-solid free version of TCPMP.
Testing Methodology CoreCodec makes no mention of the Palm OS system requirements for the player but I would assume that a Tungsten T-class OS5.x device would be the bare minimum for running this app. An SD card is also required for storing any manner of A/V media.
Installation and Feature Set
Even before installing the app, I was starting to become a bit concerned. MIDI playback, hardly a hardware-taxing feature, is promised only with the release Palm version 1.5 (and no ETA given for that update!). Additionally, WMA support will not arrive until version 1.5 but that is no great issue for me since I do not use WMA (DRM or otherwise) for any of my personal file format library unless it's something I just happened to download online.
I completely uninstalled TCPMP on my 700p before installing CorePlayer 1.02. The recently released 1.0.4 built 712 update overwrites 1.02 and installs with no issues. The new CorePlayer app does not overwrite the old TCPMP app nor is any provision made to import any preferences-they are essentially entirely separate, different products that just happen to have been produced by the same team. A huge improvement over TCPMP, by virtue of the sales revenue of the app cleanly covering any codec licensing fees, is having to not worry about downloading and hunting around for the proper codec of questionable legality to play a certain file.
Stability My main criticism of CorePlayer is simply its unstable nature in many circumstances where TCPMP was bulletproof. Pressing the 700p's "home" hard button while in CorePlayer's "information" screen causes a white screen followed by an endless reset loop. Trying to enter a streaming media URL into the app often causes a crash in 1.02 but fortunately 1.0.4 alleviates this. Some screens have a toggle for a dropdown menu that's devoid of any menu options! Cut & paste is strangely (and annoyingly) absent from the URL entry screen as well. While I can understand CoreCodec's desire to leave their revenue-free business model behind and usher in a new chapter of paid, commercial software, I think TCPMP was put out too pasture too quickly.
A/V Quality & Performance
Audio files all play well but CorePlayer is decidedly not going to replace Ptunes anytime soon. CorePlayer lacks many of the dedicated music-centric features found in Ptunes such as background playback and the ability to blank the screen to leave audio-only playback. I'd still like to see CoreCodec implement a few more audio-oriented features to truly make this a jack-of-all-trades application for Palm OS users. I was thrilled to see CorePlayer fairly immune to the 700p's laggy performance and noticed no hiccupping or stuttering during MP3 playback. I also did not find SD card speed to make a difference to overall playback quality. When playing files through my 700's pitifully weak internal speaker, the built-in preamp volume boost was appreciated though overzealous use of this adjustment can lead to distortion. On the video side of things, I'd love to see CoreCodec add some sort of MobiTV or Kinoma-style channel browser down the road. Ideally, an updated list of mobile-friendly sites with streaming media could be part of the "community" aspect of CorePlayer that has been hinted at in the past. Since 4gb looks to be the absolute cap for SD cards under Palm OS 5.x devices, local storage is finite; but as more users migrate to Treos, online streaming would permit users to view fresh content on their devices.
Ease of Use The initial purchase/registration process is straightforward and not too painful. I'd still love to see some sort of demo or trial version in addition to in-app help menus and better documentation. The CorePlayer website badly needs additional information and relevancy in regards to supported devices, available codecs etc. Additional complaints from users have focused on the misinformation spread by CoreCodec employees/administrators, the “vanishing” Palm OS forums and a number of missed dates for version update releases. The "CoreAccount" login system currently shows the Palm OS client as "coming soon" and with no direct links to download the latest version. The purchaser must refer to the original MobiHand purchase confirmation e-mail and redownload the updated app from there -- preposterous!
Conclusion I suspect that if CorePlayer can survive this rough gestational period, subsequent updates will continue to bring more compelling performance and features onboard. While there's certainly nothing overwhelmingly wrong with CorePlayer the app (although some fingers can be pointed at CoreCodec's website and corporate attitude towards their customers), there's currently no overwhelming reason to purchase it when the mature, stable, and no-frills TCMP does nearly everything equally well at a price that can never be beat: free. Nevertheless, Palm OS mobile media affecionados would be well server to keep a close eye on the state of CorePlayer as it continues to mature and improve.
My overall rating: CorePlayer for Palm OS is available for $19.95. A Windows Mobile version is also available. No trial version is available. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Article Comments
12 total comments The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments.
I bought it the other day when 1.04 came out. My biggest complaint about tcpmp was the inability to remap the controls on the PalmOS platform. You can do that now. I haven't found anything it didn't play and it seems like a nice upgrade from tcpmp. The only thing I could ask for is background playback, but at least for my usage, that's a very minor complaint.
It also helps that I bought it through http://store.justanothermobilemonday.com/ and used the 20% discount code they have prominently posted. That brings it down to $15.96...
Since 4gb looks to be the absolute cap for SD cards under Palm OS 5.x devices, local storage is finite; but as more users migrate to Treos, online streaming would permit users to view fresh content on their devices. As far as I can see.. 4GB looks to be the cap for SD cards on any device - I've never seen or heard of anything bigger... RE: 4GB
Toshiba is shipping it's 8GB SD card in Jan,: http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/11/20/toshiba/index.php ..and pretec has announced theirs a few months ago. Also, the article question s about larger then 4GB but if you have the fat32 driver then these *GB cards should be fine. Devices without the driver can search the web to find out how to get and install it on their devices. RE: 4GB
Doesn't the Palm OS have an inherent limitation to 4gb volume size regardless of FAT cluster size? I think the best we can hope for would be what the LifeDrive currently has--a 4gb internal drive and a 4gb SD card in the external slot. I always assumed that (combined with the lackluster reception given to the first LD) was the reason we never saw the mythical 8gb LifeDrive 2 that Brighthand liked to speculate about all of last year.
RE: 4GB
If Garnet's limited to 4GB volumes, then mightn't it be possible to get around it by reading an 8GB SD card as two separate 4GB volumes? Techies? RE: 4GBAdamaDBrown @ 11/30/2006 11:37:23 AM #
I don't believe it's possible to partition a card in that way and still have it recognized by a device. In any event, as far as I'm aware all the larger than 4 GB cards coming out are SDHC, which won't--to my knowledge--work in existing hardware.
I bought the coreplayer at mobihand. I had problems in purchasing it via the german paypal-service, but there was a great service. Kudos to mobihand on that!
I copied a bunch of small videos on SD-card (you know, these funny shorties you get via email all the time ;-) ... and none of the about 10 examples worked for me. Missing sound or missing picture or missing everthing cause of multiple decoder-issues. By the way, nearly the same with kinoma4... I really like these trial-less software [/irony] 'hope these issues will be fixed in the near future gr33tz 2XS
I wish that this review had dedicated provided a little more detail on the "streaming support," especially since you criticized the vendor for lack of same. Is the streaming launchable from blazer (ie, can you click on a link to a video file)? How does the 700p decide whether to use Core or the Kinoma pluggin? Or are you only allowed to enter a URL from within the Core app itself? Can you stream any file format that Core supports? Does it buffer the stream if it's high bitrate? Did you try it with Orb? RE: streaming support
To be perfectly honest, Core's information on streaming support is clear as mud. I should have made it clearer within the review but I just glossed over that for brevity's sake. Essentially, streaming audio support in this version of CorePlayer is nigh useless. Stick to the 700p integrated Kinoma/Blazer combo or PTunes deluxe if you want to stream on your Treo. I couldn't mention much because the developer gives no info and I was able to glean very little on my own or from elsewhere online.
To answer your questionss to the best of my knowledge: -Blazer still defaults to Kinoma for streaming purposes. You can (at this time, at least) only directly enter a URL into CorePlayer. -I was unable to get any streaming media to work properly (either to open at all or to play w/o crashing) on the initial 1.02 version. 1.04 gave me slightly better performance but I still get a ton of "file not supported" messages. Here's one of the handful of sites I was able to link directly to and got consistently good sound quality from (Chicago public radio station) http://wbez-sclo.streamguys.us/ -The app really needs an integrated mobile-friendly channel browser ala MobiTV and/or better URL entry & keyboard support (plus cut'n paste capabilities) when entering in those lengthy streaming site URLs. Also, Blazer integration would be phenomenal but no sign of that at this time.
You're complaining there's no MIDI support? Are you kidding? Does ANYONE actually use MIDI to listen to music? It might not be taxing, but it's CERTAINLY not one I would focus on if I were developing a media player. Complaining about that is just a joke. RE: MIDI?
I'm not complaining about the lack of MIDI support per se; rather it's calling MIDI a supported file format then having fine print underneath it saying it's not going to be available until version 1.5. We have no idea whatsoever what Core's release roadmap looks like or if there will ever be a version 1.5. I think that they should just omit MIDI/Windows Media from their supported format list and just say that these formats are forthcoming in a future release. Pinning it to an exact version number might lead to too much wishful thinking.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() Special Deals
Palm Reading? ![]() ![]() |
||||
This is very bad business planning...
Bquin
...laughing at a world too absurd to take seriously...