Comments on: Light at the End of the Tunnel: 7 Things We Need From Nova
It's been a long hard slog for Palm OS fans, these past five years. Since 2004's grand unveiling of the stillborn Cobalt, Palm OS has been lost in a nightmarish software limbo, with the "latest" iteration, Garnet, caught between the dated design paradigms of the past and the increasingly punishing demands of the future. With PDAs having fallen by the wayside and the always-connected cell phone taking their place as the de facto mobile computer years ago, Palm has been in desperate need of a capable, home-grown platform on which to build their next generation of devices. Following a disappointing false start with the Linux-powered Foleo and with the siren song of flashy new devices from Apple and RIM beckoning users to foreign shores, many were ready to give up on Palm altogether.
Article Comments
(42 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
RE: Yes, yes, and yes
It's just too bad Palm went with the 3D/gpu-less TI OMAP cpu for the 800w, and hasn't really developed a good WM polish to go with it.
Palm III -> Sony NR610C -> Sony NR70 -> Sony NX80 -> Palm T|X -> HTC Kaiser -> HTC Fuze
RE: Yes, yes, and yes
Currently, the iPhone has much of the consumer crowd enthusiasm, RIM has the business crowd, and Android momentum is building...in both the geek AND consumer crowd.
Palm may think that there is a fat middle...and I hope that there is because competition is good...but I for one am very unlikely to wait for mid/late 2009/2010 for Palm to get a new handset on the streets. Android looks awesome and I am just waiting for more handset choice.
Sheesh
They're going to need a lot more than your list to do anything in the smartphone market.
-Bosco
m105 -> NX70v -> NX80v -> iPhone -> iPhone 3G
RE: Sheesh
What would you suggest they do to take it to the next level?
RE: Sheesh
David
Palm III> Palm IIIx> Palm IIIc> Sony T615> Sony T665> Sony TH55> Palm TX
RE: Sheesh
RE: Sheesh
Screw convergence
Palm III->Visor Deluxe->Visor Platinum->Visor Prism->Tungsten E->Palm LifeDrive->Palm TX
Visor Pro+VisorPhone->Treo 180g->Treo 270->Treo 600->Treo 680->T-Mobile G1
http://mind-grapes.blogspot.com/
sync and timeline
Isn't Google going in a syncless direction with Android? I think the PIM apps just sync to gCal? Options are good, but being able to just ignore syncing and have your data kept up to date is damn priceless.
On the timeline, Tim it's not only that Palm has to get all of these line items done, they also have very little time to do it. They're burning cash and next year is going to be brutal on consumer electronics. They could get it all right but be too late to market. What do you reckon is the deadline to get your list checked off?
RE: sync and timeline
Also, if Palm are going to give the Foleo "mobile companion" concept another shot, they'll definitely need some intelligent syncing software.
As for a timeline - the sooner the better. Like bosco says, it's really only stuff that will put them on a par with where their competitors are today. I'd say Colligan's "devices by mid-2009" promise seems about right. Although who knows what Google, Apple, RIM, Microsoft et al. are going to come out with in the meantime...
RE: sync and timeline
Screw convergence
Palm III->Visor Deluxe->Visor Platinum->Visor Prism->Tungsten E->Palm LifeDrive->Palm TX
Visor Pro+VisorPhone->Treo 180g->Treo 270->Treo 600->Treo 680->T-Mobile G1
http://mind-grapes.blogspot.com/
Syncing to Palms servers
First, telco's will love it since it's going to be sending lots of tasty data of their expensive 3/4G pipes.
Secondly, this completely does away with having to support windows (2000, XP, Vista, Windows 7), Mac and a billion distros of linux. What you use on your desktop is your business and Palm wont care.
Thirdly, your data will always be backed up and always be safe, unlike on your home PC where the death of a hard drive, a thief, a fire, etc can mean that you lose everything.
Lastly, Palm can make some subscription revenue from this which will be gold from their point of view.
RE: Syncing to Palms servers
RE: Syncing to Palms servers
Yeah, where the Feds never have to tell you they've gained a warrant to invade your privacy - because it's not *your* property they've gotten into. Eejit.
RE: Syncing to Palms servers
I suspect we'll see something along the lines of that MyPalm beta service they had going awhile back.
Palm: Revenge Of The Nerdi
http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/palm-revenge-of-the-nerdi/
Still worth repeating.
Now TechCrunch is saying: PHONE.
Exclusive: New Palm phone to have slide-down keyboard, large touchscreen
http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/04/exclusive-new-palm-phone-to-have-slide-down-keyboard-large-touchscreen
>>>The new operating system is described as "amazing" and there will be a full software bazaar on launch. It will have media playback functions along with standard Palm calendar, email, and contact functionality.
But ... what if I don't WANT a frikkin phone, Palm? You got a model that will do WiFi only, like the iPod Touch?
And what about G1, baby?
RE: Palm: Revenge Of The Nerdi
I will reiterate my skepticism of Palm showing any actual new hardware at CES. And if they do, it'll be Nova running on a Treo Pro. EVDO Rev. A or HSPA, wi-fi, GPS, all of stuff Garnet cannot do, but nothing spectacularly new over what the Pro does already. Just a different OS.
Of course, regardless of what the new Nova hardware is going to ultimately look like, it's bound to be huge improvement over the FrankenGarnet Centro & aged Treos we have now. But I am sadly afraid that unless you are a Sprint user, you won't get any Nova-lovin'. I'm tethered to Verizon so that's going to hamper my chances of getting a Nova device. Look at this way: T-Mob has historically never been a Palm supporter and has not had a Palm product of ANY kind since the Treo 600. Verizon dragged their feet in carrying the 650, 700wx, 755p, and the Centro and passed completely on the 800w and (supposedly) the CDMA Treo Pro. Not a good sign, especially when combined with the rumblings that Verizon is gonna can all Palm products regardless of OS. Alltel's gonna be part of Verizon officially in just a few days so we can write them off. That leaves AT&T and Sprint domestically. AT&T passed on the most compelling piece of Palm hardware in years (Treo Pro) and AT&T remains iPhone-centric so THAT'S not a good sign either.
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p
RE: Palm: Revenge Of The Nerdi
David
Palm III> Palm IIIx> Palm IIIc> Sony T615> Sony T665> Sony TH55> Palm T|E> Palm T|E2> Palm T|X
RE: Palm: Revenge Of The Nerdi
Maybe I'd be sixth.
RE: Palm: Revenge Of The Nerdi
RE: Palm: Revenge Of The Nerdi
Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/44432840@N00/3142231559/
Too damned fat, otherwise interesting.
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
Just that all that had already been posted hours earlier...
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/01/04/say-hi-to-the-itreo.html
Speculation that it will debut on Sprint (but of COURSE it will!):
http://www.gearlog.com/2009/01/ces_2009_palms_new_nova_phone.php
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
== "...Here's what we know so far.
==
== * Nova is a Linux-based OS."
True.
== "* Nova will launch with third-party software already available."
We do not know this.
== "* Nova will focus on integrating different kinds of data stored
== in different locations."
We do not know this.
== "* Nova will integrate into Web-based social networks."
We do not know this.
== "* Nova will be driven around the Internet and Web-based applications."
We do not know this.
== "* Nova will focus on the "prosumer" market, leaving consumers for Centro
== and business for Windows Mobile Treo products."
This was originally as planned; words at the earnings call suggest we now know this is NOT true.
== "* The phone will hit shelves by June 2009."
That is the currently planned timeframe for the first phone to be "shipped".
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
Some of us sleep. Zzzzzz
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
Indeed, this week prior to the CES unveiling will require almost hourly "BE CAREFUL!" warnings from you regarding what to believe/not believe!
In fact, the SF Gate piece I posted earlier says fairly plainly that they expect Nova to supplant Garnet entirely in Palm's lineup but the cheap/safe WinMob offerings will continue.
I can see Palm continuing to sell the existing stocks of Garnet-based Centros & PDAs, especially if they are working to integrate Garnet emulation/compatibility in later Nova devices. I could even see the 128mb Centro moving to other carriers and GSM form and maybe staying in production for another 6-9 months, actually. But Palm would be better off going with a low-end Nova device and trying to phase out Garnet ina timely fashion since no one (especially Palm & their carrier partners) apparently wants to have to support or deal with Garnet any longer than they have to.
Look at what Palm did with the Zire 21 handheld back in '04. It had an ARM CPU & OS5 but otherwise was nearly identical to the original Zire with the Dragonball CPU & OS4. The OS and the CPU in the Zire 21 far outclassed the rest of the package. But it made more sense for Palm at the time to just dump the old OS4 stuff and bring everyone up to par with OS5. Same still applies now w.r.t. Nova vs. Garnet.
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
>
> We do not know this.
We might not know it about Palm's Nova, but Apple just announced at Macworld their iLife app that does this.
Guess some of Palm's potential steam just got let out, huh?
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
No, because those are DESKTOP APPS. iPhone has also had FB and MS, etc, clients for a while.
It's Palm's turn now.
RE: Phone mockup: Deal or No Deal?
These 7 things are not everyones things that is for sure.
2.)I use the centro more as a business tool so as far as the media player goes I could care less. That is what I have an ipod for.
3.) Like a previous poster mentioned sync to desktop is dead. I haven't used hotsync it 4-5 years I could care less about syncing to a desktop.
4.) This one I agree entirely blazer is old and outdated. I would love to see a browser similar to safari on the iphone. The two weeks I had an Iphone I loved the brower and Safari is the only thing I miss on the iphone after returning it.
5.) This one I agree with two the processor and memory storage are entirely underclassed in this day and age of smartphones.
RE: These 7 things are not everyones things that is for sure.
2)you may use the Centro more as a business tool, but Palm says they're going after consumers/"prosumers", who use these things as toys as well as phones. So a good media solution is absolutely essential for that.
3)I don't think sync is dead. Far from it. We may use it less, but that doesn't mean it's still not important. We all carry massive amounts of information around with us nowadays, more than ever before, and simple ways to transfer that between the myriad number of computers people own is critical. Maybe this means online sync is needed. That's what I meant by "choice" - any modern sync solution should work just about any way you want it.
This better be good
The iPod Touch is a great device, if it had the datebk+ application the TX would never be used. I like my Touch HD but it runs the same way Windows Mobile did for me 8 years ago. It constantly crashes, needs to be reset, and is too slow.
If Palm can pull out a device that will work with Tmobile's network, I'll be first in line to order one. Even the cost isn't an issue so long as they don't leave out important features. One reason I like the Touch HD so much is it has everything I want hardware wise except for a physical keyboard in a tiny package. 2 cameras, bluetooth, wi-fi, high-res screen, 3.5mm jack, charges with a standard micro USB cable, speakerphone, etc.
Palm's gotten my hopes up before, I won't be surprised if they blow it this time around as well.
Service & Reliability too please
RE: Service & Reliability too please
RE: Service & Reliability too please
Single World Phone CDMA + GSM
This helps PALM to cut down the cost and sell it to all carriers.
RE: Single World Phone CDMA + GSM
PALM should create a world phone.
It already has, it's called the Treo Pro.
By the way GSM stands for Global System for Mobile Communictions.
AT&T the largest carrier in the US seem to make some use of it, as do T-mobile. The UMTS 3G networks they use fall under the GSM description even though ironically, UMTS is technically based on CDMA.
Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. Aaron Levenstein
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
Yes, yes, and yes