Easily Copy Info from IE to Palm with Coola Right-Click

waa! I am a baby! I have a mac, and I expect the world to cater to me! waaa!

Wake up!

When Sudha Jamthe, Coola CEO, spoke at our PUG meeting in July, her answer to that kind of comment/question was that they had tentative plans to support other operating systems and even other handheld platforms. But remember, they are a VERY new company. It makes sense for them to launch their company supporting the MOST widely used combinations, that of a Windows desktop PC and PalmOS handheld. It wouldn't make much sense for them to start off supporting a less used (no judgement calls here, just numbers) OS, would it? Maybe if you contact them *nicely* about supporting MacOS and/or other stuff, they can better guage user need for it, and better plan to make it happen?

In a similar vein, a good text-to-doc converter will put interesting online things into your PDA in .doc format. The real benefit is that you have the flexibility to take anything you can get MS Word to open and transform it into a .doc file.

I think you need to remove the words "lack" "of" and "support" from that statement. BTW I use Linux

Even like that, I still prefer a Mac computer.
way more stable, faster, more reliable, than wintel computers.
Why do you think all the pros prefer a Mac?
besides most up to date stuff is available for MAC.
All the stuff that you can actually use, PC has too much crap out there, useless soft and hardware.

Even like that, I still prefer a Mac computer.
way more stable, faster, more reliable, than wintel computers.
Why do you think all the pros prefer a Mac?
besides most up to date stuff is available for MAC.
All the stuff that you can actually use, PC has too much crap out there, useless soft and hardware.

>> Even like that, I still prefer a Mac computer.
>> way more stable, faster, more reliable, than wintel >> computers.

I never said the PC was better or worse, but simply you shouldn't bitch when companies dont support a MUCH smaller and less profitable platform. We all want to put food on the table.
Logic would dictate that a PC with endless amount of different manufacturers, and infintismal combinations of HW and SW would have far more stability problems then a product from one manufacturer with a much smaller scope of additional HW/SW. If other operating systems had the same dynamics of HW/SW of a PC they to would see a greater decrease in stability. In addition you hear about PC's crashing more frequently than Macs because there is a practically a PC in every office/home compared to Macs. I am in the SW business and I am considered the "computer guy" to friends and in my core group of friends/family/business associates (maybe 35 people) only one has a Mac, which is a second machine(primary being a PC) used for DTP in a printing business. So guess what? I never hear about Mac problems, not neccessarily because they don't have them but because it's a 35:1 ratio.
Personally, I believe a big part Windows "stability" problem are more hype generated by people who don't like MS/Windows/Gates on principal than actual problems.

>> Why do you think all the pros prefer a Mac?
I don't think all the pros perfer a Mac. But it is extremly popular in certain applications. However the fact that it has great DTP support doesn't negate the fact of there only being 2 aisles of Mac SW/HW in a CompUSA.

>>besides most up to date stuff is available for MAC.
Most(a stretch) not all, which is what started this thread in the first place.

>>All the stuff that you can actually use, PC has too >>much crap out there, useless soft and hardware.
I'd rather have the option of endless software/hardware than be limited by the reverse scenario.