![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rumor: Possible Palm OS Powered SmartPhone?Posted By: PIC on Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:51:11 PM
It is unclear which licensee has developed this handheld or if it is just a design mockup. You can click on the image for a larger picture. This image could quite possibly be from a design-study mockup that is used for gauging focus-group reactions or internal "concept PDAs". Companies will often take a number of different design ideas (sometimes just one), build them up into (semi-) functioning hardware (or sometimes even just images) and get people's reactions. This is during the design phase and often they will then mix and match features etc. as they refine the hardware and feature-set. On the other had, this could be an image of a next generation Palm OS Powered SmartPhone. One possibility that you can't rule out is that this could be a crude mock-up made by some overzealous "fanboy" created in Photoshop or CAD. This could even be some sort of new Palm OS tablet-like model. Some things that we can tell based on the image is that the device has some form of high resolution screen. There is also no dedicated silkscreened graffiti area. We can't tell exactly but it could be anywhere from 320x480 to 480x640. The model would also likely have a form of virtual graffiti or other alternative input method. There are icons for the standard DateBook, Address Book, the Web Pro Browser and an unfamiliar icon in the shape of a mobile phone. The small circle on the right looks to be a microphone, which would support voice/phone abilities. As Always, We will bring you more on this story as it develops.
More Stories Like This... The Treo 800w Leak Parade Marches On Sprint Treo 800w Release Date July 13? Windows Mobile 6 Update Coming to the Verizon Treo 700wx Detailed Treo 800w Specs Revealed Verizon Centro Release Date and Pricing Info Leaked New Treo 800w Pictures and Details More articles about Rumors ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Article Comments
64 total comments The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments.
treo007 @ 11/13/2002 1:42:52 PM #
For me a phone has to look at least somewhat like a phone. This looks like an interesting handheld however. Leave the camera off or make it optional though. I have no need for poor resolution photos. Low Resolution Photos
I used to think the same thing ("no use for low resolution photos") until my wife was in an automobile accident.. she was able to use the built in camera of her NR70V to take pictures before the cars were moved, making it impossible for the guilty party to claim any sort of innocence. RE: Phone?
I still don't understand how someone could look at this picture and think it was a phone. There's nothing about it that tells me that it's a phone. RE: Phone?
Well, possibly the button on the right that is in the shape of a cell phone? Or the microphone being in the exact position for being talked into while being in your hand? In my opinion, it's fake. Anonymous source + mixture of things only Palm does + mixture of things Palm said they will never do = phoney. Sure, it could possibly be the next generation smartphone, but don't you remember when Palm said they wanted to incorporate D-Pads on all of their models? They even did it on the Tungsten W. Remember the third button on the i705? It's in the same exact position and the same exact design. Eh, I don't know, it could really go either way. I would say that it was fake, though, if I had to choose. RE: Phone?
Initially I thought it could be a smartphone, the more I look at it, looks more like a web-pad or tablet pc. RE: Phone?
>>In my opinion, it's fake. Anonymous source + mixture of things only Palm does + mixture of things Palm said they will never do = phoney. Sure, it could possibly be the next generation smartphone, but don't you remember when Palm said they wanted to incorporate D-Pads on all of their models? No,no,no - read the article. It said 'licensee' - a Palm OS device NOT a 'Palm Inc' device. Having said that - it is possibly a fake, its just that you can't make that assumption based on the 'Palm would never do this' argument. RE: Phone?terrysalmi @ 11/13/2002 4:32:52 PM #
Didn't people also say the Oslo was fake when it had basically the same circumstances? ______________________________________ Kappa Sigma Fraternity - Founded 1400 A.D. The Star and Crescent shall not be worn by every man, but only by him who is worthy to wear it... RE: Phone?Token User @ 11/13/2002 5:24:12 PM #
No,no,no - read the article. It said 'licensee' - a Palm OS device NOT a 'Palm Inc' device. Getting picky, but Palm Inc is a licensee of the PalmOS, just as Handspring, Kyocera, and Samsung are (sorry - just listed the "known" smartphone licensees). Makes you wonder how many unknown ones there are - Sendo? RE: Phone?I.M Anonymous @ 11/13/2002 6:22:06 PM #
I don't think it's a phone. My Palm V has a button with a picture of a phone on it, but it has no voice capability. I think this is just the addressbook button for the 21st century. RE: Phone?I.M Anonymous @ 11/13/2002 7:14:46 PM #
Nevermind. I just saw that it also has a corded phone button. Oops! RE: Phone?
It's amazing how fast my reply to big raji was taken off. Let me restate! This is not a political forum. Trashing Bush is not appropriate. Deleting my previous post borders on communism. Since Ed’s departure this site has become rather weak. My .02 in ‘02 RE: Phone?
Liam: you are welcome to post whatever you want as long as it's on topic and contributes constructively to a thread. Your post borders on McCarthy-ism. That is also Raj's sig, and it is acceptable by me.
I reserve the right to edit/delete any post in my TOS.
RE: yucky
definately just some CAD mockup - whether it'll be a real product or whether it was just a 'fanboy' has yet to be seen. That said, it needs work either way IMO :) RE: yucky
I like it. I hope it is an OS5 with virtual graffiti, no phone, built in camera and either wifi or BT (or both). RE: yucky
"camera is nice. esp it wont be flipping like the nx"
Why not; the camera mount looks as though it rotates, possibly more than the NX since it's restricted by the CF blister.
Now that I have used a Palm T|T, a bluetooth phone (T68i), and a bluetooth headset, I would never want an all-in-one SmartPhone. With them combined, it IS a SmartPhone. But, when I want to scale it down (e.g., I go biking, or at night), I can just take the tiny T68i. RE: Who needs a SmartPhone
What Bluetooth headset are you using and how well does it work. Oh yeah, is it in the realm of 'affordable'? Jer 23:29 RE: Who needs a SmartPhone
I don't know what you consider affordable, but, Jabra sells a Bluetooth headset. It's called the FreeSpeak. It costs around $100. RE: Who needs a SmartPhonepen_n_paper @ 11/14/2002 12:34:31 AM #
I do! :)
The Tugsten T is pricey but looking at this "beta" makes me want to get it.
Let me be the first to cry "Fake!" No part of that alleged design makes any sense. Looks like some poor college student's submission for a design final. I'd give it an F-. RE: Bad fake
Ah, isn't that what was said when the first photos of Oslo, I mean TT appeared. I hope it is a fake cause it sure is a ugly critter. Please buy Palm stuff, I want my stock to go back up so I can sell it! RE: Bad fake
I agree. It doesn't look very realistic to me, and the design is really crappy. What's with the shape of the buttons? And as for the "microphone" (and it isn't at all clear to me that's what it is), why would it be on the right side of the phone? Holding the "phone" to one's right ear would cause the user to stick the left lower corner up in the air. That doesn't make sense. The microphone would be on the left. I think someone had fun in Photoshop. Bad fake indeed
To me this looks like a twenty-minute Photoshop job, crossing the old Handspring (Visor, anyone?) and Palm m505, minus the grafitti area ... RE: Bad fake
One noticable difference between this one and the Oslo is that the Oslo still retained the extended file information from the digital camera used to take the picture. The only extended information on this one is that it was done in Photoshop 7.0. ;) "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." - Sam Brown RE: Bad fake
Looks like a FrankenPalm. m5xx stuck to a Symbol chasis. UGLY. Could this be a HandEra prototype? (just joking). RE: Bad fake
I can't believe anyone noticed the resolution on this thing.
It looks like it's running 1024x768. :-x
reminds me of either an advertisement or a demo movie for one of the palm OS devices from a couple of months ago. Can't recall where I saw it tho
I'm not sure, but either way a visual mockup of a device is a great way to get people talking. Here's my thought: what if the PDA fans / Photoshop gurus among us sumbitted our own *clearly marked* fantasy PDA designs for discussion on PIC. I think it would be great free market research for Palm and would tide us over until the next device comes out. :-) Ryan, would you consider this newsworthy enough for a front page discussion? RE: Is it real or is it Photoshop?
I would be happy to host a "mock-up" PDA Photoshop article. If enough people are interested I could create a forum section for it and post the best ones on PIC. -Ryan webmaster@palminfocenter.com RE: Is it real or is it Photoshop?TedTschopp @ 11/13/2002 7:48:28 PM #
I was going to mock up a design, but I didn't have the time to finish. I was going to include 1) Television/FM Radio Tuner Ted Tschopp RE: Is it real or is it Photoshop?
what's the point of a tv tuner if I can't watch cable such as Fox News or CNBC?
Thunderball @ 11/13/2002 3:55:31 PM #
Protect what innocents? You mean you blurred the LG logo? (Filename gave it away in that case...)
Only the first 40 comments are displayed with the article.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() Special Deals
Palm Reading? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||