![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Comments on: Treo 680 Image Turns Up
In addition, a picture of a Cingular branded Treo 750 was found as well. Read on for the full sized pics...
Detailed Comment View (134 Total Comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments. RE: Hmm...
While I'm happy to see they haven't abandoned PalmOS altogether, what I really want is a high end PalmOS device. It's going to be hard to not buy a 3g nokia if the only alternative on the Palm GSM side is a 2.5g device.
404 now. Looks like they found it.
Soon to be getting a T|X ( or maybe T5, Lifedrive or Treo - I can't decide!)
Everyone notice the little BT icon on the top of the unit's screen? While removing IR is a truly boneheaded move by Palm, it's not a total disaster if BT is present. But IR is SUCH a standard feature that I question the value in removing it. I wonder how many legacy apps will freak out when you try to execute a "beam" command and there's no IR hardware??? Personally, I'd rather have just IR and a lower pricetag than Palm's wobbly implementation of BT. So basically thing thing is going to be a sleeker, slimmer Treo 650 with a sligthly newer OS, more bundlded apps and 2x the RAM. Yet the battery capacity will be less than the 650 and the IR port is removed. There's always a chance the screen may be less brilliant than the 650's or it could have a slower CPU (very possible) like the 200mhz Xscale used in the T|E2 and Z22. Sounds like a sideways upgrade if I've ever seen one. Gain a few features, lose a few more. This is classic Palm maneuvering--just look at the T3 to T5 transition, T5 to TX or Zire 31 to Z22 even. RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!
I'd rather have BT than IR - provided Softick Audio Gateway works. :D Truth be told I won't miss IR at all. Never had the opportunity to use it. I think if Cingular can do Treo 650s for $50, then there's a good chance this one's going to have similar pricing and specs to the 650. I doubt they're going to put a lower-quality screen than the 650 in this 680, based on Colligan's recent interview response: What technologies do you see as important to incorporate into future devices? Which is fine with me. It's lookin' good. Everything I love about my 650, but less ugly. It'd be nice if they'd use the black keys and dark colouring of the 750v, though. RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!
I am using a Treo 650 now. If I change to this model, I wonder if anyone can actually notices that I have changed my phone at all. To many people, a phone is a fashion. Why can't Palm provide phones of different styles? While Palm do offer different smartphones with different OS and wireless networks, customers also want choices on their phones' outlook! Look at how Apple is so successful with their ipods and how Nokia is so successful on their phones. RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!
Agreed. Hopefully Palm are going to be a bit more innovative with next year's Treos. Even though i find the current candy-bar style Treo to be the most useful design, other people obviously have different needs. Palm needs to recognise that quick and put out a small Treo - or a dumbphone Treo, if you like. Dumbphones could sorely use the Palm UI touch. (None of the obvious jokes about what the "Palm Touch" entails, thanks. :P ) Tim I apologise for any and all emoticons that appear in my posts. You may shoot them on sight. Treo 270 ---> Treo 650 RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!
I've used IR on occasion, sometimes even for sharing contact information. But, over the years, I've found most people still swap business cards. At conferences, etc, it's quicker to pull a card out of a pocket than to have two people digging out their handhelds. Then again, I'm in the "social sciences" and, as a group, we tend to lag behind the rest of the professional world on technology implementation. RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!runeherholdt @ 9/25/2006 3:40:52 AM #
Hey everybody... I think this is my first comment on Palminfo. I just can't understand why Palm doesn't build a top end smartphone. Why do they make these small treos with a tiny screen and a keyboard at the buttom. What I would like is: I guess that's about it. But everytime I surf the web in search of propper smartphones I end up looking at Ipaq, Eten, HTC, mio, Qtek or some other brand. What do you guys want? Do you really like that tiny-screen of treo? :-) Sincerely palm m105, IIIc, zire71, T1, T3, lifedrive, T5, TX RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!
I originally bought my Treo 270 for the keyboard, because SMS on a phone keypad annoyed the hell out of me. (also out of a lust for Handspring devices) So I'd hate to see the keyboard go. As for the tiny screen, I look on it as being vastly larger, clearer and brighter than your usual phone screen, rather than teensy compared to your usual PDA screen. That said, Palm really do need to diversify the Treo line. Ideally, it would come in three flavours: 1) Classic Treo candy-bar style with QWERTY I don't believe Palm are stupid - naive, maybe - so I think they know all this already. I imagine next year's Treos are going to be a very different-looking bunch; almost certainly they won't be running the "classic" PalmOS. Or maybe everyone here is right, Palm is doomed, and we won't see anymore new Treos at ALL. How's that for depressing... RE: Bluetooth? Aye! IR? NAY!
You are forgetting 1 other design they are lacking, something similar to the o2 atom or the imate k-jam. I don't know how they sell in the US but the atoms and the minis befor them sold like hot cakes in OZ and the slide out keyboard on the k-jam puts it in my short list of funky designs.
on a long enough timeline the survival rate of everyone drops to zero
While many people agreed that the classic Treo look is not bad, Palm should provide more choices. This Treo 680 is certainly good, but it just reassemble so much like the Treo 650/700p (except the antenna).
Will Palm ever release a more phone-like Palm OS smartphone? A 320x480 Palm OS Smartphone may be an innovation to many people.
Four new models launched in '06 and not one single model has Wifi... But then again, the company is going so well that they can afford to ignore it, right? I guess Palm thinks they're smarter than the rest since they are the only company not offering it. Palm Vx (a classic) -> Palm 505 (*yawn*) -> Dell Axim (slooow...) -> Palm TE (great) -> Qtek 9090 (great idea, lousy platform) -> Nokia 6630 (a toy) -> iMate SP3i (not bad) -> Nokia 9300 (can't sync notes!!) -> Treo 650 (awesome) -> hw6915 (almost perfect) RE: And still no Wifi....
...what is this "WiFi" you speak of? Must be a brand new technology, with very little implementation in the real world. As the Treo is on the "cutting edge" of technology, I'm sure Palm would not hesitate to include it in a $650.00 "smart phone" if there were any possible uses for it. Just like they overloaded the Treo 650 with RAM - thinking ahead that their customers might want to load a few databases and programs beyond the basic PIMs. It's this "looking ahead" philosophy that has made Palm the hands-down champion of the PDA and cell phone market today, and they are unstoppable! RE: And still no Wifi....
If the North American carriers can get an 800lb gorilla like Nokia to remove Wi-Fi from their flagship business smartphone, the E61, how is a small outfit like Palm supposed to sell a Wi-Fi enabled smartphone to them? Never forget: just because it's your money paying for that Treo doesn't make you Palm's customer. The carriers are the customer. You will get the features the carriers let you have. They've dipped their toe in the Wi-Fi pool, didn't like the temperature, and now it's no Wi-Fi for you, buddy. This sad state of affairs may change some day, but for now we need to suck it up or carry two devices. RE: And still no Wifi....
>but for now we need to suck it up or carry two devices. Not necessarily, Beersie. RE: And still no Wifi....
Never forget: just because it's your money paying for that Treo doesn't make you Palm's customer. The carriers are the customer. You will get the features the carriers let you have. Excuse me, but ultimately *I* am the customer, and it's *my* decision whether to embrace (read 'accept') what they are offering; nobody can force me to "have the features the carriers will let me have". Thus, I *chose not* to buy any Palm device that doesn't have Wifi, and consequently they just lost one customer; the carriers can offer anything they wish, but it'll only do them good if *I* (and everyone else) buy it. What matters at the end of the day is number of units sold, and unsold phones collecting dust on the shelves are of zero use to the carriers, and to Palm. So one thing is what the carriers wants me to have, another thing is what I decide to have. RE: And still no Wifi....runeherholdt @ 9/25/2006 4:01:48 AM #
...If palm think that there is no use for WI-FI they are wrong. I would never buy a new device without wifi. Maybe it is going very well for Palm in the US but here in Denmark where I live it is rarity to see a store selling lot's of Palm OS devices. Most people in Denmark have a HP Ipaq PDA sollution in there pocket... sad... but true. RE: And still no Wifi....
Out of curiosity, do your evil American telco overlords offer any phones with wi-fi? Tim I apologise for any and all emoticons that appear in my posts. You may shoot them on sight. Treo 270 ---> Treo 650 RE: And still no Wifi....
Excuse me, but ultimately *I* am the customer, and it's *my* decision whether to embrace (read 'accept') what they are offering; nobody can force me to "have the features the carriers will let me have". Thus, I *chose not* to buy any Palm device that doesn't have Wifi, and consequently they just lost one customer; If you plan to be a frequent Wi-Fi user instead of using the carrier network then they are quite happy to see you go. They make their money off their pricey data plans, not off selling you the handset. In fact they take a loss on the phones in hopes of getting you into one of those plans. freakout, Cingular (largest US carrier) still sells one Wi-Fi enabled phone, a Cingular branded HTC Wizard, but since releasing that they have brought out no others to market that I'm aware of. I think we have seen the same pattern with the others. Now that Cingular is releasing the Nokia E61 with the Wi-Fi cut out and calling it the E62 I believe the story has been told: they consider Wi-Fi to be more of a loss than a leader. I think the US carriers may be spooked about the free/cheap municipal Wi-Fi buildouts starting to occur in some major US cities (as well as some small ones: http://www.pikesoft.com/blog/index.php?itemid=111). The Verizon CEO has delivered some surprisingly shrill and frightened-sounding statements against municipal Wi-Fi that let on what a concern this trend is for his company. RE: And still no Wifi....
Europe is another story, and I agree that Palm will need to bring out a Wi-Fi-enabled Treo in Europe if they want to grow that market. Flat rate wireless data plans are rare there, from what I understand, and the roaming charges for data when you travel within Europe are exorbitant. So Wi-Fi is considered almost a necessity for heavy data users. David Beers Pikesoft Mobile Computing www.pikesoft.com/blog RE: And still no Wifi....
Tim; Don't forget the mostly ignored Samsung i730 on Verizon. Good CDMA performance and a decent 240*320 screen. Integrated wi-fi and BT, even though Verizon has done their usual bit of crippling the BT profiles. A shame the slider has mnay of the same issues that plagued the Palm T|T series. I prefer the Treo keyboard over the Samsung's. But yes, to answer your question, you have at least one other smartphone offered by the US telcos with integrated wi-fi. RE: And still no Wifi....
Hi David, just to give you a ping from Austria. At T-Mobile's, the data plan for my Treo 600(250MB) costs 18€. Afaik, 1.5GB cost 75...and theres no unlimited plan available. Compare that to the chesap 30$ plan a friend reported me from the states and you see why people want wifi here... Best regards P.s. Data prices are falling here, too nowadays..finally! RE: And still no Wifi....The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/25/2006 1:46:41 PM #
Sprint Wi-Fi phone (Windows Mobile): http://www.sprint.com/business/products/phones/ppc6700_allPcsPhones.jsp With available cheap EVDO plans (500 anytime minutes + unlimited EVDO for as low as $30/month!) + the ability to run Skype + impending government-sponsored Wi-Fi networks, it's obvious that having a lot of phones like this would quickly bankrupt Sprint. Either way, I can't see the carriers surviving the VoIP "paradigm shift". Expect to see several carriers merge in the next year or two (it's already started), but their heyday is over. People are sick of being fleeced. The timing is just about perfect for Google to introduce its free portable VoIP service... The carriers are fcuked and I don't think anyone will shed a tear for them. Bwahahahaha!
RE: And still no Wifi....
Don't forget the mostly ignored Samsung i730 on Verizon. I did a quick Google on i730. The Verizon page that pops up at the top of the list makes no mention at all of the wi-fi capabilities. Amusingly. Seems even when they do offer wi-fi they don't go out of their way to advertise it... RE: And still no Wifi....
http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=1044 They are TERRIFIED of anyone figuring out that Verizon OR Sprint have any wi-fi integrated smartphones currently in their lineups. I would also assume that's why everyone is so silent to the fact that the 700w/wx have drivers for Palm's wi-fi SDIO card built in. On the 700wx, with its extra RAM, giving up SD storage is ALMOST possible in order to keep an SDIO wi-fi card installed. ALMOST. I'd much rather have one of the newer low-profile, minimally protruding wi-fi SDIO cards in my smartphone that the enormous brick of a card Palm currently offers under their branding. RE: And still no Wifi....
If you plan to be a frequent Wi-Fi user instead of using the carrier network then they are quite happy to see you go. They make their money off their pricey data plans, not off selling you the handset. In fact they take a loss on the phones in hopes of getting you into one of those plans. Now that's stretching the truth a little: no company is happy, not even indifferent, at a customer leaving; as soon I change carriers Vodafone will call me up and try to convince me to stay with them. They've done this in the past and they'll do it again. That's hardly the behavior of an indifferent company. And when they do call I'll certainly let them know the reason for me leaving. Do I expect things to change because of that? Of course not. But contrary to what you say I don't need to, nor will I, "suck it up". That's why I got the hw6915. Having said that, it is true that they do make the money off data plans. But that also includes phone calls and not only 3G, hence their concern when a customer leaves, regardless of them selling me the handset or not. RE: And still no Whiffy
I suppose the main problem from the carrier's point-of-view is that they have to pay billions and billions of dollars for their 3G wireless spectrum, and that money has to be recouped somehow. Hence pricey data charges. Not that that makes me very sorry for them - if they were smart, they'd have set up their own wifi and VoIP services long ago, rather than keeping all their eggs in one basket. As it stands they're looking rather doomed.
Although. A question I don't think I've seen asked*: if wifi does become ubiquitous and everyone has a device that uses it, won't we start to see free wifi networks become overloaded and next to useless? After all, if everyone is using them then the costs for the operators of these free networks will start to add up. They might be able to beat that with ad-supported access or something, or charging fees for service with no ads, but then you're pretty much back where you started: if you want unfettered on-the-go access, you have to pay. *possibly because it's a stupid one
Motorola hawking Razrs in vending machines Caught at the airport on an extended layover and fed up with your lame old cell phone? You're in luck: you'll soon be able to saunter over to a Motorola "InstantMoto" vending machine, whip out your credit card and pick yourself up a gleaming new Razr. That's right: Motorola plans to start selling its cellphones and accessories in vending machines in over 20 malls and airports around the U.S. The new machines apparently have the support of the major cellular network providers. Explains ArsTechnica: Cingular, T-Mobile, and Verizon are offering service plans in conjunction with the vending machines...but consumers can also purchase phones sans plan. Cingular and T-Mobile will be able to upgrade...by swapping out the SIM cards from their old phones. Verizon customers will need to call the carrier to have service switched manually, and those who want a new service plan will have to sign up online, negating part of the convenience factor." First thing to note: the vending machine approach stands in stark contrast to, say, the rich retail experience of the new Nokia store. But the main takeaway is not that different companies are trying different strategies, but rather that these manufacturers and their network allies are simply desperate for market share. Where The Browser lives, there are roughly a thousand cell phone retailers per square mile. One wonders exactly how much profit Motorola will make on its InstantMoto sales, and when exactly will this cellphone sales onslaught subside. And, yes, it must be asked: who, outside of the vending-machine crazy Japanese, would actually buy a cell phone from a vending machine? http://money.cnn.com/blogs/browser/index.html#115893582543406930 http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060922-7804.html RE: OT: Motorola Selling Razrs in Vending Machines
Note to self: next trip to the mall bring baseball bat and black mask. RE: OT: Motorola Selling Razrs in Vending Machinese_tellurian @ 9/24/2006 2:13:24 PM #
More purpose for a people driven we-com industry that the founding groups(s) may build upon with others until mature or trade for good old capital. Much to build so little time for stroking egos. :-(lol) i do not have access to defend myself (thoughts) yet can read about my thoughts with anatomical male components that share not e-currency. What does a male procreate organ have to do with we-com? :-(lol) and i can't find a home? Yes i know i lack a complete body. A soul and no body ... such pain. Let's build more and compare size some place else ... please. We have enough issues without adding more. Peace, E-T e-tellurian Completing the e-com circle with a people driven we-com solution RE: OT: Motorola Selling Razrs in Vending Machines
With the advent of a we-com e-com society, how will black market items such as coke and hookers interact? Would those that offer such items have no choice but to participate? Or would this currency model bring about the return of the barter system? What are your thoughts? RE: OT: Motorola Selling Razrs in Vending Machinesfierywater @ 9/25/2006 11:25:04 AM #
what IS he/she/it, anyways? RE: OT: Motorola Selling Razrs in Vending Machines
^^
Weirdo [weer-doh] –noun, plural weirdos. Informal. 1. an odd, eccentric, or unconventional person. 2. a psychopath, esp. a dangerous or vicious one; psycho: They caught the weirdo who attacked the children. Tim I apologise for any and all emoticons that appear in my posts. You may shoot them on sight. Treo 270 ---> Treo 650
d_aveFromCA @ 9/23/2006 11:34:54 AM #
Soooo, if this is for the more price-sensitive, what about the not so price-sensitive? I've read rumors that Cingular's planning on releasing a winmob one 750w (or whatever it's called), the 680 of course, and a 700/750p version. The last one is what i want, but i don't think any pix have surfaced yet... getting kinda worried... http://www.tabletgear.com RE: 750p?
The 680 will complete the 4 Treo's this year. I would be surprised if there was another GSM update for 6-12 months after. So yes, you have reason to be worried. A CDMA update may be expected sooner. Surur RE: 750p?
Hi, I wouldnt expect any. At least not with Garnet...they prolly wont hack it up any more altough they COULD do it from a kernel point of view. But we still have GSPDA. Good, classic 2G machines without video calling crap... Best regards RE: 750p?
MikeCon - get a 650 or 700p from Sprint for cheap. You're missing out on the integration between PIM and Phone which 2 devices can't replicate. You're also missing out on fast, seamless, integrated Internet features. Sprint is pretty good in NYC. But their big attraction is the cheap unlimited data plans.
fierywater @ 9/23/2006 11:18:15 AM #
Knowing Palm, they could be extremely stupid and think this is worth pricing at $299. It shouldn't be priced any higher than the 650 on Cingular currently is ($199). Why? Because Cingular's site alone has a lot of Windows Mobile and Blackberry competition at both the same and lower price points, not even mentioning the plethora of WM5 devices available from other sources. Now, Palm could be brilliant and release this at $150 or less. But this IS Palm we're talking about. This sucker's 320x320, right? RE: The price is everything.
...Yeah, and it's missing the "innovative" Treo Antenna Stub technology. $399 minimum "MSRP" with ridiculous rebate scams to get the price down to near the "out the door" price of similar phones.
One good thing to come from this release is it appears the external antennas are finally going away in Treo designs. As the Treo with the stub was already at the maximum radiation release allowed by US law, they must have finally cracked the secret to keeping it under the wire.
We have:
320x320 display What about the camera, if they put a VGA camera in this as opposed to a 1.3MP that's in the 700w/wx/p and 750v they are having a laugh. Anyone have anyhting more concrete?
Which is too bad. Samsung has cellphones that even I, a cellphone hater, would like to have. That sleek hardware with PalmOS -- even FrankenGarnet -- would be killer. I've had a $20 Tracfone for about two months now. I finally had to cave in and get a phone. I went cheeeep to get some experience. I still love PalmOS (fek WinMob!)... will this new cheeep Treo be my upcoming *real* phone? Or will I stay with my ancient Clie and go Samsung? Decisions... Samsung i500 - the best smartphone ever releasedThe_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/24/2006 4:36:09 AM #
Which is too bad. Samsung has cellphones that even I, a cellphone hater, would like to have. That sleek hardware with PalmOS -- even FrankenGarnet -- would be killer. The Samsung i550 would have been a great phone. But you'll never get to buy one because a couple years ago the idiots at Sprint decided to go with the Treo 650 instead. Unless Samsung releases a PalmOS i650 with EVDO (dream on) we'll never see a good PalmOS smartphone again. I've had a $20 Tracfone for about two months now. I finally had to cave in and get a phone. Why? Did you lose one of your tin cans? Or did the string finally break? Is it in case you fall and can't get up, Old Boy? Do what I did Cane: dump your land line and sign up for a SERO phone plan (unlimited EVDO, unlimited nights + weekends, free roaming (onto Verizon, etc), clear voice quality, around half the usual rate price) with Sprint. Do a Google searh for SERO plan for the details. And if you want to save on long distance and Internet charges, just use a Sprint EVDO phone as your broadband modem and Skype on a laptop or desktop for long distance. ipevo makes a high quality USB phone called the Free-1 that is specifically designed for Skype and it only costs around $30. http://www.ipevo.com/v2/prod/p000005.htm The Free-1 sounds almost as good as a land line if you have a decent high speed connection with Skype. Even works with those dumba$$ Apple computers that wankers like you seem to feel the need to abuse themselves with. ("How come you don't make a Mac version of that program? Waaaaaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaaaa!) The regional Bells and other traditional long distance providers must be crapping their diapers (I'm sure you know what that's like, Cane) right around now. With Skype already carving out a HUGE chunk of the world's long distance in just 3 years of existence, VoIP is already turning the telephone industry upside down. The paradigm officially shifted in 2006. All that matters now is the Internet backbone and having portable broadband access to it. Since switching to Sprint's SERO plan and using Skype I'm already saving over $100/month compared to what I used to pay for equivalent services. I went cheeeep to get some experience. No, you went cheap because you ARE cheap. I still love PalmOS (fek WinMob!)... will this new cheeep Treo be my upcoming *real* phone? Or will I stay with my ancient Clie and go Samsung? 1) Get a Samsung A920 EVDO Bluetooth dumbphone from Sprint. Decisions... The RIGHT decision is pretty simple. If you can't find a European TH55, see if Zodiac 2 are still available (for only $125) from Olympic Systems.
P.S. Welcome to the reality of cellphones. Biotch. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Hi, look at the GSPDA folks!!! They have cool candybar hardware! Best regards RE: Not and never will be Samsung
MikeCon - get a 650 or 700p from Sprint for cheap. You're missing out on the integration between PIM and Phone which 2 devices can't replicate. You're also missing out on fast, seamless, integrated Internet features. Sprint is pretty good in NYC. But their big attraction is the cheap unlimited data plans. (reposted in correct place) RE: Not and never will be SamsungFoo Fighter @ 9/24/2006 9:05:26 AM #
>> "Hi, look at the GSPDA folks!!! They have cool candybar hardware!" Uh..Tam, aside from the fact that GSPDA phones are garbage they also aren't available State-side. Any person intent on selecting a PalmOS-powered Smartphone would have to be desperate to choose GSPDA, and will pay a exorbitant premium in doing so. Provided you can even find one for purchase. Have you looked at the specs on the M68 for example? 160x220 display. I rest my case. QOOL labs makes some "interesting" PalmOS phones, or did at one time. But there again, in so choosing you are burdened with a low-res display. And in the case of both GSPDA and QOOL, the GUI has been so heavily customized with proprietary extensions it scarcely resembles the typical Palm experience. Neither company made serious inroads into the market, even in Asia. Buying either phone offers its own set of dangers in the form of lack of support and obsolescence. My advice, is to go with the Treo 680 if you want a full PDA experience on a phone. One thing I will say about the Palm-based Treo, inferior though it is, it does at least provide access (no pun intended) to a library of all your favorite Palm apps. There is something to be said for that. Which device you choose; a Samsung dumb-phone or Treo, has a much to do with your usage habits and requirements as the carrier you use. For example, if all you really intend to use the phone for is voice calls, then a dumb phone is a perfectly acceptable choice. When combined with a Bluetooth radio you can connect your Nokia 770 to the web by pairing the two devices. On the other hand, if you really want a seamless sync experience in managing your contacts, calendar, notes, tasks, etc., the Palm is definitely the way to go. Speaking as someone who made the transition from common plebe phone to a Smartphone; once you go Smartphone it is difficult to go back. Once you've used a Treo or Windows Mobile phone you immediately have an epiphany. A realization that this is the way mobile computing should be. Simple, integrated, converged. What makes a smartphone even more compelling is the QWERTY keyboard. If you ever attempt texting from a typical phone keypad, you're in for quite a "treat" once you experience T9 input first hand. How anyone finds text input on cell phones to be tolerable I will never understand. Nothing compares to QWERTY. That's a tough combination to beat. Good luck with your choice. P.S. one last piece of advice: if you decide on a dumb phone, look at Nokia, Sony-Ericsson, and Samsung (which you already have). Those are the ONLY handsets that I endorse based on hardware design and software ease of use. Whatever you do stay away from Motorola. They have the absolute worst software platform in the industry. I have the SLVR L7, and I rarely use the damned thing in no small part to the wretched interface and clunky user experience. Symbian S60 is the simplest interface. Followed by Sony-Ericsson, followed closely by Samsung. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
More later, but for now... I'll use a *real* device for web still, like the Nokia 770 (which has gotten better). The initial appeal of a cheap Treo is combining the CLIE and Tracfone. One less device to carry. I'm convinced the web on phones, right now, is as useful (read: useLESS) as WAP was. This isn't Japan with DoCoMo... RE: Not and never will be SamsungFoo Fighter @ 9/24/2006 11:58:41 AM #
Don't underestimate web browsing on mobile phones, Mike. You'll get no argument from me the US lags far behind Japan. But there is more to mobile web browsing that just visiting a web page. Smartphones are fantastic mobile RSS aggregators, for example. The experience is only as good or bad as the hardware and software, which is a delicate balance between form factor and user interface. Done in the right combination, the experience can be compelling and useful. That is the case with the Nokia E61, which right now stands as the pinnacle of mobile web browsing on cellular devices. Built upon Apple's Safari rendering engine (WebKit), it even features mouse pointer navigation; something I had not seen or experienced on a mobile device until now. With just the movement of my thumb I can point and click on any link, or navigate to any web page even while driving (kids, don't try this at home..or in the car). So the next time you are behind some guy swerving all over the road, forcing pedestrians into the bushes..that will be me. Even Pocket IE isn't too bad, when used in landscape. Screen orientation plays a large role in the value of web browsing a a small screen. Square Palm screens I find to be miserable. On the Nokia E61, which has a widescreen (landscape) display, it is fantastic. Pocket PC phones like the HTC TyTn, combined with Opera for Windows Mobile can be pretty damn sweet, especially on a WiFi connection or 3G data network. However, a PalmOS-based Treo represents the bottom of the barrel in terms of web browsing. Blazer is a toy, the Playschool among mobile browsers. When you combine that with a brain dead OS like Garnet, the results are extreme disappointment. Note to PalmOS users: Don't look at the Nokia E61..it will spoil you!
RE: Not and never will be Samsung
The Internet on the Treo is actually very usable. There are a lot of good sites that have "mobile-enhanced" little brothers - ie Google, Yahoo, CNN, MSN, etc. This makes surfing fast and efficient. Add EVDO and you're really cooking. The world at your fingertips fast - anytime, anywhere. There's no reason to buy/manage/charge/carry/sync/fight/fumble with 2+ devices when ONE Smartphone can do it all. Don't let them fool you, CaneyThe_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/24/2006 2:27:01 PM #
Like the brilliant President George W. Bush said: "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/bushvideos/v/bushfoolme.htm It's obvious from the advice certain posters are giving you that you are hated here at Palminfocenter. look at the GSPDA folks!!! They have cool candybar hardware! GSPDA has some egregious crap for sale. And good luck finding support for this hardware that isn't even officially sold in the USA. My advice, is to go with the Treo 680 if you want a full PDA experience on a phone. One thing I will say about the Palm-based Treo, inferior though it is, it does at least provide access (no pun intended) to a library of all your favorite Palm apps. There is something to be said for that. Go with an unproven Treo that hasn't even been released yet? W T F??? After seeing all the quality control and NVFS disasters we've been treated to by Palm/Handspring with the Treo 600/650/700p? Amazing. Yes it's nice to have an all-in-one device, but only if it actually does "all" fairly well. Even then, there are numerous compromises in choosing a smartphone over a dumbphone/PDA combo (size, weight, battery life, loss of data redundancy, loss of easy/cheap upgradability (admittedly probably not an issue for someone like Cane who is still using a 7 year old monochrome PDA), screen size/readability (likely a HUGE issue for someone like Cane with 70 year old eyes), voice quality, reception, integration with Bluetooth headsets/handsfree kits (probably not an issue with someone like Cane who doesn't own a vehicle and has never even learned how to drive), etc.) The only - and I mean ONLY - advantage I see in buying one of the current crop of Palm branded smartphones is compatibility with the PalmOS app library, assuming a user already has a lot of old, familiar PalmOS apps accumulated over the years. Unfortunately, the fly in the ointment for that argument is the presence of the dreaded NVFS/CrapRAM™ instead of RealRAM™. CrapRAM™ savagely butchers compatibility with old programs and causes severe instability of PalmOS devices that use it. Stability, speed and ease of use USED to be the three defining features of PalmOS. That is why we paid premium prices for underspecced hardware and turned a blind eye over the years to software that other platforms got before PalmOS like multimedia, Skype, Slingbox, etc. If PalmOS devices featuring NVFS are now slow and unstable, what exactly is the point of using PalmOS? I've seen more crashes in a month of using my (NVFS-crippled) Treo 700p than I have in 10 YEARS of using literally dozens of non-NVFS PalmOS devices. Go figure. The only use I have for the Treo 700p is as a broadband EVDO modem, backup phone and - hopefully - eventually a device I can use for long distance calls around the world using a REAL Skype client. Which device you choose; a Samsung dumb-phone or Treo, has a much to do with your usage habits and requirements as the carrier you use. For example, if all you really intend to use the phone for is voice calls, then a dumb phone is a perfectly acceptable choice. When combined with a Bluetooth radio you can connect your Nokia 770 to the web by pairing the two devices. Yes. On the other hand, if you really want a seamless sync experience in managing your contacts, calendar, notes, tasks, etc., the Palm is definitely the way to go. Wrong. An unstable Treo is not worth the headaches of having an all-in-one device. And last time I checked, traditional PalmOS PDAs were pretty good at presenting "a seamless sync experience in managing your contacts, calendar, notes, tasks, etc". I don't understand how people blindly ignore all the compromises that have to be made in using a smartphone. Just because smartphones are fashionabe everyone seems to be jumping on the smartphone bandwagon and forgetting how useful the traditional PDA form factor is.
Yes, but (for me) unless a smartphone is as small as a (tiny) dumbphone, it quickly becomes a pain in the a$$ (literally) lugging it around all the time. And then there's the (horrid) voice quality issues with Treos... Once you've used a Treo or Windows Mobile phone you immediately have an epiphany. A realization that this is the way mobile computing should be. Simple, integrated, converged. Yes, Kent. But once you've used a Samsung i500 you'll have ANOTHER epiphany. A realization that THIS is the way mobile computing should be. Simple, integrated, converged, tiny size, light, superb build quality and voice quality that sounds like a land line. There's a good reason why so many people that worked for Palm/PalmSource and as Palm developers still use this 4 year old phone every day... What makes a smartphone even more compelling is the QWERTY keyboard. If you ever attempt texting from a typical phone keypad, you're in for quite a "treat" once you experience T9 input first hand. How anyone finds text input on cell phones to be tolerable I will never understand. Nothing compares to QWERTY. That's a tough combination to beat. Agreed. But the original Treo 600 keyboard was easier to use than later "improved" versions. Good luck with your choice. You know Cane. He'll never actually BUY anything. Instead he'll keep yapping and agonizing on a dozen PDA sites for YEARS over trivial details while continuing to use his 7 year old monochrome Sony CLIE S320 and the phone booth a block from his dingy New York tenament apartment. P.S. one last piece of advice: if you decide on a dumb phone, look at Nokia, Sony-Ericsson, and Samsung (which you already have). Those are the ONLY handsets that I endorse based on hardware design and software ease of use. Exactly. Sony Ericsson only did one CDMA (Sprint) phone - the legendary T608 - but unless someone only wanted a simple phone with good voice quality, I'd avoid trying to track one of them down. The Samsung A920 is probably the best EVDO-capable phone Sprint has right now. If someone is willing to go with GSM the phone selection improves (several slick Sony Ericssons and a few decent Nokias). GSM also allows phone whores to easily change between phones by swapping out SIM cards, but reception, voice quality and data plans are generally vastly inferior to Sprint (CDMA). Whatever you do stay away from Motorola. They have the absolute worst software platform in the industry. I have the SLVR L7, and I rarely use the damned thing in no small part to the wretched interface and clunky user experience. Symbian S60 is the simplest interface. Followed by Sony-Ericsson, followed closely by Samsung. Agreed. MikeCon - get a 650 or 700p from Sprint for cheap. Stay FAR away from those pieces of crap, Caney. Treo 650 - obsolete, 23 MB pathetic CrapRAM™, buggy email, crappy camera, big, heavy, poorly made, crappy voice quality. Treo 700p - CrapRAM™, unstable, S L O W, big, heavy, crappy camera, etc. You're missing out on the integration between PIM and Phone which 2 devices can't replicate. Integration isn't worth putting up with substandard equipment to achieve. It only takes a few extra seconds to connect a traditional PDA to a tiny Bluetooth dumbphone. But those "Internet features" are a He11 of a lot more enjoyable/readable on a traditional 320 x 480 tablet PDA than a tiny 320 x 320 Small Square Screened Treo. Sprint is pretty good in NYC. But their big attraction is the cheap unlimited data plans. The ONLY reason to put up with the imbeciles at Sprint (possibly the most pathetic customer service reps on the planet) is the excellent voice quality and their cheap data plans. And if you get a SERO plan (e.g. $30 for unlimited EVDO data, 500 anytime minutes, free nights + weekends, free roaming onto Verizon etc., free long distance, free picture mail, etc) Sprint is IMPOSSIBLE to beat right now. I'll use a *real* device for web still, like the Nokia 770 (which has gotten better). Yes someone your age would have a lot of difficulty viewing the tiny Treo screen for long periods of time. The initial appeal of a cheap Treo is combining the CLIE and Tracfone. One less device to carry. I'm convinced the web on phones, right now, is as useful (read: useLESS) as WAP was. This isn't Japan with DoCoMo... Yes, Internet on a Treo is an exercise in frustration. But Nokia's E61 does show that Internet on a smartphone is doable - provided you have the right software and hardware. The Internet on the Treo is actually very usable. Bull. Internet on a Treo is for emergency use only. The tragic formatting "issues" Blazer has makes most web pages almost unreadable. Not to mention all the content that won't display on a Treo. If you want REAL browsing on a small device, for now the BEST solution is getting a UMPC like the VAIO UX50 and a tiny Broadband EVDO + Bluetooth-capable phone like the Samsung A920. There's no reason to buy/manage/charge/carry/sync/fight/fumble with 2+ devices when ONE Smartphone can do it all. Unfortunately "ONE Smartphone [CANNOT] do it all". Choose a smartphone over a good separate PDA + dumbphone combo and you give up PDA screen size/readability, battery life, voice quality, data redundancy, etc., etc. Cane, dumba$$ Geeko is trying to fcuk you up, as usual. It's unfortunate that Ryan can't automagically killfile his screed.
RE: Not and never will be Samsung
I'd forgotten about RSS. But since it's rumored the 680 will be nothing more than a voice phone with PDA, that's moot (the 770 does RSS -- 76 feeds and counting...). I don't want the current Treos. Too much I wouldn't use (data plan!). Combining the Tracfone and CLIE (and getting a color 320x320 screen again) has appeal. As for the vaunted library of Palm apps, bugger that. I'm not looking to go through the OS5 compatibility nightmare I went through with the TE! I use few apps on the CLIE and would use maybe 3-5 more on a 680. I wonder if I should stop in a Cingular store to see if I can snag specs and price... The *price* is the thing. Got that, Palm? Cingular is what again -- GSM? RE: Not and never will be SamsungFoo Fighter @ 9/24/2006 2:58:08 PM #
Yes, GSM. And that brings up another point about the fragmented nature of the US wireless spectrum. Unlike other parts of the world where GSM is the global standard, here in the US we have an unpleasant mashup of GMS and CDMA. If possible go with GSM (Cingular or T-Mobile), as that will free you from carrier restrictions by allowing you to use any GSM standard phone. You could buy any GSM phone you want (at your own expense of course) at any time you like, simply swap out SIM cards and you can literally change phones throughout the day. For myself I frequently switch between the E61 and Treo 650 with regularity. That's something you can't do with a CDMA network like Sprint and Verizon. You are all but stuck with whatever they sell you. GSM = hardware freedom. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
The Tracfone is GSM. Why do people expect these things to be as good as landline? I expected it to be crappy audio and it is. Anyway, off to Cingular... RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Having a unlimited, ubiquitous data plan is a beautiful thing. Don't underestimate its value. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Sprint PCS, $15/Month for Unlimited Data, 1xRTT or EV-DO. http://treocentral.com/content/Stories/911-1.htm Don't be a sucker, CaneyThe_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/24/2006 6:45:58 PM #
What carrier, what fee, what speed? Someone like you isn't going to switch phones three times a day, so the point of GSM and their SIM cards is moot. You should look for good coverage, good voice quality, cheap voice plan and cheap data plan. (Don't underestimate how useful a fast data plan is. Like 480 x 320 color screens, memory expansion, OLED screens, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Astroglide, once you've used them you'll wonder how you ever did without them.)
2) Voice quality - CDMA (Sprint, Verizon, etc) blows GSM (Cingular, T-Mobile) away. 3) Cheap voice plans - Sprint's SERO plans currently are untouchable. 4) Cheap data plans - Sprint's SERO plans currently are untouchable. (SERO plans include FREE unlimited EVDO Broadband access.)
TVoR RE: Not and never will be Samsung
500min $30 (includes unlimited vision data, unlimited nights and weekends, unlimited mobile to mobile, pic and video mail, long distance, voicemail, caller id, call waiting)
RE: Not and never will be Samsung
I am totally fed up with my 700P. Its stability and voice quality are beyond atrocious. I haven't had this many dropped calls/garbled signals since my early generation GSM Ericsson phone in 1996/97ish. I am seriously thinking about going back to my standby TX + whatever Verizon's best performing SMALL flip phone of the moment is (V3m, KRZR k1m, Samsung something or another) I hate the Verizon UI but their coverage in my part of the world is simply untouchable. I have never had a bad experience with a Verizon phone reception-wise UNTIL the 700P. Since Palm refuses to allow CDMA BT DUN/tethering, I may end up having to sync/fumble/fight with THREE devices just to do everything I need to do with no compromises; #1 RAZR/KRZR for voice calling Pathetic, huh? I haven't been to NYC that recently but Verizon's coverage there is understandably very good. Cingular is pretty good but it tends to be spotty in the boonies as well as in congested metro areas. Cane; Get the refurb'd Zod 2 + an older CDMA phone (Moto E815 or LG VX8100 would be ideal) that is proven to support PDA BT DUN and knock yourself out. Then stick a wi-fi SDIO card in one Zod slot and a 2gb SD slot in the other and go nuts. Cheapest solution for Caney:The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/24/2006 11:51:35 PM #
Get the refurb'd Zod 2 + an older CDMA phone (Moto E815 or LG VX8100 would be ideal) that is proven to support PDA BT DUN and knock yourself out. Then stick a wi-fi SDIO card in one Zod slot and a 2gb SD slot in the other and go nuts. 1) Zodiac 2 from Olympic Systems: 128 MB RealRAM™, dual SD slots = $125 2) Sprint SERO plan: 500 anytime minutes, unlimited EVDO broadband access, free nights + weekends calling, free roaming, free long distance, free calling to other Sprint users, etc. etc. http://www.sprint.com/sero 3) Samsung A920 phone = $137 with SERO plan 4) Kingston 2 GB SD card from Amazon.com = $40 5) SD Wi-Fi card from Amazon.com (if Caney gets an extra paper route) = $82 ______________________________________________________________________________ FROM THE SERO SITE: Sprint Employee Referral Offer 500 See More Plans >> - Unlimited Web access Power Vision(sm) Phones available: Samsung A940, Samsung A900, Sanyo MM-9000, Sanyo MM-7500 Sprint PCS Vision(sm) Phones available: LG VI-125, LG PM-225, Samsung VI-A820, Sanyo VI-2300, LG PM-325, Samsung PM-A840, Sanyo MM-8300, Samsung MM-A880, PalmOne Treo 650 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RE: Not and never will be Samsung
quoth the inimitable TVoR: Stay FAR away from those pieces of crap, Caney. Treo 650 - obsolete, 23 MB pathetic CrapRAM™, buggy email, crappy camera, big, heavy, poorly made, crappy voice quality. Just to provide the usual counterpoint from a satisfied 650 owner: the Treo has a superb phone UI, the best messaging system of any phone on the market, superior one-handed usage, a beautiful screen, perfectly adequate phone reception (the GSM one does, at least) and a large range of third-party apps that can make it do pretty much whatever you want. Except wi-fi. ;) The build quality on mine is excellent; it has survived more falls than I can remember and lived to till the tale. It feels nice in the hand and isn't awkward to hold and maneuver unlike a lot of the tiny, thin phones that force you to perch your fingers around them like the talons of some kind of demented, vengeful chicken. It is also cheap. I've seen on Treonauts that you can get the 650 for $50 on Cingular with rebates. Although whether the plans are a good deal or not, I have no idea. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
>>>pic and video mail, [...], voicemail, caller id, call waiting Don't want any of that. I have voicemail and that other stuff turned off on the Tracfone. It's too bad this thread has become yet another sewer. Hey, Ryan, you've become lower than a pimp. At least a pimp will *admit* beng a pimp. Special message for Mike Cane:The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/25/2006 2:05:01 PM #
>>>pic and video mail, [...], voicemail, caller id, call waiting Don't want any of that. I have voicemail and that other stuff turned off on the Tracfone.
It's too bad this thread has become yet another sewer. Tends to happen when you're around, Caney. Speaking of which, WHY are you back? I thought (hoped) you'd said you were leaving, never to return. But like a mangy cur you keep dragging your fleabitten hide back to the site. Hmmm... Hey, Ryan, you've become lower than a pimp. At least a pimp will *admit* beng a pimp. Wow. Nice words for Ryan - a man that provides so much to so many people all around the world FOR FREE. What have you EVER done for the PalmOS community, Caney? Nothing. If Ryan is "lower than a pimp", what does that make you? Go back to the Village and hang out by the tracks some more, you pervert.
U R my biotch. Don't EVER forget it.The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/25/2006 11:46:05 PM #
Please go back to blogging incessantly about the P.O.S. Nokia 770 and spewing your manic verbal diarrhea elsewhere, Cane. If you're going to buy a cellphone and a new PDA, DO IT. Otherwise, S T F U and stop yapping, Little Man. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. TVoR RE: Not and never will be Samsung
One day we will be rid of you. In the mantime, everyone can laugh as your flood of stupid words are scrolled by and ignored. In all these yeats, you've never been right about a single thing (don't drag out your URLs; more words to ignore), and unlike everyone else, you've been banned and had messages deleted from multiple sites. You're not wanted or welcome anywhere. You are pathetic beyond example. You are also the biggest coward ever to post anywhere. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
mikecane said, "One day we will be rid of you." No, Mike, we won't. Ryan, the editor of this tabloid, does not want reasoned conversation and discourse. Ryan wants the vicious, vulgar posts from TVoR and Gekko. Their posts attract readers. Ryan does not care about the damage it does do the Palm community. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Truer words were perhaps never before posted on PIC. You see what you've done to yourself, Ryan? Very sad. RE: Not and never will be SamsungSeldomVisitor @ 9/26/2006 4:01:36 PM #
Thankfully, true losers like relyons don't influence who stays and goes here. Whew! RE: Not and never will be Samsung
WTF did I do? My posts are of no value here??? Please don't lump me in with the help desk pervert. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Gekko: I didn't. You can be civil sometimes. >>>500min $30 (includes unlimited vision data, unlimited nights and weekends, unlimited mobile to mobile, pic and video mail, long distance, voicemail, caller id, call waiting) Are you getting by with just 500 minutes? I guess the free nights/weekends and m2m help a lot. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Mike - you went from no mobile phone not too long ago to a pay-as-you-go phone now, and you are worried about 500 minutes not being enough? I thought you barely used it?! Only you know how any minutes you'll use - 500 seems decent given where you came from. Personally, I probably need 1,000+ but I make lots of business calls. Also, Parkinson's Law tends to kick in - the more you have, they more you'll use! Sprint may have other SERO plans with more minutes, but if you're not sure, just start with 500 and go from there. Just make sure you get the Unlimited Vision DATA Plan. Until you have it and use it, you don't know what you're missing. Mobile Internet in the Palm of your hand anytime, anywhere is a beautiful thing. Verizon and Cingular plans are rip offs - Sprint blows them away in terms of value. And Sprint is VERY GOOD in NYC. I can't speak about the Treo 700p, but I have a 650 and it works VERY well. Check out this link to see a sample of Mobile sites you can hit on the fly: http://www.pdaportal.com/category.php?category=All+Categories&language=All+Languages&sortoption=Name "The World is Yours!" RE: Not and never will be Samsung
>>>Parkinson's Law tends to kick in Ah, he's the one to blame!! Thanks. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
And when surfing with a smartphone, you don't have the web data BOTTLENECK that is present when trying to connect a PDA to the web via a cell phone. That's called a kludge and it's not only clumsy, it's silly. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Too bad you don't have a car, you could get this:
To my dear friends: Caney and relyonsThe_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/26/2006 8:58:24 PM #
Chickenhawk and Chickensh1t - what a pair you two are. I love how you feel the irresistable urge to continually attack me from the safety of the computers in your dingy little apartments. One day we will be rid of you. In the mantime, everyone can laugh as your flood of stupid words are scrolled by and ignored. In all these yeats, you've never been right about a single thing (don't drag out your URLs; more words to ignore), and unlike everyone else, you've been banned and had messages deleted from multiple sites. You're not wanted or welcome anywhere. You are pathetic beyond example. You are also the biggest coward ever to post anywhere. Wake up, Cane. You DEFINE the word pathetic. How's your CLIE S320 holding up? After the 100,000 or so manic posts you've made to every PDA site over the years and the endless ranting about every perceived flaw about EVERY PDA released this decade I would have thought you'd have already saved enough pennies from your paper route to buy a color screened device. Even a used m505 from your local flea market. And so now we're to be treated to your latest obsession: cellphones. This from the dullard that ranted for years about how he hated cellphones. Here's a newsflash, Caney: stick with your Tracphone and spare us all the angst and drama as you blather endlessly on about cellphones, only to (years later) claim that you'll keep using your local phone booth instead. Put up or S T F U, Caney. You are the worst kind of troll: all (idiotic) talk and NO action.
Very sad. No. Sad is your pathatic attempt to manipulate Ryan. Too bad you're as obvious as a two year old child trying to steal the cookie jar. mikecane said, "One day we will be rid of you." No, Mike, we won't. Ryan, the editor of this tabloid, does not want reasoned conversation and discourse. Ryan wants the vicious, vulgar posts from TVoR and Gekko. Can ANYONE post a link to a useful post EVER made by relyons? EVER? Here's a clue: http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8630/#122455 (Dumba$$ comment attacking me) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8630/#122477 (Thread with poor relyons getting biotchslapped unconscious) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8659/#122613 (Dumba$$ comment with relyons blaming DEVELOPERS for apps being broken by new versions of PalmOS! Hmmm...) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8659/#122623 (Dumba$$ comment attacking me) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8659/#122660 (More B.S. from relyons - a pattern is emerging here...) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8702/#122919 (feeble defense of Treo 700p by relyons) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8722/#123272 (relyons insulting Palminfocenter) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8921/#124593 (relyons insulting Palminfocenter, Gekko and TVoR) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/8921/#124599 (relyons making yet another feeble attempt to have my posts here censored) http://www.palminfocenter.com/comments/9004/#125615 (relyons attacks Gekko and TVoR yet again. Wow.) Click on The_Voice_of_Reason's user name on the other hand and you're greeted with links to post after post of BRILLIANT PROSE overflowing with useful information and insightful commentary. Who is this "relyons" and why do they hate TVoR? Perhaps it's time for relyons to be outed...
Who is relyons (R. Eric Lyons)? And why do they hate TVoR?The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/26/2006 11:35:41 PM #
Hate will eat you alive, Bubba. Don't be a hater.
RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Yep, here we go again. I'm still waiting for the mythical color HandEra. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
*yawn* But it is also hilarious. That eejit really thinks I'm going to read ANY of his drivel? He has the nerve of the very sociopath that he is. Keep up the sick effort. The only time you waste is your own. Scrolling on... RE: Not and never will be Samsung
http://www.allaboutpalm.com/forum/showpost.php?p=94&postcount=10 Smart people can figure out why that was posted here: http://www.allaboutpalm.com/forum/printthread.php?t=44&pp=40 and here http://www.allaboutpalm.com/forum/printthread.php?t=44&page=2&pp=40 and here http://www.allaboutpalm.com/forum/printthread.php?t=44&page=3&pp=40 Notice especially there: >>>...moderated - yes we regard this post as offensive... Words sadly missing at PIC! Now just how pitiful is that? I'm sure following this post will be another flood of stupid words seeking my validation and approval. Pathetic, pathetic. Biotchslapping 101The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/27/2006 10:22:42 PM #
Ironic you'd post a link to the site that banned TVoR, Cane. Especially since that site is now DEAD. As Ewan (that site's owner) proved oh-so-well, anal retentive "moderation" kills interest rather quickly. His site went the way of the dodo soon after TVoR was banned. Ironically, the only thread there that received ANY interest was the one TVoR participated in. Treocentral, 1source, etc have all gone downhill because of their ridiculous moderating practices. Many of the most interesting posters have left in disgust. TVoR would immediately leave Palminfocenter should similarly-oppressive policies be instituted here. No doubt Palm would LOVE to see TVoR silenced. As always, it's Ryan decision whether or not any posts are deemed to have merit. With you being a former regular here, I've taken pity on you and tried to help you get a clue. Since biotchslapping is the only method of communication that mangy curs like you understand, in the future you'll get precisely what you deserve. Take care, Caney. TVoR Caney on his deathbed?The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/29/2006 9:10:30 PM #
Are you OK, Caney? Your posts seem... weak. RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Hey Skippy. Do you mean Nixon's middle name or the dwarfish ugly supid cartoon characer you no doubt resemble? Stop thinking you're so clever. Caney's best imitation of Smarmy Marty.The_Voice_of_Reason @ 9/30/2006 3:38:25 PM #
Caney, keep trying to reinvent yourself. Which is it going to be today: manic, dim-witted, clueless, flood posting Mike Cane or lithium-loaded Marty-wannabe? Your decision. How's that phone booth going? Have you figured out how to pair up the payphone to your CLIE S320 yet? Congratulations, Auntie Mike. You're precious. Really. Don't ever change, Girlfriend. TVoR
RE: Not and never will be Samsung
Poor Skippy. From the amount of time he spends here (when he's not posting, he's sitting there hitting Refresh to see when *I do*), and from the amount -- the endless freaking flood!, he's worse than Katrina! -- of words he posts here, it's clear Skippy can't get any sex. But what makes that fact go from pathetic to hilarious is that he can't even get sex with *himself*. Self-loathing is Skippy. And he loves to share. Ew. What happend to you, Caney?The_Voice_of_Reason @ 10/1/2006 1:16:02 AM #
Did the lithium kick in? Inquiring minds want to know. And please post some more fascinating details about your new cellphone and your new PDA. Hugs & Kisses, RE: Not and never will be SamsungThe_Voice_of_Reason @ 10/3/2006 4:24:21 PM #
Come on, Caney. You can do better than that. Stop the lithium and let us see the REAL Caney again. Call me on that shiny new cellphone of yours. You did buy one, right? TVoR We LOVE Mike Cane!The_Voice_of_Reason @ 10/4/2006 8:52:39 PM #
Plesae post some more, Caney. We hang on your every word. You are truly an asset to the Internet.
RE: Not and never will be Samsunge_tellurian @ 10/5/2006 11:46:19 AM #
Sam sings well with friends. We-com trade will enhance the investment in military trade by offering more to do than dodge bullets. A complete global package is waiting to do more with Sam too. E-T Completing the e-com circle with a people driven we-com solution Waiting for Caney.The_Voice_of_Reason @ 10/5/2006 9:22:10 PM #
ok - get a room you too. Caney's not(wo)man enough for me. ;-O
e-tellurian ABDUCTED? Oh dear.The_Voice_of_Reason @ 10/5/2006 9:25:07 PM #
A complete global package is waiting to do more with Sam too. Are you threatening Uncle Sam, E-T? If Men In Black show up at your place tonight claiming to be delivering a pizza...
e-tellurian ABDUCTED? Oh dear.e_tellurian @ 10/6/2006 5:37:13 AM #
What is happening to this forum? It is unfortunate people are being banned. Now we have people that can choose to read poorly ... very poorly. The trade package i am working on is huge. In Canada's case trade with the US is a historical event. Some are working hard to assure we have stuff to trade. The Winter Olympics will be celebrated in 2010 that is less than four years away. Thankfully some have come up with a way to house all these people in a very ecologically sensitive area. These unique ideas will offer much for all industries including the technology and energy industry. Pizza is a good all round source of food as it covers all the major food groups in a single slice. E-T Completing the e-com circle with a people driven we-com solution RE: Not and never will be SamsungSeldomVisitor @ 10/6/2006 6:34:39 AM #
> ...Pizza is a good all round source of food as it covers > all the major food groups in a single slice. Pizza is, almost without exception, nonKosher. Thus eliminating a major segment of the population not just over here on the east coast but worldwide - I believe Muslims and more observe the same dietary mandates. [just was reminded of this by an ancient sports collegue who declined din-din during a reunion since we're pizza munching] ======== But more on-topic - the el-cheapo "next TREO" sure had better be el-cheapo or it will be washed away by the flood of sub-$100 very-smart-phones The Competition will have contemporaneously. Ya think the Q is gonna be $100 forever? Ya think the Pearl is gonna be $50 forever? Food and religion?e_tellurian @ 10/6/2006 11:35:55 AM #
Imagine a nation that told you what to eat? To be unique is a good test of true freedom. In my religion we eat everything except people. This phrase was coined in 1972 by a seven year old child asked by classmates what was eaten "where he came from". Perhaps this phrase has more purpose today. Peace, E-T Completing the e-com circle with a people driven we-com solution RE: Not and never will be SamsungSeldomVisitor @ 10/6/2006 12:25:36 PM #
> ...In my religion we eat everything except people.... If only it were true for all... RE: many choicese_tellurian @ 10/6/2006 12:38:40 PM #
This truth was a necessity for the region i am from. People look at the old world with some interest. What is seldom talked about is the hardship faced by all houses as the old world worked for peace.
Today the same determination is seen in interactive innovative offerings. One of the reasons the world offshore much of it's building is because their is not the desire to remove old building to make room for manufacturing. Emerging economies offer open space without displacing people or history. The world can build on the sea if off shore choices become an issue. Environmentally sound mobile manufacturing facilities offer good access for shipping with plenty of cool water all around. E-T Completing the e-com circle with a people driven we-com solution
VampireLestat @ 9/24/2006 8:02:32 PM #
Hi VoiceofReason, CrapRAM™ is needed to lower battery consumption and secure data. CrapRAM™ would be great IF Palm Inc was in the business of supporting and developing Palm OS. Since they are rather focused on Treos and WM, the Palm OS library is starting to crumble under incompatibility/update/new release problems. I ordered an HP rx1950 yesterday. Got it because |
Either way, this looks great...Definitely a great addition to the Treo family of handhelds.