MobileInfocenter

Analyst Says Foleo Fails to Address Mobile User Needs

Gartner's PDA/Smartphone sector analyst Todd Kort has posted a dismal assessment of the Palm Foleo. Kort says the Foleo fails to adequately address mobile user needs, and believes it offers too little functionality to justify the burden of carrying around another device.

In an era in which increasing functionality is converging into ever-smaller devices, Palm has decided to buck the trend. The Foleo is too large for many smartphone users to consider carrying around as a limited-function accessory that requires a separate carrying case. Gartner believes that this unwieldiness will severely limit Foleo adoption by smartphone users, who place a premium on "pocketability" and attractive design.

Palm FoleoKort's analysis goes on to state the Foleo will compete with notebooks because of its size, regardless of how Palm tries to market the device. He sees a market for this type of device but thinks the Foleo's limited functionality and unpocketable size won't be compelling enough to compete with larger, heavier and more expensive traditional laptops.

Kort also goes on record saying Linux developers would rally behind it... if only it had a faster processor, more memory and a larger battery. "Few software developers are likely to write for this device until there is a sizable installed base, but the installed base is unlikely to become sizable unless the Foleo provides more functionality out of the box (such as a personal information manager suite, VoIP, instant messaging and cellular communications via a Bluetooth headset)."

Article Comments

 (64 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Start a new Comment Down View Full Comment Thread

Jeff said..

thefez @ 6/7/2007 1:05:23 PM # Q
... the PDA market is mature. No new improvement from us.

Very sad. In fact someone else is improving the PDA market.
Have a look at the specs of this (could-have-been-Palm) little gem:

O2 Xda Flame - PDA Phone
The 02 Xda Flame is powered by an Intel Xscale PXA 270 520MHz and an NVIDIA GoForce 5500 graphics card.
With gigantic 3.6″ 640480 resolution TOUCH screen,
has a better LCD screen than iPhone which only features a 3.5 in, 320480 resolution screen.
This PDA phone also comes integrated 2GB internal storage, 64MB Flash ROM, 128MB RAM, WiFi support and 3G network support.

Available in July, in Europe and Asia.

It could have been Palm (call it T!X whatever or Treo10000).
Hey, Jeff, Ed, Palm investors!
Looks someone is still believing in something usable ALSO as a PDA (and it has phone too!).
Damn! Why not PALM????


The rest is here on Handcellphone.com: http://www.handcellphone.com/archives/o2-xda-flame-pda-phone-that-is-powered-by-nvidia-graphics-card-announced

Sad, sad Palm aficionado.

RE: Jeff said..
sgiga @ 6/7/2007 4:06:39 PM # Q
And HTC have a large bunch HTCs http://www.htc.com

Anyway, it makes me wonder. My T3 is now 3 years old, and still has more processor power and larger screen than any of the HTC products, it even has more processor power than the Foleo and Treo as well.

I guess that a T3 with an internal GSM radio would be nice, but the thing is that it would make a good PDA, but a lousy phone. Several people i know with a HTC touch screen phone get so tired of the touch screen for phoning and SMS that they purchase another normal phone and use the HTC just as a PDA (the same will happen to the iPhone). With a good link between the PDA and the phone, the phone in the PDA really is redundant, there is no way around that fact, and the solution is the Treo. But the Treo (and any other smart phone for that matter) is not an optimal solution to the problem because the screen size will be much smaller than the PDA, and unit is just too bulky. It is more of a hack to get the PDA and the phone into one single unit than a good solution.

What I really would like is a T3 or TX kind of device with a slim good looking phone that slides into a slot in the PDA. That way I would have one unit, yet have all the benefits of the PDA and the phone. The phone don't even need to have a display (other than a minimalistic one), it could be just a numpad and speakers. They should work perfectly on their own and together. They should be connected with BT when separated, so the numpad on the phone unit could work on the PDA unit.

The same principle could wery well be used on the Foleo as well, and why it isn't already is rather strange, since it is the obvious next step.

RE: Jeff said..
adamsmark @ 6/7/2007 5:41:05 PM # Q
Regarding the T3, it is dismaying that a discontinued product remains the best PDA Palm has produced. The Foleo is intriguing, but perhaps not at $500. Again, Palm would have a marketing coup if the product were $299 -- but they've overpriced an otherwise decent product.

"I believe in the atomic bomb."

Blogging at http://agabus.com">Agabus.com.

Palm V > Vx > Clie Peg T615C > T3 > Clie TH55 > T3 > Treo 650 > Treo 700p & T3!

RE: Jeff said..
sungod @ 6/7/2007 6:21:50 PM # Q
On the plus side Jeff hinted at the treo line now deversifying.
I have read of both full screen devices and smaller non Qwerty moddles being mentioned.
How cool would a candybar/flipphone Treo be paired with a PLinux T|X2 auto syncing on the fly.

How good are cargo pants, they're a gadget lovers best friend.
RE: Jeff said..
SeldomVisitor @ 6/7/2007 6:32:13 PM # Q
> ...How cool would a candybar/flipphone Treo be paired with a PLinux T|X2
> auto syncing on the fly.

Damn! What a GREAT idea!

The original thought:

-- http://discussion.treocentral.com/showthread.php?t=33796

and its update a year later:

-- http://discussion.treocentral.com/showpost.php?p=338530&postcount=9

Giggle.

RE: Jeff said..
thefez @ 6/7/2007 6:48:48 PM # Q
I agree, for my personal taste two separate devices doing their own job is better than a converged one.
My trusty T3 is all I need for keeping organised and my bluetooth phone is the best (for my needs - no flames, please ;-) in keeping me in touch with people, taking fairly good pictures, and entertaining with loads of music and news with FM radio.
Annyoing is when I have to update contacts onto the T3 (it is the "reference") and then propagate them to the phone. A "too much" converged device would not need this step (well, the phone is converged enough to answer three needs fairly well in one single package).
It would really help if the contacts details were correctly matching between the Palm and the phone (which doesn't always happen). But here comes again the foolish will of every Company to introduce "proprietary" features into standard formats...

Maybe the Foleo will fill a niche now and will make many more people feel the need, and pleasure, of writing over a real keyboard while looking at a usable screen. I hope so. Apparently many people do work and connect wirelessly while traveling, so it could be the bridge between an undersized PDA and an oversized Laptop.

Probably what is most needed now, as we are more and more oppressed by techno-gadgets which cannot cooperate well one with another, is a true improvement of the often misused "user experience" concept.
The Foleo appeal will greatly benefit if it will prove to be a real extension of the Treo (and, why not, the TX) line.
It will also be the first to show the long awaited Palm-on-Linux world...

But please, please, please Jeff: look at how many different form factors are in the cellphone world.
Go on with the Treo, go ahead with the Foleo (even invent a new stripped-down Treo without screen and keyboard to be the phone companion of the Foleo),
BUT PLEASE LOOK ALSO towards people (who do not need and will not buy a Treo) still waiting for an updated heir of the T3.
Look at HTC, drop the phone, keep the good (leave the mic and vibra in - please!).
Make a candybar version TX-like, make a clamshell version with a keyboard (keep the graffiti, thanks!).
And youll'have made many, many people happy. Otherwise you will potentially make many people go Apple. Or wathever else. But probably Apple has the ability to make the iPhone usable also as a PDA and sync seamlessly with the Macs; then who needs a Foleo?

Jeff, please, do not throw away your first business and the many people who still love and believe in it.

RE: Jeff said..
mikecane @ 6/8/2007 7:38:13 AM # Q
Damn you T3 owners! My LifeFlash still has lag -- I've had it go up to FIFTEEN SECONDS at times between apps! I still recall how breathtakingly wicked fast that T3 was every time I fondled it. All of you put in a fat battery? What kind of battery life do you get with that?

RE: Jeff said..
rpa @ 6/8/2007 10:00:12 AM # Q
You guys/gals keep praising the T3....makes me wish I had bought one instead of staying with my Vx for so many years. I don't see the PDA market as 'dead', only in decline due to a lack of innovative products. The Palm O/S has WM beaten handsdown in my view. Plus we don't all need/want one converged device. I use a T|2 with a cheap flip phone and a notebook PC and this combo suits me fine. Lost my last phone in a Shanghai taxi....no major loss as I bought an el cheapo Moto flip phone locally that works fine (once I was able to deactivate the Chinese opera ring tones).

My point is there are many solutions possible and Palm should cater for a diverse market and not put all their eggs in one basket (e.g. the current Treo bricks). Let's have a new version of the T|X, a new flip phone version like the old Treo 270, a full screen converged device, Treos w/o software glitches and so on and let consumers have CHOICE. One size does not fit all.

rpa

RE: Jeff said..
theseus @ 6/8/2007 11:57:13 AM # Q
mikecane, I've got a T3 and have a PTG sled "permanently" attached. (I bought multiple ones and when one dies I swap it out for another that I've had charging.) With the PTG sled, I get virtually a full day and a half of usage (which equates to roughly 6 hrs of full [constant] use -- with brightness @ 60% and the BT radio always on; about 20% of the time is spent with the slider open). I make it a habit of swapping out the PTG sled in the morning before leaving for work and haven't had any problems. Yes, keeping the sled on makes it heavier (and case-less), but I don't have battery problems! ;) (I use BoxWave's screen protectors and carry it in a PDA pouch -- that completes my Bat-belt). ;)

-e

RE: Jeff said..
gtbaum @ 6/8/2007 4:43:40 PM # Q
Mikecane: What app is taking 15 seconds to load on your LF? I've had my LD for a week or so now, and I'm enjoying it. The worst delay I've experienced has been an occasional 2 seconds for pocket tunes.


RE: Jeff said..
twrock @ 6/8/2007 8:23:27 PM # Q
If you are talking about a PTunes load delay, the TX does the same thing. I don't think that is an LD exclusive issue.


Thinking about Vista? Think again: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Want an alternative? Try this: http://www.ubuntu.com/ or http://www.mepis.org/
RE: Jeff said..
sungod @ 6/8/2007 9:13:11 PM # Q
Seldom
I never said it was an original idea.
I just asked, how cool would it be?
And it's finaly in reach.

How good are cargo pants, they're a gadget lovers best friend.
RE: Jeff said..
mikecane @ 8/27/2007 3:11:15 PM # Q
>>>Mikecane: What app is taking 15 seconds to load on your LF? I've had my LD for a week or so now, and I'm enjoying it. The worst delay I've experienced has been an occasional 2 seconds for pocket tunes.

It's the bloody *built-in apps*! It's getting to the point where I am now going mad because it's now taking *five seconds* to switch between built-in apps, depending on the apps I'm using.

Five seconds doesn't sound like a lot until you experience it over and over and over again. For a one-second look up (Let me check this quickly...) *five* seconds of overhead is not fun.

Reply to this comment

No no no! Kort's got it ALL WRONG!

SeldomVisitor @ 6/7/2007 1:12:20 PM # Q
Jeez-o-Pete! Doesn't that guy WATCH the Hawkins of the world as they discuss The Next Great Thang!?

Sheesh.

Hakwins UNAMBIGUOUSLY said there's a NEXT Next Great Thang that he's not gonna tell us about right now!

I tell ya - some of these analysts...

RE: No no no! Kort's got it ALL WRONG!
PacManFoo @ 6/7/2007 5:58:22 PM # Q
The 20 people that plan to buy this are going to be terribly disappointed by this report. O.K. So I'm estimating high on how many will sell.

PDA's Past and Present:
Palm - IIIxe, Vx, M500, M505, Tungsten T, TX
Handspring - Edge, Platinum, Deluxe
Sony - SJ22
Apple - MP110, MP2000, MP2100
Reply to this comment

ANALyst ramblings

vorlon @ 6/7/2007 2:31:10 PM # Q
Convergence is the keyword. That's why nobody wants a separate digital camera, video camera, GPS, iPod, DSLite or PSP.

NOT!

RE: ANALyst ramblings
sremick @ 6/7/2007 2:41:25 PM # Q
Just because 2 devices CAN be converged, doesn't mean they SHOULD.

And if you ONLY sell/market/develop converged devices, and not standalone, there is no legitimacy to pointing to sales of converged items as evidence that that's what people want/prefer.

If the only toilet paper I could get had George Bush love sonnets written on it, yeah I'd buy it... doesn't mean I'm a connoisseur of Bush love sonnets though.



http://www.vtbsd.net/

RE: ANALyst ramblings
linds @ 6/7/2007 10:28:08 PM # Q
Something interesting for those who are arguing that the pda market is dead. Have any of you tried to purchse an old Palm device recently on Ebay. I am looking for a Palm Tungsten C right now and the prices for anything in almost new condtion is still up at close to $200 dollars. I was bidding on a used one with minor cosmetic scratches and a few scratches on the screen and probably a poor battery although they didn't say for sure but it went for over $100 dollars. In my opinion this still points to there being a market for primarily PDA devices.

RE: ANALyst ramblings
Rhauer @ 6/7/2007 11:14:37 PM # Q
Why can't Palm converage a PDA with an 80gig state of the art media player. Maybe slide out keyboard. Why is that not done. Add 5 mexp camera. Please.

RE: ANALyst ramblings
mikecane @ 6/8/2007 7:40:48 AM # Q
I've watched Palm PDA prices on ebay recently. Even sometimes a DEAD LifeDrive will pop over $100 even close to $200. T3s have a good resale price too (damnmit!). T2s are generally below $100.

Reply to this comment

Fight the power - get more airtime...

pkuhns @ 6/7/2007 2:48:18 PM # Q
Let's see: post an analysis that agrees with the crowd (thereby drowning in multiple voices) or fight the crowd and get lots of airtime. If your paycheck comes from "thinking outside the box" then you're going to release an opposing report. All I can say about his arguments are YAWN...


A Linux subnotebook with WiFi has 100 gazillion hacking opportunities. This machine will not die a quiet death and I am positive the community will find excellent ways to leverage this device...

NX70 addict...

RE: Fight the power - get more airtime...
SeldomVisitor @ 6/7/2007 2:59:11 PM # Q
You haven't seen that Asustek laptop yet?

RE: Fight the power - get more airtime...
Ronin @ 6/7/2007 4:15:04 PM # Q
Personally, I look at the Foleo as, essentially, a portable port replicator for your smartphone. In that light, I definitely see utility in such a device.

As it stands now, when I am away from a PC, I could see myself using this for e-mail and particularly to draft letters/reports and read spreadsheets. I hate reading Excel docs on the Treo screen because it is too small and mostly I just wait until I get back to a PC. I have a pretty good notebook too but it is to big to carry with me amongst the other documents I am usually carrying and its primary use is as a roaming PC at home.

I am open to the possibilities of this device and will reserve judgment until it is in the 'wild'. After years of Palm OS use, I know that for Palm it is not all about specs and the latest and greatest features but about the user experience. And despite all the criticism of Palm over the years, the devices continue to be about getting the job done in the most straightforward way. If this works as advertised then I think, the experience of typing a report on the Foleo, closing the screen and having the document present on my Treo as it just was on the 10" screen would be pretty cool and I know of no device that can do that.

As a final comment, I do think the portable keyboard solution is a different animal because you are still dealing with the small screen.

In the Spirit of Umoja,
Ronin

RE: Fight the power - get more airtime...
mikecane @ 6/8/2007 7:42:01 AM # Q
>>>A Linux subnotebook with WiFi has 100 gazillion hacking opportunities. This machine will not die a quiet death and I am positive the community will find excellent ways to leverage this device...

Baloney. The same drooling was done over the Nokia ANti-Net Tabs. End of story.

"Oooh, look! I have Linux in my pocket!"

BFD! What's that mean for the average Joe? Zip.

Reply to this comment

Nanobook

makru @ 6/7/2007 5:15:07 PM # Q
Not sure if this has come up in other discussions, but this is an interesting competitor - same price, a little smaller, but running Windows.

http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/06/nanobook.html

RE: Nanobook
VampireLestat @ 6/7/2007 6:41:48 PM # Q
That nanobook makes the Foleo look plain retarded.
I mean LOOK at the difference. wow

RE: Nanobook
t3h @ 6/7/2007 8:38:03 PM # Q
Hmmm, considering that the Nanobook is somewhat a standard PC, it could probably run Linux...

Palm TX + 1GB SD + Motorola v3x = awesomeness
Asustek Link
hoodoo @ 6/7/2007 9:42:06 PM # Q
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,132622-page,1/article.html

$199!! I repeat, $199!!

"Prices are going to start at $199, rising based on the amount of flash memory that comes with the machine instead of a hard disk. Currently, Asustek plans to sell models with 4GB, 8GB, and 16GB of flash, but that may change between now and when the first Eee PCs go on sale.

Measuring 9 inches wide by 6.6 inches deep, the Eee PC 701 is about 1.5 inches thick with the screen closed and weighs just 31 ounces. Other specifications include a 7-inch monitor, a 300,000-pixel camera, 512MB of DDR2 memory, and Wi-Fi. Next year, Asustek plans to introduce a second Eee PC model, the 1001, which will have a 10-inch screen."

RE: Nanobook
rcartwright @ 6/8/2007 12:38:33 AM # Q
Has anyone noticed that this runs a Linux distro with no clear path to sync with Windows documents and data? Also, I suspect the $199.00 price is with the 4 gig flash and the battery life is 3 hours. Recall Hawkins said 5 hours with wifi on. Not sure execs are going to flock to this.

"Many men stumble across the truth, but most manage to pick themselves up
and continue as if nothing had happened."
- Winston Churchill
RE: Nanobook
ChiA @ 6/8/2007 1:37:54 AM # Q
Has anyone noticed that this runs a Linux distro with no clear path to sync with Windows documents and data?

The nanobook comes with OpenOffice, a fully featured Office app that can open far more document formats (including Microsoft Office) than the current Docs to Go on the Palm - RTF anyone?

Even if the nanobook didn't come with OpenOffice it's free and usually quite easy to download then install it on the popular Linux distros.

If you really need Windows I guess one could try installing XP Professional ($299) then OpenOffice for Windows($0) onto the nanobook and it'll still be two dollars cheaper than the Foleo's special offer price! It's been suggested the nanobook has an Intel mobile x86 chip whilst the Foleo doesn't have x86 so Windows is totally out of the question for the Foleo...

I suspect the $199.00 price is with the 4 gig flash

Reading the article the nanobook also comes with 512MB DDR memory.
So the nanobook comes with twice the RAM and sixteen times the storage capacity but at less than half the price of the Foleo...
RE: Nanobook
twrock @ 6/8/2007 3:19:54 AM # Q
The Nanobook and the ASUS Eee are quite cool. It's great to see companies all trying to find the "magic combo" in ultra-portable devices. That should help keep the prices down. I've looked at a few other cool devices as well.

But of course there are pro's and con's with every one of them. The Nanobook and the Eee probably would not make my short list if for no other reason than I don't believe either can possibly have a true full-sized keyboard in the form factor as advertised. I just can't deal with undersized keyboards. And as long as I'm demanding a full sized keyboard, I might as well ask for the screen size to match. So I suppose that is exactly how Hawkins made his decisions as to the Foleo form factor.

All other specs aside, I'd choose the Foleo form factor over these other two. But of course that's not the only factor to include in a final decision. So in the end, I wouldn't pick the Foleo either.

But the future looks brighter for any of us who want a cheap, simple, ultra portable computer. With everyone trying, someone's going to get it right.


Thinking about Vista? Think again: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Want an alternative? Try this: http://www.ubuntu.com/ or http://www.mepis.org/

RE: Nanobook
rcartwright @ 6/8/2007 11:36:17 AM # Q
With respect to Chia, your points are valid, but in the business setting you are not seeing Open Office out there. Also, as pointed out elsewhere the keyboard is NOT standard size. Look at the pad on it, its about the size of a thumb. I do not really mean to dis the Nanobook and the price feature set is something Palm should be looking at. That said, I do not think the two products will be traveling in the same circles. I would be interested to see if it actually ever makes it over the lake, the company press to the contrary. A lot of "gee whiz" tech never gets out of Asia.

"Many men stumble across the truth, but most manage to pick themselves up
and continue as if nothing had happened."
- Winston Churchill
RE: Nanobook
ChiA @ 6/8/2007 12:38:05 PM # Q
With respect to Chia, your points are valid, but in the business setting you are not seeing Open Office out there

With respect to yourself, here's one notable figure who may disagree with you and knows more about the computer industry than either of us:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/yqya6w
Yes, he has OpenOffice 2.2 installed on his home laptop.

I take on board your point about the limitations of the nanobook.
However, the key thing to consider is that manufacturers of the eee-Laptop, nanobook etc have far more experience in this field than Palm does. It's easier for them to innovate and improve on their offerings than Palm especially when you consider Palm's poor track record on smartphone innovation in recent years.

It would have been a better use of resources if Palm had simply concentrated its limited resources purely on improving its smartphones and bringing them up to standard with competing products.

I've recently held a Samsung i600 in the Orange shop and was truly amazed a device which was as slim as the old Vx/m500 yet:

- with QWERTY keyboard
- 3G with 1.3 megapixel camera AND VGA camera for video calls.
- wifi (lacking in the US version - the i607)
- reasonable battery life

This is a device which available now and only helps to make the Treos look so very dated.

RE: Nanobook
jeffhoward001 @ 6/8/2007 1:01:54 PM # Q
Here's a couple points that people are overlooking:

- If we're talking about business users and the Nanobook, XP Pro's going to run you another $100, Vista Pro about $200.

- With those specifications, Vista's performance is going to pretty marginal. The Foleo's performance is unknown at this point, but odds are it will be pretty good since it's using a custom OS and hardware build by the same company (no guarentees, but history has show this yields much better performance then generic hardware on generic operating systems).

- The entire concept of the Foleo is based around intelligent software that works with your smartphone to make usage between the devices fairly seemless. To what level Palm and outside developers will take this is still unknown, but this early in the a product's life cylce, it's best to pay attention to the concept of the device when you don't have any hands-on experience.

- Marketing, marketing, marketing... VIA has next to no presence in the world of marketing. We are all geeks (myself included) that follow mobile technology, so we're aware of the Nanobook. Unless someone else chooses to market this for VIA, it will remain a geeky reference device. If someone else chooses to market the product, then they will most likely re-brand it and tack on their mark-up. Palm has a great marketing engine that the business world trusts.

I'm still skeptical about the success of the Foleo, I just like to remind people of some of the less-geeky factors that go into building a new product.

Tungsten T --> Palm TX --> Foleo-mini??(like an LD-II with a small attached keyboard??)

RE: Nanobook
ChiA @ 6/8/2007 3:17:09 PM # Q
If we're talking about business users and the Nanobook, XP Pro's going to run you another $100, Vista Pro about $200.

jeffhoward, I wish you'd read previous posts before making your own, this ground has already been covered.

The nanobook with XP Pro comes to $498, a dollar cheaper than the Foleo at its $499 promotional price.

If you're going to keep on the right side of Microsoft's software agreements then you'd have to buy the full edition of XP Pro, not just the upgrade, unless the nanobook starts shipping with XP in which case it'll be cheaper still:
nanobook $199
XP Pro $299 (Staples.com)

Total $498

Vista is a no go unless Microsoft releases a new version to specifically run on these ultramobile PCs.

Nevertheless, it appears the nanobook's spec more than adequately cover XP's requirement and as of yet there seems to be little, if any software for the corporate environment that's strictly Vista only.

So for $499 people can choose between a full Windows ultramobile PC or a limited Linux laptop with limited rangee of apps.

RE: Nanobook
sungod @ 6/8/2007 8:56:47 PM # Q
"The nanobook comes with OpenOffice, a fully featured Office app that can open far more document formats (including Microsoft Office) than the current Docs to Go on the Palm" Chia

Last time I cheched OpenOffice still isn't compatable with the new Office07 files but Docs2Go is.

"The nanobook with XP Pro comes to $498, a dollar cheaper than the Foleo at its $499 promotional price."
"Vista is a no go unless Microsoft releases a new version to specifically run on these ultramobile PCs." Chia

Vista performance is a biger issue than you think.
XP will no longer be available past the end of the year.
That's the deadline M$ has given resellers like Dell who have continued to sell XP.

How good are cargo pants, they're a gadget lovers best friend.

RE: Nanobook
ChiA @ 6/9/2007 5:10:53 AM # Q
Last time I checked OpenOffice still isn't compatible with the new Office07 files but Docs2Go is.

I suggest you check more carefully, DocstoGo is only partially compatible with Office 07 in that you can only view files not edit them. Besides, these are the specs for DocstoGo for Palm OS and WinMob, who knows what the Linux version running on the Treo will offer.

If the ultramobile PC market proves to be lucrative enough Microsoft will be only too happy to provide a suitable OS solution; they may already be working on a specific version of Vista (or WinMob 6?) for this market as we type. Don't forget they prefer manufacturers to be using Microsoft products instead of Linux wherever possible!!!

RE: Nanobook
pmjoe @ 6/9/2007 8:17:02 AM # Q
Has anyone noticed that this runs a Linux distro with no clear path to sync with Windows documents and data?

You mean just like the Foleo?
Reply to this comment

A new name

Remmo @ 6/7/2007 10:19:12 PM # Q
So, from now, the Foleo must be renamed to FOOLeo.

Casio B.O.S.S. -> Casio PocketViewer -> Palm IIIe -> Palm IIIc -> Tungsten T -> Tungsten T|3 -> Tungsten T|5 -> Palm T|X -> Treo 680
Reply to this comment

The ANALyst Doesn't know Jeff's Hidden Ace!

LiveFaith @ 6/7/2007 11:08:36 PM # Q
The Foleo was demonstrated without with a power brick because it sports wireless power! And you moaners said Palm could not innovate.

http://tinyurl.com/3e4c6b

I'm in with both feet suckas!!!

Pat Horne

Reply to this comment
Start a New Comment Thread Top View Full Comment Thread
Achtung! Only the first 50 comments are displayed within the article.
    Click here for the full story discussion page...

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: