Comments on: Palm Doesn't View Windows CE 4.0 as a Threat

In an interview with ComputerWorld, Michael Mace, Palm's chief competitive officer, said he doesn't see the upcoming release of of the next version of the PocketPC OS as much of a threat.

"This sounds like an incremental release of their product, and it's a lot of stuff you can do today in a Palm handheld," he said. "We already have support for 802.xx, and our OS is so simple, our developers don't need a wizard."

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (124 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

MS going into hardware

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 11:25:59 AM #
There sound rumors that for the first time in history Microsoft will go with his next generation of PDA software e.g. 4.0 into hardware-production itself.

This will be funny!


RE: MS going into hardware
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 11:29:41 AM #
say wha?

RE: MS going into hardware
Flash @ 8/21/2001 1:01:59 PM #
Yeah, huh?

**Flash**
--Martin Sheen is my President.--
www.votescount2002.com
I think they are saying that PPC4 may include a MSFT-made
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:14:14 PM #
hardware unit. I doubt it though.

RE: MS going into hardware
Spock9 @ 8/21/2001 3:05:23 PM #
Hmmm...If that's the case it sounds like it is trying to duplicate Palm in their business model. Perhaps they are seeing the light. Yeah right.

RE: MS going into hardware
AriB @ 8/21/2001 5:06:43 PM #
wouldn't that piss off HP and Compaq? After all HP is already going to come out with a linux Jornada and Compaq has handhelds.org to bring linux to the ipaq. Maybe linux will be the PDA OS of choice in 5 years?

RE: MS going into hardware
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 4:08:10 AM #
MS could easy piss on there OM's - as you like to quote it like that - why not?
Palm had exactly the same OM model till now. They where hardware and OS producer ,competing with the OM's machines.
Not really uncommon thought.

Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!

mikecane @ 8/21/2001 11:45:57 AM #
Ah, this is the Michael Mace who continues to repeat, "85% of our customers don't want MP3 or multimedia." And yet I'd bet that the "15%" who do and who have been buying Sony's CLIE have done so in numbers that exceed those who have been buying the Palm m505.

Talisker is too far in the future to worry about, agreed. But Pocket PC 2002 is what *Palm* **2001** should have been: multimedia rich on kick-ass SA chips. As great as the CLIE is, its video capabilities pale when put up against an iPaq. And with HP, Compaq, Casio, and now Toshiba and NEC coming out with SA-based PPCs running PPC 2002, Palm is going to be looking for landfills to accept many of their more-expensive units.

Integrating BeOS into PalmOS is going to take time. If Palm survives until that time, it will be astonishing. If they manage to save their business, it will be a miracle. Perhaps by addressing strictly the lower-end of the market, they can survive. But that's hardly the market they have wanted to be in.

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 12:06:06 PM #

and the PocketPC trolls keep coming...

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
Meirav @ 8/21/2001 12:12:31 PM #
I disagree strongly about the iPaq's video capabilities. It is not superior to the Clie, but I thought it was comparable.

What I did find to the iPaq's benefit is that it no longer has that performance lag when doing tasks compared to a Palm-based device. I did find the Windows Explorer-based interface a bit cumbersome, though.

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 12:19:38 PM #
The only thing wrong with iPAQ's video capabilities are that it's only 12-bit.

gMovie-ing off the Memory Stick is slow, and doesn't have enough fps without hacks. TealMovie doesn't support sound.

iPAQs have a bigger screen (though the Clie has better resolution) and more storage.

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 12:33:28 PM #

When there is PocketPC vs. Palm war, why people ALWAYS compares Video & Sound. They are not important! I don't buy PDA for listening to music or watching a videos. I buy it because I want to do something usefull with it ex. writing documents or keep up my meetings and todo list etc.

It doesn't matter is my PDA Palm or PocketPC it matters that there are right programs on my PDA.

Today my PDA is palm but I am seriously thinking to buy PocketPC because of the color screen! But I have to wait until PocketPC has all apps that I need and maybe then there are good colorscreen palm then...how knows


RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
mikecane @ 8/21/2001 1:01:06 PM #
I love these dweebs who can't figure out how to register and therefore all appear as the same dweeb -- "I.M. Anonymous" -- who dare to call other people trolls. There was NOTHING trollish in my PPC vs Palm comments, you freaking moron! Learn how to *comprehend* what you read!

As for music and video not being important -- that's not important to YOU. Don't try to squeeze everyone else in the world into your limited perspective.

I have never said that either Palm or PPC should vanquish the other. In fact, I root for Palm to survive, if only to keep the entire market out of the hands of that semi-autistic sociopath, Gates, and his band of merry thieves.

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:22:38 PM #
Wi-Fi, attachment, .mpeg. Now all together. This is what Palm neet to work on.

Putting a blind eyes on competitor doesn't make it disappear. The future is wireless internet on PDA for application as heavy as streaming video. PIM is an old trick, heck a $20 Royal can do that too. GO to Walmart and you would be surprise what this $20 bucks disposable Royal can do in basic PIM area.

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
mikecane @ 8/21/2001 1:26:35 PM #
Have you spent $20 to try that Royal PDA? I've seen it at CompUSA. That clunky screen is scary. Makes me have flashbacks to the first LED digital clocks...

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
AriB @ 8/21/2001 1:38:54 PM #
if Palm didn't think multimedia was important then why did they buy Be for? Why are they moving to ARM (and note that pocketpc isn't 'moving' towards anything so there will still be compatibility problems between different pocketpc's) Let's face it, Palm isn't going away anytime soon. Next gen palms will be cool and you'll still be able to use Wordsmith on them

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:39:00 PM #
It's $20 bucks. It syncs with Outlook and keeps calender and appointment function. The price ratio is lower by 15000% margin.

My point is, sooner or later somebody will come up with super cheap low end model in the range of sub $40 that will have function approaching basic palm model.

RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:47:02 PM #
It seems all we think of multimedia is MP3 and a StarWars trailer. Well it ain't

it's more of Audio and Video API to provide capability anywhere from video conferences and business presentation all the way to rich gaming environment.

And no, "why would anybody want that" is not the answer.


RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
gynde @ 8/21/2001 1:49:48 PM #
>I love these dweebs who can't figure out how to >register and therefore all appear as the same dweeb --> "I.M. Anonymous" -- who dare to call other people >trolls. There was NOTHING trollish in my PPC vs Palm >comments, you freaking moron! Learn how to >*comprehend* what you read!

Happy now? I am registered. I didn't point my reply to your comment...and maybe my english is not so good that I understand every word. But enough this. Let's focus on main business.

>As for music and video not being important -- that's >not important to YOU. Don't try to squeeze everyone >else in the world into your limited perspective.

No, I don't try to squeeze anything, but video and music are IMHO most important things! First I'd like to see good displays and wireless capacibility. Palm had lot to do on this area and if they are focusing on music and video first they are IMHO going to wrong way


RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 3:23:50 PM #
POCKET PC RULES, PALM DROOLS!

[Actually, I'm a die-hard Palm user who put this up to piss off all the hyper-sensitive idiots who continually whine about "trolls" everytime someone dares to mention a Pocket PC on these message boards, let alone admit that Pocket PC has some compelling features of it's own. I don't use a Pocket PC, but I can see why someone might, and I think it's a pathetic argument to complain about how "difficult" the UI is. It's not that hard; it's simply different--there are actually some very useful things about it. As I say, I prefer Palm, but I refuse to turn it into some stupid flame war. Perhaps some of you should make the same refusal.]

Say what!

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 12:12:06 PM #
PocketPC has over half of Europes PDA sales, and Mace doesn't see WinCE4/PocketPC as a threat?!?! How much marketshare does Microsoft have to grab before he does take them seriously, 90%?



RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:04:11 PM #
There's alot of things going on with consumer electronics in Europe that aren't like they are here. For example, here, almost 50% of cars sold are SUV's. There are no SUV's in all of Europe. Pretty nice, huh?

RE: Say what!
mikecane @ 8/21/2001 1:05:07 PM #
I think Mac will have to be behind Kessler on the line for Unemployment Compensation.

(OK, I admit I am being harsh and very unfair. I'm sure that Mace is a very smart guy and actually *knows* everything all of us are saying. For all we know, the poor guy could be having many sleepness nights because he *does* see the threat, where others above him at Palm do not. He is paid to express the Official Palm Point of View. But that does not mean *he* believes it or agrees with it.)

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:25:30 PM #
Good point made by poster #2, but Microsoft still has about one third of the US PDA market now as well. Either way, this is bad news for Palm. And I would certainly expect Mace to say something more intelligent than "we don't see PPC as a threat". Good lord! Mace would have to be a complete moron not to take Microsoft seriously.

RE: Say what!
Spock9 @ 8/21/2001 3:12:56 PM #
Perhaps Mace doesn't see PPC as a threat because PPC doesn't do more than the Palm. The basic functions with regards to the enterprise, which consist of working with your e-mail or Word and Excel files not to mention PowerPoint documents, are all available on the Palm with better integration between the desktop and the Palm that with the desktop and the PPC. Take a look at what a company called DataViz did recently with their lates release...4.0 I believe. Microsoft still has problems interacting with their own document types. Maybe they should talk to DataViz about how it's done. Just my $.02

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 3:54:59 PM #
yeah, than Microsoft going to tweak XP so it only work with PPC. now what?

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 4:24:01 PM #
You forgot multitasking. It's important because wireless is an important part of enterprise. Not being able to do anything while Avantgo updates is a bummer.



RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 4:39:06 PM #
Europe did not have the Clie N710 or N610 for that matter during the quarter. Although the PocketPC caught PalmOS in Europe, they still fell short of passing them. Which begs the question, why does a powerhouse like the PocketPC still not outsell the simple Palm OS? Could it be that that people still use their desktops, more powerful desktops I might add, for movie watching and MP3 playing and a majority only use their PDA's for PIM. Palm still provides more options for PIM than PocketPC so I still think that even though the PocketPC does have extended multimedia features, you cannot watch movies or listen to music in a meeting. This will be a battle so don't count Palm out yet.

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 5:13:38 PM #
Clie 710s and 610s actually reached Europe?

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 6:06:53 AM #
Unfortunately not for the moment : (

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 8:28:28 AM #
Go to www.simply.co.uk or www.jungle.com to have a look at the pda range in the UK. The iPAQs are there, sure, but what is there to fight them? The m500 is out (oooh, big deal), but we haven't seen any of the new colour [not color ;-) ] devices yet.

So we've been putting off buying a new PDA because of the new devices in the pipeline, leaving a hole in the market for PPC, just like in the states. The difference in Europe is that even when the new PalmOS devices (m505, Clie) start shipping in the USA, we don't get them here yet. So in fact the "hole in the market" is lengthened, leaving more space for PPC to squeeze into.

RE: Source?
Ed @ 8/22/2001 9:25:28 AM #
> PocketPC has over half of Europes PDA sales

Could you tell me where you got these figures? The latest I've seen have Palm outselling Compaq in Europe, if by a narrow margin:
www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=2155

---
News Editor

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 6:34:43 PM #
PocketPC not a threat eh? That arrogant kind of thinking can get a company killed. Never underestimate your opponent, especially one with lots of money and determination to topple the arrogant bastard who thinks he's on top and humble him....

RE: Say what!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/3/2001 4:35:35 AM #
Pocket PC is a serious threat in Europe for Palm.
All the top pda's that everybody is screaming about simply aren't available here (the Netherlands). Same complaints coming from the other side of the North Sea.

Sony? We still only have the PEG S300.
Handspring? Never seen one in a shop. Available through mail order, though.
HandEra? Never seen one. Perhaps available through mail order, I don't know. Not on www.pdashop.nl

Basically, the only Palm powered machines that are widely available are Palm machines, and they are expensive. Make that very expensive.

This leaves the door wide open for pcc's. No wonder iPaqs are selling like crazy over here. The m505 hasn't changed that. To be honest: I have never seen one outside of a shop window.

Do you really think MSFT is telling Mace what they have

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:22:08 PM #
up their sleeve? Mace's arrogant, lax, non-paranoid attitude will kill Palm if they're not careful. "Only the Paranoid Survive". This is trench warfare and these Palm guys act like they are in combat with a little start-up operation.

RE: Do you really think MSFT is telling Mace what they have
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:40:06 PM #
nVidia was a little startup operation...

RE: Do you really think MSFT is telling Mace what they have
Smaug @ 8/22/2001 9:33:41 PM #
and so was palm

Talk about a revolution!

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:27:42 PM #
Incremental change?!?!? PPC 4 will allow you to close applications just by tapping a "close" button! That's not incremental, that's revolutionary for Microsoft PPCs!!!!

:P

RE: Talk about a revolution!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:36:04 PM #
actually they implemented that in WInCE 1.0 and 2.0 but took it off in 3.0. Microsoft eats up the simplicity jingle. But since so many hacks are made for "slocing" apps they decide to put i back in for 4.0

Red delicious/Washington Green
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:36:16 PM #
LOL!

The #1 thing I've always disliked about PPCs, (and I don't particularly dislike them) is that I have to work awfully hard to turn off the running applications.


I can't imagine a world without green or red apples. We want both, right? They both are goods eats, but they're a little different. One is sweeter, one is more tangy....
One plays good vids and music, and great MS Office,
one has 11,480 software titles currently available for download.

I'm not out to flame a soul, 'cause let's face it, what purpose does it serve? I think that we'll keep our Palms and our PPCs, our XBoxes and our Playstations, our Nissans and our Fords. I think there's room for everyone. Why would they vanish? I mean really? Think about it. Why not both.


RE: Talk about a revolution!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 1:56:21 PM #
End your tired consumerist race. Just get what you need and stop paying for everything; Nissans and Fords, Palms and Pocket PC's--who cares? There's more to life than materialism, people. Just get what works for you and stop this nonsense.

RE: Talk about a revolution!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 2:15:37 PM #
Amen. I own a Palm IIIxe and an HP 548. One serves one set of purposes; the other serves another set. Both will have the "old" version of their OS's soon. Do I care? Not really--they do what I need them to do, and I've got more important things to worry about than whether to "upgrade" again.

RE: Talk about a revolution!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 3:15:49 PM #
Isn't this what put Palm in trouble in the first place? there is no compelling reason to upgrade?

New feature and killer app need to be develop, they just don't keep falling from the sky on old OS. There is only so much a version of OS can do before it becomes tired.

If PIM is what all Palm is aiming for, than they better be honest and start selling $20 bucks PIM instead of $449 PIM pretending to be PDA. Customer is not stupid, they know the value of the money.

RE: Talk about a revolution!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 4:51:19 PM #
Palm has been around for 5 years with the same OS. What has kept Palm alive are the 10s of thousands of developers because they, more than Palm, have the ability to make the product compete with Microsoft. That is what will keep the PalmOS alive.

See what I mean?

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 4:35:22 PM #
This just shows how clueless Palm is......in case it wasn't already obvious.

RE: See what I mean?
Altema @ 8/22/2001 1:31:07 PM #
Palm is probably more concerned about other things than an incremental OS change. What they SHOULD be paying attention to, is that MS may try the IE/Netscape method in dealing with competition. You know, undercut prices to the extent that your competitor suffocates because they don't have the same cash reserves. I'm already seeing $200.00 rebates on PPC devices, which puts them below the cost of high end Palm OS devices.

RE: See what I mean?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 5:23:40 PM #
Microsoft actually can't do that, unless it has direct rebates. Casio/HP/Compaq/URThere handle the sales, so they're the ones who lower the price. The reason? They're being discontinued in favour of the Merlin-powered PPCs.

News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 4:41:55 PM #
nt

RE: News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 8:28:31 PM #
hahaha

that's a dang good point, nt.



RE: News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.
Altema @ 8/22/2001 1:42:53 PM #
It's serious business when Microsoft comes after you, but the PPC is not it's biggest tooth! :-)

RE: News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 5:25:10 PM #
No, Windows and Office leverage is its biggest tooth.

CE is better than Palm OS in the first place

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 5:06:27 PM #
This is a no brainer.
CE is more user friendly, even more user friendly when you have been using Windows for a while. It also looks more pleasent than Palm OS. CE can do the same things that the Palm OS can do in ADDITION to playing MP3s, videos and whatnot. Slowly but surely, these PocketPCs will start matching the prices of the Palm PDAs, and guess which one the consumer is going to plan to buy.. PPC! Come on people, use your brains.. also did anybody forget to mention the Palm OS emu?

RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 5:10:56 PM #
_Old_ devices will match Palm prices. New CE devices will always be expensive. StrongARM chips aren't free, ya know.

And PPC has apparently abandoned the Monochrome market (as the discontinuation of the mono iPAQ shows.)

RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
Smaug @ 8/21/2001 8:58:34 PM #
I find palm much simpler and user friendly :)

RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 9:56:12 PM #
I find Palm as elegant but useless as a pair of chopstick in a steak house.

RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
Smaug @ 8/22/2001 3:14:49 AM #
useless? what do use your PDA for?

RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 8:17:04 AM #
"This is a no brainer.
CE is more user friendly, even more user friendly when you have been using Windows for a while. It also looks more pleasent than Palm OS. CE can do the same things that the Palm OS can do in ADDITION to playing MP3s, videos and whatnot. Slowly but surely, these PocketPCs will start matching the prices of the Palm PDAs, and guess which one the consumer is going to plan to buy.. PPC! Come on people, use your brains.. also did anybody forget to mention the Palm OS emu?"

Clie can play movies and mp3s. PalmOS is relatively faster accessing PIM information than PocketPC even though the processor is much slower. PalmOS is color . PalmOS has smaller expansion choices as well as more expansion choices. PalmOS has 10s of thousands of developers.


RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
ganoe @ 8/22/2001 10:20:58 AM #
"Slowly but surely, these PocketPCs will start matching the prices of the Palm PDAs"

PocketPC makers have consistently shown they have no interest in matching the prices of Palm OS devices. The PocketPC makers are primarily all big desktop PC makers, where just like desktop PCs, they see the market as adding more hardware features to their devices and keeping them priced at $350-$600 as the way to go. They would prefer not to instead try to beat the $200 price point below which the general population would find these devices appealing. Palm and Handspring have been successfully doing that for years now while keeping $300-$500 models as high-end.

RE: Palm vs. PPC
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 11:45:45 AM #
I have both a Palm and iPaq. I use my Palm and my iPaq just sits there draining it's battery.

BUT...I will go to one platform exclusively depending on who get to the below point first:

Palm - hi-res screen with virtual grafitti area on a StrongArm processor.

PPC - small form factor (size of 505), and reasonably long battery life.

RE: PPC is unstable and buggy
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 12:07:50 PM #
Sure PPC has some nice "power" features, but with more complexity (at least with M$ products) comes more unstability.

I have more problems with my PPC active sync software in a month, then I've had with my Palm's hotsync software in 3 years. Then when I installed M$ update to their active sync software 3.5 it just about killed my iPaq.

Also, my iPaq WAS killed when I tried to flash the ROM with Compaq's update.

When I went to all the PPC sites to get help, the board was full of others having problems.

My Palm just works, problem free.

So which PDA is more "powerful"???

RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 3:02:44 PM #
I complete agree! ActiveSync via USB is terrible! I have a Palm, a PocketPC and a Nokia Communicator 9210 (Symbian based).
Normally I use the Palm and the Nokia. PocketPC is immature.

MS


Just a PPC Troll

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 4:50:39 PM #
The debate will never end.. So I don't see the purpose of arguing. I once was a Palm User... Now I am a PPC user and I love it.

Just like in the world of Wintel machines and Apple Computers... Palms and PPCs are 2 different breeds. They both can do PIM stuff and then some. They both are uniqe. But like Apple Computers and the Wintell Camp..they both have their die hard enthsiasts which will never stray over..EVEN if the company goes under. I mean look... there are still Newton users today.. and the Old Sharp users from the day.

So my question is.. If you love your PDA so much.. Why does it bother you when other people make statements about Palm or whatever PDA you are using? It's like the whole religion thing.. Mine is better than yours.. If if you live your religion and belive in it.. than what do you care what other people say about it... I mean unless you fear that maybe your PDA like in religion isn't the right one after all and there is something better worth listening too and using.

So please ignore us PPC Trolls... If we need to keep comming back here... than maybe we will convert, (not really)..but hey..why argue with us.

I love technolgy.. So I like to read about it.. and in so doing.. I found this post from another site I wanted to share.. Because I share the same vision.. I like PDAs.. I would like to see Palm grow into something mature that would make us PPC user envious towards the Palm. I think it's great for inovation for both parties.. and can eventually leed to better pricing for both sides of the PDA world. Palm needed PPC, ot help them realize that they can expand there OS. PPC needs Palm to help them realize that there are other ways of doing things, besides the Microsoft way.

Anyway.. Her is the post.. It's not really saying that Palms are bad.. I think it just reflects about the leadership of Palm.. Something I have never agreed with in there actions.

"The saying is true, that you need to know your competitors to know where your success will lie. This is where I belive Palm lacks. Not only by statements like the one in this thread, but by there decisions on how to run Palm. They barely know what their licensees are doing let alone the Microsoft Camp.

I don't like Amway...but I will give them this for their marketing strategy. They teach in order to maximize your success, you need to use your products, know them, and learn to love them. Once you've come that far, than it will be much easier to sale the products you use.
Carl Y. and Mace, just as well should be CEO and CCO of a Tampon company. Cause much like the Palm, I am sure they never really use any of these...(but than again.. I wouldn't be surprised if they did).. Thus is why Carl Y. is shocked that they (Palm) haven't done well in Corporate sales. It is hard to innovate technology that you don't really use, or when all you know how to use is a SIMPLE calculator."


Please feel free to thrash me.. I shared my opinion... Besides I am just a troll with his PPC enjoying and loving life with my PDA!


RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 7:02:37 PM #
Don't Pocket PC's have Spill Cheekers... I mean Spell Checkers built in? Use it!!!

RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 7:38:31 PM #
PocketPC troll said:..."Besides I am just a troll with his PPC enjoying and loving life with my PDA!"

LOL! If all your doing is playing with your PocketPC and visiting Palm message boards spreading FUD, then it doesn't sound like you have much of a life!


RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 8:33:11 PM #
And to my fellow Trolls...

We do have much in common..I mean, you've posted too, so your life must be as exciting as mine. Just with my PPC I have finished everything I needed for the day..

And to the other Troll... No PPC's don't come with a spell checker, that would be an add on software. See what I mean about knowing the competition??

RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 9:47:09 PM #
PPC can have 'Spill' checker in 5 different languages isntalled at the same time.

Can your palm do that? (not that It will help me spell correctly in any language)

RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 7:27:06 AM #
Please.... would someone tell me WHY PPC people are visiting a Palm website? It does not make any sense. Its like a bunch of eunucks gathering around a whore house. What do they have to gain? I can only suspect that their motives are not positive.

RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 10:19:56 AM #
I agreed with you. Why PPC trolls visit this website and give bad comments. They are not being polite. Oops, I forgot. They're PPC trolls.

RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 10:46:10 AM #
Troll said: "If you love your PDA so much.. Why does it bother you when other people make statements about Palm or whatever PDA you are using?"

We, Palm users, totally agree. So please get away from our web site and go play with your toy, leave us alone!

RE: Just a PPC Troll
Spock9 @ 8/22/2001 11:10:09 AM #
I say, let the troll stay. He adds a different view to things. When you have only tunnel vision, you can't get out of the way of the train coming, or de-rail it. The reason most people have a problem with people from other platforms making derogitory(sp?) comments is that most people don't know enough about the competing product to make ACCURATE derogitory comments. I try to make sure that if I make a comment that is "unflattering" to the other platforms, that I at least have my sh*t right.

RE: VERY good question!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 11:41:07 AM #
I think it's great to discuss the pros and cons of both platforms, but your questions is a good one. Why does everyone get so upset when you talk about the merits of the competing platform?

I think you should ask this to the admin of PocketPC Passion (a top PPC site) who keeps censoring my posts that talk about SOME advantages of Palm, or complains about SOME problems with PPC. My posts are balanced, not flame inducing comments based on the fact that I have and use both a Palm and an iPaq.

Why then does he censor my posts???

RE: Just a PPC Troll
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 5:25:59 PM #
Have you tried asking Dale nicely?

the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 8:54:06 PM #
Their big advantage is that they are very easy to develop for, can run software and libraries identical to what runs on desktops, and will likely have increasing impact in the lucrative vertical markets. And with all that, there are no licensing fees to be paid to anyone. Microsoft and Palm may battle it out at the low end for calendaring, but these new systems may cause both companies big headaches.

RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 9:13:12 PM #
J-phone hit it big time in Japan.

RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
Spock9 @ 8/22/2001 11:13:43 AM #
That is why the announcement of Palm picking up Be Inc., was so interesting. Be Inc., has some interesting stuff and will add a who new flavor to future Palm OS version. Just my $.02

RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
Spock9 @ 8/22/2001 11:15:13 AM #
Ok, spell check...(...whole new flavor...) is what I wanted to say.

RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 3:05:43 PM #
I found interesting that there in USA there aren't any people that talk about Symbian platform.
Nokia Communicator 9210 use it. And Nokia is a big player in selling a lot of devices.
BTW using Communicator is very nice.

MS


Why are there Pocket PC users here?

Davy @ 8/21/2001 10:07:05 PM #
Isn't that kind of like men going to women.com? Why? The site isn't for you, it doesn't exclude you, but there's nothing there for you. But, if that floats your boat, what the heck. People here can't convince eachother to change palm devices, let alone switch to PocketPC, so who cares.

-Davy Fields
m505 YahooGroup Moderator
Owner m505 FAQ
www.davyfields.com

RE: Why are there Pocket PC users here?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 10:40:02 PM #
Yeah. I mean who on earth couldn't grasp the depth of Zen and Palm economy. Only higher being like Palm user can fathom this mystery. Color and sounds only confuse the mind. Fallow the Tao and you will reach computing nirvana.

Now. repeat after me....Palm is the greatest. simplicity is what the heart seek.

....Palm is greatest...palm is the greatest...rama rama ding ding...

A developers view

fparter @ 8/21/2001 10:07:41 PM #
The fact of the matter is that Micorsoft [sic] is a pain in the ass to develop for. Be it OpenGL vs
D3D, or PalmOS vs Wince, it really sucks trying to develop using any API that Micorsoft [sic] has
released.

Palm supports and helps their developers. Micorsoft [sic] wants a soul before one can become an
MS developer and their APIs were developed by marketing monkeys, not engineers.

What this means is that their are thousands of PalmOS applications and only a handful of Wince
applications.

If Palm will wake up and start using the large program base as their main sellimg point, they will
bury Wince forever.


RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 10:32:41 PM #
Only a handfull of WinCE apps? You must not have seen PocketPC software lately. There are tons of apps for PocketPC now, including a lot of PalmOS apps like HanDbase, CityTime, and Tomeraider.

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 10:37:01 PM #
hey do you still have that "brightness hack for m5o5"? It counts as 3 applications palm gear counter. 1000 callculator application, and not a single title does calculus.

[eye rolling time]

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 10:50:50 PM #
Maybe Palm should hire monkeys then instead of engineers just like Microsoft. hey after all those monkeys implement multimedia API while Palm Inc need to buy Be and smooch ARMHY to develop next version OS and tools.

If it sells, make money and can compete, hey it's good enough. It sure heck a lot better than that 'simplicity' stuff. Give me bloatware that work anytime rather than elegant but crippling user by dictating what is and what is not PDA need.

There is fan and advocacy, and there is delusional feedback. If Palm users keep blindly eating up what Palm dictate as "computing" needs without pushing Palm to move forward by giving correct criticism and feed back than there is nobody to blame but users themselves for helping accelerating Palm's demise.



RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 2:37:47 AM #
An anonymous troll writes "Only a handfull of WinCE apps? You must not have seen PocketPC software lately. There are tons of apps for PocketPC now, including a lot of PalmOS apps like HanDbase, CityTime, and Tomeraider."

Really? Let's take a quick look at Handango for an objective assessment...

Under "Business Applications", there are 1748 applications for Palm OS, versus 497 for PPC.

Under "Personal Productivity", there are 2084 applications for Palm OS, versus 462 for PPC.

Under "Education and Reference", there are 2697 applications for Palm OS versus 299 for PPC.

Under "Software Tools", there are 1432 applications for Palm OS versus 242 for PPC.

Under "Entertainment", there are 2449 applications listed for Palm OS versus 576 for PPC.

Under "Travel", there are 1197 applications listed for Palm OS versus 330 for PPC.

That's a total of 11,607 applications for Palm OS (not even counting the 905 Palm VII-specific programs listed) versus 2,406 for PocketPC, almost five times as many.

PocketPC is clearly lagging dramatically behind Palm OS in developer interest and support. The disparity is even greater when you consider that Palm OS application don't have the kind of CPU and form-factor-specific incompatibilities that PPC applications have to contend with.

Face it: Microsoft finds themself in the position, with respect to developers, that Apple's been mired in for years and years. Developers go where the market share is. The preponderence of application and developer support ensures continued high market share. A tough cycle to break, as Apple surely knows.

Couple that situation with Microsoft's well-known penchant for co-opting its developers' efforts and driving them out of business, and its fairly clear that Microsoft is not a company that developers are necessarily dying to partner with. In the handheld space, they don't have their monoply to lean on--there's more than one game in town.

Entertaining to see Bill and friends on the receiving end of that transaction for a change.


RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 3:49:50 AM #
under free emulator software not listed anywhere in handango

Palm: GBA
ppc: more than 5 of them including PALM OS

under multimedia and game entertainment:
palm: a smidgety and none is working
PPC: a truckload


under redundant whocare do we need another hex calculator:
Palm: truckload plus another bushel
PPS: get pocket excel or freebie HP49g and shut up.

under your body fat calorie calculator and your anchestor astrology:
Palm: a million plus one
PPC: just a couple

under hack master, and fix do dat just to tweak ye old simple OS
Palm: 5 million
PPC: 5 million: but almost all are skinning and personalization

etc etc...


RE: A developers view
martopiggus @ 8/22/2001 5:30:36 AM #
see! Palm users are more productive! PPC users only use their heavy bulky PDA to watch movie or listen to mp3 while we can get tons of "useless" tools to have our workdone!

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 7:02:56 AM #
>Under "Business Applications", there are 1748
>applications for Palm OS, versus 497 for PPC.

How many of those 1749 palm apps are crap? let say about 1500. There are gems but too often apps are just crap. Same can say for PPC 450 crap and 47 good apps

IMHO it's matters are there programs that you need for your PDA, not

"How many programs you can download to your pda?"
"10000 apps"
"Really? How many of those you use?"
"maybe 10"



RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 9:26:56 AM #
If you're going to pull numbers for "wonderful applications" versus "garbage applications" out of a hat, I guess you can prove anything you like. There's certainly no reason to suppose that the quality of applications on PocketPC is uniformly terrific. It hasn't proven to be the case on Windows.

Even if you assume Sturgeon's law, and say that 94% of all handheld applications are crap, there would still be five times as many "great" apps for Palm OS. That kind of reasoning cuts both ways, in the absence of any particular information to the contrary.

The facts are the facts. I can imagine it's personally upsetting to the PPC zealots out there, but there it is. Deveopers would demonstrably rather put their efforts into a Palm OS app than a PPC app.

RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 9:35:15 AM #
No question that what's important is the application that you personally care about, not all 11,000 or so of them.

Of course, the fact that there are 11,000 or so applications makes it more likely that you'll be able to find that application that you personally care about.

If you want to try to dispute verifiable facts--and anyone can get onto Handango and verify my results--you need to use facts to do it, not dopey rhetoric.

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 10:06:29 AM #
I try to look for an app that will let me type my great american novel while listening to Jimi Hendrix, but couldn't find it.

HOw about an app that will let me sync wirelessly while looking up something with browser.

copy paste Word with picture?

seeing HTML file? you know soemthing descent with fonts and pictures on....

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 10:23:09 AM #
Those aren't apps. (That's "multitasking". Oh, you can listen to mp3s in the background of the Clie while you run your apps.)

There isn't a good student management software program. Classmate is the only one and that's not very good.

There isn't a free file explorer (the explorer bundled with PPC sucks) close to McFile 1.x. Resco et al make good file explorers, but they cost upwards to $10.

We can go on forever.

RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 10:51:12 AM #
Let's get real, shall we?

Consider software for medial applications. 473 titles for Palm OS versus 40, count 'em, 40, for Pocket PC.

Need an app for tracking your patients? Better hope you have a Palm. Medical reference on infection diseases? Ditto. Anatomy reference? DSM IV? Ditto, ditto. Notes on surgical knots, stitches and sutures (with pictures)? Dosage calculator? Pediatric dosage calculator? Cardiac surgery risk calculator? ICU protocols? EMS protocols? Ditto, ditto, ditto.

Not to mention that the very first three entries in the PPC listings are the same program compiled for three different "flavors" of PocketPC--SH3, MIPS and ARM. Nor that one of the applications listed under "Medical" for PocketPC is a golf scorekeeping program.

I'm happy that you can listen to Jimi while writing that novel. Hope it's a short album and a short novel or you're gonna need an extension cord.

And as far as Word compatibility is concerned, Dataviz's Documents-to-Go offers equal if not better compatibility with desktop Word than does Pocket Word. And Handspring's Blazer browser is very nice as well.

Being useful--can you PocketPC do that?


RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 11:08:15 AM #
try here....

http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/software.shtml

just because you don't know where to look for doesn't mean it doesn't exist. and PS, medical softwares in pocket pc is already better than Palm by now. The argument might work about 2 months ago but not now. Nobody argue about this anymore.

now let's see, can Palm do gross anatomy color database? can you carry all those super large medical applications at once? Do they even fix the SD mount beyond fat 12 yet? or are you relegated to pathetic B/W text apps while forced to pic and choose which to carry at the asme time. DO you even sync wirelesly with your palm? if you do, forget about using your medical app while it is syncing.

can you carry 100Meg medical application and open 20 of them all at once?

I thought so


and PS, all those calculator and text database can be quickly implemented if somebody saw the need. It's only another calculator/VB apps.

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 11:35:21 AM #
infectious disease (try to do THAT in your palm)
http://www.hopkins-abxguide.org./

anatomy referance
It's FREEE, and in COLOR...(imagine that)
https://www.medifor.com/DistWebPage/anatomyinfo.htm

DSM IV
at least 2 companies sells this handbook, can Palm even do anything else after putting this manual in memory? This thing is 4mB
http://www.collectivemed.com/p_dsmiv.html


surgery.
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/software/surgery.shtml

just note and picture? can you do it in color and HTML? *laughing*


med calculators...
ehrrr...they are a dime a dozen. got more buttons, more equations, more computational power and precission.

etc...

bottom line, I hope you are not running out of space and your Palm becoming tempramental choking on all those big programs, while your patient drop dead cause you can't access your database from the memory card.

and for gawd sake, how about in color and bigger resolution eh? you might be able to records your medical observation, and compile your own personal internet database within too.


Headline : "Patient drop dead, while doctor try to juggle database on his Palm handheld accessing the right database and waiting for a calculation to finish"

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 11:50:01 AM #
AOL just killed their AOL 2.0 for PPC.

Hmmmm...I wonder why?

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 2:21:59 PM #
just because you don't know where to look for doesn't mean it doesn't exist

You've completely missed the point. Handango is a good statistical representation of the universe of handheld software. It makes no particular preference toward Palm versus PowerPC, developers post their own wares, and so, it seems reasonable to expect that it reflects the current state of affairs in the real world. The point was not that there exists no medical software for PPC, but that there's clearly much more in that category, and in every single other category, for Palm.

Remember how Microsoft harped on Apple for having so few applications for Mac OS, relatively speaking? Shoe's on the other foot now. And Microsoft, with their demonstrated developer-hostile approach to life, is not winning converts to any great degree.

can you carry 100Meg medical application and open 20 of them all at once?

No, and neither can you, unless you own some hitherto-unknown 2 gigabyte handheld. Don't be a dolt.

I think a previous anonymous troll (or the same one? who can tell?) hit it on the nose: if your most important requirement is to wirelessly sync your handheld while simultaneously listening to Jimi Hendrix, browsing the Web and writing the great American novel, I guess PowerPC is the thing for you.

As long as you don't mind the 45 minute battery life (which is the actual operational life of a Compaq iPaq with an 802.11b card)...

RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 2:37:14 PM #
Sorry, didn't log in before that post, and this board is surprisingly selective in the HTML tags it supports...

just because you don't know where to look for doesn't mean it doesn't exist

You've completely missed the point. Handango is a good statistical representation of the universe of handheld software. It makes no particular preference toward Palm versus PowerPC, developers post their own wares, and so, it seems reasonable to expect that it reflects the current state of affairs in the real world. The point was not that there exists no medical software for PPC, but that there's clearly much more in that category, and in every single other category, for Palm.

Remember how Microsoft harped on Apple for having so few applications for Mac OS, relatively speaking? Shoe's on the other foot now. And Microsoft, with their demonstrated developer-hostile approach to life, is not winning converts to any great degree.

can you carry 100Meg medical application and open 20 of them all at once?

No, and neither can you, unless you own some hitherto-unknown 2 gigabyte handheld. Don't be a dolt.

I think a previous anonymous troll (or the same one? who can tell?) hit it on the nose: if your most important requirement is to wirelessly sync your handheld while simultaneously listening to Jimi Hendrix, browsing the Web and writing the great American novel, I guess PowerPC is the thing for you.

As long as you don't mind the 45 minute battery life (which is the actual operational life of a Compaq iPaq with an 802.11b card)...



RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 2:50:48 PM #
To the person who posted the following, I will disect (pun intended) it point by point from a software engineer turned doctor's point of view.

BTW, I am currently evaluating PDAs for this exact purpose, using them in actual practice. I was fortunate to be given this opportunity due to my programming background. I am given a Palm m505, iPaq, Clie710, and HP Jordana for evaluation. I could care less which one is selected, I just want the best solution to be used.

YOU-SAID>infectious disease (try to do THAT in your palm)
http://www.hopkins-abxguide.org./

Do you even realize that is an antibiotics guide? No medical professional needs to keep than on him/her all the time. Oh, and I did download it to all 4 of the PDAs. They all work well on them.

YOU-SAID>anatomy referance
It's FREEE, and in COLOR...(imagine that)
https://www.medifor.com/DistWebPage/anatomyinfo.htm

If you need to carry that in your PDA to reference it, then you shouldn't be practicing medicine in the first place.

YOU-SAID>DSM IV
at least 2 companies sells this handbook, can Palm even do anything else after putting this manual in memory? This thing is 4mB
http://www.collectivemed.com/p_dsmiv.html

In Palm's defense, I already have it in the Clie as well as the m505. I wonder, have you tried it? In fact, have you tried looking at some of the pictures with your PPC? It is annoying trying to pan the damn thing. I gave minus points for all 4 PDAs on this one.


YOU-SAID>surgery.
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/software/surgery.shtml

Again, if you need to have this in your PDA, you are in the wrong profession. For any other profession, it would only be for show, so what's the *real* use of it?


YOU-SAID>just note and picture? can you do it in color and HTML? *laughing*

I am perplexed. I am currently viewing medical PDA software in *COLOR* on all 4 PDAs. Your point?


YOU-SAID>med calculators...
ehrrr...they are a dime a dozen. got more buttons, more equations, more computational power and precission.

Half agree with you. Most programmers don't understand what doctors need in terms of calculators. That's why there are so many useless ones out there. The built in calculator is sufficient for 50% of the doctors out here.

YOU-SAID>bottom line, I hope you are not running out of space and your Palm becoming tempramental choking on all those big programs, while your patient drop dead cause you can't access your database from the memory card.

On the contrary. Surprisingly, The iPaq was the first one to run out of memory. The size of the databases are different for each architecture (PalmOS vs PPC) and PPC's databases are larger in size. Also, they use more space to store other *equivalent* programs and data than their PalmOS counterparts, so I wasn't too surprised that the iPaq was the first to run out of memory and required the assistance of the Flash card. (note, we eventually used expansion cards for all 4 PDAs).

YOU-SAID>and for gawd sake, how about in color and bigger resolution eh? you might be able to records your medical observation, and compile your own personal internet database within too.

As for creating a database, that's nonsense unless you have a server class machine with a heavy duty database engine like DB2 or Oracle. For the Palm side, I found a very useful program called HanDbase which is very small and efficient for its purpose. I coudn't find an equivalent for the PPCs.

As for color and resolution, we all like the Clie (Palm OS) better than the other 3 PDAs.

YOU-SAID>Headline : "Patient drop dead, while doctor try to juggle database on his Palm handheld accessing the right database and waiting for a calculation to finish"

In real practice, that should not happen. In fact, you shouldn't even be bringing a PDA into any type of operating procedure.

Unlike what most software developers think, we doctors need more of a schedule and patient management utility rather than some bulky reference manual in our PDAs. We always have access to *real* computers for that kind of database lookup. Those little references are more suited for students than professionals. I wish I had them when I was a student.

All in all, we are leaning toward the Clie and m505 rather than the iPaq or Jordana (too clunky for our white shirt pockets).

Our point of view....


RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 4:12:44 PM #
Most palm OS and ppc referance guide are made by the same company, try this first before software vendor like handango.

http://www.handheldmed.com/


there is also
http://www.collectivemed.com/
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/



RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 4:18:39 PM #
Palm uses FAT 12 and CE uses FAT 32, addressing 100meg is no problem for CE since it can handle up to 2T.

RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 4:24:04 PM #
Palm advantage in Medical area is price and robustness of the hardware, while weak in expandibility (I/O & mem) and screen quality.

RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 5:40:50 PM #
Yet another Anonymous Troll writes

infectious disease (try to do THAT in your palm)...

Er, on close inspection of the actual site, not only can you "do THAT" on your Palm, but the site makes a point of mentioning that while this very product runs on "all Palms", if your PocketPC doesn't happen to be an iPaq, you're just plain out of luck.

Also interesting is the little fact that this product takes up a whopping 4.9 megabytes on the iPaq versus 860K on the Palm....

Now, what were you saying?


RE: A developers view
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 6:57:44 PM #
oh my, i guess only palm has the software that fit to serve medicine.

RE: A developers view
stonemirror @ 8/22/2001 7:25:12 PM #
Another Anonymous Troll writes

oh my, i guess only palm has the software that fit to serve medicine.

No, Palm just has a lot more of it. But that's not simply the case with medical software: survey suggests that it's all software.


Is this "Palminfocenter.com or PocketPcinfocenter.com?

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/21/2001 10:30:16 PM #
Need I say more?

RE: Is this
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 5:34:21 AM #
Of course not. As an Ex-avid Palm users, I'm still checking this site on a daily basis to see what's available on the other side. I don't root for any OS, I will switch to what's the best suited my needs. For now, it's PocketPC. Sorry Folks.

Warring aside...

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 12:21:32 AM #
This was a comment about Michael Mace's reaction to WinCE 4.0.

I want to know what Michael has to say about this.

tactic

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 1:55:32 AM #
i really hope michael is just playing down wince and he is not really believing what he said!


Palm stock question

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 4:03:20 AM #
If everything is so bright and wonderful, will kindly someone competent step forward and explain to the interested audience why the Palm stocks are tumbling to free fall, like bungee jumping without rubber hose.

Falling Revenues = Falling Earnings = Falling Stock Price.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 6:56:42 AM #
nt = "no text"

Everybody's Hurting
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 9:34:47 AM #
Microsoft stock reached a peak in January of 2000 of about $120. It is now selling for about $60. In January of 1999, Compaq reached about $45, it is now selling for about $14.

Everyone is suffering from the end of the Tech Bubble. The fact that Palm is selling way off its high says much more about how over-valued it used to be than any real indication of the health of the company.

RE: Palm stock question
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 9:52:05 AM #
MS stocks may have lost 50%

Palm was once 128 US$ and now trades around 4 US$
that is not agood answer - at least not for Palm.

RE: Palm stock question
Smaug @ 8/22/2001 12:39:07 PM #
Riiight...
Considering what a vastly overhyped palm was I am not horribly surprised. No offense to the palm people which I am one off. But when it went public it experienced the startup buying thing and its stock price went up astronomically.(btw I think this 4 is post split). Thats why I bought 1000 shares of palm now and am hanging on to them. When market conditions improve...

Did anyone read?

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 6:58:06 AM #
First of all, technically, "Palm" (not Michael Mace at this point,
but it likely was... just clarifying) said that it does not see Talisker
as a threat. Talisker != PocketPC.

Let me explain what I believe to be the case:

WinCE and PocketPC are 2 different Operatng systems that share a
common kernel (and some common applications). PocketPC is
intended for handheld devices, while WinCE is used for non-handheld
embedded systems. For Palm to say that they do not see Talisker as
a threat is an odd thing to say, since PalmOS isn't currently being used
outside of the handheld space, and Talisker is not going to be used in
the handheld space.

That's like saying that Goodyear (makes tires) does not see Wagner
line of brake pads as a threat. Whether they see PPC as a threat
or not is a different story. Lets just say that many companies with very
good products have uttered "Microsoft is not a threat" as last words :)

RE: Did anyone read?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 9:37:17 AM #
Analysts don't read into the fine print like that.

Eventually, Microsoft is going to adapt Talisker into a version of the Pocket PC. It probably won't happen this year - perhaps mid-late next year (depends on how the dev cycle runs).

The analogy you made isn't correct. It's more like if Firestone suddenly made whole cars, and its tires are _still_ have better performance than Goodyear (even if they use more expensive material) and it wants to improve its tires even more by retooling the car.

Michael said "We already have support for 802.xx", but no native support for 802.11b (which is currently winning out over Bluetooth, especially for high-bandwidth apps) and "and our OS is so simple, our developers don't need a wizard." I don't think that was the point, they want to make porting easier so that Microsoft can leverage their OS app strength. That will nullify the current Palm OS app base.

RE: Did anyone read?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 9:51:09 AM #
While making porting to different versions of the OS easier is a nice goal, its still a kludgy answer to a bad flaw. It might help cut into Palm's lead in applications, but I don't see it "nullifying" it. The PPC will continue to lag behind Palm in number of apps until a PPC app can run on any maker's handheld.

I thought PDA Buzz said there will be a new version of the PPC out at the end of this year?

Ed..

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 11:20:00 AM #
What's with this white background? It's hard to read. I liked the dark grey, and the light grey was ok, but the white makes it too bright and loses contrast. Any reason for the change?

Background Color
Ed @ 8/22/2001 11:54:27 AM #
If you register, you can control the entire color scheme for the site, including the background color.

www.palminfocenter.com/register.asp

---
News Editor

RE: Backgound color
Admin @ 8/22/2001 12:12:06 PM #
I recently changed the default color scheme to silver rather than the old monochrome. The dark grey had been the site colors for the past 3 years and frankly I've grown sick of them, plus I feel the light silver colors look much better and are easier on the eyes.

But like Ed mentioned, if you don't like them you can register and change the site colors to blue/green/pink if you want.

---------
Ryan
Editor in Chief
webmaster@palminfocenter.com

RE: Ed..
Hed @ 8/22/2001 9:32:14 PM #
Thanks Ed and Ryan, I now have a high contrast font scheme AND I can view articles by default in flat mode (I did not know that you could do this!) Thanks very much.

-Andrew

Mike comments

Michael @ 8/22/2001 7:29:17 PM #
Sorry I was slow to respond to this one -- I went on vacation for two days, and naturally I got quoted.

If folks think Palm is stupid or complacent, I'm sure I won't be able to convince them otherwise. But for anyone else who's interested...

--The reporter thought Talisker was the next version of Pocket PC. I had to explain the difference to him. It's a weird world where I have to explain Microsoft's product plans to a Computerworld reporter, but there you go.

--In response to the question of whether it's a threat to Palm, or *course* I said it isn't. First, that's what I really believe -- especially because, as some people have pointed out, it's not clear if the thing called Talisker will even be included the next version of Pocket PC. Second, what would you expect me to say? If I call it a threat, the reporter writes an article saying Palm expects to go out of business. The important part of my answer was the context I included about respecting the Pocket PC guys and watching them very closely, but naturally that didn't make it into the article.

For the record, here's our overall attitude on Microsoft:

1. We are not on a jihad against the company. Unlike some others in Silicon Valley, we are glad to work with them whenever we can, and we wish them well. Microsoft has a lot of different divisions, and many of them are very glad to work with us. We're glad to reciprocate.

2. We do compete as aggressively as we can with the Pocket PC team, we deeply respect them and the work they're doing. We also think we can beat them, but we do not take that for granted.

3. As I told the reporter, I am very confused by the relationship between Talisker, Merlin, ARM, SH-3, MIPS, Stinger, and several other acronyms and code names. It's not at all clear to me which of them will work with one-another and which ones won't. I'm sure we'll get clarity on that real soon, though.

4. In the meantime, in the real world of what people are buying, I just received a sales report showing that the Clie is starting to outsell the iPaq. It seems to me that's a nice validation of the Palm platform's momentum and strength.

Michael Mace
CCO
Palm, Inc.


RE: Mike comments
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/22/2001 9:12:59 PM #
So the Computerworld reporter misunderstand/misquoted you?

---------
3. As I told the reporter, I am very confused by the relationship between Talisker, Merlin, ARM, SH-3, MIPS, Stinger, and several other acronyms and code names. It's not at all clear to me which of them will work with one-another and which ones won't. I'm sure we'll get clarity on that real soon, though.
---------

so you ARE confuse about all these? Despite the press release and reports around the net.

---------
4. In the meantime, in the real world of what people are buying, I just received a sales report showing that the Clie is starting to outsell the iPaq. It seems to me that's a nice validation of the Palm platform's momentum and strength.
----------

Can you explain this phenomenon beyond "that platform whatever momentum" corp talk?

ie. does this mean customer respond to good color screen and mp3 capability? Price? Sony's image?

and why can't Palm Inc. itself capture this "platform momentum"? (the number of 'outselling iPAQ' I take would be at the rate of 400k units/quarter. which is about what Palm Inc is selling in term of revenue)

RE: Mike comments
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/23/2001 12:06:21 AM #
Just a real quick glossary:

PROCESSORS:
Three processors being used in PocketPCs:
SH3. MIPS. StrongARM.
In general, applications must be compiled specifically for each processor or they will not be compatible.
Current PalmOS devices all use Dragonball.

Soon, both platforms will be using exclusively the StrongARM processor.

OPERATING SYSTEMS:
There are two parts: the Kernel (the skeleton) and the GUI+applications (everything else.)

Up until April of last year, the name of both parts was the same: WindowsCE 1.0, 2.0, 2.11. Both parts were developed as one.

After april, they had different names. The kernel was called "Windows CE 3.0". The GUIs were called "PocketPC" and "Handheld PC 2000" for palm-sized and keyboard devices, respectively.

Talisker is the development codename for Windows CE 4.0. Merlin is the development codename for the next iteration of PocketPC, officially titled "PocketPC 2002". The GUI+Applications half is being developed independently from the kernel.

SPECULATION:
All new PocketPC's will continue to run the Windows CE 3.0 kernel. All will use the StrongARM processor. And all will use the PocketPC 2002 (Merlin) suite of GUI+Applications.

Hope that clears away some of the fog, Mike. And yes, we do appreciate your commentary very much. Thank you!

RE: Mike comments
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/23/2001 3:17:14 AM #
compete aggresively,

care to elaborate exactly what that mean? Is that 4.0/4.5?

Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass:

Latest Comments

  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000