Comments on: Palm Doesn't View Windows CE 4.0 as a Threat
"This sounds like an incremental release of their product, and it's a lot of stuff you can do today in a Palm handheld," he said. "We already have support for 802.xx, and our OS is so simple, our developers don't need a wizard."
Article Comments
(124 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
I think they are saying that PPC4 may include a MSFT-made
RE: MS going into hardware
RE: MS going into hardware
RE: MS going into hardware
Palm had exactly the same OM model till now. They where hardware and OS producer ,competing with the OM's machines.
Not really uncommon thought.
Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
Talisker is too far in the future to worry about, agreed. But Pocket PC 2002 is what *Palm* **2001** should have been: multimedia rich on kick-ass SA chips. As great as the CLIE is, its video capabilities pale when put up against an iPaq. And with HP, Compaq, Casio, and now Toshiba and NEC coming out with SA-based PPCs running PPC 2002, Palm is going to be looking for landfills to accept many of their more-expensive units.
Integrating BeOS into PalmOS is going to take time. If Palm survives until that time, it will be astonishing. If they manage to save their business, it will be a miracle. Perhaps by addressing strictly the lower-end of the market, they can survive. But that's hardly the market they have wanted to be in.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
and the PocketPC trolls keep coming...
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
What I did find to the iPaq's benefit is that it no longer has that performance lag when doing tasks compared to a Palm-based device. I did find the Windows Explorer-based interface a bit cumbersome, though.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
gMovie-ing off the Memory Stick is slow, and doesn't have enough fps without hacks. TealMovie doesn't support sound.
iPAQs have a bigger screen (though the Clie has better resolution) and more storage.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
When there is PocketPC vs. Palm war, why people ALWAYS compares Video & Sound. They are not important! I don't buy PDA for listening to music or watching a videos. I buy it because I want to do something usefull with it ex. writing documents or keep up my meetings and todo list etc.
It doesn't matter is my PDA Palm or PocketPC it matters that there are right programs on my PDA.
Today my PDA is palm but I am seriously thinking to buy PocketPC because of the color screen! But I have to wait until PocketPC has all apps that I need and maybe then there are good colorscreen palm then...how knows
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
As for music and video not being important -- that's not important to YOU. Don't try to squeeze everyone else in the world into your limited perspective.
I have never said that either Palm or PPC should vanquish the other. In fact, I root for Palm to survive, if only to keep the entire market out of the hands of that semi-autistic sociopath, Gates, and his band of merry thieves.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
Putting a blind eyes on competitor doesn't make it disappear. The future is wireless internet on PDA for application as heavy as streaming video. PIM is an old trick, heck a $20 Royal can do that too. GO to Walmart and you would be surprise what this $20 bucks disposable Royal can do in basic PIM area.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
My point is, sooner or later somebody will come up with super cheap low end model in the range of sub $40 that will have function approaching basic palm model.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
it's more of Audio and Video API to provide capability anywhere from video conferences and business presentation all the way to rich gaming environment.
And no, "why would anybody want that" is not the answer.
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
Happy now? I am registered. I didn't point my reply to your comment...and maybe my english is not so good that I understand every word. But enough this. Let's focus on main business.
>As for music and video not being important -- that's >not important to YOU. Don't try to squeeze everyone >else in the world into your limited perspective.
No, I don't try to squeeze anything, but video and music are IMHO most important things! First I'd like to see good displays and wireless capacibility. Palm had lot to do on this area and if they are focusing on music and video first they are IMHO going to wrong way
RE: Forget CE 4, it's PPC 2002 that should scare Palm!
[Actually, I'm a die-hard Palm user who put this up to piss off all the hyper-sensitive idiots who continually whine about "trolls" everytime someone dares to mention a Pocket PC on these message boards, let alone admit that Pocket PC has some compelling features of it's own. I don't use a Pocket PC, but I can see why someone might, and I think it's a pathetic argument to complain about how "difficult" the UI is. It's not that hard; it's simply different--there are actually some very useful things about it. As I say, I prefer Palm, but I refuse to turn it into some stupid flame war. Perhaps some of you should make the same refusal.]
Say what!
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
(OK, I admit I am being harsh and very unfair. I'm sure that Mace is a very smart guy and actually *knows* everything all of us are saying. For all we know, the poor guy could be having many sleepness nights because he *does* see the threat, where others above him at Palm do not. He is paid to express the Official Palm Point of View. But that does not mean *he* believes it or agrees with it.)
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
So we've been putting off buying a new PDA because of the new devices in the pipeline, leaving a hole in the market for PPC, just like in the states. The difference in Europe is that even when the new PalmOS devices (m505, Clie) start shipping in the USA, we don't get them here yet. So in fact the "hole in the market" is lengthened, leaving more space for PPC to squeeze into.
RE: Source?
Could you tell me where you got these figures? The latest I've seen have Palm outselling Compaq in Europe, if by a narrow margin:
www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=2155
---
News Editor
RE: Say what!
RE: Say what!
All the top pda's that everybody is screaming about simply aren't available here (the Netherlands). Same complaints coming from the other side of the North Sea.
Sony? We still only have the PEG S300.
Handspring? Never seen one in a shop. Available through mail order, though.
HandEra? Never seen one. Perhaps available through mail order, I don't know. Not on www.pdashop.nl
Basically, the only Palm powered machines that are widely available are Palm machines, and they are expensive. Make that very expensive.
This leaves the door wide open for pcc's. No wonder iPaqs are selling like crazy over here. The m505 hasn't changed that. To be honest: I have never seen one outside of a shop window.
Do you really think MSFT is telling Mace what they have
RE: Do you really think MSFT is telling Mace what they have
Talk about a revolution!
:P
RE: Talk about a revolution!
Red delicious/Washington Green
The #1 thing I've always disliked about PPCs, (and I don't particularly dislike them) is that I have to work awfully hard to turn off the running applications.
I can't imagine a world without green or red apples. We want both, right? They both are goods eats, but they're a little different. One is sweeter, one is more tangy....
One plays good vids and music, and great MS Office,
one has 11,480 software titles currently available for download.
I'm not out to flame a soul, 'cause let's face it, what purpose does it serve? I think that we'll keep our Palms and our PPCs, our XBoxes and our Playstations, our Nissans and our Fords. I think there's room for everyone. Why would they vanish? I mean really? Think about it. Why not both.
RE: Talk about a revolution!
RE: Talk about a revolution!
RE: Talk about a revolution!
New feature and killer app need to be develop, they just don't keep falling from the sky on old OS. There is only so much a version of OS can do before it becomes tired.
If PIM is what all Palm is aiming for, than they better be honest and start selling $20 bucks PIM instead of $449 PIM pretending to be PDA. Customer is not stupid, they know the value of the money.
RE: Talk about a revolution!
See what I mean?
RE: See what I mean?
RE: See what I mean?
RE: News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.
that's a dang good point, nt.
RE: News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.
RE: News Flash: Surfer Doesn't View Shark as a Threat.
CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
CE is more user friendly, even more user friendly when you have been using Windows for a while. It also looks more pleasent than Palm OS. CE can do the same things that the Palm OS can do in ADDITION to playing MP3s, videos and whatnot. Slowly but surely, these PocketPCs will start matching the prices of the Palm PDAs, and guess which one the consumer is going to plan to buy.. PPC! Come on people, use your brains.. also did anybody forget to mention the Palm OS emu?
RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
And PPC has apparently abandoned the Monochrome market (as the discontinuation of the mono iPAQ shows.)
RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
CE is more user friendly, even more user friendly when you have been using Windows for a while. It also looks more pleasent than Palm OS. CE can do the same things that the Palm OS can do in ADDITION to playing MP3s, videos and whatnot. Slowly but surely, these PocketPCs will start matching the prices of the Palm PDAs, and guess which one the consumer is going to plan to buy.. PPC! Come on people, use your brains.. also did anybody forget to mention the Palm OS emu?"
Clie can play movies and mp3s. PalmOS is relatively faster accessing PIM information than PocketPC even though the processor is much slower. PalmOS is color . PalmOS has smaller expansion choices as well as more expansion choices. PalmOS has 10s of thousands of developers.
RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
PocketPC makers have consistently shown they have no interest in matching the prices of Palm OS devices. The PocketPC makers are primarily all big desktop PC makers, where just like desktop PCs, they see the market as adding more hardware features to their devices and keeping them priced at $350-$600 as the way to go. They would prefer not to instead try to beat the $200 price point below which the general population would find these devices appealing. Palm and Handspring have been successfully doing that for years now while keeping $300-$500 models as high-end.
RE: Palm vs. PPC
BUT...I will go to one platform exclusively depending on who get to the below point first:
Palm - hi-res screen with virtual grafitti area on a StrongArm processor.
PPC - small form factor (size of 505), and reasonably long battery life.
RE: PPC is unstable and buggy
I have more problems with my PPC active sync software in a month, then I've had with my Palm's hotsync software in 3 years. Then when I installed M$ update to their active sync software 3.5 it just about killed my iPaq.
Also, my iPaq WAS killed when I tried to flash the ROM with Compaq's update.
When I went to all the PPC sites to get help, the board was full of others having problems.
My Palm just works, problem free.
So which PDA is more "powerful"???
RE: CE is better than Palm OS in the first place
Normally I use the Palm and the Nokia. PocketPC is immature.
MS
Just a PPC Troll
Just like in the world of Wintel machines and Apple Computers... Palms and PPCs are 2 different breeds. They both can do PIM stuff and then some. They both are uniqe. But like Apple Computers and the Wintell Camp..they both have their die hard enthsiasts which will never stray over..EVEN if the company goes under. I mean look... there are still Newton users today.. and the Old Sharp users from the day.
So my question is.. If you love your PDA so much.. Why does it bother you when other people make statements about Palm or whatever PDA you are using? It's like the whole religion thing.. Mine is better than yours.. If if you live your religion and belive in it.. than what do you care what other people say about it... I mean unless you fear that maybe your PDA like in religion isn't the right one after all and there is something better worth listening too and using.
So please ignore us PPC Trolls... If we need to keep comming back here... than maybe we will convert, (not really)..but hey..why argue with us.
I love technolgy.. So I like to read about it.. and in so doing.. I found this post from another site I wanted to share.. Because I share the same vision.. I like PDAs.. I would like to see Palm grow into something mature that would make us PPC user envious towards the Palm. I think it's great for inovation for both parties.. and can eventually leed to better pricing for both sides of the PDA world. Palm needed PPC, ot help them realize that they can expand there OS. PPC needs Palm to help them realize that there are other ways of doing things, besides the Microsoft way.
Anyway.. Her is the post.. It's not really saying that Palms are bad.. I think it just reflects about the leadership of Palm.. Something I have never agreed with in there actions.
"The saying is true, that you need to know your competitors to know where your success will lie. This is where I belive Palm lacks. Not only by statements like the one in this thread, but by there decisions on how to run Palm. They barely know what their licensees are doing let alone the Microsoft Camp.
I don't like Amway...but I will give them this for their marketing strategy. They teach in order to maximize your success, you need to use your products, know them, and learn to love them. Once you've come that far, than it will be much easier to sale the products you use.
Carl Y. and Mace, just as well should be CEO and CCO of a Tampon company. Cause much like the Palm, I am sure they never really use any of these...(but than again.. I wouldn't be surprised if they did).. Thus is why Carl Y. is shocked that they (Palm) haven't done well in Corporate sales. It is hard to innovate technology that you don't really use, or when all you know how to use is a SIMPLE calculator."
Please feel free to thrash me.. I shared my opinion... Besides I am just a troll with his PPC enjoying and loving life with my PDA!
RE: Just a PPC Troll
RE: Just a PPC Troll
LOL! If all your doing is playing with your PocketPC and visiting Palm message boards spreading FUD, then it doesn't sound like you have much of a life!
RE: Just a PPC Troll
We do have much in common..I mean, you've posted too, so your life must be as exciting as mine. Just with my PPC I have finished everything I needed for the day..
And to the other Troll... No PPC's don't come with a spell checker, that would be an add on software. See what I mean about knowing the competition??
RE: Just a PPC Troll
Can your palm do that? (not that It will help me spell correctly in any language)
RE: Just a PPC Troll
RE: Just a PPC Troll
RE: Just a PPC Troll
We, Palm users, totally agree. So please get away from our web site and go play with your toy, leave us alone!
RE: Just a PPC Troll
RE: VERY good question!
I think you should ask this to the admin of PocketPC Passion (a top PPC site) who keeps censoring my posts that talk about SOME advantages of Palm, or complains about SOME problems with PPC. My posts are balanced, not flame inducing comments based on the fact that I have and use both a Palm and an iPaq.
Why then does he censor my posts???
the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
RE: the real sleepers are Linux and Java PDAs
Nokia Communicator 9210 use it. And Nokia is a big player in selling a lot of devices.
BTW using Communicator is very nice.
MS
Why are there Pocket PC users here?
-Davy Fields
m505 YahooGroup Moderator
Owner m505 FAQ
www.davyfields.com
RE: Why are there Pocket PC users here?
Now. repeat after me....Palm is the greatest. simplicity is what the heart seek.
....Palm is greatest...palm is the greatest...rama rama ding ding...
A developers view
D3D, or PalmOS vs Wince, it really sucks trying to develop using any API that Micorsoft [sic] has
released.
Palm supports and helps their developers. Micorsoft [sic] wants a soul before one can become an
MS developer and their APIs were developed by marketing monkeys, not engineers.
What this means is that their are thousands of PalmOS applications and only a handful of Wince
applications.
If Palm will wake up and start using the large program base as their main sellimg point, they will
bury Wince forever.
RE: A developers view
RE: A developers view
[eye rolling time]
RE: A developers view
If it sells, make money and can compete, hey it's good enough. It sure heck a lot better than that 'simplicity' stuff. Give me bloatware that work anytime rather than elegant but crippling user by dictating what is and what is not PDA need.
There is fan and advocacy, and there is delusional feedback. If Palm users keep blindly eating up what Palm dictate as "computing" needs without pushing Palm to move forward by giving correct criticism and feed back than there is nobody to blame but users themselves for helping accelerating Palm's demise.
RE: A developers view
Really? Let's take a quick look at Handango for an objective assessment...
Under "Business Applications", there are 1748 applications for Palm OS, versus 497 for PPC.
Under "Personal Productivity", there are 2084 applications for Palm OS, versus 462 for PPC.
Under "Education and Reference", there are 2697 applications for Palm OS versus 299 for PPC.
Under "Software Tools", there are 1432 applications for Palm OS versus 242 for PPC.
Under "Entertainment", there are 2449 applications listed for Palm OS versus 576 for PPC.
Under "Travel", there are 1197 applications listed for Palm OS versus 330 for PPC.
That's a total of 11,607 applications for Palm OS (not even counting the 905 Palm VII-specific programs listed) versus 2,406 for PocketPC, almost five times as many.
PocketPC is clearly lagging dramatically behind Palm OS in developer interest and support. The disparity is even greater when you consider that Palm OS application don't have the kind of CPU and form-factor-specific incompatibilities that PPC applications have to contend with.
Face it: Microsoft finds themself in the position, with respect to developers, that Apple's been mired in for years and years. Developers go where the market share is. The preponderence of application and developer support ensures continued high market share. A tough cycle to break, as Apple surely knows.
Couple that situation with Microsoft's well-known penchant for co-opting its developers' efforts and driving them out of business, and its fairly clear that Microsoft is not a company that developers are necessarily dying to partner with. In the handheld space, they don't have their monoply to lean on--there's more than one game in town.
Entertaining to see Bill and friends on the receiving end of that transaction for a change.
RE: A developers view
Palm: GBA
ppc: more than 5 of them including PALM OS
under multimedia and game entertainment:
palm: a smidgety and none is working
PPC: a truckload
under redundant whocare do we need another hex calculator:
Palm: truckload plus another bushel
PPS: get pocket excel or freebie HP49g and shut up.
under your body fat calorie calculator and your anchestor astrology:
Palm: a million plus one
PPC: just a couple
under hack master, and fix do dat just to tweak ye old simple OS
Palm: 5 million
PPC: 5 million: but almost all are skinning and personalization
etc etc...
RE: A developers view
RE: A developers view
>applications for Palm OS, versus 497 for PPC.
How many of those 1749 palm apps are crap? let say about 1500. There are gems but too often apps are just crap. Same can say for PPC 450 crap and 47 good apps
IMHO it's matters are there programs that you need for your PDA, not
"How many programs you can download to your pda?"
"10000 apps"
"Really? How many of those you use?"
"maybe 10"
RE: A developers view
Even if you assume Sturgeon's law, and say that 94% of all handheld applications are crap, there would still be five times as many "great" apps for Palm OS. That kind of reasoning cuts both ways, in the absence of any particular information to the contrary.
The facts are the facts. I can imagine it's personally upsetting to the PPC zealots out there, but there it is. Deveopers would demonstrably rather put their efforts into a Palm OS app than a PPC app.
RE: A developers view
Of course, the fact that there are 11,000 or so applications makes it more likely that you'll be able to find that application that you personally care about.
If you want to try to dispute verifiable facts--and anyone can get onto Handango and verify my results--you need to use facts to do it, not dopey rhetoric.
RE: A developers view
HOw about an app that will let me sync wirelessly while looking up something with browser.
copy paste Word with picture?
seeing HTML file? you know soemthing descent with fonts and pictures on....
RE: A developers view
There isn't a good student management software program. Classmate is the only one and that's not very good.
There isn't a free file explorer (the explorer bundled with PPC sucks) close to McFile 1.x. Resco et al make good file explorers, but they cost upwards to $10.
We can go on forever.
RE: A developers view
Consider software for medial applications. 473 titles for Palm OS versus 40, count 'em, 40, for Pocket PC.
Need an app for tracking your patients? Better hope you have a Palm. Medical reference on infection diseases? Ditto. Anatomy reference? DSM IV? Ditto, ditto. Notes on surgical knots, stitches and sutures (with pictures)? Dosage calculator? Pediatric dosage calculator? Cardiac surgery risk calculator? ICU protocols? EMS protocols? Ditto, ditto, ditto.
Not to mention that the very first three entries in the PPC listings are the same program compiled for three different "flavors" of PocketPC--SH3, MIPS and ARM. Nor that one of the applications listed under "Medical" for PocketPC is a golf scorekeeping program.
I'm happy that you can listen to Jimi while writing that novel. Hope it's a short album and a short novel or you're gonna need an extension cord.
And as far as Word compatibility is concerned, Dataviz's Documents-to-Go offers equal if not better compatibility with desktop Word than does Pocket Word. And Handspring's Blazer browser is very nice as well.
Being useful--can you PocketPC do that?
RE: A developers view
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/software.shtml
just because you don't know where to look for doesn't mean it doesn't exist. and PS, medical softwares in pocket pc is already better than Palm by now. The argument might work about 2 months ago but not now. Nobody argue about this anymore.
now let's see, can Palm do gross anatomy color database? can you carry all those super large medical applications at once? Do they even fix the SD mount beyond fat 12 yet? or are you relegated to pathetic B/W text apps while forced to pic and choose which to carry at the asme time. DO you even sync wirelesly with your palm? if you do, forget about using your medical app while it is syncing.
can you carry 100Meg medical application and open 20 of them all at once?
I thought so
and PS, all those calculator and text database can be quickly implemented if somebody saw the need. It's only another calculator/VB apps.
RE: A developers view
http://www.hopkins-abxguide.org./
anatomy referance
It's FREEE, and in COLOR...(imagine that)
https://www.medifor.com/DistWebPage/anatomyinfo.htm
DSM IV
at least 2 companies sells this handbook, can Palm even do anything else after putting this manual in memory? This thing is 4mB
http://www.collectivemed.com/p_dsmiv.html
surgery.
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/software/surgery.shtml
just note and picture? can you do it in color and HTML? *laughing*
med calculators...
ehrrr...they are a dime a dozen. got more buttons, more equations, more computational power and precission.
etc...
bottom line, I hope you are not running out of space and your Palm becoming tempramental choking on all those big programs, while your patient drop dead cause you can't access your database from the memory card.
and for gawd sake, how about in color and bigger resolution eh? you might be able to records your medical observation, and compile your own personal internet database within too.
Headline : "Patient drop dead, while doctor try to juggle database on his Palm handheld accessing the right database and waiting for a calculation to finish"
RE: A developers view
Hmmmm...I wonder why?
RE: A developers view
just because you don't know where to look for doesn't mean it doesn't exist
You've completely missed the point. Handango is a good statistical representation of the universe of handheld software. It makes no particular preference toward Palm versus PowerPC, developers post their own wares, and so, it seems reasonable to expect that it reflects the current state of affairs in the real world. The point was not that there exists no medical software for PPC, but that there's clearly much more in that category, and in every single other category, for Palm.
Remember how Microsoft harped on Apple for having so few applications for Mac OS, relatively speaking? Shoe's on the other foot now. And Microsoft, with their demonstrated developer-hostile approach to life, is not winning converts to any great degree.
can you carry 100Meg medical application and open 20 of them all at once?
No, and neither can you, unless you own some hitherto-unknown 2 gigabyte handheld. Don't be a dolt.
I think a previous anonymous troll (or the same one? who can tell?) hit it on the nose: if your most important requirement is to wirelessly sync your handheld while simultaneously listening to Jimi Hendrix, browsing the Web and writing the great American novel, I guess PowerPC is the thing for you.
As long as you don't mind the 45 minute battery life (which is the actual operational life of a Compaq iPaq with an 802.11b card)...
RE: A developers view
just because you don't know where to look for doesn't mean it doesn't exist
You've completely missed the point. Handango is a good statistical representation of the universe of handheld software. It makes no particular preference toward Palm versus PowerPC, developers post their own wares, and so, it seems reasonable to expect that it reflects the current state of affairs in the real world. The point was not that there exists no medical software for PPC, but that there's clearly much more in that category, and in every single other category, for Palm.
Remember how Microsoft harped on Apple for having so few applications for Mac OS, relatively speaking? Shoe's on the other foot now. And Microsoft, with their demonstrated developer-hostile approach to life, is not winning converts to any great degree.
can you carry 100Meg medical application and open 20 of them all at once?
No, and neither can you, unless you own some hitherto-unknown 2 gigabyte handheld. Don't be a dolt.
I think a previous anonymous troll (or the same one? who can tell?) hit it on the nose: if your most important requirement is to wirelessly sync your handheld while simultaneously listening to Jimi Hendrix, browsing the Web and writing the great American novel, I guess PowerPC is the thing for you.
As long as you don't mind the 45 minute battery life (which is the actual operational life of a Compaq iPaq with an 802.11b card)...
RE: A developers view
BTW, I am currently evaluating PDAs for this exact purpose, using them in actual practice. I was fortunate to be given this opportunity due to my programming background. I am given a Palm m505, iPaq, Clie710, and HP Jordana for evaluation. I could care less which one is selected, I just want the best solution to be used.
YOU-SAID>infectious disease (try to do THAT in your palm)
http://www.hopkins-abxguide.org./
Do you even realize that is an antibiotics guide? No medical professional needs to keep than on him/her all the time. Oh, and I did download it to all 4 of the PDAs. They all work well on them.
YOU-SAID>anatomy referance
It's FREEE, and in COLOR...(imagine that)
https://www.medifor.com/DistWebPage/anatomyinfo.htm
If you need to carry that in your PDA to reference it, then you shouldn't be practicing medicine in the first place.
YOU-SAID>DSM IV
at least 2 companies sells this handbook, can Palm even do anything else after putting this manual in memory? This thing is 4mB
http://www.collectivemed.com/p_dsmiv.html
In Palm's defense, I already have it in the Clie as well as the m505. I wonder, have you tried it? In fact, have you tried looking at some of the pictures with your PPC? It is annoying trying to pan the damn thing. I gave minus points for all 4 PDAs on this one.
YOU-SAID>surgery.
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/software/surgery.shtml
Again, if you need to have this in your PDA, you are in the wrong profession. For any other profession, it would only be for show, so what's the *real* use of it?
YOU-SAID>just note and picture? can you do it in color and HTML? *laughing*
I am perplexed. I am currently viewing medical PDA software in *COLOR* on all 4 PDAs. Your point?
YOU-SAID>med calculators...
ehrrr...they are a dime a dozen. got more buttons, more equations, more computational power and precission.
Half agree with you. Most programmers don't understand what doctors need in terms of calculators. That's why there are so many useless ones out there. The built in calculator is sufficient for 50% of the doctors out here.
YOU-SAID>bottom line, I hope you are not running out of space and your Palm becoming tempramental choking on all those big programs, while your patient drop dead cause you can't access your database from the memory card.
On the contrary. Surprisingly, The iPaq was the first one to run out of memory. The size of the databases are different for each architecture (PalmOS vs PPC) and PPC's databases are larger in size. Also, they use more space to store other *equivalent* programs and data than their PalmOS counterparts, so I wasn't too surprised that the iPaq was the first to run out of memory and required the assistance of the Flash card. (note, we eventually used expansion cards for all 4 PDAs).
YOU-SAID>and for gawd sake, how about in color and bigger resolution eh? you might be able to records your medical observation, and compile your own personal internet database within too.
As for creating a database, that's nonsense unless you have a server class machine with a heavy duty database engine like DB2 or Oracle. For the Palm side, I found a very useful program called HanDbase which is very small and efficient for its purpose. I coudn't find an equivalent for the PPCs.
As for color and resolution, we all like the Clie (Palm OS) better than the other 3 PDAs.
YOU-SAID>Headline : "Patient drop dead, while doctor try to juggle database on his Palm handheld accessing the right database and waiting for a calculation to finish"
In real practice, that should not happen. In fact, you shouldn't even be bringing a PDA into any type of operating procedure.
Unlike what most software developers think, we doctors need more of a schedule and patient management utility rather than some bulky reference manual in our PDAs. We always have access to *real* computers for that kind of database lookup. Those little references are more suited for students than professionals. I wish I had them when I was a student.
All in all, we are leaning toward the Clie and m505 rather than the iPaq or Jordana (too clunky for our white shirt pockets).
Our point of view....
RE: A developers view
there is also
http://www.collectivemed.com/
http://www.medicalpocketpc.com/
RE: A developers view
RE: A developers view
RE: A developers view
infectious disease (try to do THAT in your palm)...
Er, on close inspection of the actual site, not only can you "do THAT" on your Palm, but the site makes a point of mentioning that while this very product runs on "all Palms", if your PocketPC doesn't happen to be an iPaq, you're just plain out of luck.
Also interesting is the little fact that this product takes up a whopping 4.9 megabytes on the iPaq versus 860K on the Palm....
Now, what were you saying?
RE: A developers view
RE: A developers view
oh my, i guess only palm has the software that fit to serve medicine.
No, Palm just has a lot more of it. But that's not simply the case with medical software: survey suggests that it's all software.
Is this "Palminfocenter.com or PocketPcinfocenter.com?
RE: Is this
Warring aside...
I want to know what Michael has to say about this.
tactic
Palm stock question
Falling Revenues = Falling Earnings = Falling Stock Price.
Everybody's Hurting
Everyone is suffering from the end of the Tech Bubble. The fact that Palm is selling way off its high says much more about how over-valued it used to be than any real indication of the health of the company.
RE: Palm stock question
Palm was once 128 US$ and now trades around 4 US$
that is not agood answer - at least not for Palm.
RE: Palm stock question
Considering what a vastly overhyped palm was I am not horribly surprised. No offense to the palm people which I am one off. But when it went public it experienced the startup buying thing and its stock price went up astronomically.(btw I think this 4 is post split). Thats why I bought 1000 shares of palm now and am hanging on to them. When market conditions improve...
Did anyone read?
but it likely was... just clarifying) said that it does not see Talisker
as a threat. Talisker != PocketPC.
Let me explain what I believe to be the case:
WinCE and PocketPC are 2 different Operatng systems that share a
common kernel (and some common applications). PocketPC is
intended for handheld devices, while WinCE is used for non-handheld
embedded systems. For Palm to say that they do not see Talisker as
a threat is an odd thing to say, since PalmOS isn't currently being used
outside of the handheld space, and Talisker is not going to be used in
the handheld space.
That's like saying that Goodyear (makes tires) does not see Wagner
line of brake pads as a threat. Whether they see PPC as a threat
or not is a different story. Lets just say that many companies with very
good products have uttered "Microsoft is not a threat" as last words :)
RE: Did anyone read?
Eventually, Microsoft is going to adapt Talisker into a version of the Pocket PC. It probably won't happen this year - perhaps mid-late next year (depends on how the dev cycle runs).
The analogy you made isn't correct. It's more like if Firestone suddenly made whole cars, and its tires are _still_ have better performance than Goodyear (even if they use more expensive material) and it wants to improve its tires even more by retooling the car.
Michael said "We already have support for 802.xx", but no native support for 802.11b (which is currently winning out over Bluetooth, especially for high-bandwidth apps) and "and our OS is so simple, our developers don't need a wizard." I don't think that was the point, they want to make porting easier so that Microsoft can leverage their OS app strength. That will nullify the current Palm OS app base.
RE: Did anyone read?
I thought PDA Buzz said there will be a new version of the PPC out at the end of this year?
Ed..
Background Color
www.palminfocenter.com/register.asp
---
News Editor
RE: Backgound color
But like Ed mentioned, if you don't like them you can register and change the site colors to blue/green/pink if you want.
---------
Ryan
Editor in Chief
webmaster@palminfocenter.com
RE: Ed..
-Andrew
Mike comments
If folks think Palm is stupid or complacent, I'm sure I won't be able to convince them otherwise. But for anyone else who's interested...
--The reporter thought Talisker was the next version of Pocket PC. I had to explain the difference to him. It's a weird world where I have to explain Microsoft's product plans to a Computerworld reporter, but there you go.
--In response to the question of whether it's a threat to Palm, or *course* I said it isn't. First, that's what I really believe -- especially because, as some people have pointed out, it's not clear if the thing called Talisker will even be included the next version of Pocket PC. Second, what would you expect me to say? If I call it a threat, the reporter writes an article saying Palm expects to go out of business. The important part of my answer was the context I included about respecting the Pocket PC guys and watching them very closely, but naturally that didn't make it into the article.
For the record, here's our overall attitude on Microsoft:
1. We are not on a jihad against the company. Unlike some others in Silicon Valley, we are glad to work with them whenever we can, and we wish them well. Microsoft has a lot of different divisions, and many of them are very glad to work with us. We're glad to reciprocate.
2. We do compete as aggressively as we can with the Pocket PC team, we deeply respect them and the work they're doing. We also think we can beat them, but we do not take that for granted.
3. As I told the reporter, I am very confused by the relationship between Talisker, Merlin, ARM, SH-3, MIPS, Stinger, and several other acronyms and code names. It's not at all clear to me which of them will work with one-another and which ones won't. I'm sure we'll get clarity on that real soon, though.
4. In the meantime, in the real world of what people are buying, I just received a sales report showing that the Clie is starting to outsell the iPaq. It seems to me that's a nice validation of the Palm platform's momentum and strength.
Michael Mace
CCO
Palm, Inc.
RE: Mike comments
---------
3. As I told the reporter, I am very confused by the relationship between Talisker, Merlin, ARM, SH-3, MIPS, Stinger, and several other acronyms and code names. It's not at all clear to me which of them will work with one-another and which ones won't. I'm sure we'll get clarity on that real soon, though.
---------
so you ARE confuse about all these? Despite the press release and reports around the net.
---------
4. In the meantime, in the real world of what people are buying, I just received a sales report showing that the Clie is starting to outsell the iPaq. It seems to me that's a nice validation of the Palm platform's momentum and strength.
----------
Can you explain this phenomenon beyond "that platform whatever momentum" corp talk?
ie. does this mean customer respond to good color screen and mp3 capability? Price? Sony's image?
and why can't Palm Inc. itself capture this "platform momentum"? (the number of 'outselling iPAQ' I take would be at the rate of 400k units/quarter. which is about what Palm Inc is selling in term of revenue)
RE: Mike comments
PROCESSORS:
Three processors being used in PocketPCs:
SH3. MIPS. StrongARM.
In general, applications must be compiled specifically for each processor or they will not be compatible.
Current PalmOS devices all use Dragonball.
Soon, both platforms will be using exclusively the StrongARM processor.
OPERATING SYSTEMS:
There are two parts: the Kernel (the skeleton) and the GUI+applications (everything else.)
Up until April of last year, the name of both parts was the same: WindowsCE 1.0, 2.0, 2.11. Both parts were developed as one.
After april, they had different names. The kernel was called "Windows CE 3.0". The GUIs were called "PocketPC" and "Handheld PC 2000" for palm-sized and keyboard devices, respectively.
Talisker is the development codename for Windows CE 4.0. Merlin is the development codename for the next iteration of PocketPC, officially titled "PocketPC 2002". The GUI+Applications half is being developed independently from the kernel.
SPECULATION:
All new PocketPC's will continue to run the Windows CE 3.0 kernel. All will use the StrongARM processor. And all will use the PocketPC 2002 (Merlin) suite of GUI+Applications.
Hope that clears away some of the fog, Mike. And yes, we do appreciate your commentary very much. Thank you!
RE: Mike comments
care to elaborate exactly what that mean? Is that 4.0/4.5?
Latest Comments
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
MS going into hardware
This will be funny!