Comments on: Nintendo Cracks Down on Game Clones

Ardiri.com has removed Donkie Kung, Donkie Kung Jr, and Maryo Bros from its site after Nintendo sent it a cease and desist order. Nintendo said these games "are clear violations of Nintendo's rights in the characters and audio visual works protected by U.S. and international copyrights and trademarks".
Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (93 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

BIG bummer

palmcoder @ 12/4/2001 12:03:21 PM #

man, that stinks. Aaron's games were loads of fun.

RE: BIG bummer
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 7:46:52 PM #
I can understand the intellectual property rights issues in this case but notwithstanding that legal stuff, it's a real crying shame that these games have got to be discontinued. They are fantastic!

Keep up the good work Aaron - hope to see more stuff in the future. I'm sure if you come up with something original it will be a hit, since you have both the name and also quality.

P.S. Downloaded Lemmings the other day and it is GREAT!


RE: BIG bummer
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 8:04:08 PM #
Ardiri really knows how be an offensive twit. He writes an emulator that steals from Nintendo. He releases the Liberty virus. He keeps putting out games that are violations of copyrights of other companies. He releases HaCkMe - a program designed to let anyone use programs registered to other users without paying for them. I hope he gets sued and made an example of what happens to thieves.

He hasn't even taken down the files - they can be downloaded from dozens of links on the Net. He continues to ignore the wanings he has received.

http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/download/palm/dkjr.zip

http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/download/palm/dkung.zip

http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/download/palm/maryobros.zip



RE: BIG bummer
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 9:03:45 PM #
Obviously you are the twit. Michael Ethetton of Gambit is the author of the GameBoy emulator, not Aaron. The Liberty virus, as you describe it, only effects Palms if you combine the Liberty emulator with a Liberty "WAREZ" hack. So you must be a hacker or a warez pirate. You have some emotional problems since you stalk Aaron from web page to page. You fit the facts to suit your reality. Get a life, loser!

RE: BIG bummer
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 3:35:44 AM #
Actually, Ardiri did much of the work on Liberty. Get your facts straight before you resort to name-calling.

RE: BIG bummer
ardiri @ 12/5/2001 3:42:29 AM #
Actually, Ardiri did much of the work on Liberty. Get your facts straight before

only Mike and myself know exactly how much work we put into it seperately, but, i can tell you this. Mike put over one year of effort into it (writing the core emulator), and, i put around three to four months into it (providing the user interface/interaction). in my books, that tells me Mike did more :) i didn't write the emulator - i just provided the shell for the users, and some cool features such as color tweaking and custom controls. so, you are wrong again...

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

A little defensive aren't you, Ardiri
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 4:56:04 AM #
> Actually, Ardiri did much of the work on Liberty. > Get your facts straight before you resort to name-
> calling.

RE: BIG bummer
Posted by: ardiri @ 12/5/2001 3:42:29 AM

only Mike and myself know exactly how much work we put into it seperately, but, i can tell you this. Mike put over one year of effort into it (writing the core emulator), and, i put around three to four months into it (providing the user interface/interaction). in my books, that tells me Mike did more :) i didn't write the emulator - i just provided the shell for the users, and some cool features such as color tweaking and custom controls. so, you are wrong again...

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

_______________________________________________________

The original response stated simply that you did MUCH OF THE WORK ON LIBERTY. Not all. Not that you coded the emulator component of this (fairly useless) emulator program. I'd suggest you count to ten before you send off yet another message to this thread, confirming what an arrogant, self-serving person you are. I realize you are young and have a lot to learn about deportment and maturity, but if you continue commenting in public forums like this in such an offensive tone, you will only damage yourself and others around you like Mike and poor Rayne.

THINK before you speak, Ardiri.

I hope Nintendo comes down hard on you for ripping off their games all these years. It's time you paid for what you've been doing.

RE: BIG bummer
Mojo @ 12/5/2001 8:55:16 AM #
Uh...

I just read the thread again and have to say I am confused. I didn't see Aaron's response negatively or immature. People were having a discussion where he was the subject and he added his thoughts to help clear things. I think that is his right to do so.

However after reading your response to him... I view it as the lesser. I also have to wonder what your point was and if your only purpose was to find a bridge and wait under it. Oh well.

I am sad to see the games go and I wish him luck in the future.

RE: BIG bummer
mattyparanoid @ 12/5/2001 1:31:45 PM #
I am glad I am not the only one who thinks that Mr. Ardiri does not seem to be the most professional, ethical or mature person around. I was beginning to think it was only me who got the impression that he presents himself, at least in my opinion, as unprofessional.

With all do respect to him as a Palm Developer, my negative opinion of him is derived from these things I have seen on forums and in his Palm Software releases.

1. He releases the Liberty Warez Trojan. I think I followed this drama as it unfolded and have most of the facts straight. He released it (or allowed it to get out), it was malicious. These are facts. *LAME*

2. He rips off other companies IP and makes cash off of it, then turns around and rails against "warez" and the pirating of his IP. *Hypocrite*

3. Again, he rips off other companies IP, makes cash off of it, complains about crackers and pirating, then turns around and releases (or again, lets slip), a piece of software that has at least some function for the warez crowd (HackMe). **Hypocrite*

4. His software licensing procedures are ridiculous. As are his explanations for why he does them this way. I licensed Lemmings, (hmmm, do you own the IP to be making money off of this piece of software?). Good game BTW, and again I congratulate him on releasing a fun game, but the hoops I had to jump through to install it were IMHO just plain stupid, and overkill for a $10 game. Try licensing it, maybe it is just me, but I believe in making things easy for the consumer. When I posted a comment I got a spin-control response telling me it was to make it easier for me, and that I should like it better this way. Yeah Right. *Lame and without regard for the consumer, as well as idiotic, don't tell me what is best for me*

5. Lastly if you follow the forums on some of the Palm sites as I do, you will see posts from him sometimes. While sometimes he appears to be cordial and polite, other times he comes out as mean, immature, selfish and unable to fathom that his way of thinking could possibly be seen as wrong. Again, this is just my opinion. *Sometimes Lame and unprofessional*


RE: BIG bummer
fleegle @ 12/5/2001 5:38:29 PM #
The only times I see Ardiri being mean is when someone attacks him first just like anyone else would do.

The immaturity comes from the ones who hide under the "I. M. An-ass-ymous" name and attack others. These people have the intellect of a fungus.



The real Aaron Ardiri...
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/6/2001 4:27:20 AM #
You obviously don't know Ardiri like I do. He is a pompous, rude, untrustworthy, immature man-child who regularly hangs out with the WAREZ crowd, despite his public claims that stealing software is wrong.

Ardiri's weak, hippocritical defense of why he released HaCkMe and his lies about the Liberty crack release show more about his lack of morals than anything I - or anyone else here - could say. The facts speak for themselves.

Nintendo does still sell these games

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 12:08:14 PM #
Im sure at least some of those games are still sold on the GameBoy, such as in the Game & Watch Gallery collections, so im not surprised Nintendo doesn't approve of these unofficial copies.

RE: Nintendo does still sell these games
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 1:20:13 PM #
so, i guess you can play them now on Liberty :) but, we all know a native version is much nicer as you can customize the sounds, speeds etc without the overhead of emulation.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/
You just don't know when to quit, do you, Ardiri?
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 8:25:54 PM #
Keep pissing Nintendo off and you're done. Over. Keep it up. Please.

so I guess you'll be carrying your palm and GB everywhere?
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/7/2001 3:50:34 PM #
this is pretty selfish from nintendo...
if theyre not licensing to the palm...
dont let the games die...

i have the idea to sell a belt to carry my palm and game boy =P

RE: Nintendo does still sell these games
Elfen @ 12/21/2001 4:14:40 PM #
Nintendo does not sell these games anymore; the only way to get them is to dive into the haystacks of ebay, loot, and other online auctions/used equipment sites or to vintage & antique game stores, and electronic/ham fests. Chances are you out of 10,000 attempts you make to hunt it down- you will find it at a price to much to pay for.

Secondly- Most of these older games came from their arcade division, for the most part- the old arcade games are either warehoused somewhere or in some junk pile becuase there is no one that can fix them once they die.

Nintendo takes this stuff seriously

jayhawk88 @ 12/4/2001 12:15:19 PM #
Nintendo has a long and storied history of fiercly protecting their "characters" and other IP property, going all the way back to the draconian licensing 3rd-party developers had to submit to when making NES games.

The reason for this, of course, is that Nintendo knows it is their character's that make them money, not the hardware. This is also why you don't see Mario, Donkey Kong, and Metroid on any other consoles anymore. These days it's much more important to differentiate yourself from the pack with software, rather than console hardware, a lesson Sega learned the hard way.

Serves him right

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 12:18:54 PM #
The guy is a f**king thief. I think it's pretty obvious the games are a clear copyright violation. They are exactly the same as the Nintendo versions and he has been making money on them for quite some time with no licensing from Nintendo. I hope they sue his dumb ass.

RE: Serves him right
palmcoder @ 12/4/2001 12:27:52 PM #
apparently you don't need half a brain or opposable digits to post "insightful" remarks on PIC.

RE: Serves him right
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 12:28:59 PM #
Hey ,
Relax a bit ...
Dont take it so personal...

I think you are right when you say:
"the games are a clear copyright violation. They are exactly the same as the Nintendo versions "

But , There are better ways of getting your point accross...
Im sure there will be some repercussions for this ...

Yoda...=o)

RE: Serves him right
Ed @ 12/4/2001 12:42:58 PM #
"I hope they sue his dumb ass."

People would take you more seriously if you didn't talk like you were in middle school.

It's very unlikely that Nintendo will take any further action. They sent Mr. Ardiri a cease and desist order. He has now ceased and desisted. To Nintendo's mind, this issue is probably over. The money involved is almost certainly inconsequential to Nintendo's perspective. They are just doing what they believe the law requires and protecting their copyrighted material.

I'm sorry to see these games go. I wish instead they had offered him a licence to the products and let him continue to sell them and pay a royalty, which would benefit them both and all the Palm users who would like to play these games.

---
News Editor

the issue is over.
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 1:39:06 PM #
It's very unlikely that Nintendo will take any further action. They sent Mr. Ardiri a cease and desist order. He has now ceased and desisted. To Nintendo's mind, this issue is probably over. The money involved is almost certainly inconsequential to Nintendo's perspective. They are just doing what they believe the law requires and protecting their copyrighted material.

i just received an email from Nintendo saying:

"Thank you for your prompt response and your cooperation in resolving this matter swiftly."

unfortunately, the real issue here is that if you want to create a clone - dont be 100% perfect with it! :) personally, i understand companies like Nintendo getting upset if our games made them look bad. the fact that they are perfect replicas should not cause them to get all upset, in many cases, companies license our applications when they find the "perfect" implementation. that is how the official LodeRunner game came to the Palm, introduced by PocketExpress around a year ago.


// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

Nintendo was just made aware you're still offering the games
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 8:32:43 PM #
Ever been sued, Mr. Ardiri? You will.

RE: Serves him right
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 1:21:38 AM #
Are you stupid? Ardiri isn't offering them anymore.

The games are STILL available for download from ardiri.com
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 2:11:30 AM #
He has left all download links intact. Nintendo should sue him, drag him into an extended court battle and bankrupt ardiri.com. He obviously has no scruples whatsoever.

RE: Serves him right
ardiri @ 12/5/2001 2:50:46 AM #
He has left all download links intact. Nintendo should sue him, drag him into an extended court battle and bankrupt ardiri.com. He obviously has no scruples whatsoever.

check the links again bozo - our files are stored on seperate servers, NOT on ardiri.com. the files have been removed from our mirrors. have you ever thought that it does take a while to remove stuff from the Internet (heck, its not always possible). i am sure that if you type the PGHQ download link, you'll find it too - ever heard of caching?

we took the relevant steps to remove the application from our website and from sale - now everyone except idiots like you are happy. did your mother drop you as a kid or something? or did your dad to unspeakable things to you? seek councelling. i am sure most people here have better things to do than listen to a stupid idiot complain about things like this. get a life.. big time.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

Your true character is showing again, Mr. Ardiri
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 3:06:08 AM #
The only "bozo" here is waiting for you in your bathroom mirror. Go take a look at him.

You truly deserve to get sued for the incredible arrogance and contempt you continue to display toward owners of copyrighted software. Essentially every program you have ever released (Liberty, HaCkMe, Donkie Kung, Donkie Kung Jr, Maryo Bros, etc.) either promotes stealing software or is in fact stolen from a genuine developer. This is a sad legacy for someone who should have been able to do better.

RE: Serves him right
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 5:11:48 AM #
Care to make a public apology to Nintendo and all Palm users, Aaron?

RE: Serves him right
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/7/2001 3:57:09 PM #
LOL... i should license this!

its really sad to watch people argue about something theyre not even sure what it means...

leave Mr ardiri alone...

and dont buy Nintendo products... they mess you up...
If youre getting paid for this(by nintendo that is)
then dont mind me... hehe.

Why does this remind me of "Nintendo sues the world"
back to the old happy days of emulation? =P

It doesn't take Einstein.....

Davy @ 12/4/2001 12:49:35 PM #
to realize that the products were rip off. If he'd just switched the names around, and had slightly different graphics, Nintendo would have never cared. The problem is, he blatantly copied them, and taking a picture of a painting and selling it as your own, even if you claim you never touched the original is also illegal (Bad analogy, so sue me). Lemmings(also by Ardiri) is fun, but that's not gonna go either. Ardiri needs to make new games, not copies.

RE: It doesn't take Einstein.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 12:56:02 PM #
I agree...he could've made the games similiar but not that similiar...he was just dumb...

RE: It doesn't take Einstein.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 12:56:02 PM #
yeah dumb...he is one of the best palm developers...but you have seen what he has done before...we need something original.

RE: It doesn't take Einstein.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 1:58:27 PM #
"dumb" huh? Mr. Ardiri is one of the best Palm developers out there.

RE: It doesn't take Einstein.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 2:54:41 PM #
the thing is Nintendo is still making games based on those characters ...

RE: It doesn't take Einstein.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 11:37:56 AM #
one of the best developers? Don't make me laugh. One of the most outspoken developers, yes. Helpful, sometimes. Arrogant, always.

RE: It doesn't take Einstein.....
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 10:47:57 PM #
If he was one of the best developers, he wouldn't be spending all his time doing totally derivative works. Come on ! Make something that draws Nitendo's interest because they want to put it on THEIR systems!

Coming soon from Nintendo:

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 12:53:29 PM #
Donkie Kung, Donkie Kung Jr, and Maryo Bros for the Palm OS!

RE: Coming soon from Nintendo:
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 2:00:41 PM #
now that would be FUNNY!

RE: Coming soon from Nintendo:
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 3:22:40 PM #
Actually, this is exactly what I'd like to see. Nintendo could make a deal to "aquire" these games and sell them under the Nintendo name. This would be a great head start to get into the PDA game market.

RE: Coming soon from Nintendo:
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 7:18:46 PM #
Why would Nintendo wan't to get into the PDA market? That would only take away from Gameboy sales, besides the Gameboy variants of these games are considerably better than the old hand-held games ardiri copied.

RE: Coming soon from Nintendo:
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/7/2001 4:03:59 PM #
um... read above...
now thats sarcasm!
=P
get a life man =P

Ardiri rules!

I agree with NINTENDO

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 1:02:07 PM #
The games mentioned were blatant rip-offs.
Very lucky that NINTENDO didn't demand profits made off the games plus damages.

The morale of the story is: if you want to make a clone of a game seek a legitimate license. Otherwise spend your time making original games.

We're seeing way too many BREAKOUT and TETRIS clones. It's clear that the programmers can write code to create these clones but where is the originality? Sadly lacking.


RE: I agree with NINTENDO
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 6:48:18 PM #
We're seeing way too many BREAKOUT and TETRIS clones. It's clear that the programmers can write code to create these clones but where is the originality? Sadly lacking.

the tetris company has argued that it has a patent on the look and feel of the game - clones themselves are 100% legal.

http://pineight.8m.com/tetris.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2430/tetris.html

there are some arguments specific to the Tetris game, an interesting read if i say so myself.


// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

RE: I agree with NINTENDO
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 11:50:36 AM #
I tend to agree with Nintendo Too. If you had come up with a totally original game and THEY had come up with a clone of it, Wouldn't YOU be seeking legal action against them?

As to them NOT putting out the games, the Mario Brothers game just came out for the Gameboy Advance as a secondary game to the rehashed SNES Mario2 game. So technically they have a CURRENT copyright and are CURRENTLY making money off of the product.

Cloning games has been a problem since the seventies - I remember playing asteroids and galaxian clones on the TRS-80. Clones always make money ... for a while. Then the market dries up. The first five or so are BIG news. After that... Either the legitimate title hits the platform, or the platform itself looses users as they move to the next big thing.

Granted they probably WON'T make games for the Palms or PPCs. And I doubt that many would-be Palm players will go run out and get a GBA just to play their missing games. But if Nintendo doesn't stamp out clones, they MAY loose the rights to the characters themselves - the same way corps have to protect brand names. (You don't xerox items, you copy them on a Xerox(TM)).

I'd rather see some original games that go FROM the Palm platform OUTWARD to the PPCs, PCs, and consoles. A good puzzle game COULD do that!



ARDIRI = RIP-OFF

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 1:05:25 PM #
It's just not the games that were mentioned in the Nintendo desist-and-cease letter, but just about every game on the Ardiri site.

I think ID software is going to have a cow over the Ardiri Deity3D game. Why does it look like DOOM? The gun, the marine look the same. Heck the walls and everything else do as well.

My recommendation to Ardiri: You guys have great talent as good coders, but it's time to get a real game designer.

RE: ARDIRI = RIP-OFF
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 1:10:23 PM #
I think ID software is going to have a cow over the Ardiri Deity3D game. Why does it look like DOOM? The gun, the marine look the same. Heck the walls and everything else do as well.

clones are 100% legal. however, it is out understanding (and, Nintendo's brute force approach) that using characters is not legal. Nintendo made a lot of game and watch games in the past, however, their main point of focus here was the games specifically using their copyrighted characters Donkey Kong and Mario, the italian. you will find that our other game and watch games are not violating on Nintendo's intellectual property - and, they still are available for the Palm.

with Deity 3D, for the prototype we used some ID graphics - but, you'll find that there is not a demo available for you to try.. all you see are screen shots - for all you know, it could be vapourware.

as for being DOOM - well, thats a matter of interpretation. the engine has nothing to do with doom (different 3D engine design for example) - it just looks that way. for your information, we are actually discussing using our engine to bring the official DOOM to the Palm Computing Platform with the people who *own* the rights to DOOM on handheld devices.

these types of negotiations dont take place - if you dont have anything to show. we have a demo to show, and we are in discussions with them right now. ID does not have the distribution rights for DOOM on mobile devices, they licensed this off.

however, this brings up an interesting point. if you think you are a great graphic artist - contact us! we are looking for graphically artistic people to help out with greating new graphics and great games. you can contact me directly. one of your first tasks will be developing graphics for a 3D engine (ie: deity).

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

ARDIRI as Palm Consultant?
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 1:19:50 PM #
I think Palm should bring in Ardiri as a Consultant (if they haven't already). Give him 100,000 options for a 1 year consulting gig. This guy is talented and ruthless enough to help them take on the likes of MSFT. Palm could sure use some help in the areas of "talented and ruthless".

RE: ARDIRI = RIP-OFF
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 4:11:43 PM #
Aaron's alway's been one of the best Palm platform coder's around.

How about Squiddy Kong and Feebles, the effeminate Englishman as substitute characters?

:)

RE: ARDIRI = RIP-OFF
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 11:26:56 PM #
DOOM is open source, released under the GPL. It doesn't matter if they ripped off DOOM.

RE: ARDIRI = RIP-OFF
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 5:02:49 AM #
Get a game designer TOO !!

RE: ARDIRI = RIP-OFF
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 7:00:32 AM #
Only Doom's source is GPL'd, the graphics, sounds etc. in the main WAD are still copyrighted to id software.

a great lost

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 1:35:40 PM #
Real sad to hear that, but you knew it was coming. The games were great, a little pricy, but good. I hope maybe you can make clones that do not look like the nintendo version but same concept, or will that be wrong too?
PDANature - http://Pdan.has.it - you hourly refreshed news, discussions, reviews, commentarys, features, an whatnot! Check out PDANature! http://pdan.has.it

RE: a great lost
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 2:00:53 PM #
"Pricy"? I guess you can now pay Nintendo and/or others $29.95-$39.95 for a GameBoy cart. Or you can pay $49.95-$69.95 for your PC titles.

Palm games are usually inexpensive for what you get (hours and hours of entertainment), in a portable format.

From what I've seen, the original titles on the Palm platform usually don't sell well. People like familar titles.

Is PacMan Next?

kevdo @ 12/4/2001 1:48:08 PM #
I wonder if the PacMan clone for the Palm will be next? Palm has been using that game to show off the game features of the m505 on their website!

Sure glad that I registered Mayro Bros already (and Galax and Froggy and PacMan, etc.).

Seems to me that Nintendo could make some real easy money taking Adiri's port and releasing it as a commercial version.

RE: Is PacMan Next?
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 1:52:49 PM #
Seems to me that Nintendo could make some real easy money taking Adiri's port and releasing it as a commercial version.

well, if Nintendo was interested in licensing, we could bring a whole suit of Game and Watch games to the Palm (and, PPC, EPOC, etc) and Nintendo could slap them in retail channels and make a killing off them. the problem here is that any PDA comes as a direct competitor to the GameBoy environment :) i dont see this happening for a while, but, if someone from Nintendo reads this - contact us if your interested :)

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

RE: Is PacMan Next?
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 2:12:15 PM #
What about Lemmings ? Do u have the official license to do the Palm version ?

RE: Is PacMan Next?
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 2:15:21 PM #
What about Lemmings? Do u have the official license to do the Palm version?

the demo is available, free of charge - and, we are still pursuing the license (with help from a special company) - more on the status of Lemmings on the Palm will be disclosed as it is available.

there are over 120 levels in the original.. should be fun to create those levels :) if it was to be released officially, expect it on an SD card or similar.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

Lemmings SD card
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 4:15:56 PM #
I hope you will also have an option for those of us who are still extremely happy with their IIxe....

all silly u are

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 2:55:12 PM #
eys this guy copy game and code them for palm .
But i think he is one of the best palm game programmer !!!!


And it's ok to play old games on palm !


RE: all silly u are
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/24/2001 11:14:56 PM #
Hehe, Are you only partialy accostumed to English? You can you some online translators to help you out.

But if you are ALL English, And have went to school for years, Im Sorry for making a fool of yourself:(

game boy emulator

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 3:31:10 PM #
What does this mean for the game boy emulator?

A tweak here...

Coyote67 @ 12/4/2001 3:59:43 PM #
Ok, so you can't use the donkey kong characters or blah blah. Why not just change the character names and looks a bit? Would that get nintendo off his back?
I do think its pretty stupid (Don't flame me for this) to release a product that uses characters that are an intelectual property of someone else. Also you can't say that they were written in a totally clear enviroment because original code blah blah or not, it was still made to show Nintendo characters. If I write a startrek game without licensing the property, paramount would chew my ass off. Same goes for writing a new book of the lord of the rings saga. Now if I wrote something that was inspired and doesn't use any protected intellectual entities, thats fine, Microsoft has been doing it since its birth.

---------------------------------------
When you find yourself in the company of a halfling and an ill-tempered Dragon, remember, you do not have to outrun the Dragon...you just have to outrun the halfling.
RE: A tweak here...
ardiri @ 12/4/2001 6:50:48 PM #
Ok, so you can't use the donkey kong characters or blah blah. Why not just change the character names and looks a bit? Would that get nintendo off his back?

well, i know i probably wont get a response from Nintendo Legal on this :) but, i asked this question. actually, we could roll out a suit of game and watch games with BETTER graphics than the original(s) and call them other names - but, the gameplay could be similar (can you patent a left-right-jump-switch game?). this might just be an idea we'll look into - and, do it across the board for our games.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

RE: A tweak here...
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 10:36:04 AM #
You should have told Nintendo that these are "spoofs" or "parodies" of their games. That would have left their legal folks running in circles for weeks.

Too easy NINTENDO

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 5:08:15 PM #
I think it's too easy that NINENDO claims that their copyright is violated. But they need to understand that there are millions of people wishing to play old NINTENDO games on platforms other than NES or GameBoy.
If NINTENDO insists on making consumers buy their hardware to play NINTENDO titles, they might see a possibility of being isolated from the game world just like SEGA.
Hey, NINTENDO, you must be open.
If you claim the violation, you must make NINTENDO games for PalmOS.


RE: Too easy NINTENDO
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/7/2001 4:08:36 PM #
now he's got a point...

Geesh, they aren't rip-offs they filled gap!!!

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 10:09:32 PM #
For those of us who like Donkey kong and the like these games filled a neccessary gap, and if nintendo has no plans to release versions of they're own they should leave this alone.....

I don't believe these games are a violation of "N''s copyrights because they weren't competing with Nintendo. I think they should fight nintendo on this issue

RE: Geesh, they aren't rip-offs they filled gap!!!
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/6/2001 12:57:47 AM #
You don't know the first thing about copyright law. Someone can own a copyright and not compete on a certan OS. "Fillling a gap" is not a legal defense.

If the guy would have just made games with similar gameplay but different graphics there wouldn't have been a problem. But no, he had to make the things looks like trademarked characters and copyrighted images. It's his own fault really.

Even a basic understanding of intellectual property law would have prevented this whole thing. He'd still have cool games, and you'd quit your pathetic misinformed whining.


I support the Developer NOT nintendo

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 10:11:40 PM #
nintendo would sue anyone and try to fight for anything. Sattire is completely protected by the law as well, what one would call a rip of can just as easily be argued to be a playful expression of ones artistic abilities. Cartoons, Games, Comics, Speaking out and objecting to anyone or anything is completely protected by the law.

nintendo uses its name and legal might to scare people especially the small people and developers in the world into caving in.

i feel bad for this situation and nintendo seriously needs to take a dump on its self. carma sux... but it will get its own in the end.

RE: I support the Developer NOT nintendo
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 7:51:06 AM #
You are a gen-u-wine legal genius. You should be practicing in the Supreme Court of your land...

NOT...

NINTENDO is in the right. Ardiri is making blatant copies of NINTENDO's characters and programs. It is in the right of NINTENDO to protect their franchise.

You got a problem with this?

You guys just don't get it

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/4/2001 11:49:46 PM #
Nintendo is sueing Ardiri because of that gameboy emulator: Liberty. Obviously Nintendo can't find a way to stop the distribution of Liberty, so they are sueing Ardiri over those miserable donkie kung games.

I always believe that emulator should remain free, making money off other peoples' invention is wrong. Ardiri should only charge money for his own original games (which he doesn't have), those game and watch titles and that gameboy emulator should be given out free of charge.

You'll attraction a lawsuit if you sell an emulator, you'll be better off giving it out for free. Look at Bleem! the PSX emulator, they're recently bankrupted by Sony due to the lengthy lawsuit they faced.



RE: You guys just don't get it
ardiri @ 12/5/2001 2:59:22 AM #
I always believe that emulator should remain free, making money off other peoples' invention is wrong. Ardiri should only charge money for his own original games (which he doesn't have), those game and watch titles and that gameboy emulator should be given out free of charge.

even if the games were free, they would be infringing on Nintendo's intellectual property rights - just selling them doesn't make them illegal. emulators have been proven to be 100% legal, heck, how many Palm developers use an emulator for development? (nearly all of em)! Bleem! actually won their lawsuit against Sony - however, it did cost them $2M.

did i miss the point that we actually removed the applications to meet Nintendo's requirements? what are you fighting this for? surely got nothing better to do.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

RE: You guys just don't get it
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 9:55:22 AM #
Of course Palm emulator is legal, its made by Palm themselves. An emulator is only illegal when its created by a third party without license and SELLING them.

You don't see authors of other gameboy emulator getting their ass sue by Nintendo simply because their emulators are free.

RE: You guys just don't get it
ardiri @ 12/5/2001 10:40:45 AM #
You don't see authors of other gameboy emulator getting their ass sue by Nintendo simply because their emulators are free

you miss the point here, first of all, there is no sueing going on. second of all, they were referring to the games that specifically used their trademarked characters Donkey Kong and Mario, the italian. their discussions have had NOTHING to do with the gameboy emulator - this discussion it not between Nintendo and ardiri.com, it is between Nintendo and gambitstudios (the owners of liberty). if you want to know more on the status of that, then i suggest you contact Gambitstudios with your queries - it is not ardiri.com's business here.

and, to repeat myself no one is sueing here - it was a standard "cease and desist" notification which, we complied to. if we objected to this, and, decided to bring lawyers into the battle (lawyers are the only winners here), then there would be a lawsuit of some shape and form.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/

Characters are Nintendo's Most Valuable Asset.

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 1:30:41 AM #
You all know the PS2, XBOX is out right? $299. Well Nintendo rolled theirs out the GameCube... guess what it costs $199. Nintendo is losing tons of money by selling the hardware, but their strategy is to GET people to buy the GameCube cheaply to play their FAVORITE Nintendo characters ie.. Pikachu, Mario, Luigi, DonkeyAss, etc.. this fact is well known.

GameCube sucks anyways, looks stupid and it's purple.

RE: Characters are Nintendo's Most Valuable Asset.
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 8:07:07 AM #
"looks stupid and it's purple"


Get the black one then.

Nintendo make palm games or let other people make Nintendo games for the palm, it's as easy as that.

RE: Characters are Nintendo's Most Valuable Asset.
harmful @ 12/5/2001 9:32:33 AM #
Huh? Do you think Microsoft is MAKING money on the Xbox consoles? Do a little research on the economics of console platforms -- ALL console systems lose money on the hardware in the hope of making it back on the software.

LAWYERS are Nintendo's Most Valuable Asset.
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 9:56:28 PM #
It's sure a lot easier to threaten to sue people than it is to innovate, isen't it?

RE: Characters are Nintendo's Most Valuable Asset.
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/6/2001 7:50:51 AM #
"LAWYERS are Nintendo's Most Valuable Asset"
"It's sure a lot easier to threaten to sue people than it is to innovate, isen't it?"

Nintendo have innovated. Ever heard of Shigeru Miyamoto?, (Creator of Zelda, Mario,
Donkey Kong, and had a hand in many other projects (Star Fox for example)).

Frankly, your mistaken belief that Nintendo do not innovate is an insult to Shigeru Miyamoto
and Nintendo as a whole.

Anyone would and should be free to defend their own creations, and so it is only fair
that Nintendo send in their Lawyers.

And while on the subject of not innovating, the person you are trying to defend has just
been punished for that very reason, failing to innovate, and failing to such a huge degree
that all he is doing is blatant cloning of the game characters, graphics and game play.
These games were popular long before ardiri wrote Palm clones of them. He knows this, that
is why he spent time writing Palm clones so he could earn money from them and do it without
the permission of the people who originally created the characters and games ideas.


Greedy Nintendo

I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 10:22:58 AM #
Man, why are Nintendo and Sony always sueing everyone? Throw greedy Microsoft in there, and you've got the top 3. Funny how they all 3 have new game consoles out recently too.
Course Intel is up there too.

RE: Greedy Nintendo
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 12:02:48 PM #
What's up with you people

This guy is making money out of things Nintendo designed, Greedy ?? why don't you say the guy who copied the games greedy ? instead of using his brain to think of a new games, he copied other people's game.

RE: Greedy Nintendo
Coyote67 @ 12/5/2001 12:36:41 PM #
Uh, I wouldn't say he copied them. The games are original, the characters aren't. Nothing about the game itself (other then the characters) is copied.

---------------------------------------
Stuffing feathers up your ass does not make you a chicken.
RE: Greedy Nintendo
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 5:04:06 PM #
the games are not original ....... Those game are copied from nintendo pixel by pixel ....

RE: Greedy Nintendo
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 5:49:14 PM #
Pixel by pixel?!? Get a clue. The Mario Bros has a resolution of 256x240. The Palm 160x160. The Game & Watch Game don't have "pixels" since they are LCD screens. Obviously they weren't pixel copied just look at at the facts. So you are wrong again. It seems to me you're just sore since you can't pirate (warez) his games.

RE: Greedy Nintendo
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/5/2001 7:33:09 PM #
They weren't necessarily copied pixel for pixel but they look and play exactly the same. Nintendo has every right to protect it's IP, if they didn't then other companies like Microsoft could start making Donkey Kong and Mario games for X-Box. Why are you people so thick headed around here?

RE: Greedy Nintendo
Coyote67 @ 12/6/2001 1:11:50 AM #
You know the funny thing is, Xbox dev people are saying that it might be possible to play gc games on xbox with enough time since XBox can actually read the gc's minidvds, just doesn't understand what to do with them. Totally off topic but just wanted to point it out :)

---------------------------------------
Stuffing feathers up your ass does not make you a chicken.
RE: Greedy Nintendo
I.M. Anonymous @ 12/6/2001 1:50:08 AM #
Maybe we will see the team at ardiri make a gamecube emulator as well as some N64 clone-games called pokemunk, Dario 64 and Zeldo 64.

A suggestion to ardiri, you can make an original game based on the new Star War movie: Attack of the Clones.

leave him alone

I.M. Anonymous @ 1/15/2002 9:15:11 PM #
I hate it when ignorant children mock things they do not know much about.

It pains me to see a good developer attacked over stale copyright and trademark laws.

Please keep doing what your good at, re-write the images and titles, make new designs and re-release these great palm apps!

Just ignore these fools, they know not what they do.

PS when is that doom-like game due out? It looks like another giant leap in palm ap dev.

RE: leave him alone
I.M. Anonymous @ 1/19/2002 5:06:45 PM #
I think it comes out at the end of the year :|

Where did all the pro-corporate lackys come from?
I.M. Anonymous @ 2/2/2002 9:01:45 PM #
Why on earth would anybody be so stupid as to say that these clones 'hurt consumers'? I am amazed at the idiots who are rooting for nintendo to sue! NEWS FLASH: nintendo doesn't lose a dime because THEY DON"T MAKE THESE GAMES FOR THE PALM!!!! and before you go on like complete idiots about how the palm competes with gameboy sales (or some such argument) remember that Palm is not competition for the Gameboy Advance (the gameboy is kaput) as people do not buy Palms as gamemachines!! If they want a portable game machine they buy a Gameboy or GameBoy Advance. If they want a portable PC/PDA (that can also play games) they buy a Palm of Pocket PC. There really is no overlap here. So - since Nintendo isn't losing a dime and since they wont give PDA users versions of there classic games then why the heck not allow clones of these 20 year old games (another important point - THEY ARE 20 YEARS OLD AND NOT EVEN NINTENDO MAKES THEM FOR ANY PLATFORM!!!). On top of all this - and maybe some of you are deluded on this point - we are talking about seriously small time money here. Small game developers for PDAs (like this guy) dont make millions on this kind of stuff.

RE: leave him alone
I.M. Anonymous @ 2/2/2002 10:11:38 PM #
It doesn't matter if Nintendo doesn't ever make the games anymore nor if they are only worth 2 cents. The bottom line is it's Nintendo's property and they have a right to protect it.

RE: leave him alone
I.M. Anonymous @ 2/3/2002 11:31:52 AM #
Yes - theoretically nintendo has a 'right' to protect it. Their cease and desist order was about just that - renewing their claim to the copyright - just in case they want to do future ports of these games. Its a bit like squatting laws for real-estate. Got to make sure that you dont set a precedent that cedes control of the copyright to other companies/individuals. However, why not do the smart thing and set up a standard licsensing agreement for this type of situation - ports for platforms that aren't considered worthwhile for nintendo to bother - that would allow developers like this to do a port for a reasonable licsence fee? OK - i admit - the developer in this case should have checked with nintendo on this before doing any coding (i am a developer and that's what i would have done). But, why hasn't nintendo done like ID software (makers of doom and quake) and released the source and opened the licsense agreement? Id's titles are A LOT newer and more lucrative for a pc/pda platform then nintendos, yet they have shown 'good faith' to the developer/consumer community by acknowledging that the money making potential for a PDA port is null and so, not wanting to be 'legal hawks' on the matter, they did the decent thing. What if chess and checkers and poker and blackjack had been invented during a time of such insane copyright laws? And make no mistake - the current level of lawsuit insanity in the industry is a new thing - if the idiots in this thread who want to sue this guy realized what the repercussions of such a level of persistant copyright enforcement was - they would also realize that none of the standard aspects of pda/pc's that they take for granted would be available to them as readily as they are now. Anybody who knows about the PC industry of the last 20 yrs knows that - in the 70's and 80's everybody shared (thats 'ripped off' to the cynics in the audience) willingly with each other and that virtually THOUSANDS of what are now considered common place aspects of PC's (the same pc's you are currently viewing the page on) would be - under todays legal enviroment - illegal enfringments of copyright (if xerox had taken nintendos attitude WE WOULD ALL BE PAYING THEM A CHUNK OF EVERY DOLLAR SPENT ON PC HARDWARE BECAUSE THEY INVENTED THE MOUSE / GUI OS!!). Think about this.

This WHOLE FORUM is way off-target
I.M. Anonymous @ 2/28/2002 3:26:48 AM #
I've been reading the contents of the entire forum and am completely amazed at how shallow some people are. I'm read plenty of criticisms of Aaron Ardiri which simply do not add up or stand up to scrutiny. Some of the comments above piss me off, especially those which argue that Aaron is a plain thief ripping off Nintendo's IP rights. ABSOLUTE RUBBISH. Clones are completely legal: just look at the many versions of Tetris out there. Nintendo took issue specifically with his usage of their copyrighted characters (Donkey Kong and Mario) and requested him to cease, which he did. SO WHERE'S THE ILLEGALITY IN THIS? He complied perfectly well, but some people choose to ignore reality and blather instead. I'm sorry but it looks like there are some jealous developers out there who are finding every excuse to nit-pick on Aaron's success. SHAME ON YOU. Any objective person reading this forum will come to the same conclusion that I did.

The way I look at it Aaron has an interesting business model: create clones of the best-selling old games on other platforms, and after demoing his success, try to get the original company to take notice and license them. He succeeded with LodeRunner. He didn't with Nintendo, but as some have argued above that is arguably Nintendo's loss. Aaron is staying clear within the confines of the law.

I think Aaron's business model has succeeded far better than most other Palm developers. With pitifully few exceptions (Astraware being one), original game development on the Palm is seriously backward. Aaron's model is a good one because people are familiar with these old games and take to them easily. Galax and Froggy have been remarkably successful. Remember Digger? Now where's that?

I don't know Aaron personally, but the way some people here have taken their personal differences with him and blended it together with this Nintendo issue is simply disgraceful. **** off, morons.

Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: