Comments on: Virtual Keyboard Could Revolutionize Text Input

Possible Application VKB Ltd. has developed a method for projecting an optical image of a keyboard onto a surface then detecting whether someone is typing. The virtual keyboard can also include a touchpad or a virtual mouse.

The company intends to licence its technology to manufacturers who will create salable products, not create them itself. At this stage, the company isn't releasing any information on who it is in negotiations with.

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (80 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

VERY cool, but...

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 4:52:52 PM #
my only complaint so far would be that there, obviously, is no tactile feedback. Maybe if the Palm would "click" on each keypress it might be better.

Aside from that, this has a HUGE "cool factor"!!!!!

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:31:45 PM #
If you look at the screen while you type, you can see what you've typed and you won't really need any tactile response.

(Now I'm wondering how many "hunt and peck"ers are on here.)

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:19:32 PM #
I resent being called a pecker.

And tactile feedback is quite important...

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 8:08:35 PM #
For touch typing, you rarely look at your keyboard.

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 8:09:32 PM #
For touch typing, one don't look at the keyboard very much.

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 8:25:22 PM #
Virtual tactile feedback requires an implant.
Next release.

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 11:02:29 PM #
>Virtual tactile feedback requires an implant.
Next release.

LOL! I'm a cyberpunk and I salute you greatly. Definitely among the best posts I've read so far.

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 11:25:58 AM #
While "tactile" feedback doesn't appear possible with a truly virtual keyboard, you could get audio feedback.

How about tones that would vary depending on which row of the keyboard you were pressing, and perhaps a set of tones that would let you know your index fingers were on the right spot?

Also since the keyboard is software controlled, you should be given the ability to customize the keyboard...set up function keys all over the place...reorganize the ctrl & alt keys...switch from qwerty to dvorak...etc.

RE: VERY cool, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/27/2002 12:21:36 PM #
For the love of god, why is clicking necessary?

RE: VERY cool, but...
thinkaboutit @ 4/20/2002 5:20:00 PM #
There is another cool input device that needs to be mentioned. Check out www.lightglove.com. It's not a real glove and can perform as a virtual on/off switch for the electronics around you. Next generation is a wrist worn gaming controller. extra cool....

think it through

Graffiti replacement!

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 4:59:09 PM #
If Palm could build this into the device, you would have a great graffiti replacement.

Xerox who?

RE: Graffiti replacement!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:31:11 PM #
But only when a flat surface is available.

RE: Graffiti replacement!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 12:54:09 AM #
i'm sure in time.. they would be able to eliminate the flat surface handicap...

Bluetooth solves this problem!

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:01:38 PM #
A virtual keyboard may be hard to see in certain lighting conditions and as the above comment said, how do you know once a letter has been "recieved" by the pda.

I think Bluetooth enabled keyboards will kill this idea. Think of all the advantages of a bluetooth keyboard. No line-of-sight necessary with the pda, the pda can be anywhere within 30 feet and the keyboard can be placed anywhere such as on a lap, on a desk at school, anywhere.

I really think this will be one of the best uses of bluetooth. Any opinions on my thoughts are welcome.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:12:19 PM #
Why would you want to type into your PDA when it is 30 feet away? You couldn't even see it.

And how could you see the PDA screen if you didn't have a direct line of sight to it?

Maybe a BT KB isn't all that.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:28:48 PM #
Moreover, another advantage this has over a Stowaway type of keyboard is that you may not have to carry anything, judging by the image that suggests the keyboard projector/receiver is built in.


RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
msmasitti @ 3/20/2002 5:44:52 PM #
2nd Post: It was just a comparison. It is quite obvious you won't be 30 feet away. But it is the idea that there would be no cabling at all.

------------------------
Mario
CLIE Moderator
http://www.geocities.com/msmasitti
RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:44:01 PM #
Posted by: I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:28:48 PM

Moreover, another advantage this has over a Stowaway type of keyboard is that you may not have to carry anything, judging by the image that suggests the keyboard projector/receiver is built in.


What? You may not have to carry anything? What about the projector itself?

This cannot replace the stowaway at all.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 7:10:37 PM #
I agree. The main advantage here is that you don't have to carry an additional piece of hardware if the projector is built into the PDA.

Once they get over the flat surface hurdle, it may even be possible to hold the PDA in your hand and project a "half keyboard" or some other form of input on your forearm.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 12:05:58 PM #
>I agree. The main advantage here is that you don't have to carry an additional piece of hardware if the projector is built into the PDA.


The picture doesn't show the projector built into the PDA and i dont think anyone is suggesting it be built into one (or that such a device is under development - though you never know). This wouldnt really make sense because it would limit yr ability to position the PDA for maximum viewability while typing.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 1:04:22 PM #
There are other pictures at the company's website that show the keyboard being projected directly from the PDA.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 3:15:44 PM #
Not to mention the second of the two pictures in the story.

RE: Bluetooth solves this problem!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/26/2002 7:59:23 PM #
yes!!!! this realy is tha bomb.
And it is the best for mobile using think about traveling without a LAPTOP!!!! wow no heavy stuff anymore!

Shadows...

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:05:49 PM #
This sounds neat, but aren't shadows from your fingers going to be an issue? Does the projector also play some role in detecting where your fingers are? If no, then I guess you could probably just slap a sheet of paper down with the keyboard printed on it if you wanted to.

RE: Shadows...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:21:17 PM #
> Does the projector also play some role in detecting where your fingers are?

Yes. It both projects an image of the keyboard and detects where your fingers are.

RE: Shadows...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 9:41:42 PM #
You missed my point, I was trying to figure out if the light that is projected plays a role in the detection.

RE: Shadows...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 6:29:22 AM #
most probably not....IMO more for the user to know which location to touch so that that the photodetector knows which key was "pressed" by reflection on the fingers and distance from the detector...or something...

Cool .....

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:16:55 PM #
Cool, what's next air guitar for real !!!!

RE: Cool .....
maven @ 3/20/2002 9:47:11 PM #
Actually, they have it :) I played an "air guitar" at a technology museum recently.

Hoping for 'safe' demonstrations

jjsoh @ 3/20/2002 5:37:00 PM #
: It is being demonstrated this week by Siemens
: Procurement Logistics Services at CeBIT.

Hopefully, they won't demonstrate what's in the above pic. Is it just me or does anyone else find it a bit unnerving to see an image of a driver playing around with his Palm/Virtual Keyboard while driving in the MIDDLE of the double yellow lines, when he should be on the right (or left depending on which country you're from)?

I know it's only for illustrative purposes, but you would think the marketing department would at least try not to display potentially hazardous scenarios.

Jim

RE: Hoping for 'safe' demonstrations
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:39:40 PM #
Good point!! I thought the same thing. Maybe the other part of the picture is this person's right hand holding a cell phone, wearing a virtual display headset.

I really think this could be a great application for desktop computers as well.

I could see someone who didn't want to give up the desk space getting a flat screen monitor and using a virtual keyboard and mouse.

For the not heavy computer user, or in high traffic areas (like a kitchen), this could be a great solution.


RE: Hoping for 'safe' demonstrations
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:20:32 PM #
"Professional driver, closed course". And why are you assuming the car is moving?

OK, enough about the picture. Let's talk about the keyboard. I checked the website and they also say this would be good for sterile labs. I can see keyboards being a problem there.

RE: Hoping for 'safe' demonstrations
PR @ 3/20/2002 6:32:56 PM #
even if the car's not moving, i don't know if i would be parking in the middle of the road to do my typing:)

You need to look CLOSER!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:52:29 PM #
You guys need to look closer at the PDA screen in the picture to see that the Palm setup is actually probably saving his life:

"Dear Hospital: I'm typing this onto my wireless email enabled Palm V via a virtual keyboard while driving down this rural 2 lane highway. I'm certain that I will soon be involved in a horrible head-on collision. Please send an ambulance and, if possible, a helicopter to the GPS coordinates at the end of this transmission. - A soon-to-be customer"

RE: Hoping for 'safe' demonstrations
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 9:42:11 PM #
Now that is hilarious!!!!!

no, YOU look closer!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 6:59:10 AM #
it's an m500

RE: Hoping for 'safe' demonstrations
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 8:37:55 AM #
I'd be amazed with the projector technology if the driver could even see the keyboard on a sunny day. May be it should be projected into his lap (or his passengers lap!) may be even more distracting.

Projected Display

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:38:53 PM #
A 19" Projected Virtual Projected Display Hologram Screen would be nice.

how about a display!
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:49:48 PM #
i can think of using this technology to drive a display with tapping on the service to activate a button or other widgets. you can also have a folding surface that you can roll-up when not in use. that would be cool.

RE: Projected Display
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:15:25 PM #
Check out this virtual display. Not practical yet but it has some possibilities.
www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=2994



Can't Get Too Excited Until I Know More

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:37:02 PM #
>> According to VKB, it has resolved all the
>> technological hurdles... including minimizing the
>> power consumption and component size.


Sure it has. That just means that instead of it draining your Palm's battery in one hour, it takes 1.5.

Of course, that's assuming that it can even be integrated into a Palm device without adding huge amounts of extra bulk. The pictures are all mockups. The freestanding projector looks feasible and even desirable as a consumer product, but I think we're a long way from integrating it into a handheld itself without ruining form factor and battery life.

RE: Can't Get Too Excited Until I Know More
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 5:43:14 PM #
Clarification: Meant to say that pictures all APPEAR to be mockups.

RE: Can't Get Too Excited Until I Know More
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 5:08:45 AM #
this one's not a mockup:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/020319/168/19xte.html

It was exhibited at cebit.

RE: Can't Get Too Excited Until I Know More
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 9:31:05 AM #
Yes, but that thing is not going to fit into a PDA anytime soon. Is it?

How about Power

jonecool @ 3/20/2002 6:03:50 PM #
I would imagine that projecting an image would be a severe drain on the 'ol batteries? I like this idea, but I don't think the battery power levels on a PDA to sustain a projected image for very long, exist.

RE: How about Power
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:39:47 PM #
They could use a high-intensity LED for a light source. I have an LED flashlight made by PAL that's burned constantly for a year off one 9v battery and is still really bright. The PAL Light is about the size of the projector in the first picture. LEDs are great light sources becuase they use little power and last almost forever.

Another product approach

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 6:24:08 PM #
This one seems a little more down to earth:
http://www.senseboard.com/product.php

-Craig Bowers

RE: Another product approach
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 9:16:27 PM #
Very nice, but I like to see the keyboard. I can touchtype, but do not really know the keyboard off by heart.

There could be more to that. Signing, like for the deaf, could be implemented in this, and would make a radically fast typing method... steep learning curve though.

RE: Another product approach
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 12:24:47 AM #
No, this one sucks too!

Just plain stupid

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 7:23:34 PM #
Talk about a solution looking for a problem... this is going nowhere as a keyboard. the technology might be interesting for other things, but not keyboards.
imho

RE: Just plain stupid
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 6:51:32 AM #
oh well, whatever suits you

Very Cool but ...

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 7:56:33 PM #
Is it late March already?

RE: Very Cool but ...
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 11:55:51 PM #
Almost April actually....
I agree, at this point, this is just vaporware and hype for venture capital. Can anyone tell me what existing technology could be cobbled together to do something like this?

Seems superfluous...

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 8:09:22 PM #

I don't look at the keyboard when I type anymore. The keyboard gives tactile feedback, which I like, but I'd be willing to change. My point is... why have the image of the keyboard displayed at all? Why not just a couple dots for the upper-left and upper-right corners of the keyboard? Can it be made to work without das blinken lights?

It will never catch on.

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 8:55:43 PM #
While reading the text of this article, 'type' on the surface of your desk as if there was a virtual keyboard drawn or projected on it. Now do the same thing with your real keyboard. Now say there's no need for tactile feedback.

RE: It will never catch on.
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 9:54:51 PM #
I think you and a lot of others who want tactile feedback are COMPLETELY missing the point.

For once in your life stop thinking that everyone is like you!

I for one would love to have this type of keyboard. The possibilities are endless. I could easily get used to forgetting the tactile feedback.After all, we got used to grafiti, people are getting used to thumb-pads or thumb-boards, some laptops have keyboards that have very little tactile feedback, even for homr PC's there are plenty of different 'flavors' of keyboards available AND THEY ARE BEING SOLD!!!

Imagine sitting on a plane besides someone with a keyboard that makes noise while you are trying to sleep! How much would you love for him/her to have a keyboard that is QUIET.

This is technology, if you don't like it, don't read or make comments that it will never catch one and don't ever consider about buying it. Do you really care what people think when you say that it doesn't catch on (or will not)?

Personally, I think thumbboards are useless (FOR ME) but do I think they do not catch on ? Fat chance. PDA's at $500 ? Who said an electronic device to keep your phone book at $500 would never catch on when the PDA's first came out? PLENTY of people.

Bluetooth: Lots of people are saying (or have been saying) the same thing: that it will not catch on. I for one think it will not be beneficial for me, but I could imagine plenty of people finding a good use for it.

My point is: Let technology thrive and for a change, don't be so damn negative all the time when something isn't developed that just suits you!

RE: It will never catch on.
jjsoh @ 3/21/2002 12:34:44 AM #
> Imagine sitting on a plane besides someone with a
> keyboard that makes noise while you are trying to
> sleep! How much would you love for him/her to have a
> keyboard that is QUITE.

No more tapping of laptop keyboards. All we'll hear are the sounds of drumming fingers on the pull-down tray, instead, like that annoying kid who sat next to you all the time in grade school. ;)

All kidding aside, I think you're right. I agree with what you said about thinking outside the box and always striving to find new ways of making our lives more convenient; even at the risk of failure.

With that said, I'm anxious to see how well this idea will be received (and if so, how soon it will be brought to the masses.)


Jim

RE: It will never catch on.
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 3:52:12 AM #
No more tapping of laptop keyboards. All we'll hear are the sounds of drumming fingers on the pull-down tray, instead, like that annoying kid who sat next to you all the time in grade school. ;)
----------

hehe, well, if you think about it, this will likely NOT happen. Have you tapped on a table top long enough while making a loud enough sound that could get annoying ? That actually can start hurting your fingers if you have to tap loud enough. Unless of course you have long fingernails, now that is another story...

I really think the way one would type with this device would change over time since 1) no more sounds are heard anyway and 2) it hurts the fingers if tapped too hard, LOL.

In all seriousness, try tapping for a while on a table-top, doing some imaginary typing. I really think this is a great idea and I for one would be in the market for it.

At the same time, I can understand if some people just couldn't work with it properly, or better said: adjust to the change. This seems to be problem much wider spread than just this keyboard issue ;)

Dr. Pepper

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 9:08:29 PM #
I guess spilling Dr. Pepper on the keyboard will not be as hard to clean up in the future. You won't have to take your keyboard outside and hose it off and then bake it in the oven until its dry. Will I use Bounty or Sparkle...decisions...decisions!

RE: Dr. Pepper
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 8:43:03 AM #
When I was a kid I once vomited onto my Amstrad CPC128 keyboard. That was tough to clean, worked fine afterwards tho' That was a well built machine.

RE: Dr. Pepper
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 10:21:51 AM #
Uh, guys, have you looked at keyboard prices at your local CompUSA, lately? We're talking only $20, or so, here.

RE: Dr. Pepper
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 10:42:47 AM #
LOL!

Nothing new.....Played DDR in Japan before?

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/20/2002 10:46:49 PM #
DDR is Dance Dance Revolution, a game where peple stand in front of a big screen and follow the eight directional dancing steps appear on the screen. It was a hit game back in 1998-1999. First version used stepping pads and later when it was ported to PS it used plastic pads. (I am in Asia and am not sure whether this game caught on.)

In Japan the last version used virtual sensors to detect gamers' steps which is essentially the same thing. It has been reduced in size but I think it is the same technology.

RE: Nothing new.....Played DDR in Japan before?
big_raji @ 3/20/2002 11:27:10 PM #
Yeah, I played an arcade Boxing game that used sensors to sense your movements, and boxing gloves that worked the same way as that other comment above with the senseboard ( http://www.senseboard.com/product.php )

The game was horrible. The sensors didn't respond properly to my movements, and I found that I had to GREATLY exaggerate every move I made so that it registered properly.

I get the feeling that this virtual keyboard will probably be the same way. You'll really have to make sure that your fingers move high up before coming back down to strike the surface, otherwise your movements may be too subtle.

Without a real physical sensor, the technology is probably still to far behind.


---
If you sing in french while hopping on one foot, the evil birds won't come out of your bathroom mirror.

RE: Nothing new.....Played DDR in Japan before?
palm_pilot_guy @ 3/21/2002 6:53:20 AM #
sega had this weird thing that you would plug in into the controller. it was an octogon, about 1 meter in diameter. there was nothing in the middle so you could stand in the middle and do stuff.

great for fighting games or so i heard.

it too was based technology like that.

揺ellomoto覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧流
覧覧覧覧palmoto覧覧覧覧覧覧|
覧palm_pilot_guy覧覧覧覧覧慾
覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧

Real photo!

ahecht @ 3/21/2002 1:59:37 AM #
Those are nice "artist's renditions", but yahoo has an actual photo of the device at http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/020319/168/19xte.html

Virtuality makes it "non-touch-typeable"

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 5:05:47 AM #
The virtuality of this keyboard will make it difficult for user to not watch their fingers and do touch typing -- the most sensible way to type quickly.

PDA lover

Virtuality makes it "non-touch-typeable"

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 5:40:03 AM #
The main reason why users want to get keyboards for their Palm is because they have a lot of things to type and they certainly want to touch-type them up as quickly as possible. Therefore, what use is a keyboard if it makes it difficult for users to do touchtyping? Users might as well just use the preinstalled Graffiti or the onscreen virtual keyboard for text input.

RE: Virtuality makes it
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 7:17:25 AM #
Agreed

Myself as a touch-typing person still needs my fingers to rest on the keyboard but not press down until they need to.

Imagine all 10 fingers hanging in the air and has no place to rest or has nowhere to feel where the real keyboard is.

RE: Virtuality makes it
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 8:45:42 AM #
I was watching Final Fantasy movie recently and there they use 'virtual' consoles. Doesn't look like a great improvement over tactile switches - funky visuals but could you live with it?
I could see the 'Star Trek' style of touch screens becoming more widespread though (already happening).

Anyone ever see Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within?

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 9:25:05 AM #
Great movie, the main character Aki had a wrist-mounted computer with a display and keyboard kind of like this.

ds

RE: Anyone ever see Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within?
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 1:43:43 PM #
I'm sorry. Did you just say FF was a great movie judging by a virtual prop that the virtual character had?
CHECK PLEASE.

RE: Anyone ever see Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within?
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 4:16:17 PM #
I think the comma seperating the two clauses was meant to indicate separate statements.

Final Fantasy was neat, but despite the incredible CGI, it had some of the confusing elements of some of the more philosophically-oriented traditional cel anime, and somehow that just made the flawlessness of the imagery odd. It was strange.

Whatever the input method, feedback (tactile, auditory, or otherwise) makes it more effective. It may be possible to learn the manual dexterity necessary to type with such a thing, but there will always be those that will prefer no learning curve beyond learning to touch-type in the first place.

Since I haven't that much manual dexterity to begin with, I'll probably end up being one of them. :)

--rueyeet, who resents that this comments screen doesn't have somewhere to enter username and password

WHEW!

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 9:24:53 AM #
WHEW! Im sure glad that the keyboard never caught on with lots of people saying they can write faster than typing and all.

I'm also glad that they did not invent the PDA since lots of people were used to paper organizers.

What about the eyes?

I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 3:02:28 PM #
Isn't there a form of eye-tracking technology that allows you to look at a (possibly virtual) representation of a keyboard, and by tracking the movement and pauses of the eyes registers which keys you're looking at? i don't know what it's called, or any of the details, but this sounds a heck of a lot more viable than a 'virtual keyboard'.

RE: What about the eyes?
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 3:44:23 PM #
Only if you have ten eyes that can look at many letters at once.

RE: What about the eyes?
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/21/2002 6:20:19 PM #
but typing (or entering data of any kind) is never based on simultaneous data transmission; it's always in a series.

and of course practice using this kind of method would improve speed beyond what's capable in even a dvorak keyboard.

i think we need to transcend the 10-finger box and start thinking in radically different ways. of course humans always have a problem with that.

RE: What about the eyes?
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/22/2002 10:47:08 AM #
I disagree with the "eye" thing. Why would you want to look at a keyboard while typing? People spend years trying to learn not to. Get rid of the silly display of the keyboard and just type on.... nothing. Will this device work if the keyboard is not actually displayed?

RE: What about the eyes?
I.M. Anonymous @ 3/25/2002 11:27:24 AM #
>Isn't there a form of eye-tracking technology that
>allows you to look at a (possibly virtual)
>representation of a keyboard

You can get a Canon camera which 'reads' where you focus your eye, and then takes the picture. It works. Used in a keyboard-world, one problem could be the speed at which you can type your text. Imagine you are going to type 'Apocalypse': close one eye, and do it on your own keyboard, letter by letter, 10 times. I've got a headache allready..

I think some sort of adaptive wordbook, but slightly more intelligent than in Nokia and Siemens cellphones, could be a part of a solution.

This should be combined with a keyboard technology different from the current qwerty-standard. About 10 years ago, a keyboard with 5 contact points was invented. Bit-wise, the number of combinations available is 31 - but additional, "button1 + button2" would be different from "button2 + button1". This could be illustrated on your own keyboard: "Shift-Alt-A" is currently the same as "Alt-Shift-A" - but it doesnt have to be. Resarch have proven that a 'combination'-keyboard is pretty easy to get used to.

So, I would like to see these two technologies combined. The wordbook should give suggestions as you type, 'know' which words you usually use after a punctation, and that "a wish had I Palm I" is not gramatically correct.

I love the future :)

RE: What about the eyes?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/8/2002 2:26:37 PM #
By the time this device gets mainstream we'll be talking to the PDAs.
Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: