Comments on: Rumor: Details on the Color, CDMA Treo

An anonymous source has come forward with full details on the the CDMA version of the Treo that Handspring will release before the end of June. Because it will run on Sprint's 3G network, it will have a much higher data rate than the current Treo models. It will have a 16-bit color screen. At this time it looks like there will only be a keyboard version available.
Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (78 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

Ho Hum

Beavis @ 4/19/2002 11:55:50 AM #
No Hi Res, Small Screen. Nothing special here.

RE: Ho Hum
joeberk @ 4/19/2002 12:01:27 PM #
Yeah - I mean, there's a million phones out there with the Palm OS and a 70K Internet connection.
RE: Ho Hum
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 12:01:37 PM #
This is a 2nd generation communicator, it must be SMALL, who cares of hires in a 2" display, come on!
If you look for big display and hires you don't need an integrated communicator, you need a communicating PDA, which is something different.

RE: Ho Hum
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 12:11:42 PM #
"Palm OS 3.5.2H on a 33 MHz Dragonball VZ processor"

That's the ho-hum aspect for me. But I'm sure this is being done to keep the cost low.

RE: Ho Hum
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:00:40 PM #
>> No Hi Res, Small Screen. Nothing special here. <<

More drivel from a pseudo-religious Sony fanatic. I suppose if Handspring doesn't release something that's a carbon-copy of Sony's stuff, then some people will inherently consider it inferior. Then again, if Handspring DID release a carbon-copy, they'd whine about how Sony did it first. You just can't win with some folks, which is why I simply pity them.

Perhaps "Beavis" should change his login name to "Butthead."

RE: Ho Hum
skoty @ 4/19/2002 1:05:16 PM #
Or maybe OS 3.5.2 is being used because Handspring's 3.5.2 has all the same major features at 4.1. When I say this, I'm referring to USB support and 65,000 color support to name a few.

So many visitors to this site don't seem to get that Handspring's 3.5.2 has everything 4.1 has (except for maybe that nifty drawing pad!). In fact, it has the "fast lookup" capability in Address Book that 4.1 doesn't have.

--------------
If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving definitely isn't for you.

RE: Ho Hum
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:06:16 PM #
This is what makes me NOT want to buy a smart phone. Small screen on small device. Who needs it ? Better have Sony CLIE + Bluetooth MS (belive me, after a week with hi-res screen you will never want to switch back to lo-res 160x160) and Sony Ericsson 68i phone (expensive solution) or with Ericsson T39 phone (budget solution). Small light phone + large convinient display on Clie. Bluetooth connection to GPRS phone, what means always on link, SMS messaging, and all this without even touching your phone.
RE: Ho Hum
Rolando @ 4/19/2002 1:32:23 PM #
>>(belive me, after a week with hi-res screen you will never want to switch back to lo-res 160x160)

I don't know about that. I have a Sony, and while hi-res is nice, I could live without it. I use it to look at family photos and to see my weekly view in Datebk4 and that's about it. It's nice to have, but almost a luxury for me.

I love my Sony, but I love the whole thing (jogdial, memory stick, hi-res, etc.). The jogdial, or something like it, is the part that I just couldn't do without anymore. That and some sort of card to do backups and load extra apps.

Sure, the Treo screen is a little small, but it's got some sort of "jog thingy," right? The only real missing item is some sort of memory card to load extra apps and do backups.

No graffiti

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 12:01:30 PM #
Still amazing that one would force consumers to work without something as simple as graffiti.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 12:07:15 PM #
I had the same opinion, i used a Graffiti Treo for a month then i switched to a keyboard version: you will never switch back to Graffiti ever!!
Believe me, this keyboard is simply amazing!

X.

RE: No graffiti
joeberk @ 4/19/2002 12:08:41 PM #
A lot more people know how to use a keyboard - even a small one - than who know how to pick up Graffiti.

Don't get me wrong, I like Graffiti, but I had the patience to pick it up - the general consumer won't.

RE: No graffiti
OrionNE @ 4/19/2002 12:30:46 PM #
No Memory expansion.. No Graffiti.. Looks like I will be getting a Palm M515 and bluetooth enabled phone.

I am dissapointed.

RE: No graffiti
Rolando @ 4/19/2002 1:41:26 PM #
Maybe instead of an add on "thumb keyboard," someone could come up with a snap on grafitti area?

RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 2:29:13 PM #
Maybe they are going to opt for a soft graffiti area instead of a hard one. Nothing would be more frustrating while browsing in color than to have to keep scrolling because of a graffiti area. If I were product manager, this is the way I'd go.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 3:35:11 PM #
I dont think think we will see expansion lsots on Treo until the second generation units are released. Perhaps the Treo 360?

BTW I am one of those who switched from Graffiti to keyboard too...with no regrets. Now I am annoyed that I have to use graffiti to write on my Prism.

RE: No graffiti
robrecht @ 4/19/2002 5:01:05 PM #
I couldn't get used to using the thumb keyboard on the Treo.

Thanks, Robrecht
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 5:17:03 PM #
I agree that the keyboard is amazingly easy to use. I thought it would be much harder, but it actually is very very usable. I'm much faster at typing on the keyboard than I ever was with grafitti. I'll never get a grafitti PDA again.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 4:39:14 AM #
Graffiti is what made PalmOs great.
I will never trade in my Treo 180g for a
270 with keyboard, I will for a 270g.

Graffiti is idiotic
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 2:41:58 PM #
Forcing consumers to learn a weird alphabet which requires you to carry a reference card until you learn it is idiotic. And to add insult to injury, you can only use Graffiti two-handed, and it is much slower than the Unistroke alphabet it is based on. The Palm succeeded despite Graffiti, not because of it.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 3:01:45 AM #
I hope the color GSM version of the Treo will have Grafiti even though Sprint's color CDMA version seems it won't.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 8:13:43 AM #
It would be better to have a soft grafiti area that would display large numbers (to push with the finger) when used as a phone.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 8:23:42 AM #
How do you deal with fingerprints on the screen that way?
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 10:54:12 PM #
Easy, get a screen protector like WrightRights.
RE: No graffiti
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/22/2002 9:40:12 AM #
My $.02. Personally, I prefer Grafitti. I have a RIM 857 (keyboard) I use for work (they pay for it :D), & a Palm IIIxe (grafitti) that I own. Since I have experience with both given the choice, I will take grafitti.

A virtual grafitti area included WITH a keyboard would be ideal. I understand how some people would prefer a keyboard. Not everyone is going to agree on this point. One is no better than the other.

Of course, depending on how Xerox's case against Palm turns out, this may end up being a moot point. Whatever happens, I'll adapt.

Peace,
Billman

E-mail capabilities

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 12:49:38 PM #
Sprint's 3G sounds great, but the real question is how will the Treo take advantage of it? Will the Treo have always-on e-mail? Will Sprint offer an unlimited data option for e-mail and web browsing?
RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 12:53:20 PM #
I agree with your question--this will be a MAJOR issue for me. It's not worth it to use wireless internet/e-mail if the service is outrageously expensive. Sprint has excellent coverage in my area, so that's not an issue, but cost definitely IS.

I'm seriously considering this unit. I can see myself possibly using a Treo for phone and basic PIM, then getting maybe a Fujistu mini-notebook for those times when I want portable word-processing, etc. The "coolness" of word processing on my Palm is wearing thin on the 3" screen (hi-res or no hi-res), and I don't see it improving on PPC. I'm not claiming that the rest of the world will see things this way, but I at least hope enough people want the Treo to keep it afloat.

RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 2:31:47 PM #
If Sprint PCS comes out with a bad pricing model it will not be solely linked to the Treo, but to all 3G items they sell. I can't see them having a pricing model for a one unit and not another. If they price using one of those dumb per KB models the only escape is not to buy a different handset, it's to switch to a carrier that charges you a flat fee for unlimited usage or by the minute.
RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 3:10:44 PM #
My guess is that Sprint will offer some really high priced low usage data packages. I think it will take them a few tries before they get a reasonably priced option. They always try to make the early users pay for the whole system. :)
RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 4:03:19 PM #
Sprint should offer an unlimited data package for a set monthly fee. Here are some starting points: $39.99 per month (what Palm charges for its unlimited plan on the i705). Or, $39.99 per month (what VoiceStream charges for its unlimited plan on the new Blackberry 5810). Hmmm, perhaps Sprint should charge $39.99 per month for unlimited data on the Treo...

RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 8:14:47 PM #
If Sprint are to call it 3G, the data rate should me much higher (up to 2Mbps). This is NOT 3G. Read the link for more information:

http://www.gsmworld.com/technology/3g/intro.shtml#1

Slowly, but certainly, the US will come to agree on a standard... I hope.

RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 1:32:09 PM #
Many of you are not aware of two points

1) Verizon already offers true 3g Data Services over CDMA called 1xRTT. Think of the redline area on an RPM gauge, Verizon's service is at the very start of the redline and the 1xEVDO (your 2mbs) is towards the middle. Yes GPRS (which is data only, you still use GSM for voice), from the GSM world is 2.5g and that is because the bursted rates for Voicestream, etc is well below 144kbs!

2) People on the existing Palm.net service who are paying $39.95, should get unlimited. Mainly because they are getting information over an 8k analog control channel. The effective throughput to your Palm 7 or other device would be about 2k of throughput. WOW
So you are asking Sprint, Verizon and others to offer their HIGH speed data for the same price, forget it. It is sort of like this, when DSL came out, it wasn't the same price as Dial-up!

RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 1:33:33 PM #
I have a friend at Ericson who has explained to me (and many of their corporate clients/partners) on numerous occasions that the theoritical '2 Mbps' toted by 3G proponents will in no way be available to consumers of ANY cellualar service provider. They 'overload' cells (overload isnt the right word - 'top-up'?)to insure maximum use of infrastructure. In other words, they make more $$ by sharing bandwidth amongst users. And you can't blame them: all evidence suggests that they have way over-invested in 3G and internal studies by companies such as Ericson suggest its going to take many years to make their money back and even then, only if their 'best case scenario' predictions of adoption come true AND they charge considerably more then current services (ie:not the 39.95 mentioned above). People don't seem to realize how much this industry has put its head in a noose because they were counting on a continuation of the 'good times' from a couple of years ago.

My friend at Ericcson (he is a business manager there)put it this way('off the record'): 'Even if the best case predictions for growth came true and people continued to adopt 3G at the nescesary rate (forgetting that asking people, especially north americans, to pay the extra rate that service providers need is a major barrier), in order for these companies to just break even in the next 10 years, it would require an acceleration in the move away from print media service (to online services)at such a rate as to bankrupt the print media industry. And thats the best case scenario....'

They haven't called 3G the 'largest corporate gamble in modern history' for nothing.

RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 4:23:18 PM #
Sorry to break the news to you but the FAQ's at handspring say:

Q. What version of GPRS is the Treo communicator going to use?
A. The Treo communicator will support GPRS Class 2, which will provide two channels down and one channel up (otherwise know as "2+1").

That means that the Treo will only reach a theoretical top speed of 28.8 kbs

Considering that the "4+1" Motorola V66 phone I have theoretically does 56.6 kbs, yet only reaches about 40 kbs, the treo will probably hit a top speed of ONLY 20 kbs.

RE: E-mail capabilities
cyruski @ 4/21/2002 7:25:07 AM #
40kbps must be the limitation of your provider, or the limitation of the base stations in the area, or the limitation caused by the environment. i mean, you don't always get lower speeds than advertised.

if you measure the connection speed on you treo which uses the same exact provider with v66, same location etc, you have to get 28kbps.

cyruski!

RE: E-mail capabilities
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 1:39:16 PM #
Either way, that makes for a poorly designed unit. Why would you make it half a fast as it could be? I wonder if they will be doing the same with the CDMA model. Just because the service can do 144K does not mean the device will be capable.

Ed, to my knowledge...

Fzara2000 @ 4/19/2002 1:04:21 PM #
Ed, you made a typo.

"It has a dual intensity (low/high) backlight, which implies that it is the same type of screen as on the Palm m130. With its backlight on high, the screen is roughly half as bright as a Prism."

That I believe is wrong. the M130 is the one with the slider contrast level thing. The m515 has the option to put the backlight on 'low' and 'high'.
I'm not completely sure on this however.


SONY ROCKS!

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
Ed @ 4/19/2002 1:10:24 PM #
While its true that I've made many a typo in my day, this isn't one of them. If my source is correct, the color Treo operates more like the m130 than the m515.

The m130's backlight has two settings, High and Low. Holding down the Power button toggles between these. The only time the backlight is off is when the handheld itself is off. There is no slider at all.

The m515 actually has three setting. High, Low, and Off, controlled with a slider bar.

According to the source, the Treo's screen can only be toggled between High and Low. It can't be turned off unless the Treo is off.

---
News Editor

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:12:20 PM #
It'd be a VERY bad idea to implement such a bad screen as the m130's screen. And you're right about which is which. Reflective TFTs are the way to go, anyway.

Ceterum censeo, Graffiti esse delendam... I think thumbboards are a much better way to enter information - for a smartphone anyway. Still like my Nokia Communicator best - no stylus at all. :)

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:38:11 PM #
What are you talking about?

The screen on M130 is very good, I mean, for typical
PIM, (not for game), did you see a true M130 by yourself?

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 2:21:54 PM #
What I'm curious about is the statement that it "is half as bright as the Prism?"

Not saying it's wrong, but I've never seen the Prism screen up close. That having been said, "half as bright" doesn't sound too good.

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 3:58:13 PM #
The Prism is blindingly bright. It is the brightest palm ever. It's almost too bright. Half that bright won't too too dim.
RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 4:49:22 PM #
Ed is right about the M130 screen settings. In my opinion, the M130 screen is sharper (likely because of the smaller pixel size) than the M515. It is 20 times easier to read than the M505 screen. If the TREO has a screen like the M130, it will be more than acceptable. Comparing them side by side my screen ratings (at least indoors) would be:

Prism
Clie 615C (although colors are a little muted, brightness is excellent)
M130 (on high it has great contrast)
M515 (on high or low it's still much better than the 505)

and at the bottom, the infamous M505 (really hard to see inside or outside in my opinion.)

I compared all of these at the local Best Buy. They didn't actually have a 505 but a friend of mine does.

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
cykalan @ 4/19/2002 5:13:28 PM #
oh....if you have tried the NR70(V)...

the quality screen of NR70(V) have exceeded all of the existing palm OS (and most probably, ppcs') handhelds' screen, N760, T615, m515, Prism included, for all of the parameters......no matter saturation, brightness, sharpness, resolution, viewability under sunlight...........

a combination of prism's solid and saturated colour, n760's brightness, hi-res and viewability under sunlight......it's terrific...

Alan
----
Read your manuals before you ask!!

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 6:49:32 PM #
The NR70(V) also has the worst battery life of the lot, second worst is the t615. There are trade-offs in this business...
RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
Majestic @ 4/19/2002 9:00:53 PM #
Huh?

I wasn't aware that the m130 had multiple brightness settings, but it DEFINITELY has a slider that controls contrast.

I've yet to see ANY slider on the m515. You have to tap one of three boxes with a stylus (off, low, high).

And if anyone cares, despite what anyone says, I prefer the images on the screen of an m130 to the m515 any day of the week. The only bummer is the shadowing that happens when you switch screens/applications/whatever.

RE: Ed, to my knowledge...
cyruski @ 4/20/2002 8:30:25 AM #
the m130 has a contrast slider. it does not affect the brightness. however, it has two brightness levels (high/low) selectable by holding the power button.

cyruski!

battery life?

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:17:28 PM #
the batter life should really suck since the device is so small and it has color + voice/wireless capabilities.

see you.

RE: battery life?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:19:57 PM #
Someone who has used one (the source for this rumor) says that battery life is good. Its right there in the article.
RE: battery life?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:38:30 PM #
Handspring has stated that it has nearly the same battery life as the monochrome version because they are using a new type of screen.

Always naysayers

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 1:15:48 PM #
There is always the inevitable naysayer dissing something that they don't like or own. The treo has it's faults, and could be better-high res, longer battery life, but come on... one small device with voice/data/organizational capability, color screen, web browsing, etc. Ho Hum? Don't think so.
RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 3:58:00 PM #
It's not a real web browsing capabilities, it's web clipping.

The ho-hum comment come from the fact that other device in similar category have already done what it says is the selling point.

-Samsung (color screen, small size)
-iPAQ sleeve (GPRS triband)

furthermore, by the time it come out, other device that offers better features will also be on the market.

-XDA (similar size, full feture PDA and internet capabilities plus expansion)
-Sony/Erricson p800 (full feature PDA, plus camera, big color screen)
-Microsoft smartphone (much smaller with full feature internet capabilities)

that's why the treo is a ho-hum,

It does not offer anything that the competition do better.

RE: Always naysayers
Wollombi @ 4/19/2002 4:32:22 PM #
Oh, yeah, I can see it now. MS can't even make a PC OS that doesn't crash on a regular basis. Can you imagine having to "reboot" your cell phone after every 3rd call? I can see the ad campaign now..."Get stung by Stinger".

I don't have a dog in this fight, but if I did, it would currently be anything EXCEPT the MS smartphone.

Just my $0.02.

_________________
Sean

It is not very comfortable to have the gift of being amused at one's own absurdity.
-Somerset Maugham-

RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 5:07:25 PM #
Why do you say it's not real web browsing? With my Treo, I can view almost any web site - I'm very satisfied with the web browsing capabilities of Treo, especially when you compare it to a supposedly internet ready phone.

Also - what Microsoft smartphones are you talking about? Everyone I've heard of is huge or vaporware - and talk about bad battery life, any PocketPC device please?

Samsung is not as small and the phone/pda/web/email features are not NEARLY as integrated, easy to use, or well done, and the IPAQ + sleeve is HUGE - I would never carry that hulking thing around.

If you've never used a Treo, you just won't get it - it's not just another PDA/Phone combo. Yes, that would be ho-hum. But Treo is the best phone I've ever used (nothing is as easy to dial - just tap 2-3 letters of the person's name on the keyboard and I'm there + ringer switch - why hasn't any phone maker thought of that before?), best PDA (love the keyboard, 16MB, and I find I use the PDA more than ever now that I always carry it with me - and when the color one comes out, look out!), plus I can get email via Treo mail AND browse any web site, all in a tiny package that I don't even notice is in my pocket.


RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 5:34:29 PM #
I hear thee brother. Add integrated thumb keyboard and comparably tiny form factor to the list, too.

The only PDA/Combo phone most of us aren't embarrased to walk around with.

RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 5:59:11 PM #
as of now, Color CDMA treo is vaporware too. If we are talking about MS smartphone, at least there are tons of pictures on various site from conferences and loan device. Not a single picture of color treo yet.

web browser? you are at the mercy of H/S proxy server. And it is not possible to view an HTML page offline. (ie. attachment file, file stored in SD, or anything send without going through desktop/proxy server)


RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 6:08:43 PM #
vaporware? sounds like this source actually used one - forget photos.

why would i ever need to browse an html page offline? or off an sd card? or whatever? how often will that need come up? blazer and the h/s proxy server do exactly what i need, and since treo is palm os, there are plenty of other browser solutions out there if blazer is not your cup of tea.

RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 6:23:10 PM #
> vaporware? sounds like this source actually used one - forget photos.

Color CDMA treo IS vaporware, about as vaporware as XDA, and MS smartphone. At least the XDA and the amartphone have been seen rather widely. Has anybody beside H/S engineer actually touch the color CDMA treo? if so, show picture please.


>> why would i ever need to browse an html page offline? or off an sd card? or whatever?

why do we even need a PDA? are you implying that Treo function is just glorified address book?

if Treo is sold as PDA, than customer expect PDA functionality. (ie. able to be used as PDA and not carry another PDA just to view HTML file, access picture from SD, or what not)

(I give you a good example, viewing email attachment offline, viewing downloaded page offline while in the subway, etc.)

>> how often will that need come up? blazer and the h/s proxy server do exactly what i need, and since treo is palm os, there are plenty of other browser solutions out there if blazer is not your cup of tea.


If we are talking about "who need anything" why even bother buy Treo? why not 6035? or samsung? much cheaper, very similar functionality. (etc.etc)

again, I believe the thread is trying to ask why CDMA color Treo is such a ho-hum product. Answer: It is nothing particularly good at anything. And other product offers better features, performance, price. Your argument is about as dubious as why would you want to rent a Hilton Room at $200? go to Motel six at $150, I like Motel six lounge.


I agree
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 8:59:01 PM #
Color Treo would be very good last year not now. It is too late....
RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 2:04:29 PM #
What are you people talking about???? I have used both the Kyocera (nicer than the old 'brick' version but still a dog) and the samsung (nicer but still lacking), and i have used the treo. As for "Color Treo would be very good last year not now.". Huh?? have you used this beside any device available 'last year'? Did any of those devices have 16megs and a built or cdma support??? NO. And no other pda/phone currently does either. Yes, other proprietary solutions are a t hand BUT we are talking about a Palm OS solution here (thus the title of the website). If you dont care to tap into the thousands PalmOS software available then get the sony/ericcson thing and stop posting to this site.

I am not slamming the pda / bluetooth / crowd. If thats the way u want to go then fine (i also prefer this BUT im waiting for the day when this solution will actually become available to me in my area). But for the demographic that prefers an integrated solution - im sorry but you people have clearly never compared whats out there. And as for MS/Stinger/PocketPC or whatever - i am forced to develop for this 'pretty but stupid' OS and all i can say is that when i stop laughing maybe i'll get arounf to posting the details of why this sucks as a PDA OS - never mind in yr phone(for g-o-d-s-sake!)

RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 2:52:34 PM #
When will the CDMA upgrade available? in 6-8 months? by that time the OS3.5 and dragonball will be obsolete in Palm world, nevermind the PDA scene as a whole. Hence I don't think it's such a compelling reason to buy Treo.

The current treo line is already in trouble. From phone market point of view, the 180 has a somewhat boring design compare to some of the latest phone offering. And on the package as a whole it only has slight enhancement over the much cheaper qualcom/Samsung. The Samsung even has a color screen.

Fast forward to June, around the time 270 will come out. A deluge of competing better alternative will be on the market and they all offer better internet/email software, one major selling point of Treo. And what's more treo 270 hardware would be one generation behind compare to them. (SPH-i330 on Palm. p800/XDA on wireless pda, and Z100 on smartphone.)

at any rate, no matter how one spin it, the treo line doesn't have that " gotta have it" quality. At $599 planned offering, it is competing directly in top of the line phone market. So it better has something 'top of the line' to offer. Either in phone area or PDA area.

RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 12:19:54 PM #
"When will the CDMA upgrade available? in 6-8 months? by that time the OS3.5 and dragonball will be obsolete in Palm world, nevermind the PDA scene as a whole. Hence I don't think it's such a compelling reason to buy Treo."

The CDMA Treo is not an upgrade. It is an entirely separate device that will debut in June on Sprint's 3G network, around the same time as the GSM Treo 270.

"The current treo line is already in trouble. From phone market point of view, the 180 has a somewhat boring design compare to some of the latest phone offering. And on the package as a whole it only has slight enhancement over the much cheaper qualcom/Samsung. The Samsung even has a color screen."

Comparing the Treo to the phones available in the mobile phone market today is not an accurate comparison. A lot, if not the majority of them, have the Treo beaten simply because they don't have the design constraints of having to integrate a PDA with a larger screen into the device. HS did an excellent job with design of the Treo considering their constraints. That's not to say the Treo is perfect, far from it. With poor battery life, lack of a removeable battery, no use as a wireless modem with a laptop, and a monochrome screen for starters, the Treo leaves a lot to be desired. However, the relatively small size and integrated keyboard provide a firm foundation for the Treo to grow on and I think it has the most potential of any of the smartphones out there.

"at any rate, no matter how one spin it, the treo line doesn't have that " gotta have it" quality. At $599 planned offering, it is competing directly in top of the line phone market. So it better has something 'top of the line' to offer. Either in phone area or PDA area."

That's just it, its not the fact that the Treo that offers some awesome feature in the PDA or phone arena, but a well-integrated mix of the two that HS is banking on and that no separate PDA or phone offers its own. $400 - $500 would be a more realistic selling point for the 270 though and I do think it will hurt sales.


RE: Always naysayers
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/22/2002 3:16:24 AM #
> Comparing the Treo to the phones available in the mobile phone market today is not an accurate comparison.

didn't somebody trying to argue who needs more space and expansion, and all that customer need is the nicely built address book. (ie. it's just telephone with address book, plus minimal web browsing. Full PDA capability is overkill)


> A lot, if not the majority of them, have the Treo beaten simply because they don't have the design constraints of having to integrate a PDA with a larger screen into the device. HS did an excellent job with design of the Treo considering their constraints.

Is it smarphone or is it wireless PDA? Treo is too ugly to be wireless phone, and too limited to be a PDA. It might be trivial on this forum, but not inside the store where it is displayed.

> That's not to say the Treo is perfect, far from it. With poor battery life, lack of a removeable battery, no use as a wireless modem with a laptop, and a monochrome screen for starters, the Treo leaves a lot to be desired.

from PDA point of view combined with lack of easy back up that's deadly. So in the end either a sure has to crimp on making a call, or not use it as much as normal PDA. It's an odd breed middle of nowhere compromise.

> However, the relatively small size and integrated keyboard provide a firm foundation for the Treo to grow on and I think it has the most potential of any of the smartphones out there.

highly arguable.

No Graffiti?

ChiefPilot @ 4/19/2002 6:02:00 PM #
I was really excited about this high speed wireless data access & color in a nice form factor. Unfortunately, the lack of graffiti is a deal-breaker for me. Score another loss for Handspring.


RE: No Graffiti?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 7:47:14 PM #
I absolutley agree on no Graffiti. The whole Palm platform & us hardcore users must have Graffiti? Do they really think they are going to go after RIM? I'm dying for a color Palm w/ wireless. Why can't someone do this now? (with Graffiti)
RE: No Graffiti?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 9:21:57 PM #
I freakin' love graffiti!!
RE: No Graffiti?
terrysalmi @ 4/19/2002 10:55:05 PM #
You're right...graffiti is great. But remember, this is a phone! When you pick it up, you don't want to graffiti the number, you want to press it. Not to mention you can still have graffiti by getting a program like jot that lets you write on the screen. Then you get the best of both worlds!

RE: No Graffiti?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 1:29:36 PM #
I'm a big Palm/Handspring fan and have a Platinum + VP. That said, I used a Blackberry over the summer with work. The keyboard is great - I could even touchtype after a few days. I haven't tried the Treo yet, but my experience is that the chicklet keyboards work fine, and may even be superior. I certainly wouldn't exclude a good device over the Graffiti/keyboard issue.
RE: No Graffiti?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 8:17:28 AM #
It would be better to have a soft grafiti area that would display large numbers (to push with the finger) when used as a phone.
RE: No Graffiti?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/22/2002 5:10:43 AM #
As a long time Palm OS user, I went out on a limb when I bought a Treo with the keyboard version rather than Graffiti. To be honest, after getting used to the keyboard, I would never go back to Graffiti.
RE: No Graffiti?
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/22/2002 11:41:25 AM #
Any plans for a Treo 270g?

Faster than GSM? I mean even after GPRS upgrade??

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/19/2002 11:49:12 PM #
Current GSM implementation is subpar as it only uses Circuit switched data connection. But what about GPRS upgrade? It should be much closer to Sprint 1xRTT (so called "3G" proclaimed by North American CDMA carriers but more like 2.5G to the rest of the world, including Korean carriers, who are the first one in the world to implement 1xRTT for its CDMA networks). GPRS with 4 timeslots should offer speed of 40 to 60k while a 8 timeslot device could achieve 110k. So it should be a much closer match to CDMA 1xRTT.


RE: Faster than GSM? I mean even after GPRS upgrade??
mtg101 @ 4/20/2002 5:55:32 AM #
Yeah - 3G my arse...

GPRS can technically deliver 115Kbs, although in normal usage this isn't going to happen as data bandwidth is shared in cells and deteriorates with distance from the base station.

Granted CDMA is better at data than GSM based networks, because it was designed for data from day one, but 1xRTT is NOT 3G. Unless you ask the marketing department of the Sprint Cellular Corporation - who (with any luck) will be first against the wall when the revolution comes :)


---
russ@russb.fsnet.co.uk

RE: Faster than GSM? I mean even after GPRS upgrade??
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/20/2002 4:18:08 PM #
Sorry to break the new to you but the FAQ's at handspring say:

Q. What version of GPRS is the Treo communicator going to use?
A. The Treo communicator will support GPRS Class 2, which will provide two channels down and one channel up (otherwise know as "2+1").

That means that the Treo will only reach a theoretical top speed of 28.8 kbs

Considering that the "4+1" Motorola V66 phone I have theoretically does 56.6 kbs, yet only reaches about 40 kbs, the treo will probably hit a top speed of ONLY 20 kbs.

RE: Faster than GSM? I mean even after GPRS upgrade??
cyruski @ 4/21/2002 7:31:08 AM #
40kbps must be the limitation of your provider, or the limitation of the base stations in the area, or the limitation caused by the environment. i mean, you don't always get lower speeds than advertised.

if you measure the connection speed on you treo which uses the same exact provider with v66, same location etc, you have to get 28kbps.

cyruski!

RE: Faster than GSM? I mean even after GPRS upgrade??
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 1:36:22 PM #
Either way, that makes for a poorly designed unit. Why would you make it half a fast as it could be? I wonder if they will be doing the same with the CDMA model. Just because the service can do 144K does not mean the device will be capable.
RE: Faster than GSM? I mean even after GPRS upgrade??
I.M. Anonymous @ 4/21/2002 3:28:34 PM #
"Either way, that makes for a poorly designed unit. Why would you make it half a fast as it could be? I wonder if they will be doing the same with the CDMA model. Just because the service can do 144K does not mean the device will be capable."

The CDMA Treo will definitely be capable of 144kbps. However, depending on the traffic, 70kbps is more likely what the average user will experience.

I suspect Handspring's decision to make the Treo only compatible with the "2+1" class of GPRS had something to do with the Voicestream network only supporting this type of GPRS as well (a max data rate of 28.8 kbps).


*Yawn*

I.M. Anonymous @ 4/22/2002 12:51:32 PM #
That isn't in response to the Treo, it's to this discussion. I've tried sifting through the posts on this one, but it's damn near impossible to get through it without wondering, "Who Cares?"

Palm505 and Motorola V66

I.M. Anonymous @ 5/30/2002 9:55:29 AM #
Hello !

The Motorola V66 don't have an infrared interface. Is there any other possiblity to connect
the Palm505 and the V66 to use the modem capabilities of the V66 ?

And do I need a special software for the Palm505 to communicate with the V66 ?

Thanks.

Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: