Comments on: Charger Gets Power to Palm Any Way Possible
Article Comments
(25 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: We need a snap on like this BUT offering i705
RE: We need a snap on like this BUT offering i705
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.retroglobe.com
RE: Get a BlueTooth Card and a BlueTooth phone!
At least in Europe where we have GPRS coverage :)
I have an m500 and an Ericsson T39, they work great in combo with a BlueTooth card.
I dropped the Palm and have kinda screwed up the screen (one line of pixels is now out) and totally broke the BT card. I've bought a new one now, and the slightly damaged screen gives me the excuse to by a 515 :-).
(I'd buy a Clie because of the high res, but still no sign of the BT card for it in Europe :/ Palm were much better in that they release it earlier and it was in Europe over a month ago, and still cheaper)
RE: We need a snap on like this BUT offering i705
It's a great little phone with amazing battery life (30 days on standby with the extended battery, over 24 hours actual talk time!) oh and the BT handsfree is really neat too!
I just worry I'm giving my self head cancer with all these BT attachments :-)
-- Iain
RE: We need a snap on like this BUT offering i705
the new 5 in 1 cradle
Looking forward to a CLIE version
5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
1) cigarette lighter adapter
2) AC adapter for a wall outlet
3) USB cable
4) internal batteries
5) ?
Stephen
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
As a physician, I recognize foolishness at a glance. I even recognize how much of a waste this reply is to you, since you will likely retort with some garbage to me. I can live with it.
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
Either assist others with positive info, or learn to shut it, with all due respect.
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
The origional replier was correct IMHO. All of 3 seconds was all it would have taken.
The phrase "Read The ****ing Manual" spings instantly to mind.
It would have taken you *less* time to check the web site than to post asking about the features.
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
quote:
Your reply to the person was perfectly fine, until you felt you had to show how smart you are. It didn't work.
:endquote
As an independant observer this was *clearly* not an attempt to look smart on his part. He was pointing out how stupid you are.
YOUR REPLY how ever *WAS* clearly an attempt to make you look smart and defend your stupidity.
I'm entirely impartial in this, this is just how it looks to me.
quote:
As a physician, I recognize foolishness at a glance.
:endquote
This has nothing to do with you being a physician, you ****ing moron!
It has to do with you being stupid - the two are not mutually exclusive.
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
Bottom line... I thought the original question was a good question. Guess that makes me stupid too. -)
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
There are 3 kinds of people in this world:
Those that can count and those that can't.
Jim
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
>
> The very first person wasn't stupid, they just
> weren't thinking. The second person's an ass for
> responding in such an arrogant manner. The rest of
> you should have just stayed out of it. End of
> discussion.
Hmm.. do you mean BEFORE or AFTER you? ;)
Jim
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
Anyway, why didn't my "wink" emoticon come out? What's up with PIC formatting on these message boards? Weird.
Anyone know?
Jim
RE: 5 in 1? How come I only counted 4 in 1?
Latest Comments
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
- My comments -katana
We need a snap on like this BUT offering i705