Comments on: Palm to Release XScale Powered Handheld in 2003
Article Comments
(79 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: Woo Hoo!
RE: Woo Hoo!
OK, time to decide
My stack of old PDAs is getting a little bit to big:
Pilot Pro
Visor Plat
M505 (current)
Must sell OS 5 M5xx in January....must...sell.....
Good news
Who knows what new things will be added to Palm OS?
I know it'll be weird to start thinking about video and other multimedia thins on a Palm, not a PPC.
Good stuff.
:)
Why!
RE: Why!
Assuming you meant PalmSource - I think you'll find that they consider Video Players and MP3 players the domain of the application develper - not the OS.
PalmOS applications already provide video and audio apps - mainly for the Clie at the moment - but once OS5 comes out I'm sure there will be many more.
---
russ@russb.fsnet.co.uk
RE: Why!
RE: Why!
>the hardware comes out.
Not really - you just use the PalmOS 5 Simulator available from www.palmos.com/dev
This is hos many PalmOS developers are checking their applications work with the news OS - and writing upgrades to take advantgaes to the extra speed or extra funcionaltiy.
---
russ@russb.fsnet.co.uk
RE: Why!
RE: Why!
Both multimedia apps and games can check the clock speed in Palm OS and adjust themselves accordingly. If the emulator is running at a slower equivalent speed, then the app can compensate... to a point. This is how TealMovie and Kinoma Player can sync the video and audio and play them at the correct speed. Zap!2000 will adjust your scoring based on overclocking or underclocking. If you want to have some fun with one of the movie players and FastCPU, launch the application with the processor overclocked, then turn FastCPU off and play a movie. Slow motion!
RE: Why!
So a game or media app will try and perform it's updates a set amount of times a second. The PalmOS provides the SysTicksPerSecond() function which gives for any given device the number of 'ticks' (sort of quantum time particles for the application developer) per second. Using this you can use the emulator / simulator quite well to create games and media apps.
Obviously you'll still need to test on real devices eventually - but most of the development can be done without real devices.
Asus
RE: Asus
They will be OEM for Palm so they can esentially play both sides of the fence. Asus will be the one company that is certain to win the PPC vs. Palm battle. They win either way! Brilliant.
RE: Asus
-- ASUS's PPC looks like a CLIE! Oh, the irony!
RE: Asus
Pilot production?
Wow, they're bringing back the Palm Pilot! ;)
Scott
RE: Pilot production?
Sai Yo Na Na , Micro$oft !
RE: Sai Yo Na Na , Micro$oft !
RE: Sai Yo Na Na , Micro$oft !
Scott
RE: Sai Yo Na Na , Micro$oft !
That pounding sound you hear
iPaq? Buh-bye.
Casio? Buh-bye.
Toshiba? On the way out, but probably the last survivor.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
RE: That pounding sound you hear
And neither do I want to pay $599 for a PALM either.
We all know PALM is going to milk the market by charging as much as it can bear. Expect $599 from PALM for the ARM-based PDAs.
Frankly, I'll stick with my Palm Vx which does everything I want it to do.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
But Palm already dominates the market. It has more than 85% of the market.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
While PPCs won't be able to run the X-Scale at more than 206MHz, Palms will.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
Their current marketshare is about 60%
RE: That pounding sound you hear
RE: That pounding sound you hear
Uh, not quite. Toshiba just released the e740, which has a 400MHz XScale PXA250 processor.
Now, the PPC2002 OS doesn't take full advantage of XScale, but it does support the faster processors.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
Im more inclined to believe the lower figure. As Im involved in handheld retail, We sell about 50/50 PPC and PalmOS devices.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
> faster processors.
Not really. PPC2002 has to take full advantage of XScale in order for it to run at 400 MHz. Otherwise it runs at about 200 MHz.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
According to NPDTechworld, the Palm OS now has 87.2% of the U.S. retail market, growing 10 percentage points in the last two months.
www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=3459
I know you said you don't believe this but some things aren't opinions, they're facts.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
PPC won't go anywhere -- they've still got a better file system and a more open architecture. Palm folk tend to become rather over optimistic with Palm and always spin the PPC side in the worst light. That usually translates into dissapointment and whining when the 'PPC killer' turns out to be vaporware.
Look to SONY to do anything with XScale and the multimedia possibilities. Palm will simply rehash the m515 with a 320 x 320 screen -- i.e. T-615.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
RE: That pounding sound you hear
RE: That pounding sound you hear
Now clear the sand from around your head and realize that the competition, worldwide, is NOT from PPC. Symbian is one of the major players outside of the US, and Palm's biggest foreign concern.
RE: That pounding sound you hear
RE: That pounding sound you hear
Bad for now...
RE: Bad for now...
Give me a break. Hoards of people will buy the first PalmOS 5 devices when they come out this fall, and you should know that. I'll upgrade to X-Scale if it is a substantial improvement over the ARM.
-------
James Sorenson
RE: Bad for now...
XScale is ARM
If I forget to mention this in the future, please remember that Palm OS 5 runs on ARM compliant processors. If you heard about a OS 5 being run on a processor, it has to be ARM compliant.
---
News Editor
RE: Bad for now...
Yep - everybody is confused on this point. most people think that OS 5 is designed for StrongARM - its not. StrongARM is just one particular ARM design of processor (manufactured by Intel and running at 206 mhz). According to Palm, OS 5 runs on ARM 4t architechure - which already includes chips running between 18mhz and 1ghz. check out page 8 of this palm pdf:
http://210.153.100.248/slides-2002/100.pdf
RE: Bad for now...
architecture vs. implementation
Intel licenses the *architecture* from ARM (the instruction set and what it's supposed to do), as does Motorola and maybe a few others. ARM also did several CPU core designs, some of which are licensed by TI and Motorola (and many many others). There are many different ways of executing the same instruction set (think PPro, P3, P4, Athlon, Transmeta, etc. for the ia32 ISA). The actual design (pipeline depth, cache layout, etc.) of an XScale is very different from that of an ARM Inc. designed core.
performance
RE: Bad for now...
2003??
This is taking way too long in my opinion.
RE: 2003??
RE: 2003??
"Palm's XScale powered handhelds will be available early next year, which means they won't be the company's first devices to run Palm OS 5."
"Palm's CEO said last week that his company will release an OS 5 smartphone this fall which will use TI chips."
RE: 2003??
ARM compilers. Intel has made changes to the arch.
In fact its been mentioned before that StrongARM based PocketPCs outperform the XScale using existing tools.
RE: 2003??
RE: 2003??
Sony First Most Likely
My Handspring Edge will go to my wife when the OS5 devices start coming out. Maybe next year I'll upgrade.
RE: Sony First Most Likely
Don't you think Palm would be the first to release a device a division of them created? What makes you think Palmsource didn't give Palm the OS before they shipped it out to other companies? Only time will tell but it is pretty obvious that Palm will be first out the gate.
-Bosco
RE: Sony First Most Likely
RE: Sony First Most Likely
> shipped it out to other companies?
A while back I asked Mike Mace from PalmSource about this and he promised me it wouldn't happen. PalmSource is trying as hard as it can to be scrupulously fair to all the licensees. If any of them got word that Palm had been given such a large advantage there would be big trouble.
---
News Editor
RE: Sony First Most Likely
Sony, again, and again, and a discontinue or two
RE: Sony First Most Likely
Maybe it's only palm Inc. that leads you in thinking that Palm really cost 400 dollars and really worth 400 dollars, but the truth is they are over charging for the longest while. So maybe Sony is making less profit than Palm inc. on Palm Devices, but I love the way they do it, at least they are bring something new to the palm platform every year.
RE: Sony First Most Likely
RE: Sony First Most Likely
TI vs. Intel
-Bosco
RE: TI vs. Intel
RE: TI vs. Intel
Both have a position in the marketplace and still manage to differentiate their products. Provided that PalmOS will run on either chipset (as promised) then we as consumers might actually be winners here.
I can see a company producing a line of Palm devices with both chips - the TI omap chips for the cellphone/wireless device market, the Intel for the high end MHz junkies, and perhaps Motorola for the general consumer levels devices (the sort we recommend to family and friends).
RE: TI vs. Intel
RE: TI vs. Intel
RE: TI vs. Intel
Too Little, Too Late
<end satire>
Sorry, but I really missed seeing this hackneyed post on a discussion related to a new Palm development. I suppose it's the twisted part of me taking over.
RE: Too Little, Too Late
RE: Too Little, Too Late
Which CPU is power saver?
Could anyone tell me, under the same speed, say 200MHz or 100Mhz, which CPU use less power?
And I just got my 505 tweaked!
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
Woo Hoo!