Comments on: Rumor: More Info on Palm's Forthcoming Low-End Handheld
Article Comments
(103 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: not for me
RE: not for me
Excuse ME!
RE: Excuse You
Pricing is all about profit margin. If it costs $90 to make a m100 and Palm sells it for $100, it makes an OK profit. But if they designed the new model to be even cheaper to make, like $70, and can sell it for $100, that's much better. Especially considering they will be selling it for $70 in less than 6 months.
People won't pay the same thing for a PDA that was released a year ago as they will for one that has just been released. But if what it costs you to make the PDA doesn't decline at the same rate, you got problems. That's probably why Palm is making a new low end model that will be cheaper to make and give a better profit margin than the m100 or m105.
Mind Reader
You nailed it, right-on.
People tend to get caught up in thinking that each new low-end release has to be a "better low-end model" than the last.
Not so.
It merely needs to be identical, or slightly better than yesterday's unit, but it has to be more PROFITABLE.
The m100 was not intended to be sold for $100, let alone $80 or $90 (as this new low-end model will be within 8 months).
This model doesn't suit us, but it suits many, many, many people. It will continue to saturate the market with Palm based PDAs, and what's good for the general Palm market, is good for you & I.
More development, more R & D, more CHOICES.
RE: Excuse ME!
To rant a bit, I'm one of those people. I got sucked in to the hype and bought a [non-Palm OS PDA] because I thought it would have all these great features that I need. Well, it doesn't. I miss my Palm V. Sure I like color, but the reason I loved my V was because it was small enough to take everywhere, held all my PIM data, and had a bunch of great software that did other valuable things, none of which were viewing or creating power-point presentations.
I'm coming back to the Palm camp, and soon. Maybe not with this low-end device, but I'm certainly never going to pay more than $200 for a PDA again.
RE: Excuse ME!
RE: Excuse ME!
RE: Excuse ME!
Another reason
I'm just curious as to why would Palm market a new device at the same price as an older device (m105) even though it doesn't have as many things??? I don't see a reason why somebody would pick this up as a 2 mb organizer if you can get an m105 for the same price with 8 mb. What features does this thing have that are better than the m105??? Or the m100???
________________________________________
Make it idiot proof, and somebody will make a better idiot.
RE: Another reason
RE: Another reason
The reason why anybody would buy it is maybe the form is better. It isn't always about RAM and features. Sometimes people buy thigns just because it "looks cool."
RE: Another reason
They look sharp. I've seen some ex-demo models for about 190 euro. I'm wondering.. are they really worth it?
RE: Another reason
RE: Another reason
RE: Another reason
Hey Palm good one.
Looks like they are clearing out old inventory from R&D. Spring cleaning coming early? Well maybe too late....
RE: Hey Palm good one.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
My only question: why white? I would never buy a white handheld.
====
Boze
====
RE: Hey Palm good one.
: handheld.
Maybe to match the iPod? ;)
In all seriousness, wasn't there an article not too long ago (couldn't find it in PIC archives) stating that Palm and Apple were working on some joint project?
Jim
RE: Hey Palm good one.
Chew on that.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
Puhleeze, you can get an M105 BRAND NEW for $99. Used for around $30. So why release something like this. It must be a joke.
Fall cleaning for Palm's R&D dept. I would like to see a show of hands for anyone that would pay $100 for this thing and buy it instead of an M105.
.......yeah that's what I thought.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
> So why release something like this. It must be a joke.
I talked about this under another thread but I'll (briefly) repeat myself. If it costs $90 to make a m105 and Palm sells it for $100, it makes an OK profit. But if they designed the new model to be even cheaper to make, like $70, and can sell it for $100, that's much better.
I think the m105 is much too big and I don't like the screen. If the new one doesn't have these drawbacks, I'd consider it a much better model. A huge number of sales will go to the company that can get a good-looking monochrome screen in a $100 model.
> White??
The iPod is white and it is constantly praised for its good looks. You are (mistakenly) believing what you want is what everyone wants.
If it's smaller/thinner
RE: Hey Palm good one.
SO let me get this straight. I paid $150 for my 105. So now when they release a "new model", lets call it protoype X. I, being an m105 owner will rush out and get it for two reasons:
1. Palm's cost is $70 so I should buy it at a $100 to give them a $30 profit. Compared to buying an M105 and only giving them $10. Agh no.
2. Because its another new cheap palm that "may" have a better screen. Agh no. I would have rather of spent the $150 and the $100 on a $250 palm.
SO again, I restate. This must be a joke.
Dumb or Blind?
This unit makes total sense.
You clearly have no understanding of manufacturing, profit margins, or pricing strategies.
Dumb or Blind.Hmmm... tough one
Dumb becuase you believe this:
"Uh, no.....you will *NOT* be able to even FIND an m105 by the time this thing comes out, so your theory is completely wrong."
And this:
"This unit makes total sense."
And Blind because of this:
"You clearly have no understanding of manufacturing, profit margins, or pricing strategies."
You obviously are new here and missed this: http://palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=3975
So next time before you open your hotdog hole, read....read....read..... then try to get your GED kid. Then maybe you can post something constructive to these forums.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
In all likelyhood, they will discontinue the m1xx BEFORE this unit hits the market (watch for it to happen SOON)
RE: Hey Palm good one.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
> lets call it protoype X. I, being an m105 owner will rush out and get it
You are caught in the mindset that the only people who will buy a handheld are the people who are looking for an upgrade. There are many millions of people in the U.S. and billions on the Earth who don't already own one. These are the target market.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
__________________________________________________________________
My palm III was 50p from a charity shop, and introduced me to pdas
cool name.....
I have a better name
RE: I have a better name
Call it Yugo,Pinto or Edsel. Seems Palm will have the same fate as these vehicles for dumping their R&D rejects on the public.
C'mon guys what's the real dope on Palm. A white PDA with two buttons. If that is not a "limited lot" of protypes then I don't know what is.....
RE: I have a better name
Only Two Buttons?
I've got to hope the source is wrong on this one. Only including two buttons would be a big, big mistake for Palm. Software makers would in theory need to try and support models with different numbers of buttons and now we're in PocketPC territory where the button layouts are all over the map. Woe.
-Kevin Crossman
RE: Only Two Buttons?
RE: Only Two Buttons?
Pocket PCs have a common layout that includes a central joy pad, with application buttons on either side. How is that "all over the map"?
Unless it has a D-pad.
If this is true, though, it's kind of a shame the device has no SD slot, because companies could make a lot of money selling games hard-coded into SD cards to kids. It would hold down on piracy, and maybe you could build some basic acceleration into the SD card as well. Still, if they had to cut something, losing SD at this price point is certainly justifiable, since it might never be used, and it makes the system more expensive and fragile.
"All opinions posted are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled."
RE: Only Two Buttons?
RE: Only Two Buttons?
RE: Only Two Buttons?
>a central joy pad, with application buttons on
>either side. How is that "all over the map"?
Look, I don't claim to be a PocketPC expert but I know for a fact that some of those devices have four buttons and some only have two or three (in addition to the dpad). That's what I would call all over the map!
-Kevin Crossman
RE: Only Two Buttons?
Look, I understand trying to target the low-end market. So why not just release a "reveamped" m100 (OS 4, 2 mb ram, USB and UC, etc) to ensure that people can continue to use their m100 stylus and colored faceplates?
I cannot imagine that leaving off 2 hard buttons saves that much $. If it does, it's still defeating the entire purpose of trying to get people to play games on the Palm platform. I know plenty of college student types that carry a cheap m100 (yep, with a color cover on it) and sit in the back of the lecture hall and play Zap!, Hardball, Bejeweled, Joust etc etc.
There are both good and bad (VERY bad) ways to recycle leftover m100 components...I'll let you figure out which one this POS is. Palm's upcoming holiday season is going to be so wretchedly bad it will make PIC readers' eyes water.
If anything, it'll turn off the dads'n grads who go into Best Buy to buy one of these units. I can hear the salesman now: "Well dude, if you had come in a month ago, we had these m105 units with a bunch more ram and a mail in rebate for $100. Since they are all gone now I'd really recommend you buy this Visor Neo/Sony Clie/PPC instead. You get a lot more bang for your buck. or just go a few aisles down and get one of those Royal pocket organizers for $20."
RE: Only Two Buttons?
And I personally think 2 buttons is very possible--if the up-down controls are replaced with a real joypad. Then you've got almost a Gameboy-like layout that should be plenty versatile for the organizer-and-frogger crowd (i.e. my entry-level PalmOS friends).
C'mon - you serious????
This is an early April Fools joke from Palm.
RE: Only Two Buttons?
The cheap Palm's are probably more appealing to 20 and 30 somethings with kids, a mortgage, and a 401K that just lost $15,000. Games aren't important to these people.
RE: Only Two Buttons?
RE: Only Two Buttons?
No it's not. It's a late April Fools joke. Late, like everything else Palm does.
I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
After seeing Handspring's Treo 270, I'm ready to buy one!
However, I keep waiting (impatiently) for the details of Palm's integrated phone/PDA device with OS 5.0 to decide which device to buy.
I believe that Palm needs to issue a press release this week with the details of each device, especially the phone/PDA combo. According to the article in June, their target release date was Fall 2002. I can understand being vague with details in June. It's now August 2002. The product offerings should be finalized by now, don't you think?
Any insiders know why Palm has been silent on these devices since June?
RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
Can you say m505?
RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
> Can you say m505?
Right. In case you don't get this reference, last year Palm announced the m505 in March when it wasn't available until May. During those two months, no one bought any high end Palm products (it was the Vx at the time). Turns out that in order for a company to make money, people need to buy its products. That financial crisis almost killed Palm (and Handspring, too). Neither company has completely recovered yet.
Palm won't announce its OS 5 model until about two hours before you can buy one. This is the only way to keep up sales of the m515 and keep money coming in. They won't announce it weeks or months ahead of time just because you are getting impatient.
this is #@%*!
RE: this is #@%*!
RE: this is #@%*!
Spoken in my best James Cagney imitation: "Nah, me and the boys ain't buying dis ting, see? If youse try an sell it to us, we'll rubs you out, see? Nah."
RE: this is #@%*!
You know it's kind of hard
Just to get along today
Our subject isn't cool
But he fakes it anyway
He may not have a clue
And he may not have style
But everything he lacks
Well he makes up in denial
or "Boyz in tha hood" (Dynamite Hack release).
W3rd d00d!
RE: this is #@%*!
RE: this is #@%*!
You sure don't get threads like this on the other PDA boards. :)
Palm is on the right way!
Iīm still using an Palm III, and it fulfills all my needs, including news (AvantGo) and email (Eudora). The integrated software is OK, but I also like some of the free- and shareware that is out there.
I donīt need a hgh-end PDA, but who needs one can buy one from Palm, too.
With regards
Stefan D. from Mannheim, Germany
I think it is time for a poll.
----or-----
2. Would buy a NEW M105 with 8 megs of ram and the usual 4 buttons.
Both asking price $100.
I say number 2 is a no brainer.
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
-Kevin Crossman
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
If not, then the user will remain totally content with doing basic PIM stuff and playing chess on a slower CPU. I would say that the average intermediate/semi-expert user will feel a ram pinch at 2mb LONG before they feel a mhz shortage. Besides, Palm software is growing increasingly bloated. imagine how pi**ed off your typical high shool/college gamer raised on Playstation will be when he buys Rayman or Serious Sam (in retail packaging, bought at the same time as this new low-end unit) for Palm OS and realizes it will not even fit in his meagre 2 mb of ram !?
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
1. Would you buy a NEW white palm, two buttons and two megs of ram that is smaller than a m105 with a full size screen.
----or-----
2. Would buy a NEW M105 with 8 megs of ram and the usual 4 buttons with a reduced size screen.
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
My points exactly.
"right now you can get an m105 on amazon for 84.95 with free shipping, no tax and ten bucks towards your next purchase at amazon making it in-effect 74.95. At that price the M105 can't be beat."
My M105 rocks with Fast CPU. The screen is something you just get used to. I tell ya, now for a few bucks more, the M125 with SD slot is the way to go.
Fogettabout the 2mb pinch.
Here do this:
Price the 105 with 8 megs.
Price the "protype X" with 2 megs.
Now what would it cost to upgrade the X to 8 megs. Even my 16 mghz, rechargeable AAA's and 8 megs will win this battle. Plus the reverse screen hack works great.
Palm should release this thing as a $25 dollar "intro to Palm". Now were talking! I'd buy one for the heck of it.
But seriously, they should have crammed an SD slot on there somewhere......
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
But, whatever happened to handspring?
I say, it's either a new m105, that "new" low-end palm, or a refurb Handspring Visor Platinum for just $20. For $20 more, u get a bigger screen, and a faster cpu.
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
These days I'd consider 8MB to be a bare minimum but then again I'm not the target audience for this product. I would think 8MB on the low-end, 16 to 32MB on the mid-range models, and a minimum of 32MB on the new OS 5 models.
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
So instead of creating basic Arm device, which really is the Top end (Oslo), then they just rehash the m105 in white body.
Ideally the top end would be something that out do PPC in term of screen, size, battery endurance, and eye poping gimmick. Something like the rumored top end Sony Arm device that can play and record video. But they can't pull it off, instead they just cobble together the best they can do and come out with a mediocre OSLO. (kinda expensive, kinda ugly, kinda ho-hum, all in the name of Zen)
Ideal low cost.
Think about it, big screan (w/ VG), CF/SD expansion, AA battery. (it doesn't matter if it come with 2/4 meg, since SD price has plummet)
Sony has smaller screen, albeit more pixel, and proprietary memstick slot.
Too bad Palm Inc. doesn't have the vision, and all they can do is rehashing palm V in different chasis.
RE: Ideal low cost.
RE: Ideal low cost.
It should come with some freebies, though. Maybe a free memory card or something, to sweeten the deal.
Better yet...
http://news.com.com/2110-1040-937015.html?tag=cdshrt
Just lightening up this dark thread...
Happy Monday!
2mb? I don't think so
It doesn't seem consistent with the way Palm has been going. Nor does it make much sense when you think that an 8mb chip isn't going to cost all that much more than 2mb.
One of the main reasons people buy PPCs is because they see a PPC with 32mb, a Palm with 8mb, and so they conclude that the PPC is better. (Come on! We've all seen this!)
I can't believe Palm would release one with 2mb.
Heck, install Docs to go and avantgo and you wouldn't have anything left!
(Actually as I write this post, I realise the flaw in my argument - most Palm users don't install anything at all, do they? They use the calender and phone book. 2mb is more than enough. PIC readers excepted, of course).
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
You are right about this. Palm is actually being smart on this one, they are trying to get a new market. Think about it this new palm would be perfect for kids in high school or others who want a nice datebook, and don't care about the free software and stuff. I would say a majority of people don't care about games, or about all this free software. I have also talked to a lot of girls who said they would buy a palm if it looked good and was cheap, we all know the m100's don't look good. 2MB is still a lot of space for certain people. And for the super users palm will come out with the OSLO and then the phone and one and still sell the 515 at 3 hundred, and then all will be happy :) now just want to throw this out, if this cheap unit was 2mb and had wireless ability, won't that change all of your minds ???
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
It's just the combination of 2 megs + no SD slot + reduction in buttons that adds up to a hideous device. I could (sort of) understand having a 2 meg unit with a few games in ROM and a D-pad. I could (sort of) understand a 2 meg unit with a card slot. I could certainly understand a bare-bones 4 meg unit. However, a 2 meg non-expandable unit is an absolute joke...the kids will stick with their Game Boys, TI-83 calculators and little black books, thank you very much.
Do you know HOW misinformed the average retail sales clerk (no flames, please-I am just speaking for the ones I've encountered) is? They will stand there next to an equally clueless consumer and say "don't be fooled by this Palm's cheap price, it has zero ram for expansion. Your computer at home has 256 megs, right? well, you need this $300 PPC!" There's no way to educate this segment of the market on bloatware, overclocking, or system tweaks. These are often impulse purchases and the new Palm will not stack up well at all next to the PPC units that have all the hip buzzwords like "MP3, XX megs of ram, XX mhz etc"
Consumers buy cars based by horsepower ratings and PCs based on Mhz and never bother with the intangibles.
My friend who works at Best Buy is getting flack all the time from the kids whose parents just bought them a brand-spankin' new E-machines Celeron 1.4ghz for back to school. Can you imagine how awfully disappointed they are when the integrated 810 video core runs Quake III worse than a 3 year old pIII 500 with a decent AGP card (and cannot run modern 3d games at all!) The same is going to apply to his new Palm bottom-feeder. Better bring out the bodybags, folks! I can only hope the casing this thing comes in is _very_ trendy---anyone remember the IIIe SE?
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
The only things that use up tons of space on the Palm platform are pictures and electronic books, and I only carry around a couple of maps as pictures, and one or two ebooks. Though I admit, my next Palm will have a lot more space so I can carry more books and a good Bible app.
As for the argument that 8 MB is not much more expensive, to get a brand-new unit under $100, chances are every penny counts, and $100 probably is a "magic number" for getting new sales. Besides, if you want to be cynical, it allows users to get a Palm cheap, use it, like it, then outgrow it and buy a new one in two years.
8 would be better than 2, but 2 is far from unusable.
Jon Acheson
"All opinions posted are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled."
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
> programs. You would have to delete one program to give the other a try.
You are exactly right. Joe Six-pack bought this 2MB Palm, figured out how to install free apps, experiment a few, frustrated by the limited 2MB Ram, and *BAM* !! He'll get a high-end model, and give this 2MB Palm to Joe Seven-pack. Then same thing happens to Joe Seven-pack, one more user converted to Palm loyalist, and Palm gets the revenue.
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
While I too whish that Palm would have got a MMC/SD slot in (which IMHO would mute some of the criticism) I suspect that the cost was a factor.
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
Two or three years ago, 80% of handeld buyers installed no additional applications. Maybe that's down to around 30% of Palm users; that's still 5 million customers. 2 MB will be plenty for new buyers in this market segment.
Clueless Hypocrites
Yet Palm came out with "glorified-organizers" that were low-powered, low cost, yet effective PDAs that saturated the market and inspired a sort of "fanaticism" that powers discussion groups like the very one we're on right now.
Palm brought out, (what in my mind at the time) something that was total CRAP, yet a community developed, the market for PDAs FLOURISHED, the devices improved, and WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF FOR IT.
Repeat: **WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF FOR IT**
So let me get things straight....I just wanna be clear on things as I take the temperature here at PIC.....YOU PEOPLE ARE MAKING FUN OF PALM FOR CREATING ANOTHER UNIT THAT WILL FURTHER SATURATE THE MARKET WITH PALM OS, thereby making all of our lives easier????
That just doesn't make sense.
You people simply DON'T MAKE SENSE.
I'm sure you jokers would rag on Palm if they came out with a Palm OS enabled cash register too, even though it would probably allow you to do things as a consumer you simply CANNOT do now.
Anything that has the Palm OS in it is good for US. We benefit from it one way or another. It's a standard we're pushing here, not a particular unit.
Just like with DVDs. If it were possible to sell a $50 DVD player and turn a profit, you bet your *ss your video store would carry MOSTLY DVDs, instead of "some" DVDs.
Get real folks.
Please, GET REAL.
RE: Clueless Hypocrites
> For more than half a decade, Palm released units that were absolutely, positively INFERIOR to the Apple Newton, both technologically and benefit-wise.
Technologically, perhaps. Benefit-wise is open to some discussion.
(specs from PDAStreet/PalmBlvd - They don't have a Palm 1000 listing, or I would have used that instead.)
You mean, inferior as in terms of weight?
MessagePad 2100 - Weight:22.4 oz
Palm Pilot Pro - Weight:6.0 oz
Well, it's almost 4x as heavy, so...
Maybe size?
MessagePad 2100 - Size (Inches): 8.3 x 4.7 x 1.12
Palm Pilot Pro - Size (Inches): 4.7 x 3.2 x 0.7
How about battery life?
MessagePad 2100 - ?Rumored to be in single digits?, 4 AA batteries
Palm Pilot Pro - Battery Life:30 hrs, 2 AAA batteries
For those of you who don't remember your grandfather's hand-crank pocket babbage engine, we're comparing the final-model Newton to Palm's third PDA model,(which was almost hardware-identical to the first, save for the backlight.)
Other than that, good point!
RE: Clueless Hypocrites
Trademarked names examined
Any of the open grazing areas of southern Africa.
Maybe the wireless model?
Tungsten
A hard, brittle, corrosion-resistant, gray to white metallic element extracted from wolframite, scheelite, and other minerals, having the highest melting point and lowest vapor pressure of any metal.
Low end model?
Zire
dunno, maybe the brother of general Zod from Superman II
http://www.generalzod.net/
Eagles may soar but at least weasles don't get sucked into jet engines.
RE: Trademarked names examined
Interesting post.
RE: Trademarked names examined
Slogan A: "I vant a new hand-veld" "Go out and get Palm's latest hand-veld: the Veld!" Ugh.
Slogan B: "I de-zire somezing fazter." "I'll get you a Palm Zire, sire!" Eww.
Slogan C: "Fast, efficient and delicious: a Palm Tungsten".
The third one might fly, or they might be the new names for models released exclusively in Transylvania. Or maybe Palm can do whatever they please because they, unlike normal companies that turn a profit, don't need marketing, just word of mouth (or word of Tungsten to increase de-zire to buy the new hand-veld).
RE: Trademarked names examined
Canary Techinque
Wouldn't you feel dumb to leak a report on a 2MB, 2 button PDA, then have Palm come out with something completely different?
RE: Canary Techinque
This technique is not just used in novels - Palm and other companies do this on a regular basis. FWIW, I worked at Palm for 2 years. I've also spent a bit of time inside Apple's 4 walls...
RE: Canary Techinque
Soooo, what can you tell us about the Zaphod - the new PalmOS/iPod hybrid :)
FUD.
Trained Seal Act
In all seriousness, this is pretty cool dialogue - the real test for Palm is whether they listen (assuming, of course, you're the market they're looking for...).
Lost and Found
Please pick it up here at the reception counter, it has lost its direction in the search of more users and for being too comfortable as the leader.
oslo
--Devan--
RE: oslo
---
News Editor
RE: oslo
under $100 palm?
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
not for me
i'm glad to hear this'll be in the palm family