Comments on: Rumor: More Info on Palm's Forthcoming Low-End Handheld

Several sources have come forward with more information on the sub-$100 model Palm will release later this year. According to one who says he has actually seen a prototype, it is a very basic model with 2 MB of memory and no SD/MMC slot. It is not a member of the venerable m100 series. Instead, it has a shape which is described as being similar to Sony's T series. It will come in an all-white plastic casing.
Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (103 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

not for me

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 10:50:11 AM #
Not for me, but this should be a great unit for people knew to the palm scene who just wanna "try it out" but aren't ready to shell out a few hundred bucks.

i'm glad to hear this'll be in the palm family

RE: not for me
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 10:54:25 AM #
Well, except for the serial port HotSync cable, I'd bet they'd be better off picking up one of those $99 m105s than waiting for Palm's new $99 unit. I doubt the new Palm will have 8MB, and it probably will be of cheaper construction than the m105, which was designed to sell for more than the price it's going for.

RE: not for me
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 9:13:05 PM #
I think it will have 8 MB RAM, USB etc. If sony can put a high-rez screen, expansion, and all of the other features in their handheld and sell it for $150, then Palm can sell an 8 MB Palm for $99.

Excuse ME!

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 11:08:58 AM #
If no one bought the m1xx series to enter into this market, why would they buy a 2mb Palm now? Why not buy a used Palmpilot! Is Palm competiting with those Sharp organizers??? Like I said before, glorified organizers. That's all. Nothing new. Seems Palm is going backwards. Sorry guys, it's just my 2 cents.
RE: Excuse You
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 11:12:13 AM #
People bought the m100 by the truck-load. It was one of the most successful PDAs of all time... but not with the people who read PIC, who are hobbists and will spend big bucks on a PDA. Cheap models like this are why the Palm OS has 4 times the sales of PPC.

Pricing is all about profit margin. If it costs $90 to make a m100 and Palm sells it for $100, it makes an OK profit. But if they designed the new model to be even cheaper to make, like $70, and can sell it for $100, that's much better. Especially considering they will be selling it for $70 in less than 6 months.

People won't pay the same thing for a PDA that was released a year ago as they will for one that has just been released. But if what it costs you to make the PDA doesn't decline at the same rate, you got problems. That's probably why Palm is making a new low end model that will be cheaper to make and give a better profit margin than the m100 or m105.

Mind Reader
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 1:19:37 PM #
It's almost as if you stole my thoughts.

You nailed it, right-on.

People tend to get caught up in thinking that each new low-end release has to be a "better low-end model" than the last.

Not so.

It merely needs to be identical, or slightly better than yesterday's unit, but it has to be more PROFITABLE.

The m100 was not intended to be sold for $100, let alone $80 or $90 (as this new low-end model will be within 8 months).

This model doesn't suit us, but it suits many, many, many people. It will continue to saturate the market with Palm based PDAs, and what's good for the general Palm market, is good for you & I.

More development, more R & D, more CHOICES.

RE: Excuse ME!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:19:20 PM #
I agree. I think that the folks on this board forget that there are about 18 million people out there who own Palms but don't want to watch streaming media on their GPRS-enabled PDA, and that many folks view the $100 price point as reasonable for disposable income.

To rant a bit, I'm one of those people. I got sucked in to the hype and bought a [non-Palm OS PDA] because I thought it would have all these great features that I need. Well, it doesn't. I miss my Palm V. Sure I like color, but the reason I loved my V was because it was small enough to take everywhere, held all my PIM data, and had a bunch of great software that did other valuable things, none of which were viewing or creating power-point presentations.

I'm coming back to the Palm camp, and soon. Maybe not with this low-end device, but I'm certainly never going to pay more than $200 for a PDA again.

RE: Excuse ME!
maven @ 8/12/2002 3:13:18 PM #
Someone called this device a "glorified organizer" - you know, it's funny, but thats EXACTLY the reason I bought my original PalmPilot. I needed a really good organizer. The Pilot was perfect for me, and I bet a "gorified organizer" if exactly what many consumers need, not some shrunk-down PC. At least not at first -- many of them will love their device so much they give their basic model to somebody else and upgrade to a super-deluxe version which opens new worlds to them. Thats what happened to me, now 4 years and 4 Palm OS PDA's later :)

RE: Excuse ME!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/14/2002 9:46:30 AM #
Well this is the same old thing that we have been hearing from Jeff Kirwen and the other M$ lackeys out there. On the basis of this logic, that piece of junk on my desk is just a typewriter, since I only use it for typing.


RE: Excuse ME!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/29/2002 7:57:43 AM #
What's the problem with a low-end PDA? It's different strokes for different folks. Palm will STILL be making a high-end OS 5 model so those who want to run their office on a Palm still can, those who just want to get themselves organised and hold down a few apps at the same time then they're fine too. Everyone's happy, or that's the way it should be at least.

Another reason

abosco @ 8/12/2002 11:12:42 AM #
Since you mentioned those trademark names, Ed, I further realized that Palm probably won't use Oslo as their device name. If they were planning on it, they would've also trademarked Oslo along with the other three. It's definately just a codename for it.

I'm just curious as to why would Palm market a new device at the same price as an older device (m105) even though it doesn't have as many things??? I don't see a reason why somebody would pick this up as a 2 mb organizer if you can get an m105 for the same price with 8 mb. What features does this thing have that are better than the m105??? Or the m100???

________________________________________
Make it idiot proof, and somebody will make a better idiot.

RE: Another reason
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 11:28:41 AM #
Maybe it won't be as ugly as the m1xx series. Yech!
RE: Another reason
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:27:40 PM #
The reason why Palm would sell this is because it has "less stuff", it will be cheaper to make and give them more profits.

The reason why anybody would buy it is maybe the form is better. It isn't always about RAM and features. Sometimes people buy thigns just because it "looks cool."

RE: Another reason
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 4:56:35 PM #
if they only cared about looks. Why don't re-manufacture Visors Edge and sell these for 100 US-$?

They look sharp. I've seen some ex-demo models for about 190 euro. I'm wondering.. are they really worth it?

RE: Another reason
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 9:46:32 PM #
Visor Edge? If you're a technocrat, you probably will buy a Visor Edge. But remember that the sub $100 market doesn't care more about the screen and features like what the previous post. Within this market segment, Palm has definitely the advantage because of product mindshare. Palm is still "Palm". Just like how "Coca-Cola" sounds when it comes to Colas.
RE: Another reason
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 3:32:13 AM #
Visor Edge?! That was one of the ugliest devices ever manufactured!!

RE: Another reason
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 4:08:59 AM #
It is individual perceptions on what is ugly.....

Hey Palm good one.

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 11:13:53 AM #
It's not every April 1st either. Boy this should help raise their stock prices.....

Looks like they are clearing out old inventory from R&D. Spring cleaning coming early? Well maybe too late....

RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 11:31:03 AM #
I don't understand your point at all. Are you a snob, who believes that only $800 handhelds are "worthy"? At least four times as many people buy <$100 PDAs as buy >$500. Cheap PDAs are "gateway" models. Once someone buys an inexpensive palm PDA, if later they want an expensive one, they are much more likely to get another palm. This is a proven sales stategy for cars, computers, etc.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
Boze @ 8/12/2002 11:39:08 AM #
I agree. This is a great strategy. I am living proof. I had never even thought about buying a PDA, then my dad got me an m100 for Christmas 2000 (he bought the cheapest unit available, since he wasn't sure if I would use it). It only had 2MB memory, but it was great for keeping contacts, to-do lists, and reading AvantGo content. Also, I could connect it to my mobile phone and do some minimal web-surfing in a pinch. Less than 18 months later, I upgraded to a Sony N610, and have spent almost $100 on software since I bought it in February 2002. I am also now a loyal Palm OS user. This strategy works!

My only question: why white? I would never buy a white handheld.

====
Boze
====

RE: Hey Palm good one.
jjsoh @ 8/12/2002 11:48:49 AM #
: My only question: why white? I would never buy a white
: handheld.

Maybe to match the iPod? ;)

In all seriousness, wasn't there an article not too long ago (couldn't find it in PIC archives) stating that Palm and Apple were working on some joint project?


Jim

RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:18:25 PM #
How do we know iPod doesn't already run PalmOS?

Chew on that.

RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:28:42 PM #
The iPod doesn't run the PalmOS. It uses software by Pixo Inc. Someday though.....
RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:37:26 PM #
Agh, no not a snob. For a company that is whirling into a downward spiral, the last thing they need to do is release 2mb Palm models. White?? Like I said, R&D rejects.

Puhleeze, you can get an M105 BRAND NEW for $99. Used for around $30. So why release something like this. It must be a joke.

Fall cleaning for Palm's R&D dept. I would like to see a show of hands for anyone that would pay $100 for this thing and buy it instead of an M105.

.......yeah that's what I thought.

RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:53:49 PM #
> Puhleeze, you can get an M105 BRAND NEW for $99. Used for around $30.
> So why release something like this. It must be a joke.

I talked about this under another thread but I'll (briefly) repeat myself. If it costs $90 to make a m105 and Palm sells it for $100, it makes an OK profit. But if they designed the new model to be even cheaper to make, like $70, and can sell it for $100, that's much better.

I think the m105 is much too big and I don't like the screen. If the new one doesn't have these drawbacks, I'd consider it a much better model. A huge number of sales will go to the company that can get a good-looking monochrome screen in a $100 model.

> White??

The iPod is white and it is constantly praised for its good looks. You are (mistakenly) believing what you want is what everyone wants.

If it's smaller/thinner
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:58:01 PM #
Then lots of people would buy it. Even M100/105 owners.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 1:12:46 PM #
White is fine, I said white with two buttons....is odd.

SO let me get this straight. I paid $150 for my 105. So now when they release a "new model", lets call it protoype X. I, being an m105 owner will rush out and get it for two reasons:

1. Palm's cost is $70 so I should buy it at a $100 to give them a $30 profit. Compared to buying an M105 and only giving them $10. Agh no.

2. Because its another new cheap palm that "may" have a better screen. Agh no. I would have rather of spent the $150 and the $100 on a $250 palm.

SO again, I restate. This must be a joke.

Dumb or Blind?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:35:41 PM #
Uh, no.....you will *NOT* be able to even FIND an m105 by the time this thing comes out, so your theory is completely wrong.

This unit makes total sense.

You clearly have no understanding of manufacturing, profit margins, or pricing strategies.

Dumb or Blind.Hmmm... tough one
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:46:07 PM #
Well I will say that you are both Dumb AND Blind.

Dumb becuase you believe this:
"Uh, no.....you will *NOT* be able to even FIND an m105 by the time this thing comes out, so your theory is completely wrong."

And this:

"This unit makes total sense."

And Blind because of this:
"You clearly have no understanding of manufacturing, profit margins, or pricing strategies."

You obviously are new here and missed this: http://palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=3975

So next time before you open your hotdog hole, read....read....read..... then try to get your GED kid. Then maybe you can post something constructive to these forums.

RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 5:43:52 PM #
Why do you people assume that Palm will still make the m105 by the time the new product comes out ?

In all likelyhood, they will discontinue the m1xx BEFORE this unit hits the market (watch for it to happen SOON)


RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 6:08:53 PM #
LOL trolls...it already is discontinued, in line with Sony's philosophy.
RE: Hey Palm good one.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 10:38:58 PM #
> SO let me get this straight. I paid $150 for my 105. So now when they release a "new model",
> lets call it protoype X. I, being an m105 owner will rush out and get it

You are caught in the mindset that the only people who will buy a handheld are the people who are looking for an upgrade. There are many millions of people in the U.S. and billions on the Earth who don't already own one. These are the target market.

RE: Hey Palm good one.
formerlyanon @ 8/29/2002 10:26:39 AM #
i dont think you are supposed to buy it, it is for new users. you must spend more money to get better. the LEM introduces people to handhelds, like my palm III did.

__________________________________________________________________
My palm III was 50p from a charity shop, and introduced me to pdas

cool name.....

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 11:34:57 AM #
Tungsten could be the name for the new handheld. Slim, energy saving and the barest of bones model.
dumb-palm
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 4:12:57 AM #
this sounds cool too.

Zip zilla

I have a better name

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:08:43 PM #
A 2 meg all-white PDA with called Tungsten, Zire, or Veld? I have a better name...Hoax!
RE: I have a better name
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:41:40 PM #
You are being to kind. Now stop it!!!

Call it Yugo,Pinto or Edsel. Seems Palm will have the same fate as these vehicles for dumping their R&D rejects on the public.

C'mon guys what's the real dope on Palm. A white PDA with two buttons. If that is not a "limited lot" of protypes then I don't know what is.....

RE: I have a better name
Beavis @ 8/12/2002 3:35:18 PM #
I don't think the Pinto was a reject. I recall seeing lots of them out on the road. It suffered from "Sudden Explosion Syndrome" when struck from behind.

Only Two Buttons?

kevdo @ 8/12/2002 12:12:06 PM #
Seems like a bad idea... espcially since low-end users are more likely to be game players who'll need or want all four buttons.

I've got to hope the source is wrong on this one. Only including two buttons would be a big, big mistake for Palm. Software makers would in theory need to try and support models with different numbers of buttons and now we're in PocketPC territory where the button layouts are all over the map. Woe.

-Kevin Crossman

RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 12:23:49 PM #
I don't think you should put "games" and "low end" in the same sentence. In reality games are more likely to be HIGH END. Look at your average PC. The only reason why you need these Ghz processors and graphics accelerators is because of games.
RE: Only Two Buttons?
Foo Fighter @ 8/12/2002 12:49:14 PM #
> "and now we're in PocketPC territory where the button layouts are all over the map. Woe."

Pocket PCs have a common layout that includes a central joy pad, with application buttons on either side. How is that "all over the map"?

Unless it has a D-pad.
JonAcheson @ 8/12/2002 1:01:55 PM #
I could definately see two buttons and a d-pad made out of the other two buttons and up/down. It would be a huge selling point for a low-end device aimed at kids in school, because they're going to want to play games on it. Actually, it would be a huge selling point for me, and I'm 34.

If this is true, though, it's kind of a shame the device has no SD slot, because companies could make a lot of money selling games hard-coded into SD cards to kids. It would hold down on piracy, and maybe you could build some basic acceleration into the SD card as well. Still, if they had to cut something, losing SD at this price point is certainly justifiable, since it might never be used, and it makes the system more expensive and fragile.

"All opinions posted are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled."

RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 1:03:31 PM #
But Gameboy unit sales are higher than gaming PC's, in big part because the price is under $100. Wonder whether this rumored low-end Palm unit could just look like it has less buttons because one of the "buttons" is a directional rocker or a dial?
RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 1:07:04 PM #
I think the person who told this to ED was mistaken.
RE: Only Two Buttons?
kevdo @ 8/12/2002 2:43:09 PM #
>Pocket PCs have a common layout that includes
>a central joy pad, with application buttons on
>either side. How is that "all over the map"?

Look, I don't claim to be a PocketPC expert but I know for a fact that some of those devices have four buttons and some only have two or three (in addition to the dpad). That's what I would call all over the map!

-Kevin Crossman

RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:44:13 PM #
All I can say is that, for Palm's sake, I hope this unit is priced around $50 and not a penny more. Otherwise, no one is going to buy this piece of trash.

Look, I understand trying to target the low-end market. So why not just release a "reveamped" m100 (OS 4, 2 mb ram, USB and UC, etc) to ensure that people can continue to use their m100 stylus and colored faceplates?

I cannot imagine that leaving off 2 hard buttons saves that much $. If it does, it's still defeating the entire purpose of trying to get people to play games on the Palm platform. I know plenty of college student types that carry a cheap m100 (yep, with a color cover on it) and sit in the back of the lecture hall and play Zap!, Hardball, Bejeweled, Joust etc etc.

There are both good and bad (VERY bad) ways to recycle leftover m100 components...I'll let you figure out which one this POS is. Palm's upcoming holiday season is going to be so wretchedly bad it will make PIC readers' eyes water.

If anything, it'll turn off the dads'n grads who go into Best Buy to buy one of these units. I can hear the salesman now: "Well dude, if you had come in a month ago, we had these m105 units with a bunch more ram and a mail in rebate for $100. Since they are all gone now I'd really recommend you buy this Visor Neo/Sony Clie/PPC instead. You get a lot more bang for your buck. or just go a few aisles down and get one of those Royal pocket organizers for $20."

RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:22:10 PM #
PocketPCs all have more than 2 buttons, usually 5. All the modern models, PocketPC 2k2 OS, have the same layout: four application buttons, one action button (usually under the joypad, sometimes on the side) and a voice recorder button on the side (sometimes combined with a jog dial). Yeah, it's not perfectly consistent, but it would certainly seem just as easy to grasp than the current oddities of screen input (silkscreened, virtual graffiti, a menu button that's no longer needed) on PalmOS.

And I personally think 2 buttons is very possible--if the up-down controls are replaced with a real joypad. Then you've got almost a Gameboy-like layout that should be plenty versatile for the organizer-and-frogger crowd (i.e. my entry-level PalmOS friends).

C'mon - you serious????
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:32:32 PM #
Gaming on a 2mb with Avantgo, contacts, date book, etc....???

This is an early April Fools joke from Palm.

RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 4:38:10 PM #
I don't think you should get too locked into the idea that low cost handhelds are only for students. Hell, every college student I know has more spending cash than I do and 5 credit cards. Most of them have at least one video game console and a computer than costs twice what mine did and is half as old. All of the people I know with a $600+ PPC are college students (explains all the sophomoric anti-palm comments, doesn't it?)

The cheap Palm's are probably more appealing to 20 and 30 somethings with kids, a mortgage, and a 401K that just lost $15,000. Games aren't important to these people.

RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 4:40:16 PM #
I would do all that and more with 1 mb on the old PalmPilot Professional. Get a clue.
RE: Only Two Buttons?
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 8:13:51 AM #
This is an early April Fools joke from Palm.

No it's not. It's a late April Fools joke. Late, like everything else Palm does.

I wanna know MORE about the other two!!

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:11:31 PM #
Enough stories about palm's (and sony's) low end products. I would like to hear rumor/info on the other two palms. It seems that we have had some info on oslo and now on the 2mb low end deal but what's behind door number 3? I know it will be a wireless/combo device but that's all.
RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
relyons @ 8/12/2002 2:28:29 PM #
Amen!

After seeing Handspring's Treo 270, I'm ready to buy one!

However, I keep waiting (impatiently) for the details of Palm's integrated phone/PDA device with OS 5.0 to decide which device to buy.

I believe that Palm needs to issue a press release this week with the details of each device, especially the phone/PDA combo. According to the article in June, their target release date was Fall 2002. I can understand being vague with details in June. It's now August 2002. The product offerings should be finalized by now, don't you think?

Any insiders know why Palm has been silent on these devices since June?

RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
Beavis @ 8/12/2002 3:40:12 PM #
"Any insiders know why Palm has been silent on these devices since June?"

Can you say m505?

RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
Timothy Rapson @ 8/12/2002 7:33:12 PM #
A Treo 300 with Sony HiRes screen. Yum!

RE: I wanna know MORE about the other two!!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 12:25:15 AM #
> > Any insiders know why Palm has been silent on these devices since June?

> Can you say m505?

Right. In case you don't get this reference, last year Palm announced the m505 in March when it wasn't available until May. During those two months, no one bought any high end Palm products (it was the Vx at the time). Turns out that in order for a company to make money, people need to buy its products. That financial crisis almost killed Palm (and Handspring, too). Neither company has completely recovered yet.

Palm won't announce its OS 5 model until about two hours before you can buy one. This is the only way to keep up sales of the m515 and keep money coming in. They won't announce it weeks or months ahead of time just because you are getting impatient.

this is #@%*!

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:21:34 PM #
I aint gonna buy dis piece of crap. What is Palm think'in. I aint buying this means it aint gonna sell. they gotta get their crap together or say good fring'in BYE!
RE: this is #@%*!
Token User @ 8/12/2002 2:40:44 PM #
... but something like this could be good for your remedial english classes.

RE: this is #@%*!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:45:34 PM #
Sounds like he went to Al Capone Elementary School.

Spoken in my best James Cagney imitation: "Nah, me and the boys ain't buying dis ting, see? If youse try an sell it to us, we'll rubs you out, see? Nah."

RE: this is #@%*!
Token User @ 8/12/2002 3:14:40 PM #
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of "Pretty Fly (For a White Guy)",


You know it's kind of hard
Just to get along today
Our subject isn't cool
But he fakes it anyway
He may not have a clue
And he may not have style
But everything he lacks
Well he makes up in denial

or "Boyz in tha hood" (Dynamite Hack release).

W3rd d00d!

RE: this is #@%*!
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 6:10:02 PM #
I was thinking more along the lines of seriously brain damaged.
RE: this is #@%*!
Timothy Rapson @ 8/12/2002 7:48:53 PM #
Cheese it yous guys. Ya wanta gets us kicked off here?


You sure don't get threads like this on the other PDA boards. :)

Palm is on the right way!

Stefan D. @ 8/12/2002 2:20:12 PM #
From my point of view it would be a good choice if Palm would bring a entry-level PDA with that cheap price. A lot of interested people would be able to test the PalmOS. Not everyone wants to buy a pda from 300 to 500 $$ or more.

Iīm still using an Palm III, and it fulfills all my needs, including news (AvantGo) and email (Eudora). The integrated software is OK, but I also like some of the free- and shareware that is out there.

I donīt need a hgh-end PDA, but who needs one can buy one from Palm, too.

With regards

Stefan D. from Mannheim, Germany

I think it is time for a poll.

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:40:00 PM #
1. Would you buy a NEW white palm, two buttons and two megs of ram

----or-----

2. Would buy a NEW M105 with 8 megs of ram and the usual 4 buttons.


Both asking price $100.

I say number 2 is a no brainer.


RE: I think it is time for a poll.
kevdo @ 8/12/2002 2:45:04 PM #
What if #1 used a 33 mhz processor instead of the 16 mhz one in the m105? That might push folks to number one?

-Kevin Crossman
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:55:26 PM #
I would stake my grandmother's pearl necklace on the fact that this "el cheapo" model will have, at best, a 20 mhz CPU. IIRC, the outgoing m100 and 105 models had 16 mhz CPUs (though my memory is a bit hazy and the m105 might have had a 20 mhz one). That's not a huge difference. For the majority of users, especially those running grayscale apps, a few mhz here and there won't matter much. Besides, once the user becomes familar with the platform and starts hanging around boards like this one, they will hopefully start using things like Quickbits and FastCPU to squeeze out every little bit of performance until the inevitable OS5 upgrade bug bites ;-)

If not, then the user will remain totally content with doing basic PIM stuff and playing chess on a slower CPU. I would say that the average intermediate/semi-expert user will feel a ram pinch at 2mb LONG before they feel a mhz shortage. Besides, Palm software is growing increasingly bloated. imagine how pi**ed off your typical high shool/college gamer raised on Playstation will be when he buys Rayman or Serious Sam (in retail packaging, bought at the same time as this new low-end unit) for Palm OS and realizes it will not even fit in his meagre 2 mb of ram !?

RE: I think it is time for a poll.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 2:55:42 PM #
I think a better question would be:

1. Would you buy a NEW white palm, two buttons and two megs of ram that is smaller than a m105 with a full size screen.

----or-----

2. Would buy a NEW M105 with 8 megs of ram and the usual 4 buttons with a reduced size screen.

RE: I think it is time for a poll.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:02:01 PM #
right now you can get an m105 on amazon for 84.95 with free shipping, no tax and ten bucks towards your next purchase at amazon making it in-effect 74.95. At that price the M105 can't be beat.
My points exactly.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:36:15 PM #
"imagine how pi**ed off your typical high shool/college gamer raised on Playstation will be when he buys Rayman or Serious Sam (in retail packaging, bought at the same time as this new low-end unit) for Palm OS and realizes it will not even fit in his meagre 2 mb of ram !? "

"right now you can get an m105 on amazon for 84.95 with free shipping, no tax and ten bucks towards your next purchase at amazon making it in-effect 74.95. At that price the M105 can't be beat."

My M105 rocks with Fast CPU. The screen is something you just get used to. I tell ya, now for a few bucks more, the M125 with SD slot is the way to go.

Fogettabout the 2mb pinch.

Here do this:
Price the 105 with 8 megs.
Price the "protype X" with 2 megs.

Now what would it cost to upgrade the X to 8 megs. Even my 16 mghz, rechargeable AAA's and 8 megs will win this battle. Plus the reverse screen hack works great.

Palm should release this thing as a $25 dollar "intro to Palm". Now were talking! I'd buy one for the heck of it.

But seriously, they should have crammed an SD slot on there somewhere......

RE: I think it is time for a poll.
edeab220 @ 8/12/2002 3:42:32 PM #
me, i agree w/ u people.

But, whatever happened to handspring?

I say, it's either a new m105, that "new" low-end palm, or a refurb Handspring Visor Platinum for just $20. For $20 more, u get a bigger screen, and a faster cpu.

RE: I think it is time for a poll.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:57:36 PM #
Didn't the Palm IIIx have 4MB? Couldn't they at least have that in it? I guess it's all about cost. Maybe they've actually done market research and determined that a vast majority people that buy the m105 (not people that read this site) only use the PIM functions and don't need more than 2MB. Or maybe they're trying to "encourage" people who would settle for a m105 to spring for the higher model. Or maybe they are even shifting the cost from memory to a slightly larger screen than the m105.
These days I'd consider 8MB to be a bare minimum but then again I'm not the target audience for this product. I would think 8MB on the low-end, 16 to 32MB on the mid-range models, and a minimum of 32MB on the new OS 5 models.
RE: I think it is time for a poll.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/14/2002 9:54:28 AM #
It's simple really. If palm makes the low end too good, Palm won't be able to sell the top end model, since it's pretty much the same. It's not like Palm can keep innovating at the top end and releasing something with more and more attractive features than trickle it down to the low end.

So instead of creating basic Arm device, which really is the Top end (Oslo), then they just rehash the m105 in white body.

Ideally the top end would be something that out do PPC in term of screen, size, battery endurance, and eye poping gimmick. Something like the rumored top end Sony Arm device that can play and record video. But they can't pull it off, instead they just cobble together the best they can do and come out with a mediocre OSLO. (kinda expensive, kinda ugly, kinda ho-hum, all in the name of Zen)

Ideal low cost.

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:04:46 PM #
Somebody should resurrect Handera 330 with updated OS for better CF driver and mem support, chasis redesign, and sell it for $150-199, This would be the better deal in low end market, even better than Sony's SL10.

Think about it, big screan (w/ VG), CF/SD expansion, AA battery. (it doesn't matter if it come with 2/4 meg, since SD price has plummet)

Sony has smaller screen, albeit more pixel, and proprietary memstick slot.

Too bad Palm Inc. doesn't have the vision, and all they can do is rehashing palm V in different chasis.

RE: Ideal low cost.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:27:41 PM #
Yes, lets put the most expandable, hi-end Palm OS device in a m500 case and give it away for free. That'll be the perfect deal for the low-end market.
RE: Ideal low cost.
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:44:46 PM #
That's what I've been saying for ages. I think a lot of people would go for that deal.

It should come with some freebies, though. Maybe a free memory card or something, to sweeten the deal.

Better yet...
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:57:40 PM #
Give away a BMW for every new Palm owner. Hey its just a thought. :-)

http://news.com.com/2110-1040-937015.html?tag=cdshrt


Just lightening up this dark thread...

Happy Monday!

2mb? I don't think so

aknox @ 8/12/2002 3:35:55 PM #
Why release a model with 2mb?

It doesn't seem consistent with the way Palm has been going. Nor does it make much sense when you think that an 8mb chip isn't going to cost all that much more than 2mb.

One of the main reasons people buy PPCs is because they see a PPC with 32mb, a Palm with 8mb, and so they conclude that the PPC is better. (Come on! We've all seen this!)

I can't believe Palm would release one with 2mb.

Heck, install Docs to go and avantgo and you wouldn't have anything left!


(Actually as I write this post, I realise the flaw in my argument - most Palm users don't install anything at all, do they? They use the calender and phone book. 2mb is more than enough. PIC readers excepted, of course).

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:53:17 PM #
"(Actually as I write this post, I realise the flaw in my argument - most Palm users don't install anything at all, do they? They use the calender and phone book. 2mb is more than enough. PIC readers excepted, of course)."

You are right about this. Palm is actually being smart on this one, they are trying to get a new market. Think about it this new palm would be perfect for kids in high school or others who want a nice datebook, and don't care about the free software and stuff. I would say a majority of people don't care about games, or about all this free software. I have also talked to a lot of girls who said they would buy a palm if it looked good and was cheap, we all know the m100's don't look good. 2MB is still a lot of space for certain people. And for the super users palm will come out with the OSLO and then the phone and one and still sell the 515 at 3 hundred, and then all will be happy :) now just want to throw this out, if this cheap unit was 2mb and had wireless ability, won't that change all of your minds ???

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
dsm363 @ 8/12/2002 4:03:47 PM #
I totally agree. I would think they could have at least squeezed 4MB into the thing (or maybe that size chip isn't really made in bulk anymore?).

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 4:25:57 PM #
I agree wholeheartedly. 2 megs is just USELESS. 4 megs is (relatively speaking) a whole lot more....I remember going from a Pilot 5000 to a IIIe. I actually ended up not having as much "headroom" as I thought I'd have....since I kept finding new and cool things to download (Avantgo, Albumtogo, games, etc). That was almost 3 years ago, so I can only imagine now how cramped 2 megs would be. I've got about 6 megs of e-books alone on my SD card, so these new users are going to feel the pinch pretty soon no matter how few apps they add. 4 megs would, at least, give everyone some breathing room and actually benefit Palm in the long run? Why? well, it would whet new users' appetites for downloading/storing programs and doing "more" with their handhelds. This would ultimately drive them to a higher-priced, expandable model. I posted a few months ago and said that a 2 meg unit would only make sense if it had a built in SD slot. If not, then 4 is the realistic minimum.

It's just the combination of 2 megs + no SD slot + reduction in buttons that adds up to a hideous device. I could (sort of) understand having a 2 meg unit with a few games in ROM and a D-pad. I could (sort of) understand a 2 meg unit with a card slot. I could certainly understand a bare-bones 4 meg unit. However, a 2 meg non-expandable unit is an absolute joke...the kids will stick with their Game Boys, TI-83 calculators and little black books, thank you very much.


Do you know HOW misinformed the average retail sales clerk (no flames, please-I am just speaking for the ones I've encountered) is? They will stand there next to an equally clueless consumer and say "don't be fooled by this Palm's cheap price, it has zero ram for expansion. Your computer at home has 256 megs, right? well, you need this $300 PPC!" There's no way to educate this segment of the market on bloatware, overclocking, or system tweaks. These are often impulse purchases and the new Palm will not stack up well at all next to the PPC units that have all the hip buzzwords like "MP3, XX megs of ram, XX mhz etc"
Consumers buy cars based by horsepower ratings and PCs based on Mhz and never bother with the intangibles.

My friend who works at Best Buy is getting flack all the time from the kids whose parents just bought them a brand-spankin' new E-machines Celeron 1.4ghz for back to school. Can you imagine how awfully disappointed they are when the integrated 810 video core runs Quake III worse than a 3 year old pIII 500 with a decent AGP card (and cannot run modern 3d games at all!) The same is going to apply to his new Palm bottom-feeder. Better bring out the bodybags, folks! I can only hope the casing this thing comes in is _very_ trendy---anyone remember the IIIe SE?

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 4:34:00 PM #
In addition to several friends with expensive handhelds packed with apps, I have two other friends with cheap, low end Visors. I asked them what apps they had installed and the answer was "None". 2 MB of memory will last them a lifetime.
RE: 2mb? I don't think so
JonAcheson @ 8/12/2002 4:47:22 PM #
I have to agree that 2MB is not bad for low-level users. I am currently using a Palm III with 2MB of RAM, and find it to be plenty of space if you're not storing sounds, PDFs, pictures or ebooks on the device.

The only things that use up tons of space on the Palm platform are pictures and electronic books, and I only carry around a couple of maps as pictures, and one or two ebooks. Though I admit, my next Palm will have a lot more space so I can carry more books and a good Bible app.

As for the argument that 8 MB is not much more expensive, to get a brand-new unit under $100, chances are every penny counts, and $100 probably is a "magic number" for getting new sales. Besides, if you want to be cynical, it allows users to get a Palm cheap, use it, like it, then outgrow it and buy a new one in two years.

8 would be better than 2, but 2 is far from unusable.

Jon Acheson


"All opinions posted are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled."

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
dsm363 @ 8/12/2002 5:14:55 PM #
The main problem I see with 2MB is that it hardly gives people any room to experiment with new programs. You would have to delete one program to give the other a try.

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 7:34:48 PM #
> The main problem I see with 2MB is that it hardly gives people any room to experiment with new
> programs. You would have to delete one program to give the other a try.

You are exactly right. Joe Six-pack bought this 2MB Palm, figured out how to install free apps, experiment a few, frustrated by the limited 2MB Ram, and *BAM* !! He'll get a high-end model, and give this 2MB Palm to Joe Seven-pack. Then same thing happens to Joe Seven-pack, one more user converted to Palm loyalist, and Palm gets the revenue.

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
sfdh66787 @ 8/12/2002 8:13:37 PM #
Agreed, how many people would really want to buy something for 2mb of storage, look at the m105, for a couple bucks more you can just get the whole 8, albeit still in the 100 series, but 8 megs is a necessity for all the things you can do with a plam nowadays.

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 9:52:52 PM #
Speaking as someone who just bought a M515 and bitterly bemoans the passing of his IIIxe I can see the value for the entry market user. Disposability. Right now, approximately $600.00 poorer after buying the 515, a PPK, a case and a SD card, I am having serious thoughts about the PPW analysis. PPW is Price, Performance, Worry. While I love the color and the SD card and the fact that I can see the screen just fine with office light and NO backlighting I have been obesssing about going out in the field with it. I really have something to lose now. The great thing about a 2meg glorified organizer for under $100.00 is that if it breaks then you buy another.

While I too whish that Palm would have got a MMC/SD slot in (which IMHO would mute some of the criticism) I suspect that the cost was a factor.

RE: 2mb? I don't think so
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 12:06:22 AM #
I can only think of one reason for this: embedded DRAM. Perhaps they found a vendor who can cheaply put 2 MB RAM on the same chip as the CPU. This would reduce component count and cost and allow even deeper price cuts once the unit goes into mature volume production. The m105 came out at $150 and is now being sold at $75. With one less chip, perhaps this new unit will into at $99.95, and eventually be sold *profitably* for $49.95 or less. That would get the attention of a whole new market segment and new distribution channels (bubble packed PalmOS handhelds next to the cheap CD players near the checkout line at the local drug store ?)

Two or three years ago, 80% of handeld buyers installed no additional applications. Maybe that's down to around 30% of Palm users; that's still 5 million customers. 2 MB will be plenty for new buyers in this market segment.

Clueless Hypocrites

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 3:39:43 PM #
For more than half a decade, Palm released units that were absolutely, positively INFERIOR to the Apple Newton, both technologically and benefit-wise.

Yet Palm came out with "glorified-organizers" that were low-powered, low cost, yet effective PDAs that saturated the market and inspired a sort of "fanaticism" that powers discussion groups like the very one we're on right now.

Palm brought out, (what in my mind at the time) something that was total CRAP, yet a community developed, the market for PDAs FLOURISHED, the devices improved, and WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF FOR IT.

Repeat: **WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF FOR IT**

So let me get things straight....I just wanna be clear on things as I take the temperature here at PIC.....YOU PEOPLE ARE MAKING FUN OF PALM FOR CREATING ANOTHER UNIT THAT WILL FURTHER SATURATE THE MARKET WITH PALM OS, thereby making all of our lives easier????

That just doesn't make sense.

You people simply DON'T MAKE SENSE.


I'm sure you jokers would rag on Palm if they came out with a Palm OS enabled cash register too, even though it would probably allow you to do things as a consumer you simply CANNOT do now.

Anything that has the Palm OS in it is good for US. We benefit from it one way or another. It's a standard we're pushing here, not a particular unit.

Just like with DVDs. If it were possible to sell a $50 DVD player and turn a profit, you bet your *ss your video store would carry MOSTLY DVDs, instead of "some" DVDs.

Get real folks.

Please, GET REAL.

RE: Clueless Hypocrites
orb2069 @ 8/12/2002 8:21:34 PM #
You know, you made sense, except for one line:

> For more than half a decade, Palm released units that were absolutely, positively INFERIOR to the Apple Newton, both technologically and benefit-wise.

Technologically, perhaps. Benefit-wise is open to some discussion.

(specs from PDAStreet/PalmBlvd - They don't have a Palm 1000 listing, or I would have used that instead.)

You mean, inferior as in terms of weight?

MessagePad 2100 - Weight:22.4 oz
Palm Pilot Pro - Weight:6.0 oz

Well, it's almost 4x as heavy, so...

Maybe size?

MessagePad 2100 - Size (Inches): 8.3 x 4.7 x 1.12
Palm Pilot Pro - Size (Inches): 4.7 x 3.2 x 0.7

How about battery life?

MessagePad 2100 - ?Rumored to be in single digits?, 4 AA batteries
Palm Pilot Pro - Battery Life:30 hrs, 2 AAA batteries

For those of you who don't remember your grandfather's hand-crank pocket babbage engine, we're comparing the final-model Newton to Palm's third PDA model,(which was almost hardware-identical to the first, save for the backlight.)

Other than that, good point!

RE: Clueless Hypocrites
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 12:37:50 PM #
What about price? Wasn't the MessagePad $800 !? PalmPilots started at $400, now you can get one for < $100.

Trademarked names examined

Lungboy @ 8/12/2002 3:50:23 PM #
Veld
Any of the open grazing areas of southern Africa.

Maybe the wireless model?

Tungsten
A hard, brittle, corrosion-resistant, gray to white metallic element extracted from wolframite, scheelite, and other minerals, having the highest melting point and lowest vapor pressure of any metal.

Low end model?

Zire
dunno, maybe the brother of general Zod from Superman II
http://www.generalzod.net/

Eagles may soar but at least weasles don't get sucked into jet engines.

RE: Trademarked names examined
Timothy Rapson @ 8/12/2002 7:56:09 PM #
Did you just download Noah Lite?

Interesting post.

RE: Trademarked names examined
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 10:15:23 AM #
How are they going to market these new names? At least in the English speaking countries?
Slogan A: "I vant a new hand-veld" "Go out and get Palm's latest hand-veld: the Veld!" Ugh.
Slogan B: "I de-zire somezing fazter." "I'll get you a Palm Zire, sire!" Eww.
Slogan C: "Fast, efficient and delicious: a Palm Tungsten".
The third one might fly, or they might be the new names for models released exclusively in Transylvania. Or maybe Palm can do whatever they please because they, unlike normal companies that turn a profit, don't need marketing, just word of mouth (or word of Tungsten to increase de-zire to buy the new hand-veld).
RE: Trademarked names examined
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 10:23:58 AM #
Probably about the same way Sony markets Clie (which most people can't even figure out how to pronounce) and Vaio.

Canary Techinque

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 5:11:43 PM #
One source says one thing, a second source says another, and a third says something else. Sounds like the "Canary Trick" from a Tom Clancy novel. Perhaps Palm told different stories to different people, trying to find out who the leak is.

Wouldn't you feel dumb to leak a report on a 2MB, 2 button PDA, then have Palm come out with something completely different?

RE: Canary Techinque
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 3:45:39 AM #
Especially dumb when you get your arse kicked (or fired) for braking that NDA you signed...! :-)

This technique is not just used in novels - Palm and other companies do this on a regular basis. FWIW, I worked at Palm for 2 years. I've also spent a bit of time inside Apple's 4 walls...

RE: Canary Techinque
Token User @ 8/13/2002 4:41:22 PM #
FWIW, I worked at Palm for 2 years. I've also spent a bit of time inside Apple's 4 walls...

Soooo, what can you tell us about the Zaphod - the new PalmOS/iPod hybrid :)

FUD.

Trained Seal Act

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/12/2002 9:07:36 PM #
Thanks, y'all - it's great having you all herd up and give Palm free market feedback.

In all seriousness, this is pretty cool dialogue - the real test for Palm is whether they listen (assuming, of course, you're the market they're looking for...).

Lost and Found

I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 4:04:21 AM #
We have here a few year old kids by the name "Palm" that has lost its way in the crowd of handhelds here.

Please pick it up here at the reception counter, it has lost its direction in the search of more users and for being too comfortable as the leader.

oslo

UZI4U182 @ 8/13/2002 4:16:51 PM #
As I recall in that picture of the future high-end palm model known as "Oslo", I remember it appeared as if that wasn't the whole name because it looked like right after the last O in Oslo that someone had blurred out or censored something there. Maybe this is just part of the name of that handheld?

--Devan--
RE: oslo
Ed @ 8/13/2002 4:30:26 PM #
The Oslo prototype had its serial number printed on it where you are talking about. This was removed from the image to help keep Palm from knowing who had leaked the image.

---
News Editor
RE: oslo
I.M. Anonymous @ 8/13/2002 9:54:53 PM #
Didn't stop someone posting the original unaltered image though did it... complete with serial number. :-)

under $100 palm?

PIC mobile user @ 8/14/2002 1:24:56 PM #
If the rumor is true, it will be interesting to see what (if anything) will be left out of the "new" model, as compared to the other Palm models. Would be great for students.
Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: