Comments on: Palm Offering Full Refund to m130 Owners

Several weeks ago, it was acknowledged by Palm Inc. that the m130's screen could not display the number of colors the company had previously advertised. At that time, Palm said it was working on ways to compensate m130 owners for this mistake.

The company has begun sending registered Palm m130 customers an email that gives them two options. The first is a refund for the purchase price and tax of their m130 handheld. The second is a free copy of SimCity, a $30 value.

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments

 (181 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

i JUST got this

TexSkater9140 @ 9/5/2002 8:48:24 AM #
i just recieved this e-mail.
it is kind of bad for someone who already has SimCity, and doesnt want a full refund.
but oh well, i'll just take the game anyways
-alex

---------------------------------------
Check out my site:
http://home.attbi.com/~ajramos/
Best viewed with Internet Explorer
RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:12:22 PM #
If you've already got the game and you like the unit (and why not -- it's a lot better than my m125), don't force Palm to spend money on your game. They'll just pass it back to the customers sooner or later! You can think about that when we all complain about how overpriced the OS 5 models are...

(Obviously if you don't have the game or you feel upset about missing 10% of your colour range, take them up on their offer.)

RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:08:09 PM #
I'd take the full value refund and then go buy one off of ebay.
RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:13:51 PM #
Am I blind??? Please tell me I am...

TAKE THE FREAKING MONEY..DUH

Than if you really like your Palm, go buy another one, that can be purchased CHEAPER, and with a brand new and fresh WARRANTY.

Some people just don't see an opportunity if you sholve a million bucks up their ***... They'd still insist that working for 8 bucks an hour is the best thing.

RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:32:30 PM #
> Than if you really like your Palm, go buy another one, that can be purchased
> CHEAPER, and with a brand new and fresh WARRANTY.

How does it feel to be totally contemptible?

Anyone in their right mind!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 5:10:45 PM #
Anyone in their right mind would send it back... get the refund... buy a new one for less and make some cash on the deal.. and even if its not for less just get the same thing, at least your warranty is longer.... who cares about the game and how happy you are with your palm... this is your chance to either get something new or extend your warranty...or if it is that much cheaper why dont you just keep going through the cycle of buying and returning through palm... probably wouldn't work but its an idea!!

Laters! Smarten Up!

RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 5:31:29 PM #
Yeah, smarten up! That's how you get ahead in this world: lie, cheat, and steal. Morals and ethics are for whimps. Laws are for little guys. Keep it up and eventually you can run a major U.S. corporation like Enron.
RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 6:47:59 PM #
how is get a refund, and buy another one for a cheaper price a crime !? .... hmm .... hmm ..... are you one of those Enron executives ??
RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 7:23:20 PM #
It's not a crime. It's just dishonest.
Roy
RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 7:40:01 PM #
How is that dishonest !? ...

1) I think I paidtoo much for a 12 bit screen PDA so I get a refund
2) When I go for shopping I see a M130 selling for less and I think that price justify for a 12 bit screen PDA so I buy it.

I don't see any dishonest in both action 1 and 2 ..
but I do see dishonest in giving customers false information.

RE: i JUST got this
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 7:32:49 AM #
It's not dishonest, and it's not really morally reprehensible, but it is a lot of trouble to go through for $20 or so. Most people won't bother.

Maybe I missed something...

Isaiahp @ 9/5/2002 8:51:13 AM #
I have not had my morning pot of coffee, but do you have to send your m130 back to get the refund??
RE: Maybe I missed something...
big_raji @ 9/5/2002 8:53:56 AM #
I'd assume so. :)

---
What's Wrong With This Picture?
http://raj.phangureh.com/picture.html
RE: Maybe I missed something...
epall @ 9/5/2002 12:27:20 PM #
I don't think so...

RE: Maybe I missed something...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:51:59 PM #
Yes, you have to return the handheld. Palm's on-line form requesting a refund says "Please provide the required information below. You will be contacted via email with details regarding the return of your handheld and the refund process."
RE: Maybe I missed something...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:02:19 PM #
Duh. It's not like you win the lottery just because you bought something slightly different than advertized. That's why they call it a "refund" instead of "free money for anyone why feels bad".
RE: Maybe I missed something...
useybird @ 9/5/2002 10:19:08 PM #
That's BS I just want my money and I'm keeping my handheld. If I return it I wont have a PDA. BTW I'm a registered owner and Palm is hesitant to send the emails out. This is a bad move for palm because why don't people just return it to the Point of Purchase. They should just send money. And I don't need SimCity. And even if I wanted it I could just download it from warez sites. This refund thing is even more of a ripoff than Palm selling me a 12-bit handheld. I unlike most m130 users, actually need 16-bit color for pictures and movies. It just looks crappy because of all the dithering.

----------------------------------------
A few years ago at the Sony handheld Dept.:" That's the most stupid name ever. Who would want to buy something called a 'Clie'? You must be out of your mind!"
RE: Maybe I missed something...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:34:40 PM #
> And I don't need SimCity. And even if I wanted it I could just download it from warez sites.
> I unlike most m130 users, actually need 16-bit color for pictures

Why don't you go steal a handheld with a 16 bit screen? Or you could rob a few people and use their money to buy a handheld. It shouldn't bother you. You already made it clear you don't have any morals.

RE: Maybe I missed something...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 12:34:52 AM #
Hey useybird, you need help! (Either that or you've got a mighty big lure in the water.)

Palm is offering you a full refund for the return of your m130. And you somehow think it is their responsibility to let you keep it?!!! That definitely is in the running for the "dumbest comment of the day."

You think Palm is ripping you off by not letting you keep the 130, but it is fine for you to illegally download software. Freakin' unbelievable!

Since you don't seem intelligent enough to figure it out on your own, just go out and buy a replacement for that completely useless m130, hotsync everything over with your illegal copy of Backupbuddy, and then send the m130 back to Palm for a refund.

And regarding your "need" for 16-bit, just when was it you noticed that your screen was only 12-bit? I'll bet it wasn't until some time after PIC broke the news.

RE: Maybe I missed something...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 12:57:05 AM #
So maybe you could tell me why CRT Manufacturers doest mark their Monitor's refresh rate higher

e.g. they could say this monitor can run 1024X768 at 100Hz .. but turns out it runs at 75Hz, and I am pretty sure your eyes can't count that the monitor refreshes 75 times every second. So CRT makers should all jsut say their CRT can refresh at 1000Hz, becasue human eyes can't count so fast, hay I can say whatever Hertz I want!

Sometimes something your eyes can't "see" doesn't mean it doesn't affect the user experience.

RE: Maybe I missed something...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/26/2002 2:42:29 PM #
u r stupid
coffee or not

Wow, I'm actually impressed.

big_raji @ 9/5/2002 8:52:47 AM #
I'm impressed that Palm's doing this refund.

I'm more impressed that they seem to be taking the initiative and e-mailing registered users about this. These are probably people that have never even heard of the problem.

Nice.

---
What's Wrong With This Picture?
http://raj.phangureh.com/picture.html

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 8:57:10 AM #
I'm impressed the lawsuit worked. Because without it, Palm would still be claiming that the m130 is capable of 65K colors.
RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 8:59:38 AM #
Palm said a bunch of times in public that the m130 couldn't live up to its advertised claims and it was trying to figure out how to compensate customers days before the class action suit was filed. Palm has done the right thing here and you can't twist it into a negative.
RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:00:38 AM #
Congrats, you are the first to come out with a negative spin this morning. Maybe, with a little luck you will be struck by a car on your way to work.
RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:22:01 AM #
I need to get here early more often - when there are more positive comments than negatives...

:-)

I wish I had a m130 'cause then I'd get SimCity for nix! D'oh! Silly me bought a m515 instead... oh well...

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:28:06 AM #
Not that I feel that the color problem with the m130 was that bad, I mean, one could look at the quality of the screen and decide how well or badly it displayed colors before one bought it regardless of what the "specifications" stated. But how does getting a free GAME compensate for this mistake?
RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
Scott R @ 9/5/2002 9:39:46 AM #
I think it's great that Palm is doing this. This is definitely a fair offer. It's too bad that Palm may end up taking a financial hit for someone (or group of someones) bad idea of trying to deceive people.

I have to side with the folks who say that if not for all of the bad publicity and threat of a class action lawsuit, this buy-back offer would probably not exist.

Furthermore, I think Palm would do well to reword the "58,000 color combination" nonsense and come clean. Otherwise, they could get bitten twice with this. Imagine, someone takes the free copy of SimCity then when someone else threatens a class action because the device isn't capable of 58,000 colors, but only 4096, they have to buy back the device or offer some other extra piece of software. Just bite the bullet and state it clearly as follows: "The Palm m130 can display 4096 colors but is able to play 16-bit applications." If they're afraid that 4096 colors sounds too limited, then say "thousands of colors" (which they're doing in some places), but drop the 58,000 color combinations nonsense, please.

Scott

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:45:34 AM #
"But how does getting a free GAME compensate for this mistake?"

Yes.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
Rolando @ 9/5/2002 9:46:11 AM #
I think that this is a fine thing that Palm is doing.

It's unfortunate that it won't be perfect for everyone, since not everyone wants the game (a $25-40 credit for software or accessory would have been better), but still... If you're that unhappy, take the refund.

Rolando

SimCity freeware
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:10:30 AM #
and i got a freeware version of SimCity on my m515... by ateliersoftware.com
Good deal!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:25:30 AM #
Its amazing how this small M130 issue has become such a big thing. Not many people have noticed the screen difference, and not many people have bothered Palm about it. ( they’re cheap customers. Cheap Customers = stupid people) If I did have an M130, I would gladly give it back. Imagine, you buy a PDA 3 or 4 months ago, and now you find out Palm is giving a full refund. Its almost like getting rid of your old PDA, and getting a full refund, for a PDA that is soon outdated.)
An interesting story.
And also, compensating Palm owners with a 40 dollar software game is foolish. I would have given M130 owners a choice. Maybe for example, Sim City, Zap2000!, Bejeweled, or some other game.
Palm shouldn’t have lied/mislead the public in the first place. I have completely lost my trust now in Palm, and I have been fed up of Sonys new models. Cant there be another PDA maker that doesn’t outdate as much, but offers some good stuff!?!??!

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:27:05 AM #
> But how does getting a free GAME compensate for this mistake?

If you are feeling a little bit dissatisfied with the m130's screen, getting a free (very cool) game will go a long way towards making you happy again.

If you don't feel the game is enough to make you happy again, send your m130 back and get a refund. Then buy something else.

Palm is covering the people who feel slightly miffed and the people who are really angry. If they had just offered the refund, most people would have gotten nothing because most people are mostly happy with their m130s.

I feel confident making that sweeping generalization because in all the hundreds of comments I've read on this, I only remember 2 from an actual m130 owner who wants his money back and I think both of those were from the same man.

> and i got a freeware version of SimCity on my m515...
> by ateliersoftware.com

Let's not confuse people by saying there is a freeware version of SimCity. It may have come bundled with your m515, but the term "freeware" says anyone can get it for free, which isn't true. To understand the difference, if you sent your friend a copy of MiddleCaps Hack, a freeware app, there would be no problem. If you sent your friend a copy of SimCity, you would be breaking the law. SimCity costs $40.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
Ronin @ 9/5/2002 10:44:09 AM #
I am glad that Palm is doing this if solely for the reason that it will mullify (hopefully) the press on this topic. Personally, I am also astounded by the fuss this has caused I doubt that many actual m130 owners will return their devices (much like comparatively few took HP up on their return offer).

I also wanted to address this issue of the class action suit that was filed. I doubt strongly that this had any real impact on Palm's decision. I say this because a class action suit does not begin in the same way every other suit begins, that is, the aggrieved party commences a suit against the party they believe has wronged them. A class action suit is filed and before the suit can proceed the court must certify the class or group of individuals that the suit proports to represent. The court can easily (and quite often does) decline to certify a class for various reasons including that the class (group) of people are not clearly defined or the harm caused to the group is too vague and not actionable (these are just examples). Thus the suit filed on this matter could not reasonably be considered viable at this early stage because it has several significant hurdles to overcome before Palm really needed to take it seriously.

I should add that now that Palm has taken action to address the harm, the difficulty of pursuing a class action suit is even greater because Palm can show that it has provided a remedy that is proportionate to the harm caused and that it has made diligent efforts to publish the remedy to the potential class.

More likely, the bad press was a big motivating factor. I also think that Palm is a fairly honest and above board company (despite this misrepresentation, which I chose to believe was accidental not intentional). In a time of revelations about companies inflating their bottom line for years on end, Palm has consistently been honest about its earnings (or lack thereof), financial difficulties and missteps. Considering that they are, by far, the leader in the market, it would have been easy to lie about profits and inflate stock value but they did not and took the lumps that came along with it. So, in my opinion, Palm generally does do the right thing (definitely not the most innovative or cutting edge thing) and I always cheer for people and companies that try to do the right thing.


In the Spirit of Umoja,
Ronin

Palm did the right thing...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:39:24 AM #
...and you know it. I'm not a fan of the m130, and I own a Sony, but I have to admit that Palm's come up with a pretty solid solution to what's mainly a PR issue. The lame-brain who tried to claim up above that the class-action lawsuit caused this, well, is an idiot. Palm said they were seeking a proper resolution well before any such suit was filed. So get over it.

Sure, there will be people who spin this negatively, as they do EVERY move that Palm makes. And there will no doubt be people who flame me over this, as they do EVERY positive comment about Palm. And there will likely be people who cry and whine about how Palm should do more, as they do EVERY time anything about Palm is posted. And these people should all get a life...

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:43:25 AM #
> Maybe, with a little luck you will be struck by a car on your way to work.

***

Some people on this board are just plain evil and YOU certainly count among them.

Have a nice day and watch the traffic on the way to work.

RE: Palm did the right thing...
rldunn @ 9/5/2002 11:56:52 AM #
Right on. I'm also a Sony owner, but Palm went farther than they had to with this, and they should be congratulated for that. We need more companies who make decisions like that.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
sixty-four @ 9/5/2002 12:08:08 PM #
Yea, stop hatin dudes. Palm is owning up for they're fiesco so they should be given some props for they're efforts.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:24:48 PM #
i do think it is commendable that palm is offering
a refund or a free game (for those like myself that
are happy with their m130 units. this is just my
opinion but owning a 515 as well in a side by side
comparision the m130 has a nicer screen with more
vibrant color. 12 bit. so what. if palm never told
me i would never have know nor do i really care. it
does what i need it to do without problem and that
is what counts.

kudos to palm though for doing the right thing. as
for me, i already have sim city but still intend on
keep my m130. i've become quite attached to it.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
Token User @ 9/5/2002 12:25:58 PM #
Fiasco? 8 people calling Palm support is a fiasco??

I don't own a M130. I don't own a colour PDA.

This is a deal between M130 owners and Palm, not Sony NR70V owners and Palm, or M515 owners and Palm.

The people that need to be satisfied with the deal are the ones that own the M130. Everyone else should just shut up and sit down, and let the parties involved decide if it is a good deal or not.


RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:25:11 PM #
What I am honestly surprised to see is that Palm didn't just offer their "own" branded MMC GamesCard. it includes SimCity, Zap! 2016 and a couple of other reasonable quality games on a single card. That would seem to be a strategy that would appease a wider variety of users. Besides, the MSRP on that card is only $29.99 anyway. Now, I know they have had some issues with the games on that card being buggy but even so, it'd be a perfect way for Palm to unload some excess inventory (probably to make room for the enhanced OS5 Gamescard...)

Does anyone know if the latest available version of the downloadable SimCity is newer than the version Palm puts on their gamescard?

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:23:06 PM #
In reply to the following
"Posted by: I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:28:06 AM

Not that I feel that the color problem with the m130 was that bad, I mean, one could look at the quality of the screen and decide how well or badly it displayed colors before one bought it regardless of what the "specifications" stated. But how does getting a free GAME compensate for this mistake?"

To answer your question.. it's simple..

There are two kinds of people. Those who realised Palm was screwing the people, LIED, and really got away with it, (hence the refund) and those who have their heads so far in the clouds and thinks "Oh, Golly, a Game" and belives that a game will fix all the problems in the world!.

cheap customers
UZI4U182 @ 9/5/2002 4:17:30 PM #
"( they’re cheap customers. Cheap Customers = stupid people)"

If you think cheap customers are stupid people, you must be one of those rich bastards who thinks they know everything just because they make good money. Pity you, fool. Not everyone can afford a $600 Palm, and some people who can probably don't want to spend that kind of money on one. (if they're new to Palms of course) I hope you go bankrupt and end up on the streets eating out of garbage dumpsters.

--Devan--

www.tavern.2ya.com
Palm OS apps, news, reviews and such

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
Jeff-Russell @ 9/5/2002 4:36:04 PM #
"There are two kinds of people. Those who realised Palm was screwing the people, LIED, and really got away with it, (hence the refund) and those who have their heads so far in the clouds and thinks "Oh, Golly, a Game" and belives that a game will fix all the problems in the world!."

That's a rather simplistic view. Simply because an individual is not bothered by having only 4,096 colors as opposed to 65,536 colors, does not mean that said individual is not an intelligent person. For many people, the number of colors is not important. What is important is the usefulness of the handheld overall. I own an m505 which I am very happy with, despite complaints that many people have made about its clarity and brightness. My wife owns an m130 and she notices very little difference between it and any other color handheld, and furthermore, she does not care, because it does everything she wants it to. Palm screwed up and are taking actions to rectify in a reasonable fashion. My wife is not going to return her handheld for a refund, because she is happy with the m130. Frankly, she doesn't even care that they are offering a free game! It's not that important. That's just our take on the situation.

Regards,

Jeff

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 1:35:57 PM #
"There are two kinds of people. Those who realised Palm was screwing the people, LIED, and really got away with it, (hence the refund) and those who have their heads so far in the clouds and thinks "Oh, Golly, a Game" and belives that a game will fix all the problems in the world!."

Yeah, there are two kinds of people. The people who actually bought m130's and the people that post here. Sometimes I wish we had more of the former here rather than the latter.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 2:02:04 PM #
"Yeah, there are two kinds of people. The people who actually bought m130's and the people that post here. Sometimes I wish we had more of the former here rather than the latter."

How about this I know what you want to say deep down inside

"Yeah, there are two kinds of people. The people who actually bought m130's and Sony employees that post here."

And here's the reality

"Yeah, there are two kinds of people. The people who actually bought m130's and Palm Inc. employees that post here."

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 8:31:36 PM #
"Yeah, there are two kinds of people. The people who actually bought m130's and Palm Inc. employees that post here."

That must be it. Palm employees are posting here to whine about their own policy. What a genius!

Good grief, I never said anything about Sony. I just implied that most of the people complaining here don't even have m130's. I sure hope Sony pays you for all the time you waste ruining this site with your "intelligent" remarks, since you quite obviously don't have an m130.

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/7/2002 6:25:19 PM #
LOL, that is so funny, it hurts...

We go from discussing the Palm M130 colour "issue", cuz that's all it is obviously, and it suddenly turns into someone pulling sony out of their *** and accusing that person of bashing them.... That's spectacular!!! Are you a psychic there buddy? Cuz you would have to be to pull that sony garbage out of the air. Geez... Now I remember why I stopped coming here....

RE: Wow, I'm actually impressed.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 3:49:05 AM #
Fool me once, shame on you... Fool me twice...

Palm's on a roll with their customers.


lawyers

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:09:53 AM #
The best thing about this is that the class-action ambulance-chasing blood-sucking scum bastard lawyers won't make one red cent on this.
RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:13:34 AM #
the class-action ambulance-chasing blood-sucking scum bastard lawyers _always_ make money
RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:31:51 AM #
maybe Palm should give all the returned m130s to the class-action ambulance-chasing blood-sucking scum bastard lawyers instead of money
RE: lawyers
Ronin @ 9/5/2002 10:49:40 AM #
Is this actually on topic?

It is interesting to me that no one seems to like a lawyer until they need one.


In the Spirit of Umoja,
Ronin

RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:50:18 AM #
class-action ambulance-chasing blood-sucking scum bastard lawyers are the leeches of our society.
Shakespeare said ''kill all the lawyers''
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:56:30 AM #
> It is interesting to me that no one seems to like a
> lawyer until they need one.

If there were no lawyers in the world, no one would ever need one!

RE: lawyers
Ronin @ 9/5/2002 11:03:53 AM #
"If there were no lawyers in the world, no one would ever need one!"

The logic of this statement eludes me.

Do you also believe that if there were no plumbers, doctors, carpenters, soldiers, etc. (all professions you call on when you have a problem) that no one would ever need one?

In the Spirit of Umoja,
Ronin

RE: lawyers
big_raji @ 9/5/2002 11:36:27 AM #
> "If there were no lawyers in the world, no one would
> ever need one!"
>
>The logic of this statement eludes me.

I think what he's saying is that if there were no lawyers to sue anybody, there'd be no lawyers needed to defend anybody either.

We'd be back to the glorious and perfect age of lynch mobs, posses, public executions, etc.

Yes, the good ol' days.

---
What's Wrong With This Picture?
http://raj.phangureh.com/picture.html

RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:39:45 AM #
Dear Ronin:

I represent the legal trademark holder of the "Spirit of Umoja" phrase which you have repeatedly used on this forum. My client has instructed me to file suit against you for trademark infringement. You will be personally served tomorrow a.m. Please have your lawyer call me regarding this matter.

A scumsucking lawyer

RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:55:15 AM #
>It is interesting to me that no one seems to like a >lawyer until they need one.

No, my litigious friend, people especially do not like lawyers when they need one.

RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:55:30 AM #
---
What's Wrong With This Picture?
http://raj.phangureh.com/picture.html

Dear Raji:

I represent a client who was injured while viewing the "What's Wrong With This Picture?" item posted on your website. While viewing this prank, he fell backwards in his chair and his head struck a hard table top, fracturing his C2 vertebre and causing instant quadrepelegic paralysis.

We feel you are responsible for this injury and are seeking damages including but not limted to medical expenses, lost future income, and pain and suffering. Please have your lawyer contact me immediately.

A scumsucking lawyer

Off Topic
Ed @ 9/5/2002 12:00:47 PM #
This started on topic but has since wandered way off. I'm not going to delete any of the already posted off-topic comments but don't post any more.

---
News Editor
RE: No more false claim
speed-angel @ 9/5/2002 12:49:33 PM #
The only good thing coming out of it has nothing to do with lawyers, but maybe Palm should hire a better PR firm to handle its product release so that it wouldn't have to incur those stupid cost again.

If they get more lawsuits then it will not be long before Palm needs to read, on m515's ebook reader, "Chapter 11"

RE: lawyers
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 12:53:42 AM #
Ed, thanks for leaving it. It was worth the laugh I got from hearing big_raji is going to get sued for that picture! :D
RE: Good deal!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:38:03 AM #
>Palm shouldn’t have lied/mislead the public in the first place

Read the news: Honest mistake. I doubt Palm is that stupid to lie about something that they will not be able to get away with in the long run.

universal refund?

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:11:25 AM #
Does the refund valid in Canada too?
RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:24:42 AM #
Looks like anyone in the world can get the refund. On the form you have to fill out in order to get it you can say you are from the U.S., Canada, ANZA (is that Australia and New Zealand?), Japan, Europe, Middle East/Africa, or Latin America.
RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:11:41 PM #
Palm didn't sent me any email about the refund. Can someone post that email here? And where can I fill out the refund form? Thank you.
RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:45:32 PM #
Are you a REGISTERED user? And, if you are, did you give them a real email address?

You can find all the info on Palm's Support page:
www.palm.com/support/
Look for "Palm™ m130 Color Update Program" under Support News
(Sorry, the actual link is HUGE)

RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 1:59:37 PM #
Here's the 'resultant' link:

http://www.palm.com/support/m130program/

RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:40:29 PM #
That link doesn't give you all the information. Check the one before it for the rest.
RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 6:17:54 PM #
THANKS FOR THE INFO.
RE: universal refund?
useybird @ 9/5/2002 10:37:06 PM #
I am a registered user and still have not received this email.

----------------------------------------
A few years ago at the Sony handheld Dept.:" That's the most stupid name ever. Who would want to buy something called a 'Clie'? You must be out of your mind!"
RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:49:35 PM #
I know Palm has my correct e-mail address, cause i have had problems with my palm in the past, but i have recived no e-mail concerning this.
RE: universal refund?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 2:55:16 AM #
any contact from palm after filled out the refund form?

Hurting the bottom line

Foo Fighter @ 9/5/2002 12:09:50 PM #
No doubt this refund offer will butcher Palm's earnings this quarter. A good chunk of acquired revenues are going to be returned to consumers. Palm can't afford many more mistakes like this.

RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:20:29 PM #
In all honesty, I don't believe there actually will be many refunds. If I'm already into using the organizer, I'm not going to hotsync and leave it there and get another one. I'm sure to most, the color issue is a non-issue.
RE: Hurting the bottom line
peter167 @ 9/5/2002 12:32:18 PM #
Not really. It is because you can buy the new sony one and then refund your m130, if you bought your m130 @ $279. Yet, you got a brand new handheld with a better screen and 8 MB more RAM. I can't see why one should not do it.

******************
Lie is the future.
RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 12:38:16 PM #
> No doubt this refund offer will butcher Palm's earnings this quarter.

I disagree. The refund will have minimal effect. Considering only 8 people have called Palm to ask about this, the refunds will only be about $2400. :) Joking aside, only a few thousand people will ask for refunds. Even if 3,000 people want a refund, that's less than a million dollars. Last quarter, Palm had $165 million in revenues and it has $297 million in cash and short-term investments.

RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 1:11:35 PM #
Maybe Palm will give out the refunds just in time for people to buy their new OS 5 device (I wish that would show up soon).
RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:14:19 PM #
It's no biggie. Palm will resell the returned m130s for at least $200 each and probably people will take the $300 refund and buy an OS 5 handheld from Palm. Minimal loss for Palm. At worst, Palm loses maybe $100 a handheld.
RE: Hurting the bottom line
useybird @ 9/5/2002 10:39:48 PM #
That's only if the OS 5 handheld costs $300. My guess is that it will cost twice that amount. instead of a game, palm should give out something for free that is so rare that it makes blue whales look like New Yorkers, of course I'm talking about the Palm SD Bluetooth card. Only 20 exist in the world, and guess where those 20 are? At the Palm HQ.

----------------------------------------
A few years ago at the Sony handheld Dept.:" That's the most stupid name ever. Who would want to buy something called a 'Clie'? You must be out of your mind!"
RE: Hurting the bottom line
madhatter @ 9/5/2002 11:12:20 PM #
"of course I'm talking about the Palm SD Bluetooth card. Only 20 exist in the world, and guess where those 20 are? At the Palm HQ."

Actually you can find them for $120.00 at Fry's Electronics... and I saw at least 25 on the shelf.


A Palm in hand is worth two in your pocket.

RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:53:56 PM #
i thought that was a joke... but maybe i missed something
RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/7/2002 8:11:35 PM #
I don't agree. I think that Palm's response will be very positive for the company.

Admitting an honest mistake and taking genuine steps to deal with the situation is bound to help with customer loyalty. The clear message from this is: buy a Palm and the company will stand by you; buy something else and you are on your own.

Mistakes like this should not be allowed to happen in the first place. But dealing with mistakes in such a forthright manner can only enhance customer loyalty. If the choice comes down to buying an over-hyped unit with a hi-res screen and buying a quality unit from reputable company, I know which I would choose.

RE: Hurting the bottom line
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 3:57:16 AM #
They weren't admitting anything... They got CAUGHT and then got SUED then they decided to refund the money. Not very noble when you see how this whole thing played out. HP was the only company to do it right.. Palm simply got caught and had no other option.
RE: Hurting the bottom line
cdvd @ 9/9/2002 4:13:56 AM #
> HP was the only company to do it right.

Your pro-Microsoft bias is showing.

HP handled it exactly the same way Palm did... except HP did it much slower. HP's class action suit went to court before HP gave in and offered refunds. The suit that was filed against Palm never had a chance to get to court because Palm offered the full refund before it had a chance.

And Palm's screw up was with just the m130. HP used false advertising to sell three models for over a year before it got caught.

Tell me again how HP did it right?

16bit or more color is a joke.

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 1:25:42 PM #
Humans can see only 11000 colors.
RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 1:39:22 PM #
Humans can see millions of colors, you're wrong.
RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 1:52:30 PM #
actually human can really only distinguish a few individual colors as such. I don't recall the exact number, but I believe that is less(considerably) than 11000. The additional colors do however allow for mroe gradual gradations in coloring, "better" image quality etc.

You should be able to find this in any good GUI design book or physical psychology text that has a section dealing with the structure and operation of the eye.

e.g. An old standby of one GUI design text that I had read was based upon studies that more colors in a GUI just confuse/distract the user, and IIRC it advised using only 8/16 basic colors for general GUIs. It also dealt with things like menu positioning, mouse usage, etc. Alot of it was based on Psychological studies, and GUI studies. IIRC it referenced almost as many psychology texts as technical. Sorry, but I don't recall the title of the particular text, but I imagine any UI design theory text would be similar, as it did make sense.

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:13:31 PM #
See, but you're actually citing facts from a real source that's done research. That's not how we do it here on the PIC boards.

What we do instead is make ignorant statements like "Humans can see millions of colors," then we utter the emphatic statement, "you're wrong." That alone should be enough for PIC posters to prove our point.

"I'm right, you're wrong." That's the motto of the classic PIC poster. Facts? We don't need no stinkin' facts, man. They only mess up our preconceived notions.

What we really want is
1) to claim that humans can see millions of colors. This allows us even more bitching rights about
2) the fact that the m130 only really displays 12-bit color. Then we feel more justified in claiming that
3) Palm should do even more than they've done. It's not enough that they should offer a free game or a refund; they should give us
4) free copies of WordSmith, Docs-to-Go, and Bejeweled, plus $150 cash.

Facts? Maturity? Logic? If you're on the PIC boards, you're in the wrong place for those antiquated ideals.

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:42:25 PM #
The bit depth of a display system dictates the total number of colors in the palette at any given time. Having a large palette is important for display consistency (in 8 bit mode X (X windows), jumping from one active window to another that loads a different palette illustrates the advantage). It is also usefull in that programmers don't need to manually reconfigure the active palette when a color they want to display doesn't exist in the current one.

That being said, if manual palette handling is done by an application, the bit depth of the display becomes much less important, as long as the total number of colors in the palette is greater than the number of pixels in the given screen resolution. That is how many old VGA (320x240) games managed to look "good" in 256 colors, they loaded palettes with only the desired colors to acheive very smooth gradients.

The M130 has a 130x130 screen. This amounts to 25,600 colors, since a pixel can only be one color at a time. To acheive this, you need 15 bits of precision, which yields 32,767 colors (any programmer will recognize this as maxint on a 16 bit machine, bit 16 being used to designate positive or negative)

I have no idea what Palm does to get 50+K colors out of 12 bits, but dithering implies the placement of two diferent colored pixels next to each other to form a blended color (courtesy of the human eye). Saying they can display 50k+ colors is not realistic, because 12 bits only allows for 4096 colors in the palette at once. By placing a yellow pixel next to a blue pixel you are "dithering" a green, but in reality only displaying yellow and blue.

Just my 3 cents.

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:39:11 PM #
it's 160x160.
RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 5:04:37 PM #
If humans can't see but 11,000 colors how did we discover the banding problems? Why can we see subtle differences in a 16 bit (65K colors) vs 24bit (millions of colors) picture?
RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 6:17:03 PM #
The "dithering" palm is using to display more colors is not, in this case, by placing two different color pixels next to one another, but rather the same pixel at a different time. Using refresh tricks they change the pixel value each time, so the human mind is tricked into "seeing" a unique color, and not the sum of its parts.
RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
ardiri @ 9/5/2002 6:34:43 PM #
    If humans can't see but 11,000 colors how did we discover the banding problems? Why can we see subtle differences in a 16 bit (65K colors) vs 24bit (millions of colors) picture?

simple - palettes. if you restrict a large image to a particular palette size, and, keep the image large - of course people will see artefacts.

a good palette = good presentation/view

but, focus on a 160x160 area - thats 25600 pixels. do you really think you could spot 25% of the screen as unique pixels? i dont think so. not very easily anyhow.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/
http://www.mobilewizardry.com/

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 8:14:28 PM #
actually, humans can "see" about 4 million color shades/tones/intensities (sp?)

but, i defy anyone to count how many color they can "see" on the M130.

// az --

how about writting a small program which gradually changes the color of the screen at slight intervals and have the user press a button when they "see" a color change.

might be funny to see out of 100 shades the palm can display, how many people can see

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 8:22:05 PM #
And human eyes can't really tell between 75Hz and 100Hz screen too (actually it can coz you'll get tired much faster with the low frequency one) so all CRT companies should just sell us 75Hz CRTs and tell us it's running at 100Hz ... Yeah totally make sense ...

p.s. don't tell me your eye could tell when it gets tired ... coz if your eye can count that the screen flashed for 100 or 75 time per second you must be superman or supergirl.

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
Servo @ 9/6/2002 7:39:36 AM #
"The "dithering" palm is using to display more colors is not, in this case, by placing two different color pixels next to one another, but rather the same pixel at a different time. "

No. Palm uses both frame-rate control [what you describe] and plain old side-by-side dithering to get 58 thousand-whatever colors on the m130.

See this article: www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=4049

And look under the section "How the m130 displays colors."

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
Scott R @ 9/6/2002 10:01:01 AM #
"No. Palm uses both frame-rate control [what you describe] and plain old side-by-side dithering to get 58 thousand-whatever colors on the m130."

Precisely, Servo. I think that one of the reasons why we see so many people here (and elsewhere) defending Palm on this is because they were duped into believing the double-speak that Palm came up with. The device does not use frame rate control to dither. Frame rate control is how they (and everyone else) turns three colors (red, green, and blue) to produce (in this case) 4096 colors. Dithering is how one turns 4096 colors into 58,000+ phone-baloney "color combinations."

Scott

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
jontz @ 9/6/2002 2:03:56 PM #
Just my $0.02, but the human eye can see over 16 million colors, but we only start to notice real differences in particular colors if limited to about 32,000. I think that saying 16-bit color is a joke is a little foolish unless one is color-blind. I can most definitely tell the difference between 4096 colors and 65,000 colors. Granted, the dithering on the palm m130 makes it look a lot closer to 16-bit than it really is, but it is not quite the same. If you set one computer to 12-bit color and one to 16-bit, you would notice a huge difference. I suspect that certain people have sensitive eyes and can see the difference between 16 and 32 bit color as well, but not me. Anywho, congrats to palm for doing something right for a change and offering people their money back.

RE: 16bit or more color is a joke.
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/21/2002 5:29:25 PM #
Some humans can see over 16 Million colors. This doesn't mean they see them as RGB, 8bit per channel or more. For broadcasting, it has been established that the pictures were good enough for good viewing systems to display in 18 bits (don't remember how they balanced R,G and B) but 24 or 32 bit is chosen because data is better handed by software if it is nx8 bits and because this lets people mess with light on their viewing system. Now any standard viewing system isn't able to show anything near the light spectrum the human eye is able to see. On a palm with its poor backlite, poor lcd filtering, 16 colors are enough and better than black and white, 256 good, 4096 great and 65536 useless. I hope you may not find any use in watching your DVD rips on it, or rework or even watch your 2 megapixel photographs. However, on a powerfull ppc this would be the case.

Abuse

SuccessWizard @ 9/5/2002 2:30:56 PM #
The thing that makes this a bad idea is that Palm m130 users now can use this as an upgrade path -- re-couping their purchase price and tax to spend on a new unit. Bad timing for the folks at Palm with OS 5 looming on the horizon.

Mike Lohsl
Palm & ACT! Advisor

www.successwizard.com

[I]Proud user of a Palm i705 Mobile Office and Kyocera 6035 phone[/I]

RE: Abuse
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:11:12 PM #
It's no biggie. Palm will resell the returned m130s for at least $200 each and odds are people will take the $300 and buy an OS 5 model from Palm. Sure, Palm loses some money but not a lot and they deserve at least some punishment for screwing up.
RE: Abuse
ardiri @ 9/5/2002 6:32:59 PM #
$300 for an OS5 device? hahahahaha :)

palm doesn't lose here - look, free PR on palm infocenter. just think about all the good things people are thinking about palm now - bringing up that good will aspect of marketing/distribution.

its just business.

// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/
http://www.mobilewizardry.com/

RE: Abuse
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 8:17:50 PM #
actually, it is good timing. if people trade in the m130 now and buy another one right away, palm can get rid of all the "old" os4 items before os5 hits the shelves.


RE: Abuse
useybird @ 9/5/2002 11:02:27 PM #
If owners opt for a refund, what is the point? $300. What can that buy you, an m130. Isn't that what you returned in the first place. And if Palm is Smart, they wouldn't encourage the refunded to buy a Sony, would they? Usually people who buy color never go back to monochrome. A $300 OS 5 device is totally out of the question. And what would these poor, cheated people do without their PDA? Now they would be stuck with $300 and no PDA. How sad for Palm to think of this.

----------------------------------------
A few years ago at the Sony handheld Dept.:" That's the most stupid name ever. Who would want to buy something called a 'Clie'? You must be out of your mind!"
RE: Abuse
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:23:57 PM #
> $300. What can that buy you, an m130.

You could pick up a Treo 90. It is $300. Or a Sony SJ-30, it's $300 too.

RE: Abuse
Scott R @ 9/6/2002 9:59:06 AM #
"The thing that makes this a bad idea is that Palm m130 users now can use this as an upgrade path -- re-couping their purchase price and tax to spend on a new unit."

I don't condone this sort of abuse, but let's be clear here. The initial "abuse" was by Palm in deceptively marketing this device. Hopefully some lost $$$ due to this buy-back will teach them not to try this again next time while not hurting them so bad financially that there will still be a "next time."

Scott

RE: Abuse
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 11:28:49 AM #
I fail to see how users who bought the m130 believing that the screen was up to par can be accused of abuse in opting for this remedy offered by Palm. Palm essentially lied to their customers. It seems obvious to me that any level-headed m130 owner will ask for the refund. As for adiri's statement that there's nothing out there that is the equivalent of the m130 at that price point, he, regrettably is incorrect. The Clie t615c is clearly better than the m130, and can be had from a variety of outlets at $250 or less. Others have mentioned the SJ-300 and others.
RE: Abuse
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 11:49:28 AM #
If you are genuinly happy with your m130's screen and just want a cheap upgrade, then you are abusing the system put in place to help the people who are unhappy with with the screen.

There was also a suggestion posted earlier that people trade in their m130, get the $300, then go buy another m130 at $250. That's abuse.

> As for adiri's statement that there's nothing out there that is the equivalent
> of the m130 at that price point, he, regrettably is incorrect.

ardiri didn't say that, useybird did. You are correct about there being other $300 models tho.

RE: Abuse
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/26/2002 2:43:56 PM #
yeah, i'm gonna get me a better one without payin any extra dough

What About m505 Owners?!

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 2:54:41 PM #
Palm did nothing for m505 owners about the screen brightness and quality, they denied there was a problem! What's different now?
If it was just a matter of perception, then a lot of people had the same perception!
Well, anyway, I complained the way it's most effective, instead of upgrading to another Palm , I replaced my m505 with a Sony Clie T665C, and have no regrets!
RE: What About m505 Owners?!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 3:19:22 PM #
Congratulations, you win the Dumb Comment of the Day Award™!!

If you didn't like the screen on the m505, why did you buy it? Having bought it, why did you keep it? We have laws in this country the protect people from buying things they aren't happy with. Are you ignorant of those laws? I hate to have to say it, but you don't come out of this looking very smart. Palm doesn't have to offer refunds to the obviously clueless.

RE: What About m505 Owners?!
LarryGarfield @ 9/5/2002 3:34:23 PM #
The m505 was dim to some people's eyes, not to others. But the packaging for it never made any definitively false statements. It was genuinely a matter of personal preference.

The m130 packaging explicitly said "65k colors". That, as has been revealed, was factually false. Palm has apologized for that, and is offering the (few) people who care a refund or free toy. HP did the same thing when they were caught with their pants down on the exact same issue.

If you equate the m505 brightness issue with this issue, then I can just as easily equate it with the Sony T665c having such awful buttons that the product is unusable. YOU may find it usable, but I can't stand it. Hundreds of thousands of m505 users found their devices usable as well. Deal.

--
This post is ROT26 encrypted. Reading it is a violation of the DMCA

RE: What About m505 Owners?!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:20:23 PM #
No, saying "bright color screen" when it is the dimmest color PDA ever created is just as bad. And the newer unit is pretty much the same, but surprise, a bright screen. By the way I did switch mine for a m500 even thought it was a great cost (screwed by pre-order and shipping). And don’t give palm props; they had no choice because of the lawsuit and the numbers that did not add up. But more important I am still waiting for manufacturers to admit that all the DVD players built until 1999 and many others still have the chroma error. Those companies will not even admit it is a problem.
M505
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 9:43:30 PM #
Why did they not offer a refund on the 505 that had problems with hotsyncing.....they said it would.....but then guess what.....it stoped....and they did not want to do anything about it for me....or most the people that had problems with it...Oh well **** palm....buying a clie next time
RE: What About m505 Owners?!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:00:22 PM #
>> "No, saying "bright color screen" when it is the dimmest color PDA ever created is just as bad." <<

Ssstttrrrreeeeeeeetttttttttccccccchhhhhhh.

That's what you're doing. Last time I checked, "bright" was NOT a number. "65,000" IS. To claim 65,000 when it's not is lying. To claim "bright" is, well, in the eyes of the beholder. So if you're pissed off that you can't get a refund for your m505, get over it. You don't deserve one. If you didn't like it, you shouldn't have bought. Just because the m515 was brighter doesn't admit that anyone was lying about the m505.

Your kind of BS is what's wrong with America.

RE: M505
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:09:37 PM #
Right on!

And who wants to bet a million dollars Sony will be the first to come up with a Palm OS 5 Clie?

RE: M505
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:20:07 PM #
Ah, yes, the song of the modern American:

"What's in it for me? What's in it for me? Waaah! Why can't I get something for free?"

You're pathetic.

RE: M505
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:23:43 PM #
Who here is talking about getting anything for free. It's about a problem that didn't GET SOLVED.

Perhaps you might like to queue up for a free brain from god.

RE: m505
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:28:45 PM #
> Why did they not offer a refund on the 505 that had problems with hotsyncing
> and they did not want to do anything about it for me

Contact Palm's support people and tell them your m505 won't hotsync and they will immediately offer to replace it with one that will. Saying they won't do anything about this is a flat out lie.

RE: What About m505 Owners?!
fleegle @ 9/5/2002 10:46:59 PM #
"And who wants to bet a million dollars Sony will be the first to come up with a Palm OS 5 Clie?"

Of course Sony will be the first to come up with a Palm OS 5 Clie! Sony is the only company that makes the Clie.

But, I think Palm will be the first to come out with a Palm OS 5 PDA.

RE: What About m505 Owners?!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:48:25 PM #
I've had my m505 for a few days now and I'm yet to see a SINGLE problem with the screen (if you're wondering, the price was what attracted me to the m505 instead of the m515). I'm also yet to see a problem with it syncing...
RE: What About m505 Owners?!
Altema @ 9/5/2002 11:16:46 PM #
"I've had my m505 for a few days now and I'm yet to see a SINGLE problem with the screen (if you're wondering, the price was what attracted me to the m505 instead of the m515). I'm also yet to see a problem with it syncing..."

Chances are, if you have a good unit, it never will give you any major problems.

Aside from the USB hotsync software problem (now rectified apparently), the rest of the problems were all with quality control. Some were good, some were bad, some were dim, some were brighter. I replaced mine because I needed more RAM and my own 505 was having problems.

My wife will not let her M505 go. It ran perfect from day one, always hotsyncs, and the screen is the same brightness as the M515 on low. I offered to upgrade it but she refused. She does not need the additional RAM, and would miss the backlit graffiti.

Refund for Palm 505?
PIC mobile user @ 9/10/2002 6:30:56 AM #
It's amazing how you are giving a full refund on Pam130 owners because of color issues while you have seemingly completely ignored your Palm505 users who have had to put up with a dark screen, for a product launchef with so mich bla bla bla. . It's so pathetic further, that you are not even mentioning the Palm505 anymore in any of your sites. Looks like the Palm505 never happened ! Not customer-fiendly of you Palm !
walrose09@yahoo.om
RE: Refund for Palm 505?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/10/2002 7:48:42 AM #
Umm..the m505 is a discontinued model, so why would they put it all over their website? And if you were unhappy with the PDA you bought, why didn't you return it? You must have realized the quality of the m505's display when you first saw it. The m130 issue is different, insofar as most of us can't immediately tell the difference between a 12 and 16 bit screen, and the option for a full refund from the point of purchase has likely expired.

Do you see the difference here? There really is no use or logic comparing the m505 and m130. You bought the m505, you accepted it as it was, didn't return it when you saw the "dim" screen, so just let it go already.

Headcount

quacksalve @ 9/5/2002 4:59:19 PM #
Has anyone actually decided to send theirs in? I have one. Want an m515. Uncomfortable taking advantage of this situation, but it's tempting. I'm curious what other m130 owners have decided.

RE: Headcount
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 8:25:41 PM #
Well, I'd do what you're happy with, but Palm screwed you, so why not take their offer? You're upgrading to another Palm anyway...

My $.02

RE: Headcount
Fammy @ 9/6/2002 11:57:19 AM #
I'm probably going to do it, if I can find a good replacement so I won't be Palm-less for too long.

_____
Fammy
RE: Headcount
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 3:09:52 PM #
My wife is very eager to return her's. In comparison with my m505, the m130 screen is brighter, but photos are not nearly as sharp, skin tones seeming muddy, and movies are completely blurry, not worth watching. I was disappointed with the quality, but she was prepared to live with it because it seemed such a good deal. We simply trusted what Palm had told us regarding the screen. I had attributed the lack of definition to the m130 having a different type of screen, but it seems as though that wasn't the problem. We've already signed up online for the refund.

refunding?

ardiri @ 9/5/2002 6:29:33 PM #
    ... You will be contacted via email with details regarding the return of your handheld and the refund process. ...
is it really worth sending back your unit to palm? :) i doubt many people will bother with this refund system. i surely wouldn't. how much will shipping/postage be? who is paying for that? :) lets not mention the fact that you may be palmless for a few days. i just dont see any m130 users doing this.

the m130 is a nice cheap entry level unit - if they had the money/time to waste on doing an upgrade like this; they would have purchased a m505 to begin with. what PalmOS pda can you purchase at the original m130's price? :)

makes you wonder.. doesn't it?


// az
aaron@ardiri.com
http://www.ardiri.com/
http://www.mobilewizardry.com/

Palm misled their customers on purpose

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 7:12:34 PM #
Palm misled their customers on purpose.

-Use cheaper components.
-Advertise it has 16bit 65k color when it's really 12 bit 4096 colors.
-If no one notices Palms wins.
-If they do notice, see what happens. Say "sorry" and say "it's dithering".
-Palm states only 8 people wanted refunds.
-Palm wins. The cost is small to replace a few units or send a copy of some game.

This is the second time Palm has been nailed for false advertising. The media and most sites are so Pro-Palm and Anti-Microsoft, you never hear about it.

www.ciol.com/content/news/repts/102030713.asp

Wait until the new version of the Palm comes out, it's not what they said it is. But most people here will think it's great.

Advertise that your product offers much more than it really does.
If anyone complains about your false advertising (which is against the law), wait until after the product has secured its place in the market (and in people's homes/offices) before admitting anything.
Offer a full refund for the 12 people who would actually rather have their money back than live with their underperforming machines. Placate the rest with a downloadable version of a software product that's over a decade old (after all, the company's only cost-per-download is for the used bandwidth... it's not like they're giving away physical items)
Result:
the 12 people who knew they were ripped off shut up because get their money back
the FTC will never get involved over false advertising charges
the company still sells (number of units that would have been sold if its claims had been true - 12) units
the vast majority of consumers think they got something for nothing (software) and laud the company
Repeat with next product release.
Looks like a great deal for those who don't care about the bit depth of their PDA, and a way out for those who do my ***... looks like a great marketing/disinformation strategy for Palm.
And no, this is not "the way business is done," this is "false advertising." Unfortunately, false advertising is only against the law if people complain.

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:05:40 PM #
Oh, no! A conspiracy! When will these treasonous scumbags be brought to justice?

Get off your high horse. Someone in marketing blew it. No one in engineering noticed. Stupid? Sure. Lack of communication? Absolutely. "On purpose?" Doubtful.

This is hardly a situation where Palm somehow walks away with billions of extra dollars at the consumer's expense. They made an error and are correcting it. It'll cost them some money, but far less than it might've--for which they should feel fortunate.

Some people have a wild imagination.

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:10:03 PM #
>> "The media and most sites are so Pro-Palm and Anti-Microsoft, you never hear about it." <<

Let me guess...Bill O'Reilly? Rush Limbaugh? What an outrageous, and off-base, claim.

RE: mlaP
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:13:20 PM #
Wow. You'd think the m130 didn't have a working datebook function or something, the way you overdramatize this supposed conspiracy.

Do you know how a company works? Do you think the guys in engineering have anything to do with what it says on the packaging, or that they care? NO--marketing handles that. And some goofball in Palm marketing either heard or assumed that the m130 was 16-bit, then it's on the package. With the m505, marketing decided that they'd trumpet the "vibrant color." What makes the m130 more serious is the inclusion of an actual number.

No one catches it, so it goes unnoticed. Once Palm finally allows the hand to speak to the arm, DOH!, we blew it.

Accuse Palm of stupidity all you want. But this whole conspiracy-theory thing is evidence of someone who has a little too much time, and unused imagination, on their hands.

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 10:16:52 PM #
> The media and most sites are so Pro-Palm and Anti-Microsoft, you never hear about it.

What?!?! Bwahahahaha!! Dude, your grasp on reality is very, very weak. Most newspapers, magazines, etc. are so pro-Microsoft, its a national tragedy. When Bill Gates sneezes, its on the front page of the New York Times. Anti-Microsoft, my foot.

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 9:43:04 AM #
Palm wouldn't have tried this for no other reason than they could tell it wouldn't work. HP advertised that three different Jornada models had 16 bit screens that really had only 12 bit screens. This went on for 15 months before they got caught. Does the Jornada dominate the handheld industry? No it failed so badly HP has killed it off.
RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 1:51:33 PM #
> Palm misled their customers on purpose.
> -Use cheaper components.
> -Advertise it has 16bit 65k color when it's really 12 bit 4096 colors.

Hogwash. It's a lower-cost device so of course it uses some lower cost components. It was never advertized as 16-bit color, just 65k colors. It is obvious that Palm intended for it to support more than 12-bit, 4096 colors since they: 1. developed it such that it could work in 16-bit mode for 16-bit apps; and 2. actually implemented dithering such that it could display more "color combinations" (as they call it) to represent those 16-bit values. If Palm actually wanted to provide just a 12-bit 4096 color device, they could have done it for less money and less effort.

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 2:04:46 PM #
"If Palm actually wanted to provide just a 12-bit 4096 color device, they could have done it for less money and less effort."

Yeah they want to cheat you into believing that it's a 16-bit screen, basically like your professor asks you for a 10 page paper and you hand in a 10 page paper with triple space and font 30.

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
OzziePalmDieHard @ 9/7/2002 12:38:44 AM #
"Does the Jornada dominate the handheld industry? No it failed so badly HP has killed it off."

Hah! The Jornada didn't fail, but when HP merged, they decided to call it a "HP Ipaq". Because the Ipaq was more successful.

It wasn't because the jornada failed...

Several Months Ago at Palm Headquarters;

"Hah! Those sony bastards think that they can beat us in stupid names. The Tungsten T is infinitely more ridiculous than "clie"....."

RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 4:12:09 AM #
Wow. Never realized how many people actually beleive Palm's spin and want second helpings on top of all that. No wonder why Palm thinks it can do a Clinton and pull the depends on what 'is' is type statement on this whole mess and expect their popularity poll to remain high.
RE: Palm misled their customers on purpose
FriarDroit @ 10/2/2002 11:28:42 PM #
We may never know whether Palm misled on purpose. However, Palm is certainly glacially slow in actually producing refunds. Their email and telephone communication program regarding the refund forms is vertually nonexistant.

Hmm.. SimCity

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 7:24:34 PM #
I wonder if its 12-bit color or 16-bit color :)
RE: Hmm.. SimCity
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 7:36:15 PM #
Give it a rest. That joke was funny the first 50 times someone used it.
RE: Hmm.. SimCity
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 3:06:23 AM #
Hmmm.. Well it was the first time I used it.

Maybe you should get a life and not read so many PDA boards :)

RE: Hmm.. SimCity
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 3:56:04 PM #
Back under the bridge, troll.... What difference does this make? No one pays for software anymore.
RE: Hmm.. SimCity
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 4:32:34 PM #
That's what you thieves tell yourselves, isn't it? "It's OK for me to steal because everyone does it." It isn't true and everyone else thinks you are scum.

not a disgruntled customer, but...

drw @ 9/5/2002 8:03:20 PM #
If I had an m130, I'd demand that Palm ship me an m130 that has a fully functional 16bit screen as well as a postage prepaid package into which I could place the p.o.s. 12bit unit for return. :-)

BTW, what's the status of the XEROX appeal? Funny, but I don't see any XEROX pda's at CompUSA that offer "unistrokes" recognition.

How about an update for the rest of the lawsuits pending as described in Palm's 2002 Annual Report, pages 12-14.

---
David

RE: not a disgruntled customer, but...
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/5/2002 11:52:28 PM #
If I owned an m130, I'd demand that Palm give me backrubs for the rest of my life and give me the ability to turn myself invisible.

Great!

PIC mobile user @ 9/6/2002 6:44:27 AM #
You mean I can get my money back in full? Great! Now I can get the new Sony S30 for the same $300.
RE: Great!
N473 @ 9/6/2002 4:33:43 PM #
I am returning my m130. I am expecting the return info email by Sunday (that's how long it takes according to tech support). I have already pruchased a Treo 90 from handspring.com. I want to give the thumbboard a try. I am already a newpen user (great for updating my handx weblog in bed ;), so I know I can still use grafitti. Got a free 16MB SD card too (already had a 24MB card, this is gravy).

According to palm tech support, once I have the form filled out, I need to enclose that, the reciept (got a copy), and the working m130 (I'll send the original box), to what ever address. I need to pay shipping, they suggest insurance (<- DUH!). Then in 8 to 10 weeks I get a check in the mail. The cool thing is I have already convinced the wife ;)

Cheers!
N473

RE: Great!
TLS2000 @ 9/15/2002 12:32:33 PM #
Here's some questions for anyone who is considering the refund:

Why should we have to pay the shipping cost to Palm?

Will Palm refund the price of the extended warranty that I purchased with my M130?

Why does it take 8-10 weeks for Palm to mail me a check that they can print up AS SOON AS THEY RECEIVE MY PALM?

If I live outside of the US, do I have to ship my Palm TO the US?

I don't believe that I should have to pay shipping of my M130 to Palm as part of this deal. It means that I'm STILL LOSING MONEY ON THEIR FALSE ADVERTISING!

I doubt that Palm will refund my extended warranty at $35, which means that when I throw in shipping to a US address, my costs will be somewhere in the $70 range. This is how much money I will lose in shipping my M130 back to palm. That is almost 1/4 of the purchase price.

Why does Palm have to have my money for an additional 8-10 weeks after they receive my M130? Isn't it considered reasonable to assume that they can mail the check the VERY NEXT DAY?

For most people, they're better off just taking the free game. Simcity was a VGA 256 color game, so it should work just fine on the M130 with its ability to display 4096 colors. I personally want a full refund of all expenses incurred with my return of my M130.

Tom Murdoch
Palm M130 Owner

RE: Great!
Ed @ 9/15/2002 3:35:50 PM #
> If I live outside of the US, do I have to ship my Palm TO the US?

No, if you are trying to return your m130 outside of the U.S., you should contact Palm in your country, not Palm USA.

Here's a page with links to all the international Palm sites:
www.palm.com/intl/

---
News Editor

Only 8 people?

Scott R @ 9/6/2002 10:06:59 AM #
This thread has gotten quite long and no one is probably reading anymore, but, just in case...

Everyone seems to be trusting Palm that only 8 people cared about this to call. While this may be true, it shouldn't be assumed as such. This is probably just spin to try to further downplay the issue and minimize the impact on their stock.

Scott

RE: Only 8 people?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 3:14:22 PM #
well, i called and complained about it, who are the other 7 people?
RE: Only 8 people?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/6/2002 8:21:15 PM #
> well, i called and complained about it, who are the other 7 people?

The same people with Clie's that have nothing better to do than post here.

Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!

smg_ktu @ 9/6/2002 10:09:24 PM #
I see that Palm is trying, but failing to appease me--I'm happy with my m130 so far (a replacement for a MIA IIIc), and the first accessory purchase I made was the PalmPak Games Card, which includes SimCity. Palm obviously was not utilizing logic and does not have good customer service in mind when coming up with this ultimatium-send it back, or take this game. If Palm really was using good customer service logic, they would offer free accessories and/or a credit to their on-line store-if you are satisfied with the unit, and already have SimCity. Maybe the dithering isn't 100 % perfect--but if you're happy, why screw over your customers??? Also, why should I be Palmless for any length of time while Palm plays with itsself??? Why should I be forced to have this ultimatum--take it or leave it? If you want to give me something, don't just give me something I already paid for buying your accessory expansion card!! What in the blue hell is Palm thinking???

RE: Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!
smg_ktu @ 9/6/2002 10:46:32 PM #
Why doesn't Palm give us a credit to their Software Connection, and let the owner pick their own software if they already have SimCity? It's 100% obvious to me that Palm once again is doing a half-ass job to cover their own ass and play with itself.

RE: Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!
formerlyanon @ 9/7/2002 4:59:27 AM #
shuttup, you get a free game, or get your money back, what more do you want!? them to give you a free m515, 'cos your not happy but dont want the game or tthe money back?

__________________________________________________________________
My palm III was 50p from a charity shop, and introduced me to pdas
RE: Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!
cdvd @ 9/7/2002 11:43:19 AM #
Seeing as you don't even have an m130, I don't see why anyone should care what you think. They have done more than other companies did in similar situations. When HP got busted for saying Jornadas were 16 bit when they were really 12 bit, your only option was to return it for a refund.

Some people are just natural whiners. How about if they buy all m130 employees a new house, shut down the company, and shoot all the employees? Would that make you happy?

Reminds me of a story I heard. I don't know if its true. I was told there was someone at one on the big department stores in NY part of whose job it is to get fired. If there is some whiney customer kicking up a scene, the manager would call this employee in and say "This person is responsible" and then turn to the employee and say "You're fired. Go clean out your desk." The employee would go off looking dejected and the customer would be satisfied. Of course, the employee would go back upsairs and get back to work, ready to do it all again the next time.

RE: Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/7/2002 4:59:34 PM #
Here's a suggestion. Why don't you contact Palm, instead of whining here, tell them you already own SimCity, and ask if you can get another game instead.
RE: Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/7/2002 5:15:12 PM #
>> "Here's a suggestion. Why don't you contact Palm, instead of whining here, tell them you already own SimCity, and ask if you can get another game instead." <<

Ah, but that would mean actually DOING something. When you have no life, it's much easier to go BMW (Bitch Moan Whine) on a message board, especially when you've got the emotional maturity of a 6-year-old.

RE: Boy, is Palm screwing over the m130 owners!!!
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/7/2002 8:28:39 PM #
Yeh, crucify them I say.

Funny thing though - I don't remember a certain consumer electronics giant offering to compensate the suckers who bought the T415, with the infamous "paperwhite" screen.

Get a Life

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/7/2002 7:47:35 AM #
Palm is a good company and they have made a very good product in the M130. All I was looking for was a good color PDA and found it in the M130. I don't know who you all have for an optometrist, but I need his number as I cannot tell the difference between 58,621 colors and 65,536 colors. If you really can tell the difference then go for the refund, but if not just be happy with your purchase. Get a life and find something else to do than try to scam an honest company.
RE: Get a Life
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 4:18:24 AM #
...who lies about color depth on their units.
RE: Get a Life
TLS2000 @ 9/15/2002 12:43:22 PM #
The M130 can display 4096 colors, not 58,621 colors. The extra 54525 colors that they claim it can display are just tricks that the device performs on your eye. These same tricks take the clarity of the display down.

Try looking at a 32-bit photo on a 16-bit screen (on your computer set the display to 16-bit) and it will look almost the same as 32-bit, because our eyes can't really tell much of a difference (but there is a difference, albeit slight).
Now, if you can set your computer to display that same photo in 12-bit color (using photoshop or a similar tool), it will look like it has less color, it will also look washed out and will be less sharp (in focus).
Now try and display a 16-bit photo in 12-bit color, and it will look almost the same as the 32-bit one in 12-bit.

Now reduce the resolution of the screen by almost 31 times, and display that same photo on your Palm M130 which due to the lower resolution will make it look less sharp and in focus, but it will also magnify the poor dithering that was required to make this 32-bit or even 16-bit photo fit in the 12-bit display screen.

If the M130 displayed the colors advertised, you should only really see the resolution reduction, and less clarity due to there being less pixels. Instead, you see less clarity due to there being less pixels, as well as pixels being MERGED to make it appear like there is more colors, which reduces your resolution almost in half again which reduces the clarity even more.



Tom Murdoch
Palm M130 Owner

any contact from palm yet?

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/8/2002 10:38:23 PM #
any contact from palm after filled out the refund form?
RE: any contact from palm yet?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 7:41:50 PM #
none yet. perhaps i'll try calling them. that's what somebody on a thread higher up did. i'll wait for now, give it a couple of more days.
RE: any contact from palm yet?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 9:03:58 PM #
So far no reply at all :-(
RE: any contact from palm yet?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/9/2002 9:31:57 PM #
Filled mine out Friday night, Monday night and no response yet....

Apoligies and refunds are great, but at least get back to us within several days... I'm dying to verify the refund to buy another unit

RE: any contact from palm yet?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/10/2002 8:24:57 AM #
> Filled mine out Friday night, Monday night and no response yet....

Time for a dose of reality. It has been exactly one business day since you filled out the form. One. You can't count Saturday or Sunday. They aren't business days.

RE: any contact from palm yet?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/10/2002 1:46:44 PM #
>> Filled mine out Friday night, Monday night and no response yet....

>Time for a dose of reality. It has been exactly one business day since you filled out the form. One. You can't count Saturday or Sunday. They aren't business days.

Didn't know that servers adhered to 'business day' rules, maybe there's secret midgets pulling levers in that computer case, and they don't work until tuesday... which is today. And no email yet.

RE: any contact from palm yet?
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/11/2002 5:16:11 PM #
checking email 30 times a day. man! i cannot wait any longer
RE: any contact from palm yet?
Hammer @ 9/17/2002 10:22:37 PM #
Im in Australia, and applied for the refund on the web - I havent heard anything.

I spoke with palm australia and they could upgrade me, but for a full refund I had to deal with the site.

Hammer

Full refund, unless you're from Canada

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/12/2002 3:23:46 PM #
Just got a phone call from palm today, and since I'm in Canada, no such luck for me. I guess false advertisement doesn't count if depending on your geography. Thanks for nothing palm, I'll never palm a palm product again.
RE: Full refund, unless you're from Canada
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/12/2002 11:57:52 PM #
what do u mean? the refund program doesn't cover canada?
RE: Full refund, unless you're from Canada
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/14/2002 10:11:45 PM #
I'm not sure anymore. I phoned a number given to me by the palm email support, that was just set up for the refund inquires. Talked to a woman who didn't know about what to do if I lived in Canada, so she asked some other people and phoned me, informing me the refund isn't valid in Canada. I phoned back and talked to someone else, who didn't know either way and was going to get back to me. So I don't know any more, seems no one at palm does either.
RE: Full refund, unless you're from Canada
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/14/2002 11:01:49 PM #
That's the worst customer service I've ever heard!
RE: Full refund, unless you're from Canada
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/19/2002 12:40:53 PM #
Well I guess I do get a refund now, never had my call returned but received an email describing to send it to Winnipeg, so all is good I guess. I think some of the customer service agencies should start communicating.

WRITE YOUR ATTORNEY GENERAL AND FILE SUIT IN SMALL CLAIMS

I.M. Anonymous @ 9/26/2002 2:48:29 PM #
COMPLAIN TO YOUR ATTORNEY GENERAL AND SEE IF THEY TAKE ACTION. IF NOT, FILE SUIT IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT.
RE: WRITE YOUR ATTORNEY GENERAL AND FILE SUIT IN SMALL CLAIM
I.M. Anonymous @ 9/26/2002 2:52:54 PM #
Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass:

Latest Comments

  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000