Comments on: Palm is Named in S&P's Latest Weakest Links Report

Time Magazine has just published an article which takes a look at some of the implications of the report and makes a passing mention about Palm being a "troubled firm." PalmInfocenter has obtained a copy of the report and we take a further look at how it specifically relates to Palm.
Article Comments
(42 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
RE: A Disclaimer
- http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/08/14/afx5322091.html
That "B3" means essentially "highly speculative non-investment-grade".
RE: A Disclaimer
RE: A Disclaimer
That was two weeks ago.
Now they're worth a buck fifty-seven.
What?
PALM at $3.29/share
tempting to pick up 1,000 shares on a flyer...............
Palm Inc
(PALM)
3.29 Down -0.42 -11.32%
Open: 3.19 High: 3.61 Low: 3.07
Previous Close: 3.71 Volume: 1,090,585
Eastern Time
could get uglier and go a lot lower...............probably a bad idea......who would buy them? and why? and for what premium? and with what currency?
thoughts?
http://moneycentral.msn.com/detail/stock_quote?Symbol=palm&getquote=Get+Quote
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
You SURE you want to buy in?
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
PALM quote (NASDAQ Exchange - quotes delayed 15 min)
2.94 down -0.77 -20.75%
nasty
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
Wouldn't it be funny as all hell if ACCESS, sick of ALPO going nowhere, simply BOUGHT PALM?
Cue more weeping and gnashing of teeth here at PIC.
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
Or rather, kicking selves for not shorting 10,000 shares at 6 when we were arguing about coffin nails.
PS: even-higher res iPhone rumors - http://www.intomobile.com/2008/10/23/apple-iphone-hd-spotted-online.html
320X320 SSS Die Die Die!
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
only play at this point would be an acquisition play. but who would by them? why? and for what premium? and with what? in the market where everyone is scrimping for cash on their balance sheets and trying to survive? who wants more debt? so you buy 1,000 shares at $3 and someone buys them at 20% premium and pays $3.60 = you made $600 before taxes. whoopee. not worth the risk IMO of the $3,000 downside to $0 that could very well happen.
and what happens when apple announces the $99 iphone?
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
Go here:
- http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/trader.aspx?id=ShortInterest
and type in "palm" and hit "Search".
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
So let's redo that entire post:
Though this message board/web site isn't really the place for Palm financial discussions, the most-recently reported Short Interest on Palm increased a still-dramatic 13+% over its already-astronomic previous size - and did so in half a month.
Go here:
- http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/trader.aspx?id=ShortInterest
and type in "palm" and hit "Search".
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
The thing about an iPhone HD is ... how fekkin teeny weeny would type appear in Safari then? Go on, look at the NYT and have nothing but --- appearing as lines of text. You wouldn't know what the hell to tap on!
No, it won't be a higher-res screen in an iPhone. It'll be an iPod Air/iPod Touchbook with a larger hi-res screen. I got the timing all wrong. Something that big is a January MacWorld Event, not an October reveal.
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
By the way, I call fake on that iPhone HD.
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
[ob-disclosure - I own a massive 70 shares of GM and something like 500 of GE bought at just about their peak price so, though biased and possibly benefiting from others' purchases of these, I seriously doubt any cast of, say, 100,000 buyers will benefit me enough!]
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
UH, I SAID............
mike - this is more your speed, old man -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNdw4CfbwQg
RE: PALM at $3.29/share
RE: PALM at $1.55/share
well it's a good thing i didn't take that flyer at $3.29...i'd be down 50%+. nasty.
PALM
12-1-08
After Hours: 1.55 -0.33 / -17.55% Vol. 5,140
Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009
http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/09/29/rumor-an-iphone-for-verizon-in-2009/
RE: Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009
I call bullshit on this. I suspect if they are talking at all, it to hold over ATT's head when the Apple/ATT distrobution contract is upo either in 2010 or 2012. Also, I can't see Verizon giving up the control that Apple demands. Verizon already has some iphone clones in the pipe and while Apple may want to expand to a new pool at some point once the ATT sales saturate, an easier play would be T-Moble another GSM carrier before haveing to re-engineer the phone as a CDMA phone. Why make the investment at this time in the teeth of a recession. Finally, Apple would have to have the phone recertified for CDMA with the FCC which will take time and coin.
"Many men stumble across the truth, but most manage to pick themselves up
and continue as if nothing had happened."
- Winston Churchill
RE: Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009
RE: Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009
I think the sweet spot of the market over the next year+ for the average consumer & carriers alike is going to be feature-laden, large touchscreen-enabled dumbphones, ala Dare/Instinct etc.
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p
RE: Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009
Verizon already has some iphone clones in the pipe...
I doubt anybody is switching to Verizon from AT&T to pick up an LG Dare. All the clones in the world aren't equivalent to the real thing. After Verizon's original blunder of denying Apple the ability of selling it on their network, I imagine they would be open to the idea of bringing the third iteration on their network.
If anything were to happen, it would be in 2010 at the earliest.
-Bosco
NX80v + Wifi + BT + S710a
RE: Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009 (NOT)
There's not much overseas interest in CDMA, and CDMA carriers in Canada and Australia have already started to migrate to GSM, so why would Apple put any effort into implementing CDMA support?
RE: Rumor: An iPhone for Verizon in 2009
a VZW and a Sprint iPhone makes complete sense. it's a win-win for the carriers and for Apple. Apple has built up critical mass with AT&T, proved that the subsidy-contract model works. AT&T got the advantage of the first-to-market head start, and now VZW and Sprint would get to play too. Apple expands its market exponentially and VZW and Sprint attract/retain customers who would otherwise have defected due to iphone.
what's the problem? it's done...
RE: why no Google love for PalmOS?
If you have access to the Java and the older version of gmail, it works fine!
RE: why no Google love for PalmOS?
of course, but - they could have still linked the Google Maps for PalmOS. or even created a Google Mail PalmOS app that would work.
RE: why no Google love for PalmOS?
RE: why no Google love for PalmOS?
> know that PalmOS exists!
Speaking of $3 per share for Palm, you are pointing out a key problem for Palm - the "time value" of one's own reputation/brand - they're losing it.
RE: why no Google love for PalmOS?
Hey, Gekko, what was that stock worth before the bankruptcy?
the obama crash
the stock market has dropped almost 50% from its highs. it has priced in an obama victory.
RE: the obama crash
In fact, a LOT of us out here believe it.
The Landslide for Change in a week - not just Presidential but right across the board with Congress/Senate as well - is going to be a wonder to behold.
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
A Disclaimer
The specific terms and details are mentioned in section 13 of the recent 10-Q.