Comments on: The Palm OS Cobalt Phones That Never Were

MobileRead's Bob Russell has posted a fascinating article that is certainly makes for interesting reading, what with the rumors and official statements from Palm their own in-house Linux-based OS will not be ready until early 2009. The debacle surrounding the flameout of Cobalt/OS 6.0 by PalmSouce after numerous missed deadlines and broken promises certainly makes for a cautionary tale for anyone thinking that a robust mobile OS is an easy thing to create.

In addition to the Cobalt editorial the article has three high-resolution product sheets from Singapore's Oswin Technology. The images showcase two Cobalt-based smartpohones that never saw the light of day even in their native Asian markets. While a bit chunky and unstylish by today's standards (especially the "Slide ID" flagship), the phones' specifications list is still impressive today, besting all of Palm's current offerings in several areas such as a large portrait 2.8" LCD and a 3 megapixel camera with flash along with hardware-assisted MPEG-4 encoding and decoding.

Return to Story - Permalink

Article Comments


The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Start a new Comment Down

What? My Dell X50p Works Great

LiveFaith @ 1/15/2008 7:14:23 PM # Q
Where have you all been? My X50p with Cobalt 6.1 is still going strong. The great thing is that Cobalt has nearly double the clipboard limit to 1928 bytes. Strong!

PS - Still wondering if Access is going to get a hotsync update for Vista?

Pat Horne

RE: What? My Dell X50p Works Great
PacManFoo @ 1/15/2008 9:11:49 PM # Q
I still love the look of cobalt. Too bad they couldn't have released a single PDA running cobalt.

PDA's Past and Present:
Palm TX (Number 2)
Palm - IIIxe, Vx, M500, M505, Tungsten T, TX
Handspring - Edge, Platinum, Deluxe
Sony - SJ22
Apple - MP110, MP2000, MP2100
RE: What? My Dell X50p Works Great
LiveFaith @ 1/15/2008 9:36:35 PM # Q
I guess these guys had to succumb to the market on the OS. But, wow had they released and updated those phones, they could have made some waves.

Boy, Cobalt must have really been a dog because everybody was loading up early on. Sony just abandoned the market and the others dissapeared. Remember, the "13 devices by years end" quote by the CEO. Ugggggh.

Pat Horne

RE: What? My Dell X50p Works Great
sremick @ 1/16/2008 11:21:35 AM # Q
"I still love the look of cobalt. Too bad they couldn't have released a single PDA running cobalt."

Agreed. I run a Cobalt skin on my T3. I even still had the Cobalt simulator running on my PC up until not long ago.

Reply to this comment

the iPhone that could have been

pmjoe @ 1/15/2008 11:12:51 PM # Q
Cobalt wasn't perfect at the time but 4 years of improvement since would've gone a long way. I'm far less optimistic Palm will be able to salvage things with Palm Linux over the next couple of years.

RE: the iPhone that could have been
rsc1000 @ 1/21/2008 12:51:08 AM # Q
Exactly. I still maintain that it was not entirely Palm Sources fault (per se) that it tanked and it was not because it was a bad OS - it was more due to Palm (the hardware comopany) that killed it because by the time Palm Source delivered the OS, Sony was gone so Palm (or pa1mOne or whatever they were then) just said "Nope - we no longer need to spend 1 cent on research and development because the competion is gone". I think this theory is proven by Palms inability / unwillingness to do a innovate in the years that followed Cobalt's demise.

I spent time with it on the simulator and wrote some code using the APIs - I thought it was a great improvement over the old Palm OS from a development perspective.

Cynics like TVOR spent a lot of time on messageboards back then insulting the PalmSource people (as in, directly insulting individual employees that were willing to discuss the OS on forums) and claiming that the failure was the technology. Bull. I'd take Cobolt from 3 years ago ANYDAY over the cringe-inducing Windows Mobile 6, the supposedly more 'advanced OS' because it has full multitasking and has the word 'Windows' in the title, but is slow as a dog (still!), has an god-awful UI. Sadly I don't have the choice if I want a newer, 'thriving' OS - so I am now using and developing for the Blackberry OS.

Reply to this comment

Oh well...

samdapdaman @ 1/16/2008 4:24:01 AM # Q
It would be nice to have seen some sort of feature adding update for ANY of the palms i've owned. Palm really just took money and ran with it. For them to have a overall unchanged 7 year old os and not back-port something easily... grr.

My palms
m105 x2(warranty) --> IIIc --> T3 x2(warranty) --> T3.5 --> iPod touch (in two weeks!)
*sob* Bye palm!

(Die a slow death Hotsync!)

Reply to this comment

unlocked 680 update

jdazuelos @ 1/16/2008 9:11:43 AM # Q
waiting the new OSD you can download the update for treo 680 unlocked realeased today :

Reply to this comment

Yo, ACCESS: Give It Away!

mikecane @ 1/16/2008 2:38:42 PM # Q
ACCESS gave away the PalmOS emulator for that %$#@ing Anti-Net Tabs from those *&^%##*&^$$^%ing Finns.

Give out FREE COBALT!!

Some smart guy Out There will jigger a way we can put it on our PDAs.

RE: Yo, ACCESS: Give It Away!
AdamaDBrown @ 1/16/2008 3:45:56 PM # Q
Access to Cobalt source code and/or components for free reverse engineering would also include free access to critical Access Inc. intellectual property, stuff like Garnet emulation that's still included in ALP. That's different from distributing a finished, black-box compatibility app.

RE: Yo, ACCESS: Give It Away!
mikecane @ 1/17/2008 8:13:11 PM # Q

Reply to this comment

Nagel the Bagel surfaces

mikecane @ 1/16/2008 2:40:38 PM # Q
Reply to this comment
Start a New Comment Thread Top


Register Register | Login Log in