Comments on: Palm Unveils Tungsten and Zire Sub Brands
Tungsten will be the brand name for its high-end models aimed at mobile professionals and the enterprise work forces, while Zire will be its consumer brand.
Article Comments
(112 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: Tungsten MIM
Palm is now entering the "push" e-mails market. That's certainly interesting.
Tony
RE: Tungsten MIM
RE: Tungsten MIM
Palm MIM solution based on Thin Air Apps technology!?
http://www.palm.com/enterprise/products/mims/tungsten_mims_faq.pdf
A pity that Palm didn't merge with MIM/Bluetooth leader Extended Systems Inc. As you might know, Palm is offering/using XTND's IrDA technology, MIM Solution called XTNDConnect Server (XTNDConnect Server is being offered as a migration path for current Palm HotSync server customers) and Bluetooth Solution (Palms OS 5.x Bluetooth Stack is based upon the qualified “XTNDAccess Blue SDK” from Extended Systems.)
Palm's rebranded XTNDConnect Server Device support includes Palm, Pocket PC, Windows CE and EPOC operating systems (adding RIM and SyncML). Microsoft Exchange, Lotus Domino and any ODBC-compliant database servers are supported. Connectivity to XTNDConnect Server can be wired or wireless through Ethernet, infrared, analog or wireless modems.
http://www.palm.com/enterprise/products/xtndconnect.html
What's Palm New Strategy?
Time will tell.
Intro: Mobile devices are entering the corporate enterprise in two distinct ways. The first is through the traditional IT infrastructure in which IT managers standardize a device and distribute it to employees. However, because of the low costs generally associated with PDAs, many employees are buying their own devices, bringing them into the corporate infrastructure, and asking IT to support them. This second method of entry is an unnerving prospect for many IT managers because it makes implementing mobile device hardware standards difficult. In reality, even if IT selects a single PDA platform, employee demand will dictate that they'll have to support other devices too.
It looks like Palm is offering a "New" MIM Solution based on there own (single) OS only (like Microsoft is doing with there Microsoft Mobile Information Server 2002. More and more enterprises are using different PDA's from multiple vendors. So a MIM Solution that support PDAs from multiple vendors (Microsoft Windows CE/Pocket PC 2002, Palm OS, RIM Blackberry, Symbian OS devices.) would be the prefered choice imho (see xtndconnect server for example).
any PDA cost between $99 and $499??
RE: any PDA cost between $99 and $499??
---
News Editor
Tungsten and Zire, A Slight Clarification
Don't some of the PC companies do this? Have a line that is marketed to companies and another that is for consumers?
---
News Editor
Great post-
RE: any PDA cost between $99 and $499??
Veld is their mid-range, out in 1st Quarter.
Palm still stalling?
Scott
RE: Palm still stalling?
RE: Palm still stalling?
just a thought.
RE: Palm still stalling?
RE: Palm still stalling?
RE: Palm still stalling?
>
> K
So how much PALM stock did you short before posting this?
RE: Palm still stalling?
better 802.11b solutions please
Tony
RE: better 802.11b solutions please
I've got the Xircom sled and I love it---of course, I wish it were smaller but the size is mostly taken up by a huge rechargable battery. The 802.11b SDIO card (which will come out someday) will require too much power to be useful.
Crossroads for Palm
But, and this is for the crossroads, Palm and Palmsource have to watch Bill and his Pocket PC camp. There is some formidable hardware coming out running PPC, and it will be a great shame to see the Palm OS loosing out in the high end playing field.
Johnny Christoffersen - UK
Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
:: dk ::
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
Regarding car names, they always try to mangle some good word into the name like the Integra. "Oh integrity?" "No integRA" So people think it's a good car. Of course Palm went with... well... you see what I'm saying.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
The name "Pilot" was the best of the bunch. They should have just bought, broken up and taken that tradename from the pen company with their initial IPO windfall. Can't afford to now...
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
As Nikki Sixx of Motley Crue once said "If you start with a successful sounding name you are already successful." (Courtesy of VH1 - "Behind the Music")
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
you must be the crowd that loves to order a 'grande frapachino latte'.
The first thing i thought of when I read the name Tungsten was a clean cut, cool grey metal (probably because of the platinum/tungsten rings...) an image that i'm sure palm is trying to convey. Clean cut, simple and cool....
you want to talk about sounding like an idiot at the store...i STILL don't call it a "Clie"
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
"<
Well, Chevy marketed the Nova in Mexico, with it's English name. Unfortunately, in Spanish, "No va" roughly means "it doesn't go".
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
If you go to Palm's page, Tungsten isn't just about the handhelds. They seem to be positioning it as a full complement of corporate utilities. So the name Tungsten would convey the idea of strength and security.
Just my $0.02 =)
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
Never underestimate the power of GOOD Marketing/Brand.
RE: agree...bad name.
I even like Razor better as a name, although I guess the scooter took that name after it was Palm V's code name.
I'm sure that names go through focus groups, but I think they blew it on this one.
Product/company names that I've liked have been Apple's Titanium, Acura, Intel's Xeon, Nikon's Coolpix.
Zire is ok, but Veld is also bad.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
The average person in the street refers to Palms as PalmPilots still, and most people talk of what they do with their Palm, rather than their M100/105/130/515 etc. It really doesn't matter if its Tungsten, Boron or whatever, as most people will still continue to talk about how great (or not) their "Palm" is.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
someone said: "Would have been an awesome name for a hardcase though." I agree, because they could actually make a case made of tungsten. Anyway, enough rambling. Palm has always been known as handheld brand. Even tech-un-savvy people knew which company Palm was. So... by changing that, it is like they are losing all public awareness of Palm. You will hear students saying "hey mum, I want a tungsten for christmas" and the mum will think to herself "what is tungsten?". This is a bad example, but either way, its a really bad name. It doesn't even sound nice. If Palm thinks they are going to make it easier for people to walk into a store and say "I want a tungsten T" they are very wrong. It looks like I will be buying a Palm M515 when they get cheap, then watching Palm crash and Burn over the next 2 to 5 years. Very sad... but currently the way palm is going, inevitable.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
Off Topic: This is an urban legend. The car wasn't a failure in Mexico because of the name. Think of it this way...it would be like a furniture company in the US marketing a dinning room set under the brand name "Notable." Would you think no one would buy it because who would want a dinning room set with "No table"? Notable doesn't mean the same thing as "no table" just because it's made up of those two words. I bet most people wouldn't even notice the coincidence. It's works the same way in Spanish.
It's a cute story, but doesn't hold any great marketing lesson.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
I never thought "Windows" was a good tech product name, even before it was fashionable to beat up on M$. Windows is too generic, and refers to a commonplace thing made of glass that breaks easily...oh wait, maybe it's a better name than I realized.
W is the chemical symbol for tungsten
http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/elements/74.html
RE: Tungsten is a terrible name.
It's a cute story, but doesn't hold any great marketing lesson.
-->
Maybe so, but the Toyota MR2 in French is pronounced 'em-air-duh'; exatcly the same as the French word for 'sh!t': merde!
Also, I think the Nissan Cedric is possible the worst ever name for a car. Just be thankful the Tungsten isn't call the Palm Alfred or something (apologies to all Alfreds out there!).
FBN
Show me the SONY!
RE: Show me the SONY!
RE: Show me the SONY!
Matt
RE: Show me the SONY!
RE: Show me the SONY!
Check out the HP 928, forgetting the Microsoft bashing etc. just looking at the layout of the hardware etc.
I think it would be better to inlude the phone element into the screen section.
Screen open, works as speakerphone.
Screen closed, speaker at hinge end ouside, mic at bottom outside.
Screen flipped round, speaker and mic at the same location, but operated from the reverse side.
Zuber
MIM Solution
That said, there are still fundamental problems with this and Palm's i705 solution. Palm needs to get a small thumbboard integrated into the device. They should offer something in a form factor similar to the Hiptop, though with a twistable screen ala the Sony NR70 series (thus allowing for stylus or thumbboard input). So long as Palm does not offer an integrated thumbboard, the i705 will compare poorly to the Blackberry for composing wireless email or instant messaging.
Scott
RE: MIM Solution
RE: MIM Solution
>this and Palm's i705 solution. Palm needs to get a
>small thumbboard integrated into the device
Um... did you see the spy photos of the new Tungsten W device? See the recent PIC news story on Palm's new "smartphone".
-Kevin Crossman
RE: MIM Solution
Yes, I'm aware of that. If they can offer the same sort of package that Danger's device will supposedly offer ($40 for unlimited data and a decent amount of voice minutes) and get the device to sell for about $300, it could indeed be a formiddable offering. But, I tend to doubt that either of these will be the case. If it sells for $500 and you have to pay per the megabyte, it will have a marginal impact.
Scott
RE: MIM Solution
We have SSL, (X)HTML, PersonalJava, and IMAP. Those are sufficient to implement all the enterprise handheld integration anybody could want. If Palm needs special server software, than the Palm handheld has a problem. Microsoft is, of course, trying the same stuff with their junky handheld Office and scheduling applications.
Come on, guys, wake up: if you keep selling crap, people won't buy your hardware. Make your handhelds support standard protocols. Put the smarts to handle the mobile and disconnected aspects of using networked applications on the handheld itself. Don't try to trick people into buying into yet more complex, non-standard software hacks.
RE: MIM Solution
You'd think so, but people are still running Exchange and Domino servers. Tungsten MIM is for these people.
And to the person that brought up the demise of MyPalm, the problem is it's hard to provide that functionality to people for free. And now that Yahoo! can do almost all the stuff MyPalm used to do, the market for such a thing is dead.
Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
Another GPRS/GSM model -- and the pda/phone selections for those networks become more and more crowded.
Meanwhile the pda/phone selection for CDMA is practically non-existent -- unless you want to get the outrageously priced Thera or go with a TREO on Sprint's crappy coverage.
You can argue all you want about which is better, GSM or CDMA, but the fact is -- Verizon has the best coverage nationwide (no, I don't work for them) and the crappiest selection of phones of all.
Am I the only one who feels this way and is everyone else satisfied with the lousy network coverage of Cingular, VoiceStream, T-Mobile, Sprint -- just so they
can get the cool pda/phones??
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
Also a couple of US carriers have issues PR to the effect that they intend on expanding GSM/GPRS coverage in the US.
Like it or not, CDMA is still a niche market when you consider the global viability of your product. As you say, there are expensive options, but not many. Welcome to life in a niche market.
So patience will obviously be required in getting niche support for PDA-Phones. It is still conceivable that support will grow - look at how the availability of organic and vegetarian products has grown. But also recall how long that actually took.
And just as an aside - I use Cingular. Their coverage is WONDERFUL for my needs. I don't do a lot of traveling, and no one has a better plan than the one I have. If one becomes available, I might switch, but I will probably tend to stay with GSM/GPRS as it offers many more options. If I found that GSM service sucked, that would be a factor, but as all the companies expand, I don't really see that as a pproblem. Maybe CDMA/TDMA will develop something that will change my mind - it's quite possible.
Learn patience - you'll be better for it.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
In fact none of Kyocera's or Samsung's smartphones are available in GSM versions.
CDMA:
Qualcomm PDQ
Kyocera 6035
Kyocera 7135 (announced)
Samsung I300
Samsung M330 (announced)
Samsung I330 (announced)
Treo 300
GSM:
Treo 180
Treo 270
Palm Tungsten W (announced)
Sounds to me it's the GSM world that's getting the shaft.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
"Like it or not, CDMA is still a niche market when you consider the global viability of your product. As you say, there are expensive options, but not many. Welcome to life in a niche market."
"niche market" -- I don't think so -- in addition to the 10's of millions of US CDMA subscribers, there are several countries in Asia (ie Korea) that use CDMA.
TREO on Sprint -- that's a "niche".
And the comment:
"It is still conceivable that support will grow - look at how the availability of organic and vegetarian products has grown. But also recall how long that actually took."
???
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
Treo 300 (released, and hard to get hold of from stores - they are selling REAL well).
Kyocera 6035 (monochrome, lots of fans but soon to be outpaced by the 7135).
Kyocera 7135 (RSN - Yay!)
Samsung Bluechip (RSN - Sounds good too ...)
Those are the PalmOS PDA/cellphone combos.
On another front, Verizon/Sprint/KTTI/KDI/Alltel> have a swag of Brew enabled phones coming that are also very cool - but more from a cellphone with PDA functionality perspective than PDA with cellphone pov.
There are some great phones that unfortunatley have only been released to the Koreana and Japanese CDMA markets so far ... but variations of many of them should be here soon as well.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
The 7135 was announced back in June and there is still no official release date.
The Samsung currently available is also old and has a crappy color screen.
I already mention Treo 300 -- for Sprint -- another network with lame coverage.
The ONLY decent pda/phone available for Verizon is Thera -- for the outrageos price of $799.--
If you've kept up with released pda/phone combos released this year, you'd know that models for GSM
are far more plentiful and more functional, better screen quality, better form factors, etc. than CDMA (except if you want force yourself to go with limited Sprint coverage).
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
Verizon also does a nice job of letting you use their "Quick Network" feature to get online...without having to subscribe to their mobile web service.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
combos. I don't think you have to sacrifice one for the other -- especially with a huge company with vast financial resources like Verizon.
C'mon Verizon -- get some decent, affordable (ie less than $800) phone/pda combos.
I'm tired of carrying around 2 devices.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
You I-can't see beyond my border excuse for intelligent life. GSM is the WORLD STANDARD. REPEAT: THE WORLD STANDARD.
CDMA sux. CDMA is ploy to rip you off and you defend it? Oh, you MOROM! Get with it sukhead.
You are pretty excited about SMS, eh? It's new, eh? WRONG, SUKKER! IT'S ABOUT FIVE YEARS OLD! You are just living a techno-backward country held hostage by a CDMA vendor that pays your government. SUKKER.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
check out the WORLDWIDE CDMA coverage here:
http://www.cdg.org/world/cdma_world.asp
Then take an anger management class and learn how
to make at least a semi-coherent post.
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
If *you'd* been following the smartphone market, that's always been the case for new smartphones. That's the cost of the convenience of carrying one device on your belt instead of two. You don't get that for the same price as only one device. That plus the fact that the sales volumes of those are typically less than the volumes of stand alone PDA's and stand alone phones. So you the consumer pick up a greater share of the manufacturers expected revenue.
"If you've kept up with released pda/phone combos released this year, you'd know that models for GSM
are far more plentiful and more functional"
Blah, yes we're sooo hard done by as CDMA users [picture me playing worlds smallest violin]. And yes my phones have always been CDMA.
"better screen quality, better form factors, etc. than CDMA (except if you want force yourself to go with limited Sprint coverage)."
Oh, and like GSM coverage in the US is anything but limited...
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
CDMA sux."
Then go live in the "world" and be happy. Here in North America CDMA is what we do. Like it or lump it.
You think there's no good reason for it?
MUCH reduced power usage, far more handsets per tower (good for both the provider and the end user), easier migration to 3G, faster interim 3G data. Sure you can get some good GPRS performance in the mean time, but at the cost of a good number of time slots on the network. I can just imagine the TV commercials to ensure similiar to the high speed cable vs. ADSL with neighbors calling each other bandwidth hogs... We'll be seeing GPRS users looking around for other GPRS users on the same tower, and saying "OK, whose using all the time slots!" [Enter the voice of James Earl Jones and the Verizon solution...]
In fact it may trouble the CDMA haters when they do their research at GSM and CDMA association websites to glean that the technical reasons are so compelling that the migration path of GSM ends in the CDMA camp as well. Perhaps someone will chime in with, "all your air-interfaces are belong to us"...
UMTS will use a CDMA air interface (Wideband CDMA). So get your terminology straight. Your issue isn't with CDMA, it's with IS-95, the protocol that the Verizons and Sprints use over a CDMA air interface.
One might look to iDen (Nextel and Telus Mike) for relief as it's feature set is more GSM like, in areas like flexible call forwarding etc. In fact, having toured the switch facilities in Canada, it even runs on GSM switches. But even there, Nextel has announced migration to CDMA.
But regardless, even for a PDA news site, we've bashed that argument to pieces in previous threads here, and there's little to be gained with further whining along those lines.
Deal with it. Even if the arguments were constructive, they serve little point here.
-Craig Bowers
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
LOL!
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
> (monochrome, big, clunky, ugly).
When you say 6035 think "workhorse", "robust", "durable". While past it's prime, it's still useable. I use it every day, couldn't make it through a single work day without it.
> The 7135 was announced back in June and there
> is still no official release date.
Info was leaked, kyo lawyers tried to get the leaks plugged, then finally it was announced with a release date of "Q4".
> The Samsung currently available is also old and
> has a crappy color screen.
Nope, it's a nice color screen that can double as a flashlight in the dark.
> I already mention Treo 300 -- for Sprint -- another
> network with lame coverage.
Now here's the crappy screen, that puts off concentric lcd waves when tapping it.
> The ONLY decent pda/phone available for Verizon
> is Thera -- for the outrageos price of $799.--
You are so off base with that comment. Thera is a PocketPC with a dialer added on. You can't dial from pocket outlook which must be synced with the dialer address book. It only has 8 hours of standby (vs 150 hours for the 6035). To use as a regular phone you have to hold it upside down because they got the speaker and the mic backwards. It's a brick too, and has no screen protection. I've dropped my 6035 about a dozen times from waist height onto asphalt, concrete, tile. It takes a lickin and keeps on tickin. Can your pocketpc phone do that?
> If you've kept up with released pda/phone
> combos released this year, you'd know that
> models for GSM are far more plentiful and
> more functional, better screen quality, better
> form factors, etc. than CDMA (except if you
> want force yourself to go with limited Sprint
> coverage).
I've kept up with them. They're not ready for prime time. Especially the T-Mobile, PocketPC Phone Edition. Who wants to reboot several times/day?
My 6035 is 16 months old and I maybe soft reset once every couple months.
---
David
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
http://www.markspace.com/datacord_verizon.html
I've been doing it for nearly a month now and I'm thrilled with it. I use ICQ to chat, Eudora to check email and browse the internet (two separate programs), and use countless other PQA's designed for PalmVII's. And for the most part, I use my free night and weekends!
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
[I posted saying I connect using a Palm m515 to Verizon phone (it happens to be a Kyocera QCP 3035)]
RE: Will we ever see decent pda/phones for CDMA??
Anyway, don't forget the Kyocera 7135's twin - Samsung SPH-i550! Another Palm/phone hybrid...
GO Handspring Go Sony
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
Ignorance is bliss in this context would be you keeping yours to yourself.
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
Have faith in the platform. Remmber..Palm's are still cheaper than most PPC's, except for the toshiba e310 (I might buy that one...too sweet :), so Palm's still have an advantage over PPC's.
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
Geez, how can Palm be always so wrong?
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
Oh, and each platform has its own set of difficulties integrating with our corporate office and e-mail. Neither works overly well.
I still think that the technology exists to bring full Pentium II or higher class PCs to the PDA form factor and wonder why the notebook vendors just don't do this. OS in ROM, fast boot times. 100% compatibility. Seems like a natural move.
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
> with consumer oriented products which are
> the real money makers. Who cares about enterprise
> or corporate solutions, Microsoft already
> dominates that area and with upcoming tablet
> pc's and I guess within same price range
A circuit city associate told me the only reason Sony produces Palms and not PocketPC's is that they view Microsoft as a competitor (as in Xbox vs Playstation). I know, lame explanation, but there are probably lots of companies who would prefer to deal with anyone else besides Microsoft. Thus Palm and Linux offer alternatives.
And you think TabletPC's are cool? How about the price tag of about $3,000? Still cool? You think they're going to let execs and purchasing managers look sheek (sp?) without having to fork over an extra grand for that priviledge?
---
David
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
> which only spells high prices. Sony and Handspring I hope will come out with
> consumer oriented products which are the real money makers.
What part of Palm introducing the Zire sub-brand as entry-level did you miss in this article?
RE: GO Handspring Go Sony
Taking bets on the future of Five
RE: Taking bets on the future of Five
It probably won't use bluetooth and will probably be color screen etc.
RE: Taking bets on the future of Five
Tungsten T is essentially a OS 5 version of a m515 with slightly different body style. Priced around the same but using the new OS, Bluetooth, etc.
If I was a betting man I would guess the m130 goes to $200 and the m515 goes to $325-$350.
-Kevin Crossman
Veld = mid-range consumer device?
Veld is gone!
Veld = mid-range consumer device?
What about Zire?
RE: What about Zire?
Tungsten on the other hand conjures up images of a tongue, cheap metal or dim interrogation type lighting. The name had a bad sound and tons of negative built in "baggage".
RE: What about Zire?
Tungsten sounds like a crash-proof device. Both names won't get used. Both will be referred to as "my palm".
Pentium was the 586 and it was thought that each iteration would have a new name, but they stuck with pentium on through MMX Pro, II, III, 4. That means we should be running a 80886 processor by now.
Too much effort is going into the name thing. It will quickly be forgotten and become part of nomenclature as coke, pepsi, and sprite. Like "lincoln town-car" Does that mean it's unsuitable for driving on country roads? How about "Windows NT based on new technology" I have a box that says that, but isn't that redundant since NT already means that? What's the successor to XP? "XP version 2 with whitening and tarter control? :-)
---
David
RE: What about Zire?
I just give up. "Is that one of them new Palm Pilots?". "It's a Cli-what?". "It's a i-what?". "Who-spring?"
RE: What about Zire?
Never underestimate the power of GOOD Marketing/Brand.
Is this all?!
RE: Is this all?!
When the ARM-based Palms come out, people will hopefully port one of the open source handheld platforms to it and give it some decent software base. Existing Palm applications will continue to run in such an environment under emulation, just like they do with PalmOS5.
If Palm were smart (fat chance), they'd then drop PalmOS6 and move over to something better. At least they should tolerate it. If they try to fight it, they'll lose.
RE: Is this all?!
You are right that Arm-based Palm OS devices will be ported to Linux in no time. C# will be a candidate computer language to use. Ximian will port mono soon to Arm-based platform. Qt# will be coming to this devices as well.
Treo/Tungsten
Leaked pictures fake then...
/Robert
Too much memory!
However, I would say the "revolution is not thorough".
The entry level should go back to Pilot 5000 when palm's initial comment on RAM issued: "You never need more than 512K memory!"
Veld
probably be their mid-range product. Why they would
do an XScale is beyond me, considering the Palm
support for the Beta XScale tools wont even be
available until November. They are probably doing
it as a favor to Intel who is helping them develop
Palm OS 5.0 using their XScale reference boards.
Personally, I'm excited about the Tungsten products.
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
Tungsten MIM
I'd say good luck. If they don't get sued, and the product is solid, I may be able to convince my company to use it instead of RIM. As much as I love RIm for it's wireless email capabilities, you can't do very much beyond that. I always miss havign aPalm device (and DateBK5) around when I'm on a RIM device.
But no doubt, RIM is the benchmark for corporate wirless email connectivity.