Comments on: Review: Championship Card Games
Article Comments
(28 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: At least this way...
The fact this looks like a Windows port wouldn't have anything to do with the slow speed, eh? (yeah, thought so...).
The company could not understand that I don't care if the moves are "championship level" -- if I have to wait between moves the game is essentially unplayable. At least for this player.
-Kevin Crossman
RE: At least this way...
You will get FASTER play. You will get DUMBER play. You will pay more than TWICE as much. $20 for DreamQuest vs $45 for Standalone. You make your own choices.
Panagiotis
RE: At least this way...
Then (almost) everybody would be happy.
RE: At least this way...
>decades: permit the user to select the strength of
>the computer player.
Yes... and the game is still too slow. :-(
-Kevin Crossman
I love this game
i can't get enough of it. I love SPADES!
it is slow and i wish it was hires+ hopefully
in the future they can upgrade this game so its better.
http://www.sonystyle.com/vaio/images/clie/clie_760.jpg">
Any idea what language its programmed in?
What all does the installer install?
Just curious, I'm too lazy to download and install it :)
Schu
RE: Any idea what language its programmed in?
Unfortunately AppForge is like a duck, it swims, and it flies, it just doesn't do either very well. It is compiled code, but the language is basic, and calls to the Palm API set are wrappered. Don't get me wrong, Appforge has its place, and is brilliant as a prototyping tool (VERY quick development in a MS VB type way), and Appforge apps might actually run at a reasonable speed on the new PalmOS 5 units. But, these games really demonstrate that something are better done natively.
Token.
~ "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed." - DV ~
Way overpriced...
I guess a hard-core gamer might pay it, but the review doesn't make the game sound worth it!
Pepper a Game Reviewer?
--Devan-- | Email me: UZI4U182@att.net
Webmaster of www.tavern.2ya.com
Palm OS apps, news, reviews and such
Check out the brand new forum!
Proud owner of a Palm m100, Sony CLIÉ PEG-S320, and Sony CLIÉ PEG-SJ30!
RE: Pepper a Game Reviewer?
-Pepper
I love my Palm . . . do you?
Unfair review
The start up IS slow, but if you look at the messages on the screen, it's not the GAME loading (that already happened mostly), it's the AppForge garbage loading. AppForge is what allows them to use nearly identical code for multiple platforms.
A large part of the memory footprint is the AppForge components again.
I think the price statements are a little unreasonable - software is the result of someones labor and should be compensated. I just went to Handango and except for a few games, all recent card games where at least $15 for ONE game and several were over $25 for ONE game. DQ's Championship bundle for all THREE is $19.99 (facts should be gotten straight - this is the direct price also).
The speed issues aside, which can be LARGELY subjective, the reviewer really ignored the most important point. The gameplay. He covered the mechanics of the game, but how well it plays is something else.
I purchased this game for one reason. This is the only card game on the Palm platform that plays like a human and not a robot playing by rote. This thing actually can make mistakes in the same manner as a human appropriate to the level set. At the highest level, don't expect any mistakes - it is BRUTAL. If you bid NIL in Spades, for example, be prepared to defend that bid vigourously.
A more honest rating would be more like:
Design: 5 (It's a well implemented card game that is unconfusing and plays like a human - the only REAL design criteria for a card game)
Cost/Benefit: 5 (Three excellent games for less than the price of one game elsewhere)
Coolness: 3 or 5 (I'll agree here - (3)cards are not the coolest thing in the world. (5)What is cool - if your a card player- is the skill of the game)
Overall: 4.3 (for general public) or 5 (for card players)
If you are only an action game player I can understand this review, but this is not Solitaire, these are thinking games and it's obvious a lot of skull sweat went into producing them.
As usual, this is only my opinion and your mileage may vary.
Panagiotis
RE: Unfair review
Has anyone played Purple Software's card games? Just curious, as there are no demos available.
RE: Unfair review
RE: Unfair review
_______________________________________
Ed Hardy: The best damn palm news editor. Ever.
Ansi soit-il.
RE: Unfair review
I do own an m505 and an s10. I'm sorry you disagree with my view of the game. Unfortunately, the game ran far too slow for me, and I do not believe in overclocking.
-Pepper
I love my Palm . . . do you?
RE: Unfair review
The problem is, I don't think you were the right person to review this product. You are obviously NOT a serious card player. This is a product for that audience. You should be reviewing product that you fully understand.
Of course, like the very first poster commented, you'll probably die before giving a product a good review. Have you ever written software? Or do you just like tearing apart other peoples work.
A knowledgable and objective reviewer is essential to a useful review.
Panagiotis
Yes I love my Palm (Clie) too. I don't suffer fools, do you?
RE: Unfair review
I'm sorry you were also displeased with how I felt about this game. Unfortunately, though, I feel it unfair for you to make certain statements about me. If you were to read some of my prior reviews you would see that I have written a fair number of positive reviews, so for you to say that I would die before writting a poistive review is inappropriate. Also, I have done a fair amount of programming on the side, and I understand that it can be VERY difficult and VERY time consuming . . . not to mention frustrating. I understand that the developer put a lot of time and effort into the product, and I am in no way trying to tear their product appart. I love games of all sorts, card games included. As I stated, i found this game to be quite challenging, but the speed was just unsuitible. I greatly appreciate the challenge of the game, but didnt find it worth the drawback.
Once again, I'm sorry you disagree with my views, and hopefully we can agree in the future
-Pepper
I love my Palm . . . do you?
RE: Unfair review
All of your comments sound a little too defensive to be objective - as if you have a personal interest in the product.
Pepper gave a review, as she has done many times before (some positive, some negative). Not every review is agreeable to every reader. That's life. But it seems extremely silly to criticize her by making assumptions regarding her equipment, her likes and dislikes of types of games, and whether "she'll die before she gives a positive review." (*which you didn't originally state, but you did repeat)
Do us a favor - try to remember that reviews such as this are one person's opinion and are done voluntarily.
RE: Unfair review
The only connection I have with Dream Quest is that I I gave them money for their products. Not an employee or anything else.
Take Mithras to task for the no positive reviews, I just agreed with him/her. The couple of recent reviews I have seen by Pepper HAVE been less than glowing.
I made no assumptions about Pepper's hardware, I asked what was used and that it ran fine on my 760 without any acceleration.
I agree that all have an opinion, I said in my first and last posts that this is MY opinion and that disagreement is OK.
I made no assumptions about Pepper's likes or dislikes about games. I said "IF you are only an action game player", that's not an assumption of any kind. I do make a conclusion that "You are obviously NOT a serious card player" based on Pepper's review and what was considered important in that review.
Pepper and Sartre,
I didn't make any positive or negative personal comments about Pepper. I commented on / responded to the review. Yes, I questioned Pepper's qualifications to perform the review ( ie. is Pepper a card player ). As far as I know ( which I don't at all), Pepper could be a wonderful person or a pain in the tookus. I have no idea.
Please read my comments carefully without bias or preconception before assuming I am saying something I am not.
PG
RE: Unfair review
Its all quite alright, no offense is taken. I completely understand your questioning of my qualifications -- I also wonder about the qualifications of the strangers I encounter on the internet
-Pepper
I love my Palm . . . do you?
RE: Unfair review
I have seen claims that Purple's card game's AIs are very weak....
RE: Unfair review
I ate lunch with the developer
--
Ben Combee, CodeWarrior for Palm OS technical lead
Programming help at www.palmoswerks.com
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
At least this way...
Keep up the good work! I'm happy to see reviews that aren't just warmed-over press releases.